Achieving complete metabolic response in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with chemotherapy, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and salvage SBRT: A case report

Oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents significant treatment challenges due to its complexity and resistance to conventional therapies. The case report presented addresses a 55-year-old male patient with oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, showcasing an exceptional complete metabolic response to a multimodality treatment combining double immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and chemotherapy, followed by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The patient underwent a treatment regimen incorporating two cycles of carboplatin, pemetrexed, nivolumab, and ipilimumab followed by nivolumab, and ipilimumab maintenance. After a partial response, SBRT was applied to persistent lesions, achieving a complete metabolic response. This case highlights the potential of combining dual ICI with chemotherapy and SBRT in treating oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative NSCLC underscoring the importance of multimodality treatment strategies.

Avelumab in Combination With Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced Squamous NSCLC

Introduction

We present the results of a phase 2a trial of first-line avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody) plus cetuximab (anti-EGFR antibody) in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous NSCLC received avelumab 800 mg (d 1 and 8), cetuximab 250 mg/m² (d 1) and 500 mg/m² (d 8), cisplatin 75 mg/m² (d 1), and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² (d 1 and 8) for four 3-week cycles, followed by avelumab 800 mg and cetuximab 500 mg/m² every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the best overall response; the secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. Efficacy analyses were reported from an updated data cutoff.

Results

A total of 43 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 6.6 months for the primary analyses and 9.2 months for the efficacy analyses. In the efficacy analyses, 15 patients had a confirmed partial response (objective response rate, 34.9% [95% confidence interval: 21.0%-50.9%]), and the median duration of response was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval: 4.2-12.5 mo). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months and 10.0 months, respectively. In the safety analyses (primary analysis), 38 patients (88.4%) had a treatment-related adverse event, of whom 24 (55.8%) had a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event.

Conclusions

The combination of avelumab + cetuximab and chemotherapy showed antitumor activity and tolerable safety; however, the ORR was not improved compared with those reported for current standards of care (NCT03717155).

A phase II study (TACTI-002) in first-line metastatic non–small cell lung carcinoma investigating eftilagimod alpha (soluble LAG-3 protein) and pembrolizumab: Updated results from a PD-L1 unselected population

9003

Background: Eftilagimod alpha (E) is a soluble LAG-3 protein binding to a subset of MHC class II molecules to mediate antigen presenting cell (APC)/CD8 T-cell activation. Stimulation of the APCs and subsequent T cell recruitment with E may lead to stronger anti-tumor responses than observed with pembrolizumab (P) alone. We hereby report results of the extended first-line non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cohort of the TACTI-002 (“Two ACTive Immunotherapies”) phase II trial. Methods: Pts with untreated metastatic NSCLC, unselected for PD-L1 expression were recruited. Objective response rate (ORR) by iRECIST was the primary endpoint (EP) and secondary EPs include ORR by RECIST 1.1, tolerability, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and exploratory biomarker. Pts received 30 mg E SC q2w for 8 cycles (1 cycle= 3 weeks) and then q3w for up to 1 year with P (200 mg IV q3w for up to 2 years). Imaging was done every 8 weeks. PD-L1 was assessed centrally. This has been approved by relevant CAs, ECs, and IRBs. Results: From Mar 2019 to Nov 2021 114 pts were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (44-85) and 74% were male. ECOG PS was 0 and 1 in 37% and 63% of pts, respectively. Pts presented squamous (35%) or non-squamous (62%) NSCLC with 88% of pts at stage IV at the time of study entry. All PD-L1 subgroups were represented (Table). Pts received median 6.0 (range 1–35) P and 7.0 (1-22) E administrations. 19 (17%) pts discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs). The most common (≥15%) AEs were dyspnea (33%), asthenia (30%), decreased appetite (22%), cough (20%), anemia (20%), fatigue (19%), pruritus (18%), constipation (17%) and diarrhea (15%). At data cut-off (Jan 2022), 75 pts with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were evaluated for efficacy. ORR (iRECIST) was 37.3% in the ITT and 41.8%% in the evaluable pts assessed by local read. DCR 73.3% was reported. Response rate for squamous and non-squamous pathology were 33.3 % and 40.3 %, respectively. Results according to RECIST 1.1 were comparable. Responses were observed in all PD-L1 subgroups (Table). 24/28 (86%) responses were already confirmed while median duration of response was not yet reached (5 events). Conclusions: E + P is safe and shows encouraging antitumor activity in first-line metastatic NSCLC patients unselected for PD-L1, warranting further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03625323. [Table: see text]

COVID-19 disease in patients with LUNG cancer in Spain: GRAVID LunG canceR pAtients coVid19 Disease (GRAVID STUDY)

e18709

Background: Patients with cancer may be more susceptible to infection and at increased risk of more severe COVID-19 disease; however, prognostic factors are not yet clearly identified. The LunG canceR pAtients coVid19 Disease (GRAVID) study aimed to describe clinical characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of poor outcome in patients with lung cancer and COVID-19. Methods: In this large nationwide study, we reviewed medical records of patients with lung cancer and confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from 65 Spanish hospitals. Clinical features, treatments and disease outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was to determine all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were hospitalization and admission to intensive care units (ICU). Risk factors for poor prognosis were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Overall, 447 patients were included for analysis. Mean age was 67·1 ± 9·8 years; 332 (74·3%) were men, and 383 (85·7%) current/former smokers. NSCLC was the most frequent type of cancer (377, 84·5%), consisting mainly of adenocarcinoma (228, 51·0%), and stage III metastatic or unresectable disease (354, 79·2%). Two-hundred and sixty-six (59·5%) patients were receiving anticancer treatment, mostly first-line chemotherapy. In total, 350 (78·3%) patients were hospitalized for a mean of 13·4 ± 11·4 days, nine (2·0%) patients were admitted to the ICU, and 146 (32·7%) died. Advanced disease and the use of corticosteroids to treat COVID-19 during hospitalization were predictors of mortality. Hospitalized, non-end-of-life stage patients with lymphocytopenia and high LDH had an increased risk of death. Severity of COVID-19 correlated to higher mortality, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation rates. Conclusions: Due to their underlying comorbidities and immunocompromised status, patients with lung cancer and COVID-19 show high hospitalization and mortality rates. These outcomes, alongside the identification of prognostic factors, may inform physicians on the risks and benefits in this population, in order to provide individualized oncological care.

Patient-derived lung cancer organoids for the selection of therapeutic options in an ALK-rearranged tumor

e21014

Background: ALK rearrangements are key targets in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, the optimal sequential strategy of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) remains to be defined. Testing drug sensitivity in patient derived organoids (PDOs) could support a rational drug selection in this setting. Methods: We designed an observational study assessing the correlation between drug sensitivity of PDOs established in Invitrocue and the clinical outcome in our institution. To date, forty cases have been included, of which nine were lung cancers. Results: PDO was sucessfully established in 7/9 cases (77%). Three patients did not receive any of the drugs tested in vitro due to clinical deterioration. One patient was deemed as sensitive to carboplatin but tumor showed to be resistant. A meaningful correlation was observed in an oncogenic addicted tumor. A 54-year-old never-smoker man who had been diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma stage IVa (T3N1M1a). He received standard first-line therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy and antiangiogenics achieving tumor progression. A next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel revealed the presence of the EML4-ALK fusion variant 3a/b. The patient started alectinib but showed progression after 12 months. A second NGS panel did not identify any new ALK resistance mutation but acquiring TP53. Treatment was switched to brigatinib with no response. Finally, fresh tumor tissue was obtained from a liver biopsy to establish PDOs and drug sensitivity to 8 compounds was tested. The In vitro results demonstrated no activity of lorlatinib but a strong response to crizotinib. The patient started Crizotinib 250mg BID achieving partial response after 8 weeks and treatment duration of 6 months. A third liver biopsy for PDOs and NGS revealed acquired ALK C1156Y and I1171T mutations that confer resistance to crizotinib but sensitive to ceritinib, respectively. Conclusions: We present clinical evidence that PDOs are an alternative tool in oncogenic addicted tumors helping to guide treatment decisions and increasing a more personalized sequential treatment approach.

Lung cancer patients with COVID-19 in Spain: GRAVID study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cancer may be at increased risk of more severe COVID-19 disease; however, prognostic factors are not yet clearly identified. The GRAVID study aimed to describe clinical characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of poor outcome in patients with lung cancer and COVID-19.

METHODS

Prospective observational study that included medical records of patients with lung cancer and PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis across 65 Spanish hospitals. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were hospitalization and admission to intensive care units (ICU).

RESULTS

A total of 447 patients with a mean age of 67.1 ± 9.8 years were analysed. The majority were men (74.3 %) and current/former smokers (85.7 %). NSCLC was the most frequent type of cancer (84.5 %), mainly as adenocarcinoma (51.0 %), and stage III metastatic or unresectable disease (79.2 %). Nearly 60 % of patients were receiving anticancer treatment, mostly first-line chemotherapy. Overall, 350 (78.3 %) patients were hospitalized for a mean of 13.4 ± 11.4 days, 9 (2.0 %) were admitted to ICU and 146 (32.7 %) died. Advanced disease and the use of corticosteroids to treat COVID-19 during hospitalization were predictors of mortality. Hospitalized, non-end-of-life stage patients with lymphocytopenia and high LDH had an increased risk of death. Severity of COVID-19 correlated to higher mortality, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality rate was higher among patients treated with corticosteroids during hospitalization, while anticancer therapy was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization or death. Tailored approaches are warranted to ensure effective cancer management while minimizing the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.