Gender-Based Outcome Discrepancies in Patients Who Underwent Alcohol Septal Ablation or Septal Myectomy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical evidence and emerging studies suggest that the clinical heterogeneity observed in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy could be because of gender-based differences. We aimed to explore the gender-related differences pertaining to the treatment outcomes after alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and septal myectomy (SM). We searched PUBMED/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS to identify studies that report gender-stratified comparison of outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was short-term (within 30 days) mortality. A total of 15 studies totaling 31,907 patients (47% men and 53% women) were included. Women were found to be significantly older at the time of intervention (ASA: mean difference [MD] 7.55 years; SM: MD 4.41). In the ASA and SM treatment arms, women had a significantly higher risk of short-term all-cause mortality (ASA: risk ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.71, p = 0.0003; SM: risk ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.90, p = 0.01), more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation (ASA; p = 0.002, SM: p = 0.05), and longer in-hospital stay (ASA: MD 1.00 days, SM: MD 0.69). Among those who underwent ASA, women had a significantly higher rate of atrioventricular block. In conclusion, regardless of ASA or SM, women consistently presented at an older age and exhibited a higher risk-increased mortality rate, a greater incidence of atrioventricular block, and a higher likelihood of permanent pacemaker requirement-and longer hospital stay among women than men. This strongly emphasizes the need for a gender-specific approach to optimize care and improve treatment outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Services in Brazil's Healthcare System: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provoked disruptions in healthcare delivery, leading to the cancellation and postponement of various health services, including surgery. Numerous countries closed their borders and established laws mandating the use of face masks and social distancing and enforced lockdowns, and various activities were constrained. Brazil, the largest and most populous country in Latin America, also experienced a rapid and sustained surge in infections and deaths. Brazil was the most severely impacted nation in Latin America. The impact of the pandemic on surgical services in Brazil has not been adequately studied since most studies only cover the early phases of the pandemic. Thus, this study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical services throughout the entire period. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional design was used to examine surgical cases from 2019 to 2022 and compared the following indicators: (1) number of hospital admissions, (2) length of hospital stay (LOS) (in days), and (3) volume of urgent and elective procedures. Data was divided into four time periods, pre-pandemic (March-December 2019), pandemic (March-December 2020), recovery (March-December 2021), and post-pandemic (March-December 2022), and was analyzed for the number of admissions and LOS based on surgical procedures performed by stratifying according to region, sex, age, and type of surgery (urgent versus elective). Results The number of admissions for surgical procedures ranged between 859,646 and 4,015,624 for 2019, 686,616 and 3,419,234 for 2020, 787,791 and 3,829,019 for 2021, and 760,512 and 3,857,817 for 2022 for the category of region; 4,260,900 and 5,991,775 for 2019, 3,594,117 and 4,984,710 for 2020, 4,182,640 and 5,590,808 for 2021, and 4,077,651 and 5,561,928 for 2022 for the category of sex; and 2,170,288 and 3,186,117 for 2019, 1,516,830 and 2,825,189 for 2020, 1,748,202 and 3,030,272 for 2021, and 1,900,023 and 2,859,179 for 2022 for the category of age. The variable age showed a comparable trend, albeit with an expressive decline for surgeries in the age range of 0-19 years. The LOS (in days) for surgical procedures ranged between 110,157 and 910,846 for 2019, 58,562 and 897,734 for 2020, 67,926 and 904,137 for 2021, and 100,467 and 823,545 for 2022. Thoracic surgery indicated no statistically significant difference in the number of admissions and LOS. Elective surgeries had a decline in the number of admissions and LOS, a 13% and 9.3% decline between 2019 and 2020, respectively. Urgent surgeries experienced a slight decrease in admissions and LOS, with a decline of 2.4% and 2.8% between 2019 and 2020, respectively. Conclusions Population characteristics, such as age, sex, and region, showed decreased hospital admissions during the pandemic, followed by a recovery toward pre-pandemic levels afterward. The number of surgical admissions and the length of hospital stays decreased during the pandemic but gradually returned to pre-pandemic levels in the recovery and post-pandemic phases. Notably, thoracic surgery remained statistically consistent across all periods, indicating its emergency nature compared to other surgeries. Thus, we conclude that the pandemic had minimal impact on thoracic surgery cases, contributing to a stable trend.