Deep learning performance compared to healthcare experts in detecting wrist fractures from radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning (DL) algorithms in the diagnosis of wrist fractures (WF) on plain wrist radiographs, taking healthcare experts consensus as reference standard.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched in the period from 1 Jan 2012 to 9 March 2023. Eligible studies were patients with wrist radiographs for radial and ulnar fractures as the target condition, studies using DL algorithms based on convolutional neural networks (CNN), and healthcare experts consensus as the minimum reference standard. Studies were assessed with a modified QUADAS-2 tool, and we applied a bivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.

RESULTS

Our study was registered at PROSPERO with ID: CRD42023431398. We included 6 unique studies for meta-analysis, with a total of 33,026 radiographs. CNN performance compared to reference standards for the included articles found a summary sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 80%-97%) and a summary specificity of 93% (95% CI: 76%-98%). The generalized bivariate I-squared statistic indicated considerable heterogeneity between the studies (81.90%). Four studies had one or more domains at high risk of bias and two studies had concerns regarding applicability.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of CNNs was comparable to that of healthcare experts in wrist radiographs for investigation of WF. There is a need for studies with a robust reference standard, external data-set validation and investigation of diagnostic performance of healthcare experts aided with CNNs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

DL matches healthcare experts in diagnosing WFs, which potentially benefits patient diagnosis.

Sedimentation of formed elements in distally ischaemic flaps

Our aim was to find out whether thrombosis has a key role in distally ischaemic flaps and whether heparin improves flap survival in distally ischaemic myocutaneous and pure skin flaps in pigs. In experiment 1 we measured the concentration of coagulation factors in the venous effluent from both viable flaps and distally ischaemic flaps. In experiment 2 radioactively labelled blood components (red cells, platelets and fibrinogen) were injected intravenously and the distribution of each tracer was measured. In experiment 3 either heparin or saline was given as a local, continuous direct intra-arterial infusion. Fluorescein was used in all experiments to estimate the eventual flap survival. Our results indicate that thrombosis is not an important factor in distal ischaemia, and that heparin did not improve survival. Instead, there seems to be selective pooling of formed elements in the ischaemic portion of the flap.