Hypereosinophilic syndrome: a rare cause of ST-elevation myocardial infarction and thrombus formation on the aortic valve

We present a case of a man in his 30s presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and eosinophilia. The patient underwent thrombus aspiration and initially echocardiographic evaluation was normal. The patient was discharged after 2 days, but was hospitalised again after 6 days. Echocardiographic evaluation now revealed a thrombus formation on the aortic valve. Laboratory data revealed increasing eosinophilia, and treatment with high-dosage corticosteroids and hydroxyurea was initiated as eosinophilic disease with organ manifestations could not be precluded. Eosinophils normalised and the patient was discharged again. The combination of hypereosinophilia and absence of infection, rheumatological disorders and malignancy, led to reactive or idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome being the most plausible diagnoses. The patient was closely monitored in the cardiology and haematology outpatient clinics. Echocardiographic evaluation, performed 6 weeks after the patient was discharged, showed significant regression in the size of the thrombus mass.

Work Disability and Return to Work After Treatment for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Purpose

Most adult patients diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are below retirement age. The overall survival of patients with ALL has improved with implementation of high intensity pediatric-inspired treatment protocols. However, this treatment comes with a risk of long-term complications, which could affect the ability to work. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of disability pension (DP) and return to work (RTW) for patients with ALL.

Patients and Methods

Patients aged 18-60 years diagnosed with ALL between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the Danish National Acute Leukemia Registry. Each patient was matched with five comparators from the general population on birth year, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to calculate the cumulative risk of DP for patients and comparators from index date (defined as 1 year after diagnosis) with competing events (transplantation or relapse, death, retirement pension, or early retirement pension). Differences in cumulative incidences were calculated using Gray's test. RTW was calculated as proportions one, three, and five years after the index date for patients holding a job before diagnosis.

Results

A total of 154 patients with ALL and 770 matched comparators were included. The 5-year cumulative risk of DP was increased fivefold for patients with ALL compared with the general population. RTW was 41.7%, 65.7%, and 60.7% one, three, and five years after the index date, respectively.

Conclusion

The risk of DP in patients with ALL increased significantly compared with the general population. Five years after the index date, RTW was 60.7% for patients with ALL.

The multidisciplinary approach to eosinophilia

Eosinophilic granulocytes are normally present in low numbers in the bloodstream. Patients with an increased number of eosinophilic granulocytes in the differential count (eosinophilia) are common and can pose a clinical challenge because conditions with eosinophilia occur in all medical specialties. The diagnostic approach must be guided by a thorough medical history, supported by specific tests to guide individualized treatment. Neoplastic (primary) eosinophilia is identified by one of several unique acquired genetic causes. In contrast, reactive (secondary) eosinophilia is associated with a cytokine stimulus in a specific disease, while idiopathic eosinophilia is a diagnosis by exclusion. Rational treatment is disease-directed in secondary cases and has paved the way for targeted treatment against the driver in primary eosinophilia, whereas idiopathic cases are treated as needed by principles in eosinophilia originating from clonal drivers. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with secondary eosinophilia and are managed by the relevant specialty-e.g., rheumatology, allergy, dermatology, gastroenterology, pulmonary medicine, hematology, or infectious disease. The overlap in symptoms and the risk of irreversible organ involvement in eosinophilia, irrespective of the cause, warrants that patients without a diagnostic clarification or who do not respond to adequate treatment should be referred to a multidisciplinary function anchored in a hematology department for evaluation. This review presents the pathophysiology, manifestations, differential diagnosis, diagnostic workup, and management of (adult) patients with eosinophilia. The purpose is to place eosinophilia in a clinical context, and therefore justify and inspire the establishment of a multidisciplinary team of experts from diagnostic and clinical specialties at the regional level to support the second opinion. The target patient population requires highly specialized laboratory analysis and therapy and occasionally has severe eosinophil-induced organ dysfunction. An added value of a centralized, clinical function is to serve as a platform for education and research to further improve the management of patients with eosinophilia. Primary and idiopathic eosinophilia are key topics in the review, which also address current research and discusses outstanding issues in the field.