Clinical and genetic characteristics of late-onset Huntington's disease in a large European cohort

Background and purpose

Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by CAG‐triplet repeat expansions. CAG‐triplet repeat expansion is inversely correlated with age of onset in HD and largely determines the clinical features. The aim of this study was to examine the phenotypic and genotypic correlates of late‐onset HD (LoHD) and to determine whether LoHD is a more benign expression of HD.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study of 5053 White European HD patients from the ENROLL‐HD database. Sociodemographic, genetic and phenotypic variables at baseline evaluation of subjects with LoHD, common‐onset HD (CoHD) and young‐onset HD (YoHD) were compared. LoHD subjects were compared with healthy subjects (HS) aged ≥60 years. Differences between the CoHD and LoHD groups were also explored in subjects with 41 CAG triplets, a repeat number in the lower pathological expansion range associated with wide variability in age at onset.

Results

Late‐onset HD presented predominantly as motor‐onset disease, with a lower prevalence of both psychiatric history and current symptomatology. Absent/unknown HD family history was significantly more common in the LoHD group (31.2%) than in the other groups. The LoHD group had more severe motor and cognitive deficits than the HS group. Subjects with LoHD and CoHD with 41 triplets in the larger allele were comparable with regard to cognitive impairment, but those with LoHD had more severe motor disorders, less problematic behaviors and more often an unknown HD family history.

Conclusions

It is likely that cognitive disorders and motor symptoms of LoHD are at least partly age‐related and not a direct expression of the disease. In addition to CAG‐triplet repeat expansion, future studies should investigate the role of other genetic and environmental factors in determining age of onset.

A role for accelerometry in the differential diagnosis of tremor syndromes

Accelerometry is a reliable tool for gauging the occurrence, amplitude and frequency of tremor. However, there is no consensus on criteria for accelerometric diagnosis of tremor syndromes. We enrolled 20 patients with essential tremor (ET), 20 with dystonic tremor (DT), and 20 with classic parkinsonian tremor (PD-T), all meeting accepted clinical criteria. All the patients underwent dopamine transporter imaging (by means of single-photon emission computed tomography) and triaxial accelerometric tremor analysis. The latter revealed groupwise differences in tremor frequency, peak dispersion, spectral coherence, unilaterality and resting vs action tremor amplitude. From the above, five diagnostic criteria were extrapolated for each condition. Receiver operating characteristic curves, depicting criteriabased scoring of each tremor type, showed negligible declines in specificity for scores ≥4 in patients with ET or DT and scores ≥3 in patients with PD-T, thus providing a simple scoring method (accelerometrically derived) for differential diagnosis of the principal tremor syndromes.