1
|
Nyrop KA, Page A, Deal AM, Wagoner C, Kelly EA, Kimmick GG, Copeland A, Speca J, Wood WA, Muss HB. Association of self-directed walking with toxicity moderation during chemotherapy for the treatment of early breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:68. [PMID: 38153568 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08275-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the field of exercise oncology, there is a need to quantify the potential benefits of moderate, self-directed physical activity during active treatment. In a pooled analysis of three identical single-arm intervention studies, we investigate the association of activity tracker steps with patient-reported toxicities during chemotherapy. METHODS Women with early breast cancer who were enrolled in the intervention studies reported their symptom severity every 2-3 weeks throughout chemotherapy, and daily steps were documented through a Fitbit activity tracker. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Poisson regression models with robust variance. For outcomes significant in unadjusted models, adjusted RRs were calculated controlling for race, age, and education level. Tracker step cut point (high step, low step) was determined by the means. Cumulative incidence functions of moderate, severe, and very severe (MSVS) symptoms were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS In a sample of 283 women, mean age was 56 years and 76% were White. Mean tracker-documented steps/week were 29,625, with 55% walking below the mean (low step) and 45% above (high step). In multivariable analysis, high step patients had lower risk for fatigue [RR 0.83 (0.70, 0.99)] (p = 0.04), anxiety [RR 0.59 (0.42, 0.84)] (p = 0.003), nausea [RR 0.66 (0.46, 0.96)] (p = 0.03), depression [RR 0.59 (0.37, 0.03)] (p = 0.02), and ≥ 6 MSVS symptoms [RR 0.73 (0.54, 1.00)] (p = 0.05) and had 36% lower risk for dose reductions [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.43, 0.97)] (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Self-directed walking at a rate of at least 30,000 steps/week may moderate the severity of treatment side effects during chemotherapy for early breast cancer. TRIAL NUMBERS NCT02167932, NCT02328313, NCT03761706.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Nyrop
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - A Page
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - C Wagoner
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - E A Kelly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | | | | | - JoEllen Speca
- UNC Rex Cancer Care, UNC Rex Healthcare, Raleigh, USA
| | - William A Wood
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
- Division of Hematology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - H B Muss
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Somers TJ, Winger JG, Fisher HM, Hyland KA, Davidian M, Laber EB, Miller SN, Kelleher SA, Vilardaga JCP, Majestic C, Shelby RA, Reed SD, Kimmick GG, Keefe FJ. Behavioral cancer pain intervention dosing: results of a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial. Pain 2023; 164:1935-1941. [PMID: 37079854 PMCID: PMC10733867 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Behavioral pain management interventions are efficacious for reducing pain in patients with cancer. However, optimal dosing of behavioral pain interventions for pain reduction is unknown, and this hinders routine clinical use. A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) was used to evaluate whether varying doses of Pain Coping Skills Training (PCST) and response-based dose adaptation can improve pain management in women with breast cancer. Participants (N = 327) had stage I-IIIC breast cancer and a worst pain score of > 5/10. Pain severity (a priori primary outcome) was assessed before initial randomization (1:1 allocation) to PCST-Full (5 sessions) or PCST-Brief (1 session) and 5 to 8 weeks later. Responders ( > 30% pain reduction) were rerandomized to a maintenance dose or no dose and nonresponders (<30% pain reduction) to an increased or maintenance dose. Pain severity was assessed again 5 to 8 weeks later (assessment 3) and 6 months later (assessment 4). As hypothesized, PCST-Full resulted in greater mean percent pain reduction than PCST-Brief (M [SD] = -28.5% [39.6%] vs M [SD]= -14.8% [71.8%]; P = 0.041). At assessment 3 after second dosing, all intervention sequences evidenced pain reduction from assessment 1 with no differences between sequences. At assessment 4, all sequences evidenced pain reduction from assessment 1 with differences between sequences ( P = 0.027). Participants initially receiving PCST-Full had greater pain reduction at assessment 4 ( P = 0.056). Varying PCST doses led to pain reduction over time. Intervention sequences demonstrating the most durable decreases in pain reduction included PCST-Full. Pain Coping Skills Training with intervention adjustment based on response can produce sustainable pain reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara J. Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Joseph G. Winger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Hannah M. Fisher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Kelly A. Hyland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Marie Davidian
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| | - Eric B. Laber
- Department of Statistical Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Shannon N. Miller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah A. Kelleher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Catherine Majestic
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Rebecca A. Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Shelby D. Reed
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Francis J. Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nyrop KA, Monaco J, Vohra S, Deal AM, Wood WA, Shachar SS, Dees EC, Kimmick GG, Speca JC, Muss HB. Body mass index and patient-reported function, quality of life and treatment toxicity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:196. [PMID: 36859693 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07637-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates whether high body mass index (BMI) in women diagnosed with early breast cancer (BC) is associated with patient-reported symptom severity during chemotherapy. METHODS Women with Stage I-III BC completed toxicity reports for 17 side effects throughout regularly scheduled chemotherapy infusions. Toxicity reports were compared in women with obesity (BMI > = 30) versus no obesity (BMI < 30). Fisher's exact tests and 2-sample t-tests compared baseline patient characteristics. Risk ratios (RR) for women with obesity as compared to no obesity were estimated for individual symptoms that were patient-rated as moderate, severe or very severe (MSVS) severity, adjusting for marital status and race. RESULTS In a sample of 286 patients, Black women comprised 23% of the sample. The obesity rate was 76% among Black patients and 31% among White patients (p < .0001). Women with obesity rated an average of 6.9 side effects (standard deviation, SD 4.2) as MSVS vs 5.5 side effects (SD 3.7) among women with no obesity (p = .003). In adjusted analysis, women with obesity had significantly greater risk for MSVS fatigue (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.36), dyspnea (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.09-2.69), arthralgia (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.97), peripheral neuropathy (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01-2.08), edema of limbs (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.18-2.88), and abdominal pain (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07-2.87). There were no inter-group differences in BC stage or phenotype, chemotherapy treatment modifications, or hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS Among women with early BC, patients with obesity reported higher chemotherapy toxicity as compared to patients without obesity; however, this did not result in differences in treatment completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.
| | - Jane Monaco
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sanah Vohra
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | | | - E Claire Dees
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | | | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stalls JM, Bovbjerg DH, Somers TJ, Plumb Vilardaga JC, Kimmick GG, McAuliffe PF, Keefe FJ, Posluszny DM, Sullivan MJL, Erkanli A, Reed SD, Sutton L, Owen L, Massa L, Shelby RA. Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 122:106934. [PMID: 36152791 PMCID: PMC10001426 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
>276,000 Americans will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ this year and most will undergo breast surgery as part of their care. Although prognosis is excellent, many patients experience persistent post-surgical pain (PSP), which has no satisfactory pharmacological treatment. The causal contributions of pain-associated psychological factors (e.g., catastrophic thoughts about pain, psychological flexibility, self-efficacy) to the continuing burden of PSP have not yet been determined and may be opportune intervention targets. The randomized trial described here will compare the benefits of three manualized behavioral interventions for individuals with PSP. Participants will receive either: 1) self-guided health education (SGHE); 2) interventionist-guided health education (IGHE); or 3) interventionist-guided pain coping skills training with elements of acceptance and commitment therapy that specially target catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility (CST-PSP). Participants will prospectively complete validated assessments of primary outcomes (PSP severity and interference) at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3-, 6-, and 12-months later. Validated measures of emotional distress and cancer-specific distress will be assessed as secondary outcomes. To test their roles as drivers of PSP, catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility, will be assessed and statistically analyzed as mediators of hypothesized beneficial effects. The interventions' impacts on pain sensitivity and central sensitization will be investigated to test these physiological pathways as proximal drivers of PSP. To better characterize the patient experience, additional validated measures will be explored for associations with PSP, along with demographic and clinical factors. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04225585, registered January 13, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliann M Stalls
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Dana H Bovbjerg
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Donna M Posluszny
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lisa Massa
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mitin N, Nyrop KA, Strum SL, Knecht A, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Claire Dees E, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, O'Hare EA, Muss HB. A biomarker of aging, p16, predicts peripheral neuropathy in women receiving adjuvant taxanes for breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:103. [PMID: 36075910 PMCID: PMC9458644 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00473-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying patients at higher risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major unmet need given its high incidence, persistence, and detrimental effect on quality of life. We determined if the expression of p16, a biomarker of aging and cellular senescence, predicts CIPN in a prospective, multi-center study of 152 participants enrolled between 2014 and 2018. Any women with newly diagnosed Stage I–III breast cancer scheduled to receive taxane-containing chemotherapy was eligible. The primary outcome was development of grade 2 or higher CIPN during chemotherapy graded by the clinician before each chemotherapy cycle (NCI-CTCAE v5 criteria). We measured p16 expression in peripheral blood T cells by qPCR before and at the end of chemotherapy. A multivariate model identified risk factors for CIPN and included taxane regimen type, p16Age Gap, a measure of discordance between chronological age and p16 expression, and p16 expression before chemotherapy. Participants with higher p16Age Gap—higher chronological age but lower p16 expression prior to chemotherapy - were at the highest risk. In addition, higher levels of p16 before treatment, regardless of patient age, conferred an increased risk of CIPN. Incidence of CIPN positively correlated with chemotherapy-induced increase in p16 expression, with the largest increase seen in participants with the lowest p16 expression before treatment. We have shown that p16 expression levels before treatment can identify patients at high risk for taxane-induced CIPN. If confirmed, p16 might help guide chemotherapy selection in early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin A O'Hare
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nyrop KA, Damone EM, Deal AM, Wheeler SB, Charlot M, Reeve BB, Basch E, Shachar SS, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Wood WA, Muss HB. Patient-reported treatment toxicity and adverse events in Black and White women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:409-422. [PMID: 34739658 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06439-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is not known whether chemotherapy-related symptom experiences differ between Black and White women with early breast cancer (Stage I-III) receiving current chemotherapy regimens and, in turn, influences dose delay, dose reduction, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization. METHODS Patients self-reported their race and provided symptom reports for 17 major side effects throughout chemotherapy. Toxicity and adverse events were analyzed separately for anthracycline and non-anthracycline regimens. Fisher's exact tests and two-sample t-tests compared baseline patient characteristics. Modified Poisson regression estimated relative risks of moderate, severe, or very severe (MSVS) symptom severity, and chemotherapy-related adverse events.Please check and confirm that the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified and amend if necessary.no changes RESULTS: In 294 patients accrued between 2014 and 2020, mean age was 58 (SD13) and 23% were Black. For anthracycline-based regimens, the only significant difference in MSVS symptoms was in lymphedema (41% Black vs 20% White, p = .04) after controlling for axillary surgery. For non-anthracycline regimens, the only significant difference was MSVS peripheral neuropathy (41% Blacks vs. 23% White) after controlling for taxane type (p = .05) and diabetes (p = .05). For all other symptoms, severity scores were similar. Dose reduction differed significantly for non-anthracycline regimens (49% Black vs. 25% White, p = .01), but not for anthracycline regimens or in dose delay, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization for either regimen. CONCLUSION Except for lymphedema and peripheral neuropathy, Black and White patients reported similar symptom severity during adjuvant chemotherapy. Dose reductions in Black patients were more common for non-anthracycline regimens. In this sample, there were minimal differences in patient-reported symptoms and other adverse outcomes in Black versus White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Nyrop
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA. .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - E M Damone
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - M Charlot
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - B B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - E Basch
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S S Shachar
- Department of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - K E Reeder-Hayes
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E C Dees
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - T A Jolly
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - G G Kimmick
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M S Karuturi
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R E Reinbolt
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - J C Speca
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA
| | - W A Wood
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H B Muss
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Campus Box 7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7305, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sedrak MS, Freedman RA, Cohen HJ, Muss HB, Jatoi A, Klepin HD, Wildes TM, Le-Rademacher JG, Kimmick GG, Tew WP, George K, Padam S, Liu J, Wong AR, Lynch A, Djulbegovic B, Mohile SG, Dale W. Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:78-92. [PMID: 33002206 PMCID: PMC7854940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a disease of aging and, as the world's population ages, the number of older persons with cancer is increasing and will make up a growing share of the oncology population in virtually every country. Despite this, older patients remain vastly underrepresented in research that sets the standards for cancer treatments. Consequently, most of what we know about cancer therapeutics is based on clinical trials conducted in younger, healthier patients, and effective strategies to improve clinical trial participation of older adults with cancer remain sparse. For this systematic review, the authors evaluated published studies regarding barriers to participation and interventions to improve participation of older adults in cancer trials. The quality of the available evidence was low and, despite a literature describing multifaceted barriers, only one intervention study aimed to increase enrollment of older adults in trials. The findings starkly amplify the paucity of evidence-based, effective strategies to improve participation of this underrepresented population in cancer trials. Within these limitations, the authors provide their opinion on how the current cancer research infrastructure must be modified to accommodate the needs of older patients. Several underused solutions are offered to expand clinical trials to include older adults with cancer. However, as currently constructed, these recommendations alone will not solve the evidence gap in geriatric oncology, and efforts are needed to meet older and frail adults where they are by expanding clinical trials designed specifically for this population and leveraging real-world data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Hyman B. Muss
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Tanya M. Wildes
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - William P. Tew
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin George
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Simran Padam
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Liu
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrea Lynch
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | - William Dale
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shachar SS, Deal AM, Reeder-Hayes KE, Nyrop KA, Mitin N, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens on Expression of the Aging Biomarker, p16INK4a. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa082. [PMID: 33409457 PMCID: PMC7771421 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although chemotherapy saves lives, increasing evidence shows that chemotherapy accelerates aging. We previously demonstrated that mRNA expression of p16INK4a , a biomarker of senescence and molecular aging, increased early and dramatically after beginning adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens in early stage breast cancer patients. Here, we determined if changes in p16INK4a expression vary by chemotherapy regimen among early stage breast cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a study of stage I-III breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. p16INK4a expression was analyzed prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy (median 6.2 months after the last chemotherapy) in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Chemotherapy-induced change in p16INK4a expression was compared among regimens. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS In 146 women, chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in p16INK4a expression (accelerated aging of 17 years; P < .001). Anthracycline-based regimens were associated with the largest increases (accelerated aging of 23 to 26 years; P ≤ .008). Nonanthracycline-based regimens demonstrated a much smaller increase (accelerated aging of 9 to 11 years; P ≤ .15). In addition to the type of chemotherapy regimen, baseline p16INK4a levels, but not chronologic age or race, were also associated with the magnitude of increases in p16INK4a . Patients with lower p16INK4a levels at baseline were more likely to experience larger increases. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the aging effects of chemotherapy may be influenced by both chemotherapy type and the patient's baseline p16INK4a level. Measurement of p16INK4a expression is not currently available in the clinic, but nonanthracycline regimens offering similar efficacy as anthracycline regimens might be favored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Chen YT, Reeve BB, Basch EM, Wood WA, Shachar SS, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Lee JT, Brenizer A, Muss HB. Patient-reported symptom severity, interference with daily activities, and adverse events in older and younger women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Cancer 2020; 127:957-967. [PMID: 33216355 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, it is unknown whether patient-reported symptom severity and symptom interference with daily activities differ between younger (aged <65 years) and older (aged ≥65 years) women receiving similar chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer (EBC). METHODS Study participants rated 17 side effects of chemotherapy regimens currently in use in clinical practice (2014-2019). RESULTS Of 284 women with EBC (stage I-III), approximately 57% were aged <65 years and 43% were aged ≥65 years. For anthracycline-based regimens, a higher percentage of younger women reported moderate, severe, or very severe (MSVS) hot flashes (49% vs 18%) (P < .001). For nonanthracycline regimens, a higher percentage of younger women reported MSVS hot flashes (38% vs 19%) (P = .009) and a lower percentage reported MSVS arthralgia (28% vs 49%) (P = .005). With regard to symptom interference with daily activities, a higher percentage of younger women being treated with anthracycline-based regimens reported MSVS hot flashes (32% vs 7%) (P = .001) and myalgia (38% vs 18%) (P = .02). For nonanthracycline chemotherapy, a higher percentage of younger women reported MSVS interference for hot flashes (26% vs 9%) (P = .006) and lower percentages reported abdominal pain (13% vs 28%) (P = .02). Overall, there were no significant differences noted among younger versus older patients with regard to hospitalizations (19% vs 12%; P = .19), dose reductions (34% vs 31%; P = .50), dose delays (22% vs 25%; P = .59), or early treatment discontinuation (16% vs 16%; P = .9546). CONCLUSIONS Older and younger women with EBC who were treated with identical chemotherapy regimens generally experienced similar levels of symptom severity, symptom-related interference with daily activities, and adverse events. LAY SUMMARY In this study, women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer rated the severity of 17 symptoms and symptom interference with their activities of daily living. Older (aged ≥65 years) and younger (aged <65 years) women who received identical chemotherapy regimens generally experienced similar levels of symptom severity, symptom-related interference with daily activities, and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yi Tang Chen
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan M Basch
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - E Claire Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Addison Brenizer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Reeve BB, Basch E, Chen YT, Park JH, Shachar SS, Carey LA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Lee JT, Wood WA, Muss HB. Congruence of patient- and clinician-reported toxicity in women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:3084-3093. [PMID: 32315091 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, collected alongside the clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, enables comparisons of patient and clinician reports on treatment toxicity. METHODS In a multisite study of women receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, symptom reports were collected on the same day from patients and their clinicians for 17 symptoms; their data were not shared with each other. The proportions of moderate, severe, or very severe patient-reported symptom severity were compared with the proportions of clinician-rated grade 2, 3, or 4 toxicity. Patient-clinician agreement was assessed via κ statistics. Chi-square tests investigated whether patient characteristics were associated with patient-clinician agreement. RESULTS Among 267 women, the median age was 58 years (range, 24-83 years), and 26% were nonwhite. There was moderate scoring agreement (κ = 0.413-0.570) for 53% of symptoms, fair agreement for 41% (κ = 0.220-0.378), and slight agreement for 6% (κ = 0.188). For example, patient-reported and clinician-rated percentages were 22% and 8% for severe or very severe fatigue, 41% and 46% for moderate fatigue, 32% and 39% for mild fatigue, and 6% and 7% for none. Clinician severity scores were lower for nonwhite patients in comparison with white patients for peripheral neuropathy, nausea, arthralgia, and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS Although clinician reporting of symptoms is common practice in oncology, there is suboptimal agreement with the gold standard of patient self-reporting. These data provide further evidence supporting the integration of patient-reported outcomes into oncological clinical research and clinical practice to improve monitoring of symptoms as well as timely interventions for symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan Basch
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Yi Tang Chen
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ji Hye Park
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth C Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Meghan S Karuturi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | | | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ludmir EB, Subbiah IM, Mainwaring W, Miller AB, Lin TA, Jethanandani A, Espinoza AF, Mandel JJ, Fang P, Smith BD, Smith GL, Pinnix CC, Sedrak MS, Kimmick GG, Stinchcombe TE, Jagsi R, Thomas CR, Fuller CD, VanderWalde NA. Decreasing incidence of upper age restriction enrollment criteria among cancer clinical trials. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:451-454. [PMID: 31711757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age disparities among cancer clinical trial participants are pervasive and worsening over time. Identification of factors associated with age disparities is critical to improve enrollment of older patients on trials. The incidence and impact of trial eligibility criteria that exclude patients on the basis of age remains opaque. METHODS ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for completed oncologic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Phase 3 RCTs assessing a therapeutic intervention among adult cancer patients were included. Trial eligibility criteria were assessed using the ClinicalTrials.gov website as well as trial publications and protocol documentation. RESULTS Seven hundred and forty-two trials met inclusion criteria, with a total combined enrollment of 449,720 patients. Upper age restriction enrollment criteria were identified for 10.1% of RCTs; the median age cutoff for restricted trials was 72 years (interquartile range 70-80 years). Linear regression modeling revealed decreasing incidence of age restriction criteria over time, at a rate of -1.1% annually (p = .03); trials initiating enrollment in 2002-2005, for example, had a 16.1% rate of age-restrictive eligibility criteria, compared with 7.6% for trials initiating enrollment in 2010-2014. CONCLUSION Use of eligibility criteria that explicitly exclude patients on the basis of age appears to be decreasing with time. Future efforts should aim to better characterize the relationship between eligibility criteria (such as those that exclude patients on the basis of specific organ function) and their association with age disparities among enrolled patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Austin B Miller
- The University of Texas Health Science Center McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Lin
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Penny Fang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - C David Fuller
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kelleher SA, Winger JG, Dorfman CS, Ingle KK, Moskovich AA, Abernethy AP, Keefe FJ, Samsa GP, Kimmick GG, Somers TJ. A behavioral cancer pain intervention: A randomized noninferiority trial comparing in-person with videoconference delivery. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1671-1678. [PMID: 31162756 PMCID: PMC10141528 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Behavioral cancer pain interventions are efficacious for improving important pain outcomes; yet, traditional in-person delivery limits patient access. This study compared videoconference-delivered mobile health pain coping skills training (mPCST) to in-person pain coping skills training (PCST-traditional). METHODS This study was a randomized, noninferiority trial with cancer patients. Participants (N = 178) were randomly assigned to four, 45-minute sessions of mPCST or PCST-traditional. Session content focused on evidence-based cognitive and behavioral pain management skills. Assessments were completed at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month posttreatment, and included measures of primary intervention outcomes (ie, pain severity and pain interference) and secondary intervention outcomes (ie, physical symptoms, psychological distress, physical well-being, and self-efficacy). The main study aim tested whether mPCST was more accessible (defined as feasibility, acceptability, patient burden, and engagement) than PCST-traditional. The second aim tested whether mPCST was noninferior to PCST-traditional. RESULTS mPCST demonstrated significantly greater feasibility (ie, attrition, adherence, and time to completion) than PCST-traditional. Both groups reported similar patient burden and engagement as well as a high degree of acceptability. All intervention outcomes demonstrated noninferiority at posttreatment and, with the exception of physical symptoms, 3-month posttreatment. Concerning the primary intervention outcomes, 95% CIs for the mean differences (d) were below the noninferiority margin of 1 for pain severity (posttreatment d = 0.09, 95% CI, -0.63-0.81; 3 months d = -0.43 95% CI, -1.22-0.36) and pain interference (posttreatment d = -0.11, 95% CI, -0.99-0.76; 3 months d = -0.26 95% CI, -1.14-0.62). CONCLUSION mPCST is highly accessible and noninferior to PCST-traditional.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Kelleher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joseph G Winger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Krista K Ingle
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ashley A Moskovich
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amy P Abernethy
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Greg P Samsa
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dorfman CS, Arthur SS, Kimmick GG, Westbrook KW, Marcom PK, Corbett C, Edmond SN, Shelby RA. Partner status moderates the relationships between sexual problems and self-efficacy for managing sexual problems and psychosocial quality-of-life for postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy. Menopause 2019; 26:823-832. [PMID: 30994574 PMCID: PMC7081279 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Past studies indicate that >90% of breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) experience menopausal symptoms including sexual problems (eg, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia); however, research examining the impact of these problems on quality-of-life is limited. This cross-sectional study examined (1) the impact of sexual problems and self-efficacy for coping with sexual problems (sexual self-efficacy) on quality-of-life (ie, psychosocial quality-of-life and sexual satisfaction), and (2) partner status as a moderator of these relationships. METHODS Postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking AET completed measures of sexual problems (Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life [MENQOL] sexual subscale], sexual self-efficacy, psychosocial quality-of-life (MENQOL psychosocial subscale), and sexual satisfaction (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General item). RESULTS Bivariate analyses showed that women reporting greater sexual problems and lower sexual self-efficacy had poorer quality-of-life and less sexual satisfaction (all P-values < 0.05). Partner status moderated the relationship between sexual problems and psychosocial quality-of-life (P = 0.02); at high levels of sexual problems, unpartnered women experienced poorer psychosocial quality-of-life than partnered women. Partner status also moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and psychosocial quality-of-life (P = 0.01). Self-efficacy was unrelated to psychosocial quality-of-life for partnered women; for unpartnered women, low self-efficacy was associated with poorer quality-of-life. Partner status did not moderate the relationships between sexual problems or self-efficacy with sexual satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Greater sexual problems and lower sexual self-efficacy were associated with poorer psychosocial quality-of-life and sexual satisfaction among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors taking AET. Interventions to address sexual problems and sexual self-efficacy, particularly among unpartnered women, may be beneficial for improving the well-being of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors on AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sarah S Arthur
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Cheyenne Corbett
- Duke Supportive Care and Survivorship Center, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sara N Edmond
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidity & Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Adjei A, Buckner JC, Cathcart-Rake E, Chen H, Cohen HJ, Dao D, De Luca JE, Feliciano J, Freedman RA, Goldberg RM, Hopkins J, Hubbard J, Jatoi A, Karuturi M, Kemeny M, Kimmick GG, Klepin HD, Krok-Schoen JL, Lafky JM, Le-Rademacher JG, Li D, Lichtman SM, Maggiore R, Mandelblatt J, Morrison VA, Muss HB, Ojelabi MO, Sedrak MS, Subbiah N, Sun V, Tuttle S, VanderWalde N, Wildes T, Wong ML, Woyach J. Arti Hurria, M.D.: A tribute to her shining legacy in the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:179-183. [PMID: 31201095 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Araba Adjei
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Jan C Buckner
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | | | - Hongbin Chen
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Dyda Dao
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Jo-Ellen De Luca
- Alliance for Clinical Trials Patient Advocate, United States of America
| | | | | | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University, Morgantown, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Judith Hopkins
- Novant Health, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Aminah Jatoi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
| | - Meghan Karuturi
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | | | | | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - Daneng Li
- City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Stuart M Lichtman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Ronald Maggiore
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | | | - Vicki A Morrison
- University of Minnesota, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Hyman B Muss
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | | | | | - Niveditha Subbiah
- Alliance for Clinical Trials, Protocol Operations Office, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Virginia Sun
- City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Susan Tuttle
- Southeast Clinical Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Tanya Wildes
- Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Melisa L Wong
- University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Woyach
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Reeder-Hayes KE, Shachar SS, Reeve BB, Basch E, Choi SK, Lee JT, Wood WA, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Patient-reported and clinician-reported chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with early breast cancer: Current clinical practice. Cancer 2019; 125:2945-2954. [PMID: 31090930 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the current study, the authors investigated the incidence of moderate to severe chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) for chemotherapy regimens commonly used in current clinical practice for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. Patient-reported and clinician-assessed CIPN severity scores were compared, and risk factors for CIPN severity were identified. METHODS Patients completed a Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring form and oncologists completed a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events form. CIPN reports were collected prospectively during regularly scheduled infusion visits throughout the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS The sample included 184 women with a mean age of 55 years; approximately 73% were white. The 4 chemotherapy regimens used were doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel (60 patients); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (50 patients); docetaxel, carboplatin, and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (24 patients); and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (18 patients). All patients treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel and carboplatin received paclitaxel; all patients treated with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide and docetaxel, carboplatin, and anti-HER2 received docetaxel. The chemotherapy dose was reduced in 52 patients (28%); in 15 patients (29%), this reduction was due to CIPN. Chemotherapy was discontinued in 26 patients (14%), 8 because of CIPN. Agreement between patient-reported and clinician-assessed CIPN severity scores was minimal (weighted Cohen kappa, P = .34). Patient-reported moderate to severe CIPN was higher for paclitaxel (50%) compared with docetaxel (17.7%) (P < .001). Pretreatment arthritis and/or rheumatism (relative risk [RR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06-2.35 [P = .023]) and regimens containing paclitaxel (RR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.72-4.83 [P < .0001]) were associated with higher CIPN severity. Being married (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.887 [P = .01]) was found to be associated with lower CIPN severity. CONCLUSIONS The discrepancy between patient-reported and clinician-assessed CIPN underscores the need for both patient and clinician perspectives regarding this common, dose-limiting, and potentially disabling side effect of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn E Reeder-Hayes
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan Basch
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William A Wood
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Carey K Anders
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth C Dees
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - JoEllen C Speca
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Shachar SS, Basch E, Reeve BB, Choi SK, Lee JT, Wood WA, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Patient-Reported Toxicities During Chemotherapy Regimens in Current Clinical Practice for Early Breast Cancer. Oncologist 2018; 24:762-771. [PMID: 30552158 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study explores the incidence of patient-reported major toxicity-symptoms rated "moderate," "severe," or "very severe"-for chemotherapy regimens commonly used in early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Female patients aged 21 years or older completed a validated Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring instrument and rated 17 symptoms throughout adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Fisher's exact tests compared differences in percentages in symptom ratings, and general linear regression was used to model the incidence of patient-reported major toxicity. RESULTS In 152 patients, the mean age was 54 years (range, 24-77), and 112 (74%) were white; 51% received an anthracycline-based regimen. The proportion of patients rating fatigue, constipation, myalgia, diarrhea, nausea, peripheral neuropathy, and swelling of arms or legs as a major toxicity at any time during chemotherapy varied significantly among four chemotherapy regimens (p < .05). The mean (SD) number of symptoms rated major toxicities was 6.3 (3.6) for anthracycline-based and 4.4 (3.5) for non-anthracycline-based regimens (p = .001; possible range, 0-17 symptoms). Baseline higher body mass index (p = .03), patient-reported Karnofsky performance status ≤80 (p = .0003), and anthracycline-based regimens (p = .0003) were associated with greater total number of symptoms rated major toxicities (alternative model: chemotherapy duration, p < .0001). Twenty-six percent of dose reductions (26 of 40), 75% of hospitalizations (15 of 20), and 94% of treatment discontinuations (15 of 16) were in anthracycline-based regimens. CONCLUSION Capturing multiple toxicity outcomes throughout chemotherapy enables oncologists and patients to understand the range of side effects as they discuss treatment efficacies. Continuous symptom monitoring may aid in the timely development of interventions that minimize toxicity and improve outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study investigated patient-reported toxicities for 17 symptoms recorded prospectively during adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer. An analysis of four commonly used chemotherapy regimens identified significant differences among regimens in both individual symptoms and total number of symptoms rated moderate, severe, or very severe. Longer chemotherapy regimens, such as anthracycline-based regimens followed by paclitaxel, had higher proportions of symptoms rated major toxicities. The inclusion of patient perspectives on multiple toxicity outcomes at the same time at multiple time points during chemotherapy has the potential for improving patient-provider communication regarding symptom management, patient satisfaction, and long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten A Nyrop
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Ethan Basch
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jordan T Lee
- Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - William A Wood
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Dees
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - JoEllen C Speca
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sitlinger A, Shelby RA, Van Denburg AN, White H, Edmond SN, Marcom PK, Bosworth HB, Keefe FJ, Kimmick GG. Higher symptom burden is associated with lower function in women taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 10:317-321. [PMID: 30553719 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the impact of symptoms on physical function in women on adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. METHODS Eligible women were postmenopausal, had hormone receptor positive, stage I-IIIA breast cancer, completed surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and on adjuvant endocrine therapy. At a routine follow-up visit, women (N = 107) completed standardized symptom measures: Brief Fatigue Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, Menopause Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Neurotoxicity scales. Two performance measures assessed function: grip strength (Jamar dynamometer; n = 71) and timed get-up-and-go (TUG; n = 103). Analyses were performed with an overall symptom composite score. Correlations and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to test adverse effects on physical function. RESULTS The mean age was 64 years (range 45-84), 81% white, 84% on an aromatase inhibitor, and on endocrine therapy for mean 35 months (range 1-130 months). Dominant hand grip strength was inversely correlated with symptom composite scores (r = -0.29, p = .02). Slower TUG was positively correlated with higher Charlson comorbidity level (r = 0.36, p < .001) and higher symptom composite scores (r = 0.24, p = .01). In multivariate analyses, weaker dominant and non-dominant hand grip strength were significantly associated with greater symptom composite scores (β = -0.27, t = 2.43, p = .02 and β = -0.36, t = 3.15, p = .003, respectively) and slower TUG was associated with higher symptom composite scores (β = 0.18, t = 1.97, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS Higher symptom burden is associated with worse physical function, as measured by hand grip strength and TUG. Further study to determine the impact of endocrine therapy and its side effects on function is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sitlinger
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Alyssa N Van Denburg
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Heidi White
- Center for Aging, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Sarah N Edmond
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Paul K Marcom
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Center for Health Services Research, Durham VAMC, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Population Health Science, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moore AH, Trentham-Dietz A, Burns M, Gangnon RE, Greenberg CC, Vanness DJ, Hampton J, Wu XC, Anderson RT, Lipscomb J, Kimmick GG, Cress R, Wilson JF, Sabatino SA, Fleming ST. Obesity and mortality after locoregional breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 172:647-657. [PMID: 30159788 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4932-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Higher mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis has been observed among women who are obese. We investigated the relationships between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause or breast cancer-specific mortality after a diagnosis of locoregional breast cancer. METHODS Women diagnosed in 2004 with AJCC Stage I, II, or III breast cancer (n = 5394) were identified from a population-based National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) patterns of care study (POC-BP) drawing from registries in seven U.S. states. Differences in overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, including age- and stage-based subgroup analyses. RESULTS In women 70 or older, higher BMI was associated with lower overall mortality (HR for a 5 kg/m2 difference in BMI = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.95). There was no significant association between BMI and overall mortality for women under 70. BMI was not associated with breast cancer death in the full sample, but among women with Stage I disease; those in the highest BMI category had significantly higher breast cancer mortality (HR for BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 vs. 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 = 4.74, 95% CI 1.78-12.59). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to our hypothesis, greater BMI was not associated with higher overall mortality. Among older women, BMI was inversely related to overall mortality, with a null association among younger women. Higher BMI was associated with breast cancer mortality among women with Stage I disease, but not among women with more advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Holliston Moore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. .,University of Wisconsin, 307 WARF Building, 610 Walnut St, Madison, WI, 53726, USA. .,Smith Cardiovascular Research Building, University of California San Francisco, 555 Mission Bay Blvd S, Suite 161, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Marguerite Burns
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ronald E Gangnon
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Caprice C Greenberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.,University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David J Vanness
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - John Hampton
- University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Roger T Anderson
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Joseph Lipscomb
- Rollins School of Public Health and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Rosemary Cress
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, USA
| | | | | | - Steven T Fleming
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kimmick GG, Li X, Fleming ST, Sabatino SA, Wilson JF, Lipscomb J, Cress R, Bergom C, Anderson RT, Wu XC. Risk of cancer death by comorbidity severity and use of adjuvant chemotherapy among women with locoregional breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:214-220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
20
|
Kelleher SA, Dorfman CS, Plumb Vilardaga JC, Majestic C, Winger J, Gandhi V, Nunez C, Van Denburg A, Shelby RA, Reed SD, Murphy S, Davidian M, Laber EB, Kimmick GG, Westbrook KW, Abernethy AP, Somers TJ. Optimizing delivery of a behavioral pain intervention in cancer patients using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial SMART. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 57:51-57. [PMID: 28408335 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Pain is common in cancer patients and results in lower quality of life, depression, poor physical functioning, financial difficulty, and decreased survival time. Behavioral pain interventions are effective and nonpharmacologic. Traditional randomized controlled trials (RCT) test interventions of fixed time and dose, which poorly represent successive treatment decisions in clinical practice. We utilize a novel approach to conduct a RCT, the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design, to provide comparative evidence of: 1) response to differing initial doses of a pain coping skills training (PCST) intervention and 2) intervention dose sequences adjusted based on patient response. We also examine: 3) participant characteristics moderating intervention responses and 4) cost-effectiveness and practicality. METHODS/DESIGN Breast cancer patients (N=327) having pain (ratings≥5) are recruited and randomly assigned to: 1) PCST-Full or 2) PCST-Brief. PCST-Full consists of 5 PCST sessions. PCST-Brief consists of one 60-min PCST session. Five weeks post-randomization, participants re-rate their pain and are re-randomized, based on intervention response, to receive additional PCST sessions, maintenance calls, or no further intervention. Participants complete measures of pain intensity, interference and catastrophizing. CONCLUSIONS Novel RCT designs may provide information that can be used to optimize behavioral pain interventions to be adaptive, better meet patients' needs, reduce barriers, and match with clinical practice. This is one of the first trials to use a novel design to evaluate symptom management in cancer patients and in chronic illness; if successful, it could serve as a model for future work with a wide range of chronic illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Kelleher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Caroline S Dorfman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jen C Plumb Vilardaga
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Catherine Majestic
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Joseph Winger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Vicky Gandhi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Christine Nunez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Alyssa Van Denburg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Susan Murphy
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Marie Davidian
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| | - Eric B Laber
- Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Department of Internal Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kelly W Westbrook
- Department of Internal Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Amy P Abernethy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kimmick GG, Major B, Clapp J, Sloan J, Pitcher B, Ballman K, Barginear M, Freedman RA, Artz A, Klepin HD, Lafky JM, Hopkins J, Winer E, Hudis C, Muss H, Cohen H, Jatoi A, Hurria A, Mandelblatt J. Using ePrognosis to estimate 2-year all-cause mortality in older women with breast cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 49907 and 369901 (Alliance A151503). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 163:391-398. [PMID: 28283904 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4188-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tools to estimate survival, such as ePrognosis ( http://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/carey2.php ), were developed for general, not cancer, populations. In older patients with breast cancer, accurate overall survival estimates would facilitate discussions about adjuvant therapies. METHODS Secondary analyses were performed of data from two parallel breast cancer studies (CALGB/Alliance 49907/NCT000224102 and CALGB/Alliance 369901/NCT00068328). We included patients (n = 971) who were age 70 years and older with complete baseline quality of life data (194 from 49907; 777 from 369901). Estimated versus observed all-cause two-year mortality rates were compared. ePrognosis score was calculated based on age, sex, and daily function (derived from EORTC QLQ-C30). ePrognosis scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse prognosis based on mortality of community-dwelling elders and were categorized into three groups (0-2, 3-6, 7-10). Observed mortality rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Patient mean age was 75.8 years (range 70-91) and 73% had stage I-IIA disease. Most patients were classified by ePrognosis as good prognosis (n = 562, 58% 0-2) and few (n = 18, 2% 7-10) poor prognosis. Two-year observed mortality rates were significantly lower than ePrognosis estimates for patients scoring 0-2 (2% vs 5%, p = 0.001) and 3-6 (8% vs 12%, p = 0.01). The same trend was seen with scores of 7-10 (23% vs 36%, p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS ePrognosis tool only modestly overestimates mortality rate in older breast cancer patients enrolled in two cooperative group studies. This tool, which estimates non-cancer mortality risk based on readily available clinical information may inform adjuvant therapy decisions but should be validated in non-clinical trial populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen G Kimmick
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3204, Durham, NC, 29910, USA.
| | - Brittny Major
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan Clapp
- Department of Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Biomathematics and Bioinformatics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeff Sloan
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brandelyn Pitcher
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3204, Durham, NC, 29910, USA.,Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karla Ballman
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Myra Barginear
- Hofstra-North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | | | - Andrew Artz
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Eric Winer
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clifford Hudis
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Hyman Muss
- UNC Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Harvey Cohen
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3204, Durham, NC, 29910, USA
| | | | | | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Freedman RA, Seisler DK, Foster JC, Sloan JA, Lafky JM, Kimmick GG, Hurria A, Cohen HJ, Winer EP, Hudis CA, Partridge AH, Carey LA, Jatoi A, Klepin HD, Citron M, Berry DA, Shulman LN, Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Muss HB. Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among older women receiving anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on Modern Cooperative Group Trials (Alliance A151511). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 161:363-373. [PMID: 27866278 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4051-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We examined acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) events among 9679 women treated for breast cancer on four adjuvant Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trials with >90 months of follow-up in order to better characterize the risk for AML/MDS in older patients receiving anthracyclines. METHODS We used multivariable Cox regression to examine factors associated with AML/MDS, adjusting for age (≥65 vs. <65 years; separately for ≥70 vs. <70 years), race/ethnicity, insurance, performance status, and anthracycline receipt. We also examined the effect of cyclophosphamide, the interaction of anthracycline and age, and outcomes for those developing AML/MDS. RESULTS On Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 40101, 49907, 9344, and 9741, 7290 received anthracyclines; 15% were in the age ≥65 and 7% were ≥70. Overall, 47 patients developed AML/MDS (30 AML [0.3%], 17 MDS [0.2%]); 83% of events occurred within 5 years of study registration. Among those age ≥65 and ≥70, 0.8 and 1.0% developed AML/MDS (vs. 0.4% for age <65), respectively. In adjusted analyses, older age and anthracycline receipt were significantly associated with AML/MDS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for age ≥65 [vs. <65] = 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-8.33; HR for anthracycline receipt [vs. no anthracycline] = 5.16, 95% CI 1.47-18.19). There was no interaction between age and anthracycline use. Deaths occurred in 70% of those developing AML/MDS. CONCLUSIONS We observed an increased risk for AML/MDS for older patients and those receiving anthracyclines, though these events were rare. Our results help inform discussions surrounding anticipated toxicities of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - D K Seisler
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J C Foster
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J A Sloan
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J M Lafky
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - G G Kimmick
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - A Hurria
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research and Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - H J Cohen
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - E P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - C A Hudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - A H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A Jatoi
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - H D Klepin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - M Citron
- ProHEALTH Care Associates, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - D A Berry
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L N Shulman
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A U Buzdar
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - V J Suman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - H B Muss
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Loh KP, Janelsins MC, Mohile SG, Holmes HM, Hsu T, Inouye SK, Karuturi MS, Kimmick GG, Lichtman SM, Magnuson A, Whitehead MI, Wong ML, Ahles TA. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2016; 7:270-80. [PMID: 27197918 PMCID: PMC4969145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) can occur during or after chemotherapy and represents a concern for many patients with cancer. Among older patients with cancer, in whom there is little clinical trial evidence examining side effects like CRCI, many unanswered questions remain regarding risk for and resulting adverse outcomes from CRCI. Given the rising incidence of cancer with age, CRCI is of particular concern for older patients with cancer who receive treatment. Therefore, research related to CRCI in older patients with cancers is a high priority. In this manuscript, we discuss current gaps in research highlighting the lack of clinical studies of CRCI in older adults, the complex mechanisms of CRCI, and the challenges in measuring cognitive impairment in older patients with cancer. Although we focus on CRCI, we also discuss cognitive impairment related to cancer itself and other treatment modalities. We highlight several research priorities to improve the study of CRCI in older patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kah Poh Loh
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, United States.
| | | | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, United States
| | - Holly M Holmes
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States
| | - Tina Hsu
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Canada
| | - Sharon K Inouye
- Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States; Hebrew Senior Life, United States
| | | | | | | | - Allison Magnuson
- James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, United States
| | | | - Melisa L Wong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Harnden KK, Kimmick GG, Marcom PK, Westbrook KE, Blackwell KL. Abstract P6-04-11: The foundation one assay influences clinical decision making in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-04-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Tumor DNA sequencing is now readily available in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of molecular testing on clinical decision-making in MBC at an academic cancer center.
Methods:
We obtained the Foundation One (FO) tests that were requested from Duke Cancer Institute breast oncologists between 12/2013 and 4/2015. We examined the following: ER/PR/HER2 status, histology, biopsy site and time, #months (mons) from time tissue was obtained to testing, #lines of prior therapy prior to tissue sampling and FO testing, #mons from initial diagnosis/MBC to FO. The following variables from the FO test were abstracted: #genomic alterations, #rx with potential benefit, #clinical trials available, #variations of unknown significance (VUS). Physicians were retrospectively surveyed regarding influence of FO results on clinical treatment decisions and on clinical trial consideration.
Results:
To date, 58 specimens have been sent for FO testing. From the time of FO testing, the mean #of mons since initial diagnosis (dx) was 84.4(7-435) and the mean #of mons since the dx of MBC was 31.4(1-140). Pts with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were more likely to have FO ordered within 1 year of MBC diagnosis (OR=2.93, p=0.048). On average, pts had received 3.78 lines of rx for MBC (0-10) at the time FO was sent. The timing of tissue acquisition for FO testing was bimodal (45% had a new bx for the assay whereas 55% had the FO test on archival bx). 50% of un-resulted (unsuccessful) FO assays were from archival tissue with a mean #mons since the archival tissue was obtained of 42 mons (18-74). To date, 56% of resulted samples were from archival tissue with a mean #mons since the archival tissue was obtained of 19.6(2-75).
Per the FO report: the mean #genomic alterations per pt = 6.21 (1-16); the mean #VUS per pt = 11.5 (3-30); the mean #mutation-directed rx per pt= 3.4 (0-15), the mean #mutation-directed clinical trials per pt= 9.33 (0-20). Genomic alterations occurring in ≥ 10% patients included: TP53 (48%), CCND1 (27%), FGF4 (27%), FGF19 (27%), FGFR1 (25%), PIK3CA (25%), FGF3 (25%), MYC (25%), ZNF703 (21%), ESR1 (19%), MCL1 (15%), CDH1 (13%), ERBB2 (10%), EMSY (10%), MYST3 (10%).
36 pts had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 6 pts had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), and 6 had invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). No genomic alterations were associated with a sub-type of MBC with the exception of ESR1 mutations in ER+ IDC (100%) and CDH1 mutations in ILC (67%). Pts found to have ESR1 mutations had on average 63 mons(10-200) of endocrine therapy at the time of tissue sampling.
When the breast cancer medical oncology physicians were retrospectively surveyed, 42% FO assays influenced clinical treatment decisions and 14% resulted in clinical trial enrollment.
Conclusions:
FO utilization is variable based on MBC sub-type and the timing of tissue collection is bimodal. ESR1 mutations were associated with history of prolonged endocrine rx treatment in ER+ IDC and CDH1 mutations were associated with ILC. FO assays frequently influenced clinical treatment decisions but did not result in a high number of pts enrolled on clinical trials. We will update our dataset with additional FO assays and clinicopathologic variables.
Citation Format: Harnden KK, Kimmick GG, Marcom PK, Westbrook KE, Blackwell KL. The foundation one assay influences clinical decision making in metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-04-11.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sutton LM, Geradts J, Hamilton EP, Havlin KA, Kimmick GG, Marcom PK, Spector NL, Watson M, Rabin DU, Bruno TO, Noe A, Miller S, Subramaniam C, Layton S, Grichnik K. CHAMBER: A Regional Performance Improvement CME Initiative for Breast Cancer Health Care Providers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13:1005-11. [PMID: 26285246 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
CHAMBER was a regional educational initiative for providers of care to patients with HER2+ breast cancer. The study goals were to (1) enhance testing for HER2/neu overexpression in patients with invasive breast cancer; (2) increase the appropriate use of targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ breast cancer; and (3) enhance patients' coping ability. This Performance Improvement Continuing Medical Education (PI-CME) initiative included clinical practice assessment, educational activities, and reassessment. Chart review revealed a high rate of HER2 testing (98%) before and after education. Targeted therapy for patients with HER2+ breast cancer declined after the program (from 96% to 61%), perhaps attributable to an increase in awareness of medical reasons to avoid use of targeted therapy. Assessment for patients' emotional coping ability increased after education (from 55% to 76%; P=.01). Rates of testing for HER2 amplification and assessment of emotional well-being after education were consistent with ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative benchmark values. Documentation of actions to address emotional problems remained an area for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M Sutton
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Joseph Geradts
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Erika P Hamilton
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Kathleen A Havlin
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - P Kelly Marcom
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Neil L Spector
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Melanie Watson
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Daniel U Rabin
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Theodore O Bruno
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Amanda Noe
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Stacy Miller
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Chitra Subramaniam
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Sherry Layton
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| | - Katherine Grichnik
- From Department of Medicine, Duke School of Medicine and Health System, and Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee; The France Foundation, Old Lyme, Connecticut; Duke Medicine, Center For Educational Excellence, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Duke School of Medicine, Center for Educational Excellence, Durham, North Carolina; and American Anesthesiology, Mednax National Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kimmick GG, Camacho F, Anderson RT. Abstract P3-07-17: Rates of adherence and persistence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among women enrolled in Medicare Part D in a four-state region of Appalachia. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p3-07-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Disparities exist in breast cancer outcomes by age, geographic location, and socioeconomic status, but there is little data regarding contributing factors to disparities within Appalachia. Underuse of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer can contribute to disparities. We studied older women within four states of Appalachia and explored adherence and persistence rates for adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Methods: The study group consisted of women with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed 2008-2009 in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and Georgia, who were continuously enrolled in Part D Medicare and filled a prescription for tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane. Adherence rate is defined by medication possession ratio (MPR=sum of days supply for all claims during the calendar year after first prescription). Persistence rate was defined as absence of a 90 day or greater gap in prescription coverage since the first prescription fill. Univariate analyses by Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric test were performed. Variables included age, year of diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity score, Medicaid/Medicare versus Medicare insurance status, rural versus urban residence, county-level economic status (Appalachia Regional Commission: Distressed, At risk, Transitional, or Competitive), state, stage (1, 2A, 2B, or 3), and breast conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy.
Results: We identified 726 eligible cases. Mean age was 75.1 years (range 41-98); 97.9% were white; 47.9% had rural residence, 9.5% lived in distressed counties, 29.1% were dual-Medicaid/Medicare insured, mean Charlson comorbidity score was 1.66, and tumor was stage 1 in 56.6%, 2 in 33.6%, and 3 in 9.8%. Mean MPR was 57% (SD 0.27). Persistence rate at 6-months was 79% (SD 0.41) and at 12-months was 36% (SD 0.48).
MPR varied significantly within age groups (p=0.01), county-level economic status levels (p=0.01), and Singh Index Area Deprivation tertiles (p=0.01). Mean MPR increased with increasing age: 48% for age 40--65, 55% for age 66-75, 59% for age 76-85, and 63% for age 86 and older. MPR was highest among those in the Competitive ARC class at median levels of 64%, versus 53% in Distressed, 58% in At Risk, and 58% in Transitional. Greatest area deprivation tertile also coincided with lower mean and median MPR adherence.
Persistence at 12 months varied significantly among age groups (p=0.01), and type of surgery (p=0.04). Persistence rates were lower in younger cases: 23% for age 40-65, 34% for age 66-75, 37% for age 76-85, and 49% for age 86 and older. Persistence rates were 32% in those who had BCS and 42% in mastectomy. Persistence rates varied significantly among comorbidity levels (p=0.0260); but, after adjusting for age and using logistic regression, this association was only marginally significant (p=0.05). Adjusted expected persistence increased as comorbidity score increased: 28% for 0; 35% for 1; and 39% for 2 or more.
Conclusions: Among this group of women within four states in Appalachia with Medicare Part D who filled a prescription for endocrine therapy, overall adherence and persistence rates were low. Higher adherence and persistence rates were seen in older age groups.
Citation Format: Gretchen G Kimmick, Fabian Camacho, Roger T Anderson. Rates of adherence and persistence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among women enrolled in Medicare Part D in a four-state region of Appalachia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-17.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ursem CJ, Bosworth HB, Shelby RA, Hwang W, Anderson RT, Kimmick GG. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: importance in women with low income. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2015; 24:403-8. [PMID: 25884292 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There are wide disparities in breast cancer-specific survival by patient sociodemographic characteristics. Women of lower income, for instance, have higher relapse and death rates from breast cancer. One possible contributing factor for this disparity is low use of adjuvant endocrine therapy-an extremely efficacious therapy in women with early stage, hormone receptor positive breast cancer, the most common subtype of breast cancer. Alone, adjuvant endocrine therapy decreases breast cancer recurrence by 50% and death by 30%. Data suggest that low use of adjuvant endocrine therapy is a potentially important and modifiable risk factor for poor outcome in low-income breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carling J Ursem
- 1 Department of Hematology and Oncology, UCSF , San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Nearly half of all women diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer are age 65 years or older with the number of women diagnosed expected to increase as the population ages and life expectancy improves. Older women are less likely to be offered standard cancer treatments, are more likely to develop higher toxicity, and have higher mortality. Chronologic age should not be the only factor used for making treatment decisions. Functional dependence, organ function, comorbidity, polypharmacy, social support, cognitive and/or psychosocial factors, overall life expectancy, and patient's goals of care are equally vital and should be assessed before and during treatment. In this review, current evidence and treatment guidelines for older women with breast or ovarian cancer are outlined.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kimmick GG, Camacho F, Mackley HB, Kern T, Yao N, Matthews SA, Fleming S, Lipscomb J, Liao J, Hwang W, Anderson RT. Individual, Area, and Provider Characteristics Associated With Care Received for Stages I to III Breast Cancer in a Multistate Region of Appalachia. J Oncol Pract 2014; 11:e9-e18. [PMID: 25228530 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2014.001397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe individual, area, and provider characteristics associated with care patterns for early-stage breast cancer in Appalachian counties of Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. METHODS Cases of stages I to III breast cancer from 2006 to 2008 were linked to Medicare claims occurring within 1 year of diagnosis. Rates of guideline-concordant endocrine therapy (n = 1,429), chemotherapy (n = 1,480), and radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery were studied; RT was studied in women age ≥ 70 years with stage I estrogen receptor (ER) -positive/progesterone receptor (PR) -positive cancer, for whom RT was optional (n = 1,108), and in all others, for whom RT was guideline concordant (n = 1,422). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Independent variables included age, race, county-level economic status, state, surgeon graduation year and volume, comorbidity, diagnosis year, Medicaid/Medicare dual status, histology, tumor size, tumor sequence, positive lymph nodes, ER/PR status, stage, trastuzumab use, and surgery type. RESULTS Population mean age was 74 years; 97% were white. For endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and RT, guideline concordance was 76%, 48%, and 83%, respectively. Where it was optional, 77% received RT. Guideline-concordant endocrine therapy was lower in North Carolina versus Pennsylvania (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.88) and higher if surgeon graduated between 1984 and 1988 versus ≥ 1989 (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.34). Guideline-concordant chemotherapy varied significantly by state, county-level economic status, and surgeon volume. In guideline-concordant RT, lower surgeon volume (v highest) predicted RT use (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.36). In optional RT, North Carolina residence (v Pennsylvania; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48) and counties with higher economic status (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94) predicated RT omission. CONCLUSION Notable variation in care by geographic and surgical provider characteristics provides targets for further research in underserved areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen G Kimmick
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Fabian Camacho
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Heath B Mackley
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Teresa Kern
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nengliang Yao
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stephen A Matthews
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Steven Fleming
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Joseph Lipscomb
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jason Liao
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Wenke Hwang
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Roger T Anderson
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Penn State College of Medicine, State College, PA; Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA; University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY; and Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Klepin HD, Pitcher BN, Ballman KV, Kornblith AB, Hurria A, Winer EP, Hudis C, Cohen HJ, Muss HB, Kimmick GG. Comorbidity, chemotherapy toxicity, and outcomes among older women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on a clinical trial: CALGB 49907 and CALGB 361004 (alliance). J Oncol Pract 2014; 10:e285-92. [PMID: 25074878 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2014.001388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated associations among comorbidity, toxicity, time to relapse (TTR), and overall survival (OS) in older women with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907 (Alliance) randomly assigned women ≥ 65 years old with stages I-III breast cancer to standard adjuvant chemotherapy or capecitabine. We reviewed data from 329 women who participated in the quality of life companion study CALGB 70103 and completed the Physical Health Subscale of the Older American Resources and Services Questionnaire. This questionnaire captures data on 14 comorbid conditions and the degree to which each interferes with daily activities. A comorbidity burden score was computed by multiplying the total number of conditions by each condition's level of interference with function. Outcomes were grade 3 to 5 toxicity, TTR, and OS. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between comorbidity and toxicity, and Cox proportional hazards models for TTR and survival. RESULTS Number of comorbidities ranged from 0 to 10 (median 2); the comorbidity burden score ranged from 0 to 25 (median 3). The most common conditions were arthritis (58%) and hypertension (55%). Comorbidity was associated with shorter OS, but not with toxicity or TTR. The hazard of death increased by 18% for each comorbidity (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.33) after adjusting for age, tumor size, treatment, node and receptor status. Comorbidity burden score was similarly associated with OS (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.14). CONCLUSIONS Among older women enrolled onto a clinical trial, comorbidity was associated with shorter OS, but not toxicity or relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brandelyn N Pitcher
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alice B Kornblith
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Arti Hurria
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eric P Winer
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Clifford Hudis
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shelby RA, Edmond SN, Wren AA, Keefe FJ, Peppercorn JM, Marcom PK, Blackwell KL, Kimmick GG. Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms moderates the relationship between physical symptoms and well-being in breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:2851-9. [PMID: 24821365 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2269-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2013] [Accepted: 04/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the relationships between physical symptoms, self-efficacy for coping with symptoms, and functional, emotional, and social well-being in women who were taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. METHODS One hundred and twelve women who were taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor) for breast cancer completed measures of physical symptoms, self-efficacy for coping with symptoms, and functional, social, and emotional well-being at the time of routine medical follow-up (women were on average 3.4 years post-surgery; range 3 months to 11 years). RESULTS Multiple linear regression analyses showed that higher self-efficacy for coping with symptoms was associated with greater functional, emotional, and social well-being after controlling for physical symptoms (p < 0.05). Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms moderated the relationship between physical symptoms and functional (B = 0.05, SE = 0.02, t = 2.67, p = 0.009) and emotional well-being (B = 0.03, SE = 0.01, t = 2.45, p = 0.02). As self-efficacy increased, the relationship between greater physical symptoms and lower well-being became weaker. Among women with high levels of self-efficacy, physical symptoms were not related to functional and emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms may reduce the negative impact of physical symptoms and contribute to well-being in breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy. Future studies could examine whether psychosocial interventions aimed at increasing self-efficacy for managing symptoms help women better cope with treatment side effects and improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St., Suite 340, Durham, 27705, NC, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Demark-Wahnefried W, Jones LW, Snyder DC, Sloane RJ, Kimmick GG, Hughes DC, Badr HJ, Miller PE, Burke LE, Lipkus IM. Daughters and Mothers Against Breast Cancer (DAMES): main outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of weight loss in overweight mothers with breast cancer and their overweight daughters. Cancer 2014; 120:2522-34. [PMID: 24804802 PMCID: PMC4232005 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2013] [Revised: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies to date have used the cancer diagnosis as a teachable moment to promote healthy behavior changes in survivors of cancer and their family members. Given the role of obesity in the primary and tertiary prevention of breast cancer, the authors explored the feasibility of a mother-daughter weight loss intervention. METHODS A randomized controlled trial of a mailed weight loss intervention was undertaken among 68 mother-daughter dyads (n = 136), each comprised of a survivor of breast cancer (AJCC stage 0-III) and her adult biological daughter. All women had body mass indices ≥ 25 kg/m2 and underwent in-person assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, with accelerometry and exercise capacity performed on a subset of individuals. All women received a personalized workbook and 6 newsletters over a 1-year period that promoted weight loss; exercise; and a nutrient-rich, low-energy density diet. A total of 25 dyads received individually tailored instruction (INDIVIDUAL), 25 dyads received team-tailored instruction (TEAM), and 18 dyads received standardized brochures (CONTROL). RESULTS The trial met its accrual target, experienced 90% retention, and caused no serious adverse events. Significant differences in baseline to 12-month changes were observed between INDIVIDUAL versus CONTROL mothers for body mass index, weight, and waist circumference (WC); significant differences also were observed in the WC of corresponding daughters (P < .05). Significant differences were found between INDIVIDUAL versus CONTROL and TEAM versus CONTROL dyads for WC (P = .0002 and .018, respectively), minutes per week of physical activity (P = .031 and .036, respectively), and exercise capacity (P = .047 for both). CONCLUSIONS Significant improvements in lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes are possible with tailored print interventions directed toward survivors of cancer and their family members. For greater impact, more research is needed to expand this work beyond the mother-daughter dyad. Cancer 2014;120:2522–2534. © 2014 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. Obesity is a major risk factor for the incidence and mortality of several cancers. The results of this randomized controlled trial of weight loss among 136 women diagnosed with breast cancer and their biological daughters suggests that the diagnosis of cancer can be used to motivate healthy diet and exercise behaviors among survivors of cancer and their family members using mailed print interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Edmond SN, Shelby RA, Kimmick GG, Marcom PK, Peppercorn JM, Keefe FJ. Symptom communication in breast cancer: relationships of holding back and self-efficacy for communication to symptoms and adjustment. J Psychosoc Oncol 2014; 31:698-711. [PMID: 24175903 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2013.835023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy improves overall survival for women with breast cancer. However, side effects may compromise patients' quality of life (QOL). This study examined how two communication variables (self-efficacy for symptom communication [SE] and holding back from discussing cancer-related concerns [HB]) relate to QOL, pain and menopausal symptoms. Participants with breast cancer (N = 61) completed questionnaires regarding symptoms, communication, and QOL. SE was positively related to QOL and negatively related to pain interference. HB from discussing cancer-related concerns was related negatively to QOL and positively to pain interference. HB mediated the relationship between SE and QOL as well as between SE and pain interference. Increased SE is beneficial among women on endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Future research should determine if interventions to improve SE are feasible and can improve QOL and symptom tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara N Edmond
- a Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hornsby WE, Douglas PS, West MJ, Kenjale AA, Lane AR, Schwitzer ER, Ray KA, Herndon JE, Coan A, Gutierrez A, Hornsby KP, Hamilton E, Wilke LG, Kimmick GG, Peppercorn JM, Jones LW. Safety and efficacy of aerobic training in operable breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a phase II randomized trial. Acta Oncol 2014; 53:65-74. [PMID: 23957716 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2013.781673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the safety and efficacy of moderate-to-high intensity aerobic training in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Twenty patients with stage IIB-IIIC operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) or AC in combination with aerobic training (AC + AET) (n = 10/group) for 12 weeks. The AC+ AET group performed three supervised aerobic cycle ergometry sessions per week at 60%-100% of exercise capacity (VO2peak). Safety outcomes included exercise testing as well as treatment- and exercise training-related adverse events (AEs), whereas efficacy outcomes included cardiopulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as measured by a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) scale. RESULTS Twelve non-significant ECG abnormalities and three non-life threatening events occurred during CPET procedures. One AE was reported during aerobic training. There were no significant between group differences for clinician-documented events (e.g. pain, nausea) or hematological parameters (p's > 0.05). Attendance and adherence rates to aerobic training were 82% and 66%, respectively. Intention-to-treat analysis indicated that VO2peak increased by 2.6 ± 3.5 ml/kg/min (+ 13.3%) in the AC + AET group and decreased by 1.5 ± 2.2 ml/kg/min (-8.6%) in the AC group (between group difference, p = 0.001). FACT-B increased 11.1 points in the AC + AET group compared to a 1.5 point decrease in the AC group (between group difference, p = 0.685). CONCLUSION Moderate-to-high intensity aerobic training when conducted with one-on-one supervision is a safe adjunct therapy associated with improvements in cardiopulmonary function and select PROs during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Freedman RA, Pitcher B, Keating NL, Ballman KV, Mandelblatt J, Kornblith AB, Kimmick GG, Hurria A, Winer EP, Hudis CA, Cohen HJ, Muss HB. Cognitive function in older women with breast cancer treated with standard chemotherapy and capecitabine on Cancer and Leukemia Group B 49907. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 139:607-16. [PMID: 23681403 PMCID: PMC3920483 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2562-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Accepted: 05/03/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive changes in older women receiving chemotherapy are poorly understood. We examined self-reported cognitive function for older women who received adjuvant chemotherapy on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 49907. CALGB 49907 randomized 633 women aged ≥65 with stage I-III breast cancer to standard adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil or doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide) versus capecitabine. We examined self-reported cognitive function in 297 women (CALGB 361002) who enrolled on the quality of life substudy and had no gross impairment on cognitive screening. Women were evaluated using an 18-item instrument at six time points (baseline through 24 months). At each time point for each patient, we calculated a cognitive function score (CFS) defined as the mean response of items 1-18 and defined impairment as a score >1.5 standard deviations above the overall average baseline score. Differences in scores by patient characteristics were evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis test. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess CFSs by treatment over time. Among 297 women, the median age was 71.5 (range 65-85) and 73 % had performance status of 0. Baseline depression and fatigue were reported in 6 and 14 % of patients, respectively. The average CFS at baseline was 2.08 (corresponding to "normal ability"), and baseline cognitive function did not differ by treatment regimen (p = 0.350). Over 24 months, women reported minimal changes at each time point and insignificant differences by treatment arm were observed. In a healthy group of older women, chemotherapy was not associated with longitudinal changes in self-reported cognitive function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heidi K. White
- School of Medicine; Duke University; Durham; North Carolina
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fleming ST, Kimmick GG, Sabatino SA, Cress RD, Wu XC, Trentham-Dietz A, Huang B, Hwang W, Liff JM. Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study. Ann Epidemiol 2012; 22:807-13. [PMID: 22948184 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2011] [Revised: 08/02/2012] [Accepted: 08/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Description of care patterns is important as evidence-based guidelines increasingly dictate care. We explore the level of agreement between claims and record abstraction for guideline concordant multidisciplinary breast cancer care. METHODS From the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care study, in which medical record abstraction of breast cancer and treatment was accomplished, cases include breast cancer where Medicare claims were available. Components of care were breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy, node assessment, radiation (RT), and chemotherapy (CTX), including specific chemotherapeutic agents, and combinations. We compared Medicare claims with record abstraction, and measured concordance using the kappa statistic and sensitivity. RESULTS The study sample consisted of 1762 women with stage 0 to 4 breast cancer. Level of agreement was excellent for surgery type (kappa = 0.84) and CTX (kappa = 0.89); agreement for RT therapy was slightly lower (kappa = 0.79). For standard multicomponent strategies, sensitivities and specificities were high; for example, 88.8%/93.5% for mastectomy plus nodes and 86.6%/95.4% for BCS plus nodes and RT. For selected, standard, multi-agent, adjuvant CTX regimens, sensitivities ranged from 66.3% to 68.8% (kappa 0.63-0.73). CONCLUSIONS Medicare claims, compared with chart abstraction, is a reliable method for determining patterns of multicomponent care for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven T Fleming
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kimmick GG, Camacho F, Hwang W, Mackley H, Stewart J, Anderson RT. Adjuvant Radiation and Outcomes After Breast Conserving Surgery in Publicly Insured Patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2012; 3:138-146. [PMID: 22712029 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies report that lack of adjuvant radiation (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is associated with higher short-term mortality. It is generally accepted that adjuvant RT decreases risk of breast cancer recurrence and thereby lowers long-term mortality; here, we explore reasons for its relationship to short-term mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1,583 publically insured women who had BCS between 1998 and 2002 (mean 71.8 years, range 27-101), of whom 1,346 (85%) received RT. Multivariate analyses with Cox Proportional Hazards and Logistic Regression models included: age; race; comorbidity; insurance status; tumor size; number of nodes positive; hormone receptor status; receipt of radiation; adjuvant chemotherapy; preventive care - including mammography, Pap smear and primary care visits; and hospitalization. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 52.8 months, overall mortality was significantly lower in those who received RT (HR 0.45, p<0.0001) and higher with older age (HR 1.05, p<0.0001) and greater comorbidity (HR 1.16, p=0.0007). Local recurrence was less with receipt of optimal radiation (HR 0.47; p=0.03). Breast cancer event, as determined by a clinically logical algorithm to detect breast cancer recurrence and death, however, was not significantly associated with receipt of RT (OR 1.32, p=0.2). CONCLUSION: These results imply that the higher short-term mortality in women not receiving RT after BCS is related to factors other than breast cancer recurrence.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wu XC, Lund MJ, Kimmick GG, Richardson LC, Sabatino SA, Chen VW, Fleming ST, Morris CR, Huang B, Trentham-Dietz A, Lipscomb J. Influence of race, insurance, socioeconomic status, and hospital type on receipt of guideline-concordant adjuvant systemic therapy for locoregional breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 2011; 30:142-50. [PMID: 22147735 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.36.8399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For breast cancer, guidelines direct the delivery of adjuvant systemic therapy on the basis of lymph node status, histology, tumor size, grade, and hormonal receptor status. We explored how race/ethnicity, insurance, census tract-level poverty and education, and hospital Commission on Cancer (CoC) status were associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS Locoregional breast cancers diagnosed in 2004 (n = 6,734) were from the National Program of Cancer Registries-funded seven-state Patterns of Care study of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Predictors of guideline-concordant (receiving/not receiving) adjuvant systemic therapy, according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, were explored by logistic regression. RESULTS Overall, 35% of women received nonguideline chemotherapy, 12% received nonguideline regimens, and 20% received nonguideline hormonal therapy. Significant predictors of nonguideline chemotherapy included Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.86), high-poverty areas (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96), and treatment at non-CoC hospitals (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.85), with adjustment for age, registry, and clinical variables. Predictors of nonguideline regimens among chemotherapy recipients included lack of insurance (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.92), high-poverty areas (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.97), and low-education areas (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89) after adjustment. Living in high-poverty areas (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96) and treatment at non-CoC hospitals (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.83) predicted nonguideline hormonal therapy after adjustment. ORs for poverty, education, and insurance were attenuated in the full models. CONCLUSION Sociodemographic and hospital factors are associated with guideline-concordant use of systemic therapy for breast cancer. The identification of modifiable factors that lead to nonguideline treatment may reduce disparities in breast cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1615 Poydras St, Suite 1400, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Herold CI, Chadaram V, Peterson BL, Marcom PK, Hopkins J, Kimmick GG, Favaro J, Hamilton E, Welch RA, Bacus S, Blackwell KL. Phase II Trial of Dasatinib in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Using Real-Time Pharmacodynamic Tissue Biomarkers of Src Inhibition to Escalate Dosing. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:6061-70. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-1071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
41
|
Abstract
Older adults frequently have pre-existing and cancer-related risk factors for cardiovascular toxicity from cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the risk factors and strategies for prevention and management of cardiovascular complications in older women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetan Shenoy
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Perez AT, Arun B, Tripathy D, Tagliaferri MA, Shaw HS, Kimmick GG, Cohen I, Shtivelman E, Caygill KA, Grady D, Schactman M, Shapiro CL. A phase 1B dose escalation trial of Scutellaria barbata (BZL101) for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 120:111-8. [PMID: 20054647 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0678-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2009] [Accepted: 12/04/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BZL101 (FDA IND# 59,521), an orally delivered aqueous extract from the herb Scutellaria barbata, in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The trial was an open-label, phase 1B, multicenter, dose escalation study. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed breast cancer and measurable stage IV disease. The standard phase 1 "3 + 3" study design was used to determine the MTD. Primary endpoints were toxicity and MTD of BZL101. Secondary outcomes included efficacy based on RECIST criteria. A total of 27 women with a median of 2 prior chemotherapy treatments for metastatic disease were treated in four different dose cohorts. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) were uncommon. Dose-limiting toxicities included the following: grade 4 AST elevation, grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 fatigue, and grade 3 rib pain. Fourteen patients were evaluable according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Investigator assessment classified three patients with stable disease for >120 days (21%). One patient was on BZL101 for 449 days and remains stable for 700 + days. Independent radiology review identified three patients with objective tumor regression (>0% and <30%). The MTD was not reached, thus per protocol, the MTD was defined as the maximum administered dose of BZL101 40 g/day. In conclusion, oral administration of BZL101 was safe, well tolerated, and showed promising clinical evidence of anticancer activity in this heavily pretreated population of women with MBC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Kimmick GG, Camacho F, Wei W, Balkrishnan R, Anderson R. Survival outcome is similar for first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine or taxane for metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-6091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract #6091
Background: Capecitabine is often offered as first-line treatment option for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we compare characteristics of and survival among women prescribed capecitabine or taxane monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy for MBC.
 Methods: Women receiving first-line chemotherapy for MBC from 1998 to 2005 were identified from the North Carolina tumor registry linked with Medicaid and Medicare claims records, and were followed through the end of 2005 with survival data from the National Death Index. T-tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline charactistics between patients who received first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine versus taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Overall survival was examined as average months survived post-diagnosis of metastases using Cox proportional hazard modeling. The following variables were included in the models: age, race, comorbidity, insurance coverage, hormone receptor (HR) status, time from diagnosis of metastases to first-line chemotherapy, trastuzumab use, time from initial diagnosis to metastasis, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy, and year of first-line chemotherapy.
 Results: There were 257 patients with MBC starting first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine (n=71) or a taxane (n=186). Statistically significant differences between patients treated with capecitabine versus taxane were seen for the following baseline characteristics: insurance coverage, such that women in the taxane group were more likely insured by Medicare only; time from initial diagnosis to recurrence was longer in the capecitabine group; time from metastases to first-line chemotherapy was longer in the capecitabine group. The unadjusted 1-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates were longer for the taxane treated group than for the capecitabine treated group: 72% vs 59%, p=0.002, and 75% and 63%, p=0.01. In multivariate analysis, treatment received was not associated with overall or cancer-specific survival after adjustment for baseline differences in the populations. Factors significantly associated with increased overall and cancer-specific survival were positive HR status (HR 0.65, p=0.01; HR 0.60, p=0.005), greater time from metastases until 1st line chemotherapy (for each additional month: HR 0.95, p 0.0001; HR 0.96, p=0.0004), and earlier year of 1st line chemotherapy (for each previous year compared to successive year 2005-1998: HR 0.86, p=0.022; HR 0.86, p=0.03).
 Conclusions: In this population-based study, women who received capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC were more often insured by Medicaid, had a longer disease free interval and time to first-line chemotherapy from diagnosis of metastases. In multivariate analysis, however, first-line capecitabine and taxane for MBC yielded similar survival outcomes.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6091.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GG Kimmick
- 1 Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - F Camacho
- 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | | | - R Balkrishnan
- 3 Ohio State University College of Pharmacy and School of Public Health, Columbus, OH
| | - R Anderson
- 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Increased body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and death. However, the association has not been consistent in the literature and may depend on several factors such as menopausal status, extent of disease, and receptor status. We performed a secondary analysis on what we believe is the largest prospective trial of adjuvant chemotherapy to assess the effect of BMI on prognosis in women with lymph node positive breast cancer. The study included 636 women with a median follow-up of over 13 years. Cox's proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the effect of BMI on outcomes. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival curves and log rank tests were used to assess differences in survival for BMI groups. We found that increased BMI was generally predictive of faster time to recurrence and decreased survival, but that the relationship was stronger for younger women, those with progesterone receptor negative disease and those with a greater number of lymph nodes that were positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Z Vitolins
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Anderson RT, Kimmick GG, Camacho F, Whitmire JT, Dickinson C, Levine EA, Torti FM, Balkrishnan R. Health system correlates of receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: a study of low-income Medicaid-enrolled women. Am J Manag Care 2008; 14:644-652. [PMID: 18837642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe patient and healthcare system correlates of receipt of recommended care in North Carolina (NC) as indicated by receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Subjects were 344 women diagnosed as having primary breast cancer in 1998 and 1999, who were classified as being alive at least 12 months after treatment with BCS. Medicaid claims were used to supplement central cancer registry (CCR) data about adjuvant RT, and hospital medical record verification was performed when no RT was documented. Health system characteristics (size and volume) were obtained from existing databases. RESULTS Of 344 NC women enrolled in Medicaid and treated with BCS, one third did not receive RT. The following patient and health system characteristics were associated with lack of receipt of adjuvant RT after BCS: older age (>or=65 years), residing in a low-population density county, receiving BCS at a smaller hospital, and living in a county classified as a whole-county specialist scarcity area. CONCLUSIONS Some low-income women do not access RT following BCS, placing them at risk for worse outcomes than those associated with standard mastectomy. We identify geographic isolation and scarcity of healthcare specialists as possible leverage points for interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger T Anderson
- Department of Public Health Services, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kimmick GG, Cirrincione C, Duggan DB, Bhalla K, Robert N, Berry D, Norton L, Lemke S, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Winer E. Fifteen-year median follow-up results after neoadjuvant doxorubicin, followed by mastectomy, followed by adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) followed by radiation for stage III breast cancer: a phase II trial (CALGB 8944). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 113:479-90. [PMID: 18306034 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9943-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2008] [Accepted: 02/12/2008] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe long-term results of a multimodality strategy for stage III breast cancer utilizing neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by mastectomy, CMF, and radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with biopsy-proven, clinical stage III breast cancer and adequate organ function were eligible. Neoadjuvant doxorubicin (30 mg/m(2) days 1-3, every 28 days for 4 cycles) was followed by mastectomy, in stable or responding patients. Sixteen weeks of postoperative CMF followed (continuous oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day); methotrexate (0.7 mg/kg IV) and fluorouracil (12 mg/kg IV) weekly, weeks 1-8, and than biweekly, weeks 9-16). Radiation therapy followed adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Clinical response rate was 71% (79/111, 95% CI = 62-79%), with 19% complete clinical response. Pathologic complete response was 5% (95% CI = 2-11%). Median follow-up is 15.6 years. Half of the patients progressed by 2.2 years; half died by 5.4 years (range 6 months-15 years). The hazard of dying was greatest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter. Time to progression and overall survival were predicted by number of pathologically involved lymph nodes (TTP: HR [10 vs. 1 node] 2.40, 95% CI = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 2.50, 95% CI = 1.74-3.58, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS After multimodality treatment for locally advanced breast cancer, long-term survival was correlated with the number of pathologically positive lymph nodes, but not to clinical response. The hazard of death was highest during the first 5 years after diagnosis and declined thereafter, indicating a possible intermediate endpoint for future trials of neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G G Kimmick
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke South, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kimmick GG, Lovato J, McQuellon R, Robinson E, Muss HB. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of sertraline (Zoloft) for the treatment of hot flashes in women with early stage breast cancer taking tamoxifen. Breast J 2006; 12:114-22. [PMID: 16509835 DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122x.2006.00218.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We observed the relief of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors taking tamoxifen and treated with sertraline for depression. Our objective was to assess the effect of sertraline on the frequency and severity of hot flashes, mood status, and health-related quality of life. We used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study using 6 weeks of sertraline (50 mg each morning) versus placebo. Study participants were 62 breast cancer survivors from an oncology clinic in a tertiary care center on adjuvant tamoxifen reporting bothersome hot flashes. Patients were asked to keep a daily hot flash diary to record hot flash frequency and severity, from which hot flash scores (frequency x severity) were calculated. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Breast (FACT-B) (at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks) were used to assess mood and quality of life. Sixty-two women were accrued. Forty-seven women (median age 53.9 years, range 36.6-77.1 years; 89% postmenopausal; 85.5% Caucasian) completed the first 6 weeks and 39 completed 12 weeks. The baseline daily hot flash frequency and score were 5.8 (standard deviation 4.1) and 11.5 (14.0), respectively. At the end of the first 6 weeks, hot flash frequency decreased by 50% in 36% of those taking sertraline compared to 27% taking placebo. In the crossover analysis, sertraline was significantly more effective than placebo: women crossing from placebo to sertraline had a decrease (-0.9 and -1.7) in hot flash frequency and score, whereas those crossing from sertraline to placebo had an increase (1.5 and 3.4) in hot flash frequency and score (p = 0.03 and 0.03). Forty-eight percent preferred the sertraline period, 11% preferred the placebo period, and 41% had no preference (p = 0.006). Measures of depression and quality of life were within normal range and did not change significantly within treatment groups. Sertraline decreases hot flashes in breast cancer survivors taking tamoxifen and women prefer sertraline to placebo. Further study of sertraline for the management of hot flashes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen G Kimmick
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kimmick GG, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Mandelblatt J, Johnson JL, Wheeler J, Heinze R, Cohen HJ, Muss HB. In Reply. J Clin Oncol 2005. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.02.8787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Judith Wheeler
- Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Robin Heinze
- Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kimmick GG, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Mandelblatt J, Johnson JL, Wheeler J, Heinze R, Cohen HJ, Muss HB. Improving Accrual of Older Persons to Cancer Treatment Trials: A Randomized Trial Comparing an Educational Intervention With Standard Information: CALGB 360001. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2201-7. [PMID: 15800312 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.01.222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To design and test a geriatric educational intervention to improve accrual of cancer patients age 65 years and older to cooperative group–sponsored treatment trials. Methods Main member institutions of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) and its affiliates were randomly assigned to receive standard information (n = 73) or educational intervention (n = 53). Standard information included CALGB Web site access and periodic notification about existing trials. The geriatric educational intervention included standard information plus: (1) an educational seminar; (2) educational materials; (3) a list of available protocols for use on charts; (4) a monthly e-mail and mail reminders for 1 year; and (5) a case discussion seminar. The main outcome was percentage of accrual of older persons to phase II and III treatment protocols after study initiation compared with baseline. Results There were 3,032 patients entered onto trials in the baseline year, and 2,160 and 1,239 during the 2 years postintervention, respectively. Overall percentage of accrual of older patients was 37% at baseline, and 33% and 31% during the first and second years after intervention. There was no improvement in accrual in the intervention versus control arm: 36% v 32% in the first year and 31% v 31% in the second year. Conclusion Accrual of older patients was not increased by this intervention. Reasons for lack of effect include low intervention intensity, high baseline accrual rates, and closure of several high-accruing protocols during the study. More intense and multifaceted approaches will be needed to change physician (and patient) behavior and to increase accrual of older persons to clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen G Kimmick
- Duke University Medical Center, Suite 3800 Duke S, Box 3204, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kimmick GG, Shelton BJ, Case LD, Cooper MR, Muss HB. Long-term follow-up of a phase II trial studying a weekly doxorubicin-based multiple drug adjuvant therapy for stage II node-positive carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 72:233-43. [PMID: 12058965 DOI: 10.1023/a:1014953407098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination chemotherapy improves outcomes in women with breast cancer (BC) that involves axillary nodes. This single-arm study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive doxorubicin-based multidrug regimen as adjuvant therapy in women with stage II, node positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 7/80 and 8/85, 654 women, aged 25-73, who had a mastectomy for stage IIB BC were accrued. Patients with prior RT, chemotherapy, or surgical or radiation castration within 1 year of diagnosis were excluded. Treatment consisted of: 6 weekly courses of IV cyclophosphamide (C) 400 mg/m2, doxorubicin (A) 10 mg/m2, vincristine (V) I mg/m2, fluorouracil (F) 400 mg/m2, and a tapering course of prednisone followed by 12 courses of C 400 mg/m2, A 20mg/m2, V 1 mg/m2, F 400 mg/m2 given every 2 weeks. Patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors received Tamoxifen 10 mg bid between weeks 8 and 30. Treatment did not exceed 8 months. Median follow-up is 13.1 years. RESULTS Six hundred thirty six patients are eligible. Fewer positive (+) nodes, premenopausal status, and positive progesterone receptor status are significantly (p < 0.05) associated with longer survival. At 10 years, 61% were relapse-free in the 1-3 +node group compared to 37 and 21% in the 4-9 and > or = 10 +node groups, respectively (p = 0.0001). Relapse-free survival at 10 years is 50% for premenopausal and 45% for postmenopausal patients. Severe or life-threatening hematological toxicity was seen in 6/630 (< 1%) patients. Four patients had severe (grade 3) neurotoxicity which resolved. No cardiac toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION This adjuvant regimen compares favorably to other published adjuvant treatments with similar length of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen G Kimmick
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1082, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|