Radiology and adult celiac disease. Current indications of small bowel barium examinations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the current role of small bowel (SB) radiologic barium examinations in adult celiac disease (ACD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 61 SB barium examinations in 280 ACD patients. Sixty-one examinations in 61 patients were performed: 7/61 with small bowel ''follow-through'' (SBFT) method, and 54/61 with small bowel double-contrast enteroclysis (SBE). Radiological criteria for ACD diagnosis were divided in four groups: 1) definite ACD (reversal of jejuno-ileal fold pattern); 2) possible ACD (malabsorption pattern and ileal jejunization); 3) malabsorption (fluid, dilatation, ''moulage'', flocculation); 4) complicated ACD (irregular, thickened, nodular folds; wall thickening; masses).

RESULTS

In 49/61 patients RX examinations were performed before ACD diagnosis. In this group, clinical presentations included one or more of the following: diarrhea, weight loss, malabsorption, anemia, abdominal pain; 7/49 had a SBFT, and 42/49 a SBE. All 7 SBFTs showed pattern 3, and 8/42 SBEs showed pattern 2 (suspected ACD). In 34/42 patients SBE allowed a definite ACD diagnosis (pattern 1); however, 6/34 were also false-positive for complicated ACD (pattern 4). Ten out of sixty-one patients were clinically suspected of having complicated ACD, correctly excluded (8/8) or confirmed (2/2) by SBE. None of these 59/61 patients had a radiologic diagnosis of normal' SB. The last 2/61 patients with ACD, examined for persisting chronic anemia, had a normal SBE.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirm that SB radiology may be of value either in ACD diagnosis or in excluding complications: SBE is currently the most accurate examination. SBE alone is however less accurate in confirming complicated ACD; further imaging techniques are always needed in this clinical context.