Increased QRS duration and dispersion are associated with mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular apical pacing

BACKGROUND

Permanent right ventricular apical pacing may have negative effects on ventricular function and contribute to development of heart failure. We aimed to assess intra- and interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular apical pacing, and to establish electrocardiographic markers of dyssynchrony.

METHODS

84 patients (46:38 male:female) who required permanent pacing were studied. Pacing was done from right ventricular apex in all patients. We measured QRS duration and dispersion on standard 12-lead ECG. Intra- and interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were followed-up for 24 months.  Results: Six months after implantation, QRS duration increased from 128.02 ms to 132.40 ms, p≤0.05. At 24 months, QRS dispersion increased from 43.26 ms to 46.13 ms, p≤0.05. Intra- and interventricular dyssynchrony increased and left ventricular ejection fraction decreased during follow-up. A QRS dispersion of 47 ms predicted left ventricular dysfunction and long-term electromechanical dyssynchrony with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 76%.  Conclusion: In patients with permanent right ventricular apical pacing there is an increased duration and dispersion of QRS related to dyssynchrony and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. This study shows that QRS dispersion could be a better predictive variable than QRS duration for identifying left ventricular ejection fraction worsening in patients with permanent right ventricular apical pacing. The electrocardiogram is a simple tool for predicting systolic function worsening in these patients and can be used at the bedside for early diagnosis in the absence of clinical symptoms, allowing adjustments of medical treatment to prevent progression of heart failure and improve the patient's quality of life.

Vectorial theory surpasses the local theory in explaining the origin of P-wave dispersion

BACKGROUND

Local theory and the vectorial theory are used to explain the origin of P-wave dispersion (PWD). There are no previous studies that analyze both at the same time.

OBJECTIVES

We set out to determine the implication of local and vectorial theories in the origin of PWD.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing electrophysiological study. Inhomogeneous atrial conduction was evaluated by atrial electrogram dispersion in terms of duration (EGM_durdis) and morphology (EGM_morph dis). P-distal coronary sinus interval (P-DCS) was also measured. P-wave was measured twice, firstly at a calibration of 20 mm/mV and a sweep speed of 50 mm/s, enhancement 10× (basic measurement [BM]), and second time at sweep speed of 150 mm/s, enhancement 80-160× (high precision measurement [HPM]).

RESULTS

PWD with BM was 48 ms [36-54 ms] while with HPM it was 4 ms [0-10 ms], p < 0.001. With BM, maximum and minimum P- wave duration presented a moderate correlation (r = 0.342; p < 0.001), using HPM it becomes strong (r = 0.750; p < 0.001). In cases with P-DCS < 80 ms (r = 0.965; p < 0.001), but not with P-DCS ≥ 80 ms (r = 0.649; p < 0.001), the previous correlation became almost perfect with HPM. EGM_durdis and EGM_morphdis were weak but significantly correlated with PWD. This correlation became moderate in patients with P-DCS ≥ 80 ms and disappeared in those with P-DCS, using BM and HPM.

CONCLUSION

Vectorial theory explains almost entirely the PWD phenomenon. Inhomogeneous conduction could be an additional mechanism to explain PWD, but its contribution is small.

New Parameter of the Second Half of the P-Wave, P-Wave Duration, and Atrial Conduction Times Predict Atrial Fibrillation during Electrophysiological Studies

OBJECTIVE

Several P-wave parameters reflect atrial conduction characteristics and have been used to predict atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between maximum P-wave duration (PMax) and new P-wave parameters, with atrial conduction times (CT), and to assess their predictive value of AF during electrophysiological studies (AF-EPS).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing EPS. The patients were divided into 2 groups designated as no AF-EPS and AF-EPS, depending on whether AF occurred during EPS or not. Different P-wave parameters and atrial CT were compared for both study groups. Subsequently, the predictive value of the P-wave parameters and the atrial CT for AF-EPS was evaluated.

RESULTS

The values of CT, PMax, and maximum Ppeak-Pend interval (Pp-eMax) were significantly higher in patients with AF-EPS. Almost all P-wave parameters were correlated with the left CT. PMax, Pp-eMax, and CT were univariate and multivariate predictors of AF-EPS. The largest ROC area was presented by interatrial CT (0.852; p < 0.001; cutoff value: ≥82.5 ms; sensitivity: 91.1%; specificity: 81.1%). Pp-eMax showed greater sensitivity (79.5%) to discriminate AF-EPS than PMax (72.7%), but the latter had better specificity (60.4% vs. 41.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial CT were directly and significantly correlated with PMax and almost all the parameters of the second half of the P-wave. CT, PMax, and Pp-eMax (new parameter) were good predictors of AF-EPS, although CT did more robustly.

Atrial conduction explains the occurrence of the P-wave dispersion phenomenon, but weakly

BACKGROUND

P-wave dispersion (PWD) is believed to be caused by inhomogeneous atrial conduction. This statement, however, is based on limited little solid evidence. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between atrial conduction and PWD by means of invasive electrophysiological studies.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in 153 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) undergoing an electrophysiological study. Different atrial conduction times were measured and correlated with PWD.

RESULTS

Only the interatrial (P-DCS) and left intra-atrial conduction times (ΔDCS-PCS) showed a significant correlation with PWD, but this correlation was weak. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined that both P-DCS (β = 0.242; P = .008) and ΔDCS-PCS (β = 0.295; P < .001) are independent predictors of PWD. Performing the multivariate analysis for arrhythmic substrates, it is observed that only ΔDCS-PCS continued to be an independent predictor of PWD. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that regardless of the types of arrhythmic substrates, PWD discriminates significantly, but moderately, to patients with P-DCS and ΔDCS-PCS ≥75 percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times were directly and significantly correlated with PWD, but only weakly, and were independent predictors of PWD. In general, PWD correctly discriminates patients with high values in interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times, but moderately. This is maintained in cases with accessory pathways; however, in patients with AVNRT it only does so for intraleft atrial conduction times. Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times weakly explains PWD.