Maximizing mesh mileage: evaluating the long-term performance of a novel hybrid mesh for ventral hernia repair

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and long-term outcomes of GORE Synecor™ in ventral hernia repair (VHR).

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center case review analyzed outcomes in patients who underwent VHR with Synecor from May 2016 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were hernia recurrence and mesh infection rates. Secondary outcomes were 30-day morbidity, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, re-operation, surgical-site infection (SSI) and occurrence (SSO) rates, and occurrences requiring intervention (SSOI).

RESULTS

278 patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 24.1 (0.2-87.1) months. Mean hernia defect size was 63.4 (± 77.2) cm2. Overall hernia recurrence and mesh infection rates were 5.0% and 1.4% respectively. No mesh infections required full explantation. We report the following overall rates: 13.3% 30-day morbidity, 4.7% 30-day readmission, 2.9% re-operation, 7.2% SSI, 6.1% SSO, and 2.9% SSOI. 30-day morbidity was significantly higher in non-clean (42.1% vs 11.2%, p < 0.01), onlay (OL) mesh (37.0% vs preperitoneal (PP) 16.4%, p = 0.05 vs retrorectus (RR) 15.0%, p < 0.05 vs intraperitoneal (IP) 5.2%, p < 0.001), and open cases (23.5% vs 3.1% laparoscopic vs 4.4% robotic, p < 0.01). SSI rates were significantly higher in non-clean (31.6% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001), OL mesh (29.6% vs RR 11.3%, p < 0.05 vs PP 5.5%, p < 0.01 vs IP 0.0%, p < 0.001), and open cases (15.2% vs 0% laparoscopic vs 0% robotic, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Long-term performance of a novel hybrid mesh in VHR demonstrates a low recurrence rate and favorable safety profile in various defect sizes and mesh placement locations.

Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy

Surgery remains one of the major treatment options available to patients with esophageal cancer, with high mortality in certain cohorts. The aim of this study was to develop a simple preoperative risk scale based on patient factors, hospital factors, and tumor pathology to predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to create the risk scale. Patients who underwent open or laparoscopic transhiatal and transthoracic esophageal resection were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition codes. Patients <18 years and those with peritoneal disease were excluded. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to define a predictive model of perioperative mortality and to create a simple risk scale. From 1998 to 2011, a total of 23 751 patients underwent esophagectomy. The observed overall perioperative mortality rate for this cohort was 7.7%. Minimally invasive techniques, and operations performed in higher volume centers were protective, whereas increasing age, comorbidities and diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma were independent predictors of mortality. Based on this population, a risk scale from 0-16 was created. The calibration revealed a good agreement between the observed and risk scale-predicted probabilities. A set of sensitivity/specificity analyses was then performed to define normal (score 0-7) and high risk (score 8-16) patients for clinical practice. Mortality in patients with a score of 0-7 ranged from 1.3-7.6%, compared with 10.5-34.5% in patients with a score of 8-16. This simple preoperative risk scale may accurately predict the risk of perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy and can be used as a clinical tool for preoperative counseling.

Initial experience with transvaginal incisional hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

Natural orifice surgery has evolved from a preclinical setting into a common occurrence at the University of California San Diego (UCSD). With close to 40 transvaginal cases, we have become comfortable with this technique and are exploring other indications. One of the perceived advantages in natural orifice surgery is the potential reduction in the incidence of hernia formation. Patients with abdominal wall hernias may be at increased risk of forming additional hernias at incision sites. In addition, patients with recurrent incisional hernias may, likewise, be at increased risk. We believe that reducing or eliminating abdominal wall incisions may be of benefit in the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Here, we describe what we believe to be the first natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgical (NOTES) approach to the repair of an abdominal wall hernia.

METHODS

The patient is a 38-year-old female with a painful recurrent umbilical hernia, previously repaired 8 years prior with a polypropylene-based mesh. The patient underwent a transvaginal recurrent umbilical hernia repair with one other 5-mm port in the abdomen for safety.

RESULTS

The patient had no intraoperative or postoperative complications. At 5 months follow up, the patient had no complaints, no evidence of hernia recurrence, and was very pleased with her result.

CONCLUSIONS

The repair of primary and incisional hernias of the ventral abdominal wall via a transvaginal approach is technically feasible, and the result of our initial case was exceptional. However, there are still significant obstacles which must be addressed before this approach can be widely utilized. These obstacles include safe entrance into the abdominal cavity via a transvaginal approach, the proper mesh to be placed during the repair, and the risk of infection.

Effect of robotic assistance on the "learning curve" for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

The number of living-related donor kidney transplantations have increased since the advent of minimally invasive surgery. Robotic technology has emerged as a promising alternative to laparoscopic techniques. The authors reviewed their institution experience with robotic hand-assisted donor nephrectomies (RHADNs).

METHODS

Between August 2000 and April 2006, 273 robotically assisted left donor nephrectomies were performed using a hand-assisted technique. Prospectively collected information for 214 patients regarding complications, hospital stay, blood loss, warm ischemia time, operative time, and outcomes is presented.

RESULTS

The cohort of donors included 110 men and 104 women with a mean age of 36 years (range, 18-61 years). These donors included 86 African Americans, 46 Caucasians, 74 Hispanics, and 8 of other races. Left renal artery anomalies were found in 61 patients (29%). Four patients underwent conversion to open surgery. The hospital stay was 2.3 days (range, 1-8 days), the blood loss 82 ml (range, 10-1,500 ml), and the mean warm ischemia time 98 s (range, 50-200 s). The operative time was 201 min (range, 100-320 min) for the first 74 cases, 129 min (range, 65-240 min) for the second 70 cases, and 103 min for the last 70 cases (p < 0.001), for an overall average of 150 min. Complications decreased significantly after the first 74 cases. The 1-year patient survival rate was 100%, and the 1-year graft survival rate was 98%. The average recipient creatinine at 6 months was 1.4 mg/dl.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific changes in operative technique over time have improved patient safety and diminished complications with RHADN. Currently, RHADN can be performed expeditiously with a minimal rate of complications and conversion to open procedure by a surgical team with appropriate training and experience.

Accelerated fractionation radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy in patients with stage IV inoperable head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage IV inoperable head and neck cancer has a 2-year mortality rate of greater than 70% when treated with conventional radiotherapy. A Phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of concomitant chemotherapy and accelerated, interrupted, twice-a-day radiotherapy on tumor response, locoregional control, survival, and morbidity.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with Stage IV inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and a minimum follow-up of 36 months were evaluated. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy was administered during weeks 1, 3, and 5 (with planned breaks during weeks 2 and 4), consisting of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, continuous 5-day infusion of 5-fluorouracil, 750 mg/m2 per day, and radiotherapy, 2 Gy twice a day, more than 6 hours apart, followed by 3 days of radiation therapy alone (final "boost") in week 6, for a total dose of 70 Gy and treatment duration of 5 1/2 weeks (38 days).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients achieved a clinical complete response (82%). Actuarial locoregional control at 3 years was 73% and the actuarial 3-year survival probability, including all deaths, was 38%. All locoregional recurrences were manifested within 12 months. Of the 20 deaths, 12 were tumor related (locoregional and/or metastatic), 3 were treatment related, and 5 were due to other causes. Acute toxicity consisted of grade 3 mucositis and dysphagia and grade 2-3 leukopenia, not requiring treatment interruption or cessation.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant accelerated radiation therapy and chemotherapy is a feasible treatment approach in this prognostically poor patient population, yielding dramatic tumor responses and impressive locoregional control at the cost of somewhat increased acute toxicity. Although serious late complications have not been observed, caution should be exercised in view of the relatively short follow up.