1
|
Stefanolo JP, Segura V, Grizzuti M, Heredia A, Comino I, Costa AF, Puebla R, Temprano MP, Niveloni SI, de Diego G, Oregui ME, Smecuol EG, de Marzi MC, Verdú EF, Sousa C, Bai JC. Effect of Aspergillus niger prolyl endopeptidase in patients with celiac disease on a long-term gluten-free diet. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1545-1555. [PMID: 38617446 PMCID: PMC11008412 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i11.1545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gluten-free diet (GFD) has limitations, and there is intense research in the development of adjuvant therapies. AIM To examine the effects of orally administered Aspergillus niger prolyl endopeptidase protease (AN-PEP) on inadvertent gluten exposure and symptom prevention in adult celiac disease (CeD) patients following their usual GFD. METHODS This was an exploratory, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled CeD patients on a long-term GFD. After a 4-wk run-in period, patients were randomized to 4 wk of two AN-PEP capsules (GliadinX; AVI Research, LLC, United States) at each of three meals per day or placebo. Outcome endpoints were: (1) Average weekly stool gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) between the run-in and end of treatments and between AN-PEP and placebo; (2) celiac symptom index (CSI); (3) CeD-specific serology; and (4) quality of life. Stool samples were collected for GIP testing by ELISA every Tuesday and Friday during run-ins and treatments. RESULTS Forty patients were randomized for the intention-to-treat analysis, and three were excluded from the per-protocol assessment. Overall, 628/640 (98.1%) stool samples were collected. GIP was undetectable (< 0.08 μg/g) in 65.6% of samples, and no differences between treatment arms were detected. Only 0.5% of samples had GIP concentrations sufficiently high (> 0.32 μg/g) to potentially cause mucosal damage. Median GIP concentration in the AN-PEP arm was 44.7% lower than in the run-in period. One-third of patients exhibiting GIP > 0.08 μg/g during run-in had lower or undetectable GIP after AN-PEP treatment. Compared with the run- in period, the proportion of symptomatic patients (CSI > 38) in the AN-PEP arm was significantly lower (P < 0.03). AN-PEP did not result in changes in specific serologies. CONCLUSION This exploratory study conducted in a real-life setting revealed high adherence to the GFD. The AN-PEP treatment did not significantly reduce the overall GIP stool concentration. However, given the observation of a significantly lower prevalence of patients with severe symptoms in the AN-PEP arm, further clinical research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pablo Stefanolo
- Small Bowel Section, Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires “Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo”, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Verónica Segura
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain
| | - Martina Grizzuti
- Department of Medicine, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Abel Heredia
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain
| | - Isabel Comino
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain
| | - Ana Florencia Costa
- Department of Medicine, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Roberto Puebla
- Small Bowel Section, Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires “Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo”, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - María Paz Temprano
- Small Bowel Section, Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires “Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo”, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Sonia Isabel Niveloni
- Small Bowel Section, Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires “Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo”, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Gabriel de Diego
- Basic and Applied Research Group in Immunology and Bioactives (GIBAIB), Institute of Ecology and Sustainable Development (INEDES), National University of Lujan, Luján 6700, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María E Oregui
- Department of Medicine, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Edgardo Gustavo Smecuol
- Small Bowel Section, Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Hospital of Buenos Aires “Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo”, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
| | - Mauricio C de Marzi
- Basic and Applied Research Group in Immunology and Bioactives (GIBAIB), Institute of Ecology and Sustainable Development (INEDES), National University of Lujan, Luján 6700, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Elena F Verdú
- Department of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4L8, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolina Sousa
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville 41080, Spain
| | - Julio César Bai
- Department of Medicine, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires C1051ABB, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|