1
|
Kuut TA, Buffart LM, Braamse AMJ, Csorba I, Bleijenberg G, Nieuwkerk P, Moss-Morris R, Müller F, Knoop H. Does the effect of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) vary by patient characteristics? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2024; 54:447-456. [PMID: 37927223 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723003148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Debate is ongoing on the efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). With an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis we investigated whether the effect of CBT varied by patient characteristics. These included post-exertional malaise (PEM), a central feature of ME/CFS according to many. We searched for randomized controlled trials similar with respect to comparison condition, outcomes and treatment-protocol. Moderation on fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength, subscale fatigue severity), functional impairment (Sickness Impact Profile-8) and physical functioning (Short Form-36, subscale physical functioning) was investigated using linear mixed model analyses and interaction tests. PROSPERO (CRD42022358245). Data from eight trials (n = 1298 patients) were pooled. CBT showed beneficial effects on fatigue severity (β = -11.46, 95% CI -15.13 to -7.79); p < 0.001, functional impairment (β = -448.40, 95% CI -625.58 to -271.23); p < 0.001; and physical functioning (β = 9.64, 95% CI 3.30 to 15.98); p < 0.001. The effect of CBT on fatigue severity varied by age (pinteraction = 0.003), functional impairment (pinteraction = 0.045) and physical activity pattern (pinteraction = 0.027). Patients who were younger, reported less functional impairments and had a fluctuating activity pattern benefitted more. The effect on physical functioning varied by self-efficacy (pinteraction = 0.025), with patients with higher self-efficacy benefitting most. No other moderators were found. It can be concluded from this study that CBT for ME/CFS can lead to significant reductions of fatigue, functional impairment, and physical limitations. There is no indication patients meeting different case definitions or reporting additional symptoms benefit less from CBT. Our findings do not support recent guidelines in which evidence from studies not mandating PEM was downgraded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Kuut
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L M Buffart
- Department of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A M J Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Csorba
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Moss-Morris
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - F Müller
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Penson A, Walraven I, Bronkhorst E, Grootenhuis MA, Maurice-Stam H, de Beijer I, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Tissing WJE, van der Pal HJH, de Vries ACH, Bresters D, Ronckers CM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Neggers S, Versluys BAB, Louwerens M, Pluijm SMF, Blijlevens N, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Kremer LCM, Knoop H, Loonen J. Chronic fatigue in childhood cancer survivors is associated with lifestyle and psychosocial factors; a DCCSS LATER study. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102044. [PMID: 37922688 PMCID: PMC10774970 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with chronic fatigue (CF) in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants were included from the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS) LATER cohort, a nationwide cohort of CCS (≥5 years after diagnosis) and siblings as controls. Fatigue severity was assessed with the 'fatigue severity subscale' of the Checklist Individual Strength ('CIS-fatigue'). CF was defined as scoring ≥35 on the 'CIS-fatigue' and having fatigue symptoms for ≥6 months. Twenty-four parameters were assessed, categorized into assumed fatigue triggering, maintaining and moderating factors. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to investigate the association of these factors with CF. RESULTS A total of 1927 CCS participated in the study (40.7% of invited cohort), of whom 23.6% reported CF (compared with 15.6% in sibling controls, P < 0.001). The following factors were associated with CF: obesity [versus healthy weight, odds ratio (OR) 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-2.87], moderate physical inactivity (versus physical active, OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.67-3.34), poor sleep (yes versus no, OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.54-2.68), (sub)clinical anxiety (yes versus no, OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.10-2.19), (sub)clinical depression (yes versus no, OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.20-3.59), pain (continuous, OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.33-1.66), self-esteem (continuous, OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.98), helplessness (continuous, OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.08-1.19), social functioning (continuous, OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99) and female sex (versus male sex, OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.36-2.37). CONCLUSION CF is a prevalent symptom in CCS that is associated with several assumed maintaining factors, with lifestyle and psychosocial factors being the most prominent. These are modifiable factors and may therefore be beneficial to prevent or reduce CF in CCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Penson
- Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Nijmegen.
| | - I Walraven
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - E Bronkhorst
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | | | | | - I de Beijer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht
| | | | - W J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital/University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | | | - A C H de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht
| | - C M Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UMCU, Utrecht
| | - S Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Department of Medicine, Section Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam
| | | | - M Louwerens
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden
| | - S M F Pluijm
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht
| | - N Blijlevens
- Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Nijmegen
| | | | - L C M Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Loonen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship, Department of Hematology, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Veldman MHJ, van der Aa HPA, Knoop H, Bode C, Hulshof CTJ, van der Ham L, van Rens GHMB, Heymans MW, van Nispen RMA. Usability and feasibility of E-nergEYEze: a blended vision-specific E-health based cognitive behavioral therapy and self-management intervention to reduce fatigue in adults with visual impairment. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1271. [PMID: 37974261 PMCID: PMC10655361 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 50% of adults with visual impairment experience severe fatigue. Therefore, we developed a guided E-health intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy and self-management to reduce fatigue in this population. This pilot study evaluated the usability, feasibility, fidelity and potential effectiveness of E-nergEYEze. METHODS E-nergEYEze was developed by a design team and customized by conducting a pilot study using an iterative development strategy. The intervention was first tested in a usability study among adults with visual impairment (n = 5). Participants were asked to think-aloud while exploring the intervention features and a semi-structured interview was performed afterwards. Subsequently, the enhanced intervention was tested in a feasibility study. Adults with visual impairment and severe fatigue (n = 10) followed the intervention partially with guidance from a social worker and one-time computer trainer support. Fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength), fatigue impact (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale) and cognitive behavioral therapy skills (Competencies of Cognitive Therapy Scale-Self Report) were measured at baseline and at three months follow-up and analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The intervention was evaluated through evaluation forms. RESULTS The usability study resulted in adjustments to content and lay-out with regard to optically shortened text sentences, separate pages for information and assignments with one read-aloud audio and an additional descriptive explanation of page content. Digital challenges were overcome with mandatory computer training and e-platform modifications. The feasibility study showed a positive trend in reducing fatigue severity (Z -6.108; P < .001; SD 8.4), impact of fatigue (Z - 4.451; P < .001; SD 11.4) and cognitive behavioral therapy skills (Z -2.278; P = .023; SD 19.3). Participants gave useful feedback regarding accessibility, content and guidance, with an overall positive experience. The intervention was rated with a median score of 8 (range 7-10). CONCLUSION We developed, evaluated and optimized E-nergEYEze by applying a user-centered and iterative approach. E-nergEYEze showed a promising trend to reduce fatigue severity and impact of fatigue and to increase cognitive behavioral therapy skills. The study methods were feasible and the fidelity of the intervention protocol was suitable. Performing a randomized controlled trial is warranted to give insight into whether E-nergEYEze is cost-effective in reducing severe fatigue in adults with visual impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Clinical Trial Registry Platform: NL7764. Date registered: 28-05-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H J Veldman
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Mental Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - H P A van der Aa
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Mental Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Departments of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Bode
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - C T J Hulshof
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L van der Ham
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G H M B van Rens
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M A van Nispen
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Mental Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Verveen A, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, Csorba I, Coomans EM, Koch DW, Appelman B, Barkhof F, Boellaard R, de Bree G, van de Giessen EM, Golla S, van Heugten CM, Horn J, Hulst HE, de Jong MD, Kuut TA, van der Maaden T, van Os YMG, Prins M, Slooter AJC, Visser-Meily JMA, van Vugt M, van den Wijngaard CC, Nieuwkerk PT, Knoop H, Tolboom N, van Berckel BNM. Neurobiological basis and risk factors of persistent fatigue and concentration problems after COVID-19: study protocol for a prospective case-control study (VeCosCO). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072611. [PMID: 37399444 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The risk factors for persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints after infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the underlying pathophysiology are largely unknown. Both clinical factors and cognitive-behavioural factors have been suggested to play a role in the perpetuation of complaints. A neurobiological aetiology, such as neuroinflammation, could be the underlying pathophysiological mechanism for persisting complaints.To unravel factors associated with persisting complaints, VeCosCO will compare individuals with and without persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints >3 months after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The study consists of two work packages. The first work package aims to (1) investigate the relation between persisting complaints and neuropsychological functioning; (2) determine risk factors and at-risk phenotypes for the development of persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints, including the presence of postexertional malaise and (3) describe consequences of persistent complaints on quality of life, healthcare consumption and physical functioning. The second work package aims to (1) determine the presence of neuroinflammation with [18F]DPA-714 whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with persisting complaints and (2) explore the relationship between (neuro)inflammation and brain structure and functioning measured with MRI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective case-control study in participants with and without persistent fatigue and cognitive complaints, >3 months after laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants will be mainly included from existing COVID-19 cohorts in the Netherlands covering the full spectrum of COVID-19 acute disease severity. Primary outcomes are neuropsychological functioning, postexertional malaise, neuroinflammation measured using [18F]DPA-714 PET, and brain functioning and structure using (f)MRI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Work package 1 (NL79575.018.21) and 2 (NL77033.029.21) were approved by the medical ethical review board of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (The Netherlands). Informed consent is required prior to participation in the study. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and shared with the key population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Verveen
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Csorba
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dook W Koch
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brent Appelman
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Godelieve de Bree
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsmarieke M van de Giessen
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep Golla
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janneke Horn
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke E Hulst
- Anatomy & Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical, Health and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Menno D de Jong
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Microbiology & Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja A Kuut
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa van der Maaden
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne M G van Os
- Human Resources, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Prins
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J C Slooter
- Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Center, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Neurology, UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michele van Vugt
- Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cees C van den Wijngaard
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - P T Nieuwkerk
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
den Boer I, Hendrix YMGA, Knoop H, van Pampus MG. Identifying women with fear of childbirth with the Dutch Fear of Birth Scale and its added value for consultations. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 43:419-425. [PMID: 34907846 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2021.2013797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Determine whether the Fear of Birth Scale (FOBS) is a useful screening instrument for Fear of Childbirth (FoC) and examine the potential added value of screening by analyzing how often pregnant women discuss their FoC during consultation. METHODS This cross-sectional survey study included nulliparous pregnant women of all gestational ages, recruited via the internet, hospital and midwifery practices. The online questionnaires included the FOBS and Wijma Delivery Expectations Questionnaire version A (W-DEQ A). The latter was used as golden standard for assessing FoC (cutoff: ≥85). RESULTS Of the 364 included women, 67 (18.4%) had FoC according to the W-DEQ A. Using the FOBS with a cutoff score of ≥49, the sensitivity was 82.1% and the specificity 81.1%, with 111 (30.5%) women identified as having FoC. Positive predictive value was 49.5% and negative predictive value 95.3%. Of the women with FoC (FOBS ≥49), 68 (61.3%) did not discuss FoC with their caregiver. CONCLUSION The FOBS is a useful screening instrument for FoC. A positive score must be followed by further assessment, either by discussing it during consultation or additional evaluation with the W-DEQ A. The majority of pregnant women with FoC do not discuss their fears, underscoring the need for screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I den Boer
- Department of Medical Psychology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y M G A Hendrix
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G van Pampus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Cruchten RTP, van As D, Glennon JC, van Engelen BGM, 't Hoen PAC, Wenninger S, Daidj F, Cumming S, Littleford R, Monckton DG, Lochmüller H, Catt M, Faber CG, Hapca A, Donnan PT, Gorman G, Bassez G, Schoser B, Knoop H, Treweek S, Wansink DG, Impens F, Gabriels R, Claeys T, Ravel-Chapuis A, Jasmin BJ, Mahon N, Nieuwenhuis S, Martens L, Novak P, Furling D, Baak A, Gourdon G, MacKenzie A, Martinat C, Neault N, Roos A, Duchesne E, Salz R, Thompson R, Baghdoyan S, Varghese AM, Blom P, Spendiff S, Manta A. Clinical improvement of DM1 patients reflected by reversal of disease-induced gene expression in blood. BMC Med 2022; 20:395. [PMID: 36352383 PMCID: PMC9646470 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02591-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an incurable multisystem disease caused by a CTG-repeat expansion in the DM1 protein kinase (DMPK) gene. The OPTIMISTIC clinical trial demonstrated positive and heterogenous effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on the capacity for activity and social participations in DM1 patients. Through a process of reverse engineering, this study aims to identify druggable molecular biomarkers associated with the clinical improvement in the OPTIMISTIC cohort. METHODS Based on full blood samples collected during OPTIMISTIC, we performed paired mRNA sequencing for 27 patients before and after the CBT intervention. Linear mixed effect models were used to identify biomarkers associated with the disease-causing CTG expansion and the mean clinical improvement across all clinical outcome measures. RESULTS We identified 608 genes for which their expression was significantly associated with the CTG-repeat expansion, as well as 1176 genes significantly associated with the average clinical response towards the intervention. Remarkably, all 97 genes associated with both returned to more normal levels in patients who benefited the most from CBT. This main finding has been replicated based on an external dataset of mRNA data of DM1 patients and controls, singling these genes out as candidate biomarkers for therapy response. Among these candidate genes were DNAJB12, HDAC5, and TRIM8, each belonging to a protein family that is being studied in the context of neurological disorders or muscular dystrophies. Across the different gene sets, gene pathway enrichment analysis revealed disease-relevant impaired signaling in, among others, insulin-, metabolism-, and immune-related pathways. Furthermore, evidence for shared dysregulations with another neuromuscular disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, was found, suggesting a partial overlap in blood-based gene dysregulation. CONCLUSIONS DM1-relevant disease signatures can be identified on a molecular level in peripheral blood, opening new avenues for drug discovery and therapy efficacy assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco T P van Cruchten
- Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniël van As
- Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey C Glennon
- Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Baziel G M van Engelen
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A C 't Hoen
- Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kuut TA, Müller F, Aldenkamp A, Assmann-Schuilwerve E, Braamse A, Geerlings SE, Gibney KB, Kanaan RAA, Nieuwkerk P, Olde Hartman TC, Pauëlsen D, Prins M, Slieker K, Van Vugt M, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Keijmel SP, Knoop H. A randomised controlled trial testing the efficacy of Fit after COVID, a cognitive behavioural therapy targeting severe post-infectious fatigue following COVID-19 (ReCOVer): study protocol. Trials 2021; 22:867. [PMID: 34857010 PMCID: PMC8637041 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05569-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) results in debilitating long-term symptoms, often referred to as Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC), in a substantial subgroup of patients. One of the most prevalent symptoms following COVID-19 is severe fatigue. Prompt delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), an evidence-based treatment that has shown benefit in reducing severe fatigue in other conditions, may reduce post-COVID-19 fatigue. Based on an existing CBT protocol, a blended intervention of 17 weeks, Fit after COVID, was developed to treat severe fatigue after the acute phase of infection with SARS-CoV-2. METHOD The ReCOVer study is a multicentre 2-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of Fit after COVID on severe post-infectious fatigue. Participants are eligible if they report severe fatigue 3 up to and including 12 months following COVID-19. One hundred and fourteen participants will be randomised to either Fit after COVID or care as usual (ratio 1:1). The primary outcome, the fatigue severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-fatigue), is assessed in both groups before randomisation (T0), directly post CBT or following care as usual (T1), and at follow-up 6 months after the second assessment (T2). In addition, a long-term follow-up (T3), 12 months after the second assessment, is performed in the CBT group only. The primary objective is to investigate whether CBT will lead to a significantly lower mean fatigue severity score measured with the CIS-fatigue across the first two follow-up assessments (T1 and T2) as compared to care as usual. Secondary objectives are to determine the proportion of participants no longer being severely fatigued (operationalised in different ways) at T1 and T2 and to investigate changes in physical and social functioning, in the number and severity of somatic symptoms and in problems concentrating across T1 and T2. DISCUSSION This is the first trial testing a cognitive behavioural intervention targeting severe fatigue after COVID-19. If Fit after COVID is effective in reducing fatigue severity following COVID-19, this intervention could contribute to alleviating the long-term health consequences of COVID-19 by relieving one of its most prevalent and distressing long-term symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register NL8947 . Registered on 14 October 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Kuut
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - F Müller
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Aldenkamp
- Department of Lung Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S E Geerlings
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K B Gibney
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R A A Kanaan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - P Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T C Olde Hartman
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Pauëlsen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Prins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Slieker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - M Van Vugt
- Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C P Bleeker-Rovers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S P Keijmel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Verdam MGE, van Ballegooijen W, Holtmaat CJM, Knoop H, Lancee J, Oort FJ, Riper H, van Straten A, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, de Wit M, van der Zweerde T, Sprangers MAG. Re-evaluating randomized clinical trials of psychological interventions: Impact of response shift on the interpretation of trial results. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252035. [PMID: 34032803 PMCID: PMC8148324 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effectiveness of psychological treatment is often assessed using patient-reported health evaluations. However, comparison of such scores over time can be hampered due to a change in the meaning of self-evaluations, called ‘response shift’. Insight into the occurrence of response shift seems especially relevant in the context of psychological interventions, as they often purposefully intend to change patients’ frames of reference. Aims The overall aim is to gain insight into the general relevance of response shift for psychological health intervention research. Specifically, the aim is to re-analyse data of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of psychological interventions targeting different health aspects, to assess (1) the occurrence of response shift, (2) the impact of response shift on interpretation of treatment effectiveness, and (3) the predictive role of clinical and background variables for detected response shift. Method We re-analysed data from RCTs on guided internet delivered cognitive behavioural treatment (CBT) for insomnia in the general population with and without elevated depressive symptoms, an RCT on meaning-centred group psychotherapy targeting personal meaning for cancer survivors, and an RCT on internet-based CBT treatment for persons with diabetes with elevated depressive symptoms. Structural equation modelling was used to test the three objectives. Results We found indications of response shift in the intervention groups of all analysed datasets. However, results were mixed, as response shift was also indicated in some of the control groups, albeit to a lesser extent or in opposite direction. Overall, the detected response shifts only marginally impacted trial results. Relations with selected clinical and background variables helped the interpretation of detected effects and their possible mechanisms. Conclusion This study showed that response shift effects can occur as a result of psychological health interventions. Response shift did not influence the overall interpretation of trial results, but provide insight into differential treatment effectiveness for specific symptoms and/or domains that can be clinically meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. G. E. Verdam
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - W. van Ballegooijen
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. J. M. Holtmaat
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Lancee
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F. J. Oort
- Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. Riper
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Mental Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. van Straten
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Mental Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I. M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Mental Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. de Wit
- Mental Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T. van der Zweerde
- Department of Clinical, Neuro-, & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. G. Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Poort H, Peters MEWJ, van der Graaf WTA, Nieuwkerk PT, van de Wouw AJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, Bleijenberg G, Verhagen CAHHVM, Knoop H. Cognitive behavioral therapy or graded exercise therapy compared with usual care for severe fatigue in patients with advanced cancer during treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 31:115-122. [PMID: 31912784 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related fatigue remains a prevalent and burdensome symptom experienced by patients with advanced cancer. Our aim was to assess the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or graded exercise therapy (GET) on fatigue in patients with advanced cancer during treatment with palliative intent. PATIENTS AND METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted from 1 January 2013 to 1 September 2017. Adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer who reported severe fatigue during treatment [Checklist Individual Strength, subscale fatigue severity (CIS-fatigue) ≥35] were accrued across nine centers in The Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of CBT or GET, or usual care (1 : 1: 1, computer-generated sequence). Primary outcome was CIS-fatigue at 14 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fatigue measured with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), quality of life, emotional functioning, physical functioning, and functional impairments at baseline, 14, 18, and 26 weeks. RESULTS Among 134 participants randomized, the mean age was 63 (standard deviation 9) years and 77 (57%) were women. Common diagnoses included: breast (41%), colorectal (28%), and prostate cancer (17%). A total of 126 participants completed assessment at 14 weeks. Compared with usual care, CBT significantly reduced fatigue [difference -7.2, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) -12.7 to -1.7; P = 0.003, d = 0.7], whereas GET did not (-4.7, 97.5% CI -10.2 to 0.9; P = 0.057, d = 0.4). CBT significantly reduced EORTC-QLQ-C30 fatigue (-13.1, 95% CI -22.1 to -4.0; P = 0.005) and improved quality of life (10.2, 95% CI 2.4 to 17.9; P = 0.011) and physical functioning (7.1, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.7; P = 0.036) compared with usual care. Improvement in emotional functioning and decrease in functional impairments failed to reach significance. GET did not improve secondary outcomes compared with usual care. CONCLUSIONS Among advanced cancer patients with severe fatigue during treatment, a CBT intervention was more effective than usual care for reducing fatigue. Following GET, patients reported lower fatigue, but results were not significant, probably due to a smaller sample size and lower adherence than anticipated. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands National Trial Register, identifier: NTR3812.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Poort
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M E W J Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P T Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J van de Wouw
- Department of Medical Oncology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - M W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C A H H V M Verhagen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Buffart LM, Schreurs MAC, Abrahams HJG, Kalter J, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Newton RU, Courneya KS, Armes J, Arving C, Braamse AM, Brandberg Y, Dekker J, Ferguson RJ, Gielissen MF, Glimelius B, Goedendorp MM, Graves KD, Heiney SP, Horne R, Hunter MS, Johansson B, Northouse LL, Oldenburg HS, Prins JB, Savard J, van Beurden M, van den Berg SW, Brug J, Knoop H, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Effects and moderators of coping skills training on symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with cancer: Aggregate data and individual patient data meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev 2020; 80:101882. [PMID: 32640368 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the effects of coping skills training (CST) on symptoms of depression and anxiety in cancer patients, and investigated moderators of the effects. METHODS Overall effects and intervention-related moderators were studied in meta-analyses of pooled aggregate data from 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patient-related moderators were examined using linear mixed-effect models with interaction tests on pooled individual patient data (n = 1953) from 15 of the RCTs. RESULTS CST had a statistically significant but small effect on depression (g = -0.31,95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.40;-0.22) and anxiety (g = -0.32,95%CI = -0.41;-0.24) symptoms. Effects on depression symptoms were significantly larger for interventions delivered face-to-face (p = .003), led by a psychologist (p = .02) and targeted to patients with psychological distress (p = .002). Significantly larger reductions in anxiety symptoms were found in younger patients (pinteraction < 0.025), with the largest reductions in patients <50 years (β = -0.31,95%CI = -0.44;-0.18) and no significant effects in patients ≥70 years. Effects of CST on depression (β = -0.16,95%CI = -0.25;-0.07) and anxiety (β = -0.24,95%CI = -0.33;-0.14) symptoms were significant in patients who received chemotherapy but not in patients who did not (pinteraction < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS CST significantly reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety in cancer patients, and particularly when delivered face-to-face, provided by a psychologist, targeted to patients with psychological distress, and given to patients who were younger and received chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Buffart
- Department of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
| | - M A C Schreurs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - H J G Abrahams
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J Kalter
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - P B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, Florida, USA.
| | - R U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
| | - K S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - J Armes
- School of Health Science, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
| | - C Arving
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - A M Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Y Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - R J Ferguson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | | | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - K D Graves
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - S P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | - R Horne
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
| | - M S Hunter
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - B Johansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - L L Northouse
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - H S Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - J Savard
- School of Psychology, Université Laval and Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC, Canada.
| | - M van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - S W van den Berg
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - J Brug
- National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, Braamse AMJ, Bleijenberg G, Buffart LM, Knoop H. Graded activity is an important component in cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce severe fatigue: results of a pragmatic crossover trial in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1692-1698. [PMID: 31524020 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1659513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Fatigue is one of the most common and distressing long-term effects of cancer treatment. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based intervention for patients with severe post-cancer fatigue. CBT for fatigue is a complex intervention consisting of multiple elements like a graded activity program, regulation of the sleep-wake rhythm and reformulation of fatigue-related cognitions. The contribution of the separate elements to the positive effect of CBT on fatigue is unclear. The main objective of this pragmatic crossover trial was comparing the efficacy of graded activity with the other elements of CBT in reducing post-cancer fatigue.Material and methods: Severely fatigued cancer survivors were randomized to (i) graded activity followed by the other elements of CBT after crossover (n = 41), or (ii) the two components in reverse order (n = 48). Fatigue severity was measured at baseline, before crossover and after CBT (Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), Fatigue Severity subscale). Differences in effects on fatigue were examined with a linear regression analysis. Objective physical activity, perceived activity and self-efficacy were explored as mediators of the effect of graded activity.Results: Before crossover, the reduction in fatigue was significantly larger after graded activity than after the other elements (β = 4.75, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = -9.19; -0.32). An increase in perceived activity mediated this effect (β = -4.17, 95% CI = -7.37; -1.37).Conclusions: Graded activity is an important component of CBT for post-cancer fatigue as it resulted in a larger reduction in fatigue compared with the other elements, mediated by an increased level of perceived activity. Results indicated that the other elements of CBT are of added value in reducing fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. J. G. Abrahams
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - A. M. J. Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. Bleijenberg
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L. M. Buffart
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bernard P, Savard J, Steindorf K, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, May AM, Galvao DA, Chinapaw MJ, Stuiver MM, Griffith KA, Mesters I, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schmidt ME, Ulrich CM, Sonke GS, van Harten W, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J, Buffart LM. Effects and moderators of exercise on sleep in adults with cancer: Individual patient data and aggregated meta-analyses. J Psychosom Res 2019; 124:109746. [PMID: 31443811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on sleep disturbances and sleep quality in patients with mixed cancer diagnoses, and identify demographic, clinical, and intervention-related moderators of these effects. METHODS Individual patient data (IPD) and aggregated meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Using data from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care project, IPD of 2173 adults (mean age = 54.8) with cancer from 17 RCTs were analyzed. A complementary systematic search was conducted (until November 2018) to study the overall effects and test the representativeness of analyzed IPD. Effect sizes of exercise effects on self-reported sleep outcomes were calculated for all included RCTs. Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the effects of exercise on post-intervention outcome values, adjusting for baseline values. Moderator effects were studied by testing interactions for demographic, clinical and intervention-related characteristics. RESULTS For all 27 eligible RCTs from the updated search, exercise interventions significantly decreased sleep disturbances in adults with cancer (g = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.16; -0.02]). No significant effect was obtained for sleep quality. RCTs included in IPD analyses constituted a representative sample of the published literature. The intervention effects on sleep disturbances were not significantly moderated by any demographic, clinical, or intervention-related factor, nor by sleep disturbances. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provides some evidence that, compared to control conditions, exercise interventions may improve sleep disturbances, but not sleep quality, in cancer patients, although this effect is of a small magnitude. Among the investigated variables, none was found to significantly moderate the effect of exercise interventions on sleep disturbances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Bernard
- Université Laval Cancer Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada; School of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada; Physical Activity Sciences Department, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Research centre, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - J Savard
- Université Laval Cancer Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada; School of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada; CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - K Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M G Sweegers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K S Courneya
- Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - R U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Jacobsen
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - A M May
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D A Galvao
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - M J Chinapaw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M M Stuiver
- Department of Physiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K A Griffith
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| | - I Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg t University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Bohus
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg t University, Mannheim, Germany; Faculty of Health, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Thorsen
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M E Schmidt
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C M Ulrich
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - G S Sonke
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - W van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Huntsman Cancer Institute and University of Utah, Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - M J Velthuis
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D R Taaffe
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - W van Mechelen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Kersten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Nollet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Wenzel
- Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - J Wiskemann
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Brug
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - L M Buffart
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roerink ME, van der Schaaf ME, Hawinkels LJAC, Raijmakers RPH, Knoop H, Joosten LAB, van der Meer JWM. Pitfalls in cytokine measurements - Plasma TGF-β1 in chronic fatigue syndrome. Neth J Med 2018; 76:310-313. [PMID: 30220655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum TGF-β1 concentrations are reported to be elevated in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). However, measurement of circulating cytokines is a complex procedure and control of pre-analytical procedures is essential. The objective of the current study was to measure circulating TGF-β1 concentrations in CFS patients compared to healthy controls, taking into account differences in pre-analytical procedures. METHODS Two cohorts of female CFS patients were included. In both studies patients were asked to bring a healthy, age-matched control. At baseline, TGF-β1 levels were measured in plasma and additionally P-selectin, a marker of platelet activity, was determined in a subgroup of participants. RESULTS 50 patients and 48 controls were included in cohort I, and 90 patients and 29 controls in cohort II. Within the cohorts there were no differences in TGF-β1 concentrations. However, between the cohorts there was a large discrepancy, which appeared to be caused by differences in g-force of the centrifuges used. The lower g-force used in cohort II (1361 g) caused more platelet activation, reflected by higher p-selectin concentrations, compared to cohort I (p < 0.0001), which was confirmed in a second independent experiment. There was a correlation between TGF-β1 and p-selectin concentrations (r 0.79, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that control of pre-analytical procedures is an essential aspect when measuring circulating cytokines. No evidence for enhanced TGF-β1 in patients with CFS was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Roerink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abrahams H, Gielissen M, Verhagen C, Knoop H. The relationship of fatigue in breast cancer survivors with quality of life and factors to address in psychological interventions: A systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2018; 63:1-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
15
|
Kalter J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Sweegers MG, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Newton RU, Courneya KS, Aitken JF, Armes J, Arving C, Boersma LJ, Braamse AMJ, Brandberg Y, Chambers SK, Dekker J, Ell K, Ferguson RJ, Gielissen MFM, Glimelius B, Goedendorp MM, Graves KD, Heiney SP, Horne R, Hunter MS, Johansson B, Kimman ML, Knoop H, Meneses K, Northouse LL, Oldenburg HS, Prins JB, Savard J, van Beurden M, van den Berg SW, Brug J, Buffart LM. Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 22 RCTs. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1150-1161. [PMID: 29361206 PMCID: PMC5947559 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective This individual patient data (IPD) meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions (PSI) on quality of life (QoL), emotional function (EF), and social function (SF) in patients with cancer, and to study moderator effects of demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention‐related characteristics. Methods Relevant studies were identified via literature searches in 4 databases. We pooled IPD from 22 (n = 4217) of 61 eligible randomized controlled trials. Linear mixed‐effect model analyses were used to study intervention effects on the post‐intervention values of QoL, EF, and SF (z‐scores), adjusting for baseline values, age, and cancer type. We studied moderator effects by testing interactions with the intervention for demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention‐related characteristics, and conducted subsequent stratified analyses for significant moderator variables.Results: PSI significantly improved QoL (β = 0.14,95%CI = 0.06;0.21), EF (β = 0.13,95%CI = 0.05;0.20), and SF (β = 0.10,95%CI = 0.03;0.18). Significant differences in effects of different types of PSI were found, with largest effects of psychotherapy. The effects of coping skills training were moderated by age, treatment type, and targeted interventions. Effects of psychotherapy on EF may be moderated by cancer type, but these analyses were based on 2 randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes of some cancer types. Conclusions PSI significantly improved QoL, EF, and SF, with small overall effects. However, the effects differed by several demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention‐related characteristics. Our study highlights the beneficial effects of coping skills training in patients treated with chemotherapy, the importance of targeted interventions, and the need of developing interventions tailored to the specific needs of elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kalter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health research institute and Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Sweegers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, FL, USA
| | - R U Newton
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - K S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J F Aitken
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.,Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J Armes
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - C Arving
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MAASTRO clinic), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A M J Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S K Chambers
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.,Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Ell
- Department of Adults and Healthy Aging, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - R J Ferguson
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M F M Gielissen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - K D Graves
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - S P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - R Horne
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - M S Hunter
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - B Johansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M L Kimman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Meneses
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - L L Northouse
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - H S Oldenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Savard
- School of Psychology, Université Laval and Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - M van Beurden
- Department of Gynecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S W van den Berg
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Brug
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L M Buffart
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Knoop H, Behr J, Bonella F, Knoop U. Therapeutisches Vorgehen bei IPAF? Pneumologie 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. med. Umut Knoop und Dr. med. Heiko Knoop
| | - J Behr
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Klinikum der LMU München; Comprehensive Pneumology Center
| | - F Bonella
- Schwerpunkt Interstitielle und Seltene Lungenerkrankungen, Ruhrlandklinik, Universitätsmedizin Essen
| | - U Knoop
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. med. Umut Knoop und Dr. med. Heiko Knoop
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van den Akker LE, Beckerman H, Collette EH, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, Twisk JW, Dekker J, de Groot V. Cognitive behavioural therapy for MS-related fatigue explained: A longitudinal mediation analysis. J Psychosom Res 2018; 106:13-24. [PMID: 29455894 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) effectively reduces fatigue directly following treatment in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), but little is known about the process of change during and after CBT. DESIGN Additional analysis of a randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVE To investigate which psychological factors mediate change in fatigue during and after CBT. METHODS TREFAMS-CBT studied the effectiveness of a 16-week CBT treatment for MS-related fatigue. Ninety-one patients were randomized (44 to CBT, 47 to the MS-nurse consultations). Mediation during CBT treatment was studied using assessments at baseline, 8 and 16weeks. Mediation of the change in fatigue from post-treatment to follow-up was studied separately using assessments at 16, 26 and 52weeks. Proposed mediators were: changes in illness cognitions, general self-efficacy, coping styles, daytime sleepiness, concentration and physical activity, fear of disease progression, fatigue perceptions, depression and physical functioning. Mediators were separately analysed according to the product-of-coefficients approach. Confidence intervals were calculated with a bootstrap procedure. RESULTS During treatment the decrease in fatigue brought on by CBT was mediated by improved fatigue perceptions, increased physical activity, less sleepiness, less helplessness, and improved physical functioning. Post-treatment increases in fatigue levels were mediated by reduced physical activity, reduced concentration, and increased sleepiness. CONCLUSION These results suggests that focusing on improving fatigue perceptions, perceived physical activity, daytime sleepiness, helplessness, and physical functioning may further improve the effectiveness of CBT for fatigue in patients with MS. Maintenance of treatment effects may be obtained by focusing on improving physical activity, concentration and sleepiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E van den Akker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - H Beckerman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E H Collette
- Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J W Twisk
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V de Groot
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Vulpen JK, Sweegers MG, Kalter J, Peeters PH, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Steindorf K, Stuiver MM, Hayes S, Mesters I, Knoop H, Goedendorp M, Mutrie N, Thorsen L, Schmidt M, Sonke GS, Bohus M, James EL, Oldenburg HS, Velthuis MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Galvão DA, Chinapaw MJ, Irwin ML, Griffith KA, van Weert E, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Schulz KH, Short CE, Plotnikoff RC, Potthoff K, van Beurden M, van Harten WH, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J, Buffart LM, May AM. Abstract P6-12-06: Effect and moderators of exercise on fatigue in patients with breast cancer: Meta-analysis of individual patient data. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-12-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background - Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling complaints in patients with breast cancer and can effectively be reduced by physical exercise, with small to moderate effect sizes. To identify heterogeneity in responses to exercise and to further personalize exercise prescriptions, moderators of exercise effects on fatigue should be investigated. However, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not adequately powered for such analyses. Therefore we conducted meta-analyses using the individual patient data of several exercise RCTs. The aim is to investigate the effect and moderators of physical exercise on cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer.
Methods - Within the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) consortium, principal investigators of 34 exercise RCTs worldwide have shared their individual patient data. Twenty-two of these RCTs included patients with breast cancer with a total sample size of 3,061. Different questionnaires to assess level of fatigue were used, which was acknowledged by using z-scores in the analysis. A one-step individual patient data meta-analysis, using a linear mixed-effect model adjusted for baseline fatigue, with a random intercept on study (to account for study clustering) was undertaken to investigate effect of exercise on fatigue. The result, a between-group difference in z-scores, corresponds to a Cohen's d effect size. An interaction term was included in the model to assess potential moderators including demographic (age, marital status, education), clinical (body mass index, presence of distant metastasis), intervention-related (intervention timing, delivery mode and duration), and exercise-related (exercise type, frequency, intensity, duration) characteristics.
Results – Exercise significantly reduced fatigue reported by women with breast cancer (β= -0.15, 95% CI -0.21;-0.09). This effect did not differ significantly between patients with different demographic and clinical characteristics (p-valuesinteraction >0.05). Also, neither timing (during or post-treatment) and duration of the intervention, nor exercise-related factors moderated intervention effects on fatigue. Supervised exercise had significantly larger effects on fatigue than unsupervised exercise (βdifference= -0.17, 95%CI -0.28;-0.05). Compared to the control group, supervised exercise significantly improved fatigue (β = -0.21, 95%CI = -0.28;-0.14), while unsupervised exercise did not (β = -0.04, 95%CI = -0.14;0.06).
Conclusion – Exercise significantly reduces fatigue in patients with breast cancer across subgroups formed on the basis of age, marital status, education level, body mass index, and presence of distant metastasis. The effect of exercise is significantly larger when performed under supervision. Hence, exercise, and preferably supervised exercise, represents a viable intervention for the prevention and treatment of fatigue among patients with breast cancer.
Citation Format: van Vulpen JK, Sweegers MG, Kalter J, Peeters PH, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Steindorf K, Stuiver MM, Hayes S, Mesters I, Knoop H, Goedendorp M, Mutrie N, Thorsen L, Schmidt M, Sonke GS, Bohus M, James EL, Oldenburg HS, Velthuis MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Galvão DA, Chinapaw MJ, Irwin ML, Griffith KA, van Weert E, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Schulz K-H, Short CE, Plotnikoff RC, Potthoff K, van Beurden M, van Harten WH, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten M-J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J, Buffart LM, May AM. Effect and moderators of exercise on fatigue in patients with breast cancer: Meta-analysis of individual patient data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JK van Vulpen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - MG Sweegers
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - J Kalter
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - PH Peeters
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - KS Courneya
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - RU Newton
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - NK Aaronson
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - PB Jacobsen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - K Steindorf
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - MM Stuiver
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - S Hayes
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - I Mesters
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - H Knoop
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - M Goedendorp
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - N Mutrie
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - L Thorsen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - M Schmidt
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - GS Sonke
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - M Bohus
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - EL James
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - HS Oldenburg
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - MJ Velthuis
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - F Nollet
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - J Wenzel
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - J Wiskemann
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - DA Galvão
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - MJ Chinapaw
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - ML Irwin
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - KA Griffith
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - E van Weert
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - AJ Daley
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - A McConnachie
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - K-H Schulz
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - CE Short
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - RC Plotnikoff
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - K Potthoff
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - M van Beurden
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - WH van Harten
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - KH Schmitz
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - KM Winters-Stone
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - DR Taaffe
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - W van Mechelen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - M-J Kersten
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - IM Verdonck-de Leeuw
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - J Brug
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - LM Buffart
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| | - AM May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia; University of Maryland, Baltimore; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Ham
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Janse A, Worm-Smeitink M, Bleijenberg G, Donders R, Knoop H. Efficacy of web-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2018; 212:112-118. [PMID: 29436329 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2017.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Face-to-face cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) leads to a reduction of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Aims To test the efficacy of internet-based CBT (iCBT) for adults with CFS. METHOD A total of 240 patients with CFS were randomised to either iCBT with protocol-driven therapist feedback or with therapist feedback on demand, or a waiting list. Primary outcome was fatigue severity assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength (Netherlands Trial Register: NTR4013). RESULTS Compared with a waiting list, intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a significant reduction of fatigue for both iCBT conditions (protocol-driven feedback: B = -8.3, 97.5% CI -12.7 to -3.9, P < 0.0001; feedback on demand: B = -7.2, 97.5% CI -11.3 to -3.1, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between both iCBT conditions on all outcome measures (P = 0.3-0.9). An exploratory analysis revealed that feedback-on-demand iCBT required less therapist time (mean 4 h 37 min) than iCBT with protocol-driven feedback (mean 6 h 9 min, P < 0.001) and also less than face-to-face CBT as reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS Both iCBT conditions are efficacious and time efficient. Declaration of interest None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Janse
- Academic Medical Center (AMC),University of Amsterdam,Department of Medical Psychology,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute,Amsterdam,the Netherlands
| | - M Worm-Smeitink
- Academic Medical Center (AMC),University of Amsterdam,Department of Medical Psychology,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute,Amsterdam,the Netherlands
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Radboud University Medical Center,Nijmegen,the Netherlands
| | - R Donders
- Department for Health Evidence,Radboud University Medical Centre,Nijmegen,the Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Academic Medical Center (AMC),University of Amsterdam,Department of Medical Psychology,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute,Amsterdam,the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Worm-Smeitink M, Gielissen M, Bloot L, van Laarhoven HWM, van Engelen BGM, van Riel P, Bleijenberg G, Nikolaus S, Knoop H. The assessment of fatigue: Psychometric qualities and norms for the Checklist individual strength. J Psychosom Res 2017; 98:40-46. [PMID: 28554371 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) measures four dimensions of fatigue: Fatigue severity, concentration problems, reduced motivation and activity. On the fatigue severity subscale, a cut-off score of 35 is used. This study 1) investigated the psychometric qualities of the CIS; 2) validated the cut-off score for severe fatigue and 3) provided norms. METHODS Representatives of the Dutch general population (n=2288) completed the CIS. The factor structure was investigated using an exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined. Concurrent validity was assessed in two additional samples by correlating the CIS with other fatigue scales (Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, MOS Short form-36 Vitality subscale, EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue subscale). To validate the fatigue severity cut-off score, a Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was performed with patients referred to a chronic fatigue treatment centre (n=5243) and a healthy group (n=1906). Norm scores for CIS subscales were calculated for the general population, patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS; n=1407) and eight groups with other medical conditions (n=1411). RESULTS The original four-factor structure of the CIS was replicated. Internal consistency (α=0.84-0.95) and test-retest reliability (r=0.74-0.86) of the subscales were high. Correlations with other fatigue scales were moderate to high. The 35 points cut-off score for severe fatigue is appropriate, but, given the 17% false positive rate, should be adjusted to 40 for research in CFS. CONCLUSION The CIS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue, with a validated cut-off score for severe fatigue that can be used in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Worm-Smeitink
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Gielissen
- Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Bloot
- Department of Medical Psychology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B G M van Engelen
- Department of Neurology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P van Riel
- IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - S Nikolaus
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Knoop H, Ewig S, Kreuter A, Knoop U. To be or not to be: Nummuläres Ekzem und akutes Nierenversagen unter Pirfenidon? Pneumologie 2017. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Gemeinschaftspraxis, Dr. med. Umut Knoop & Dr. med. Heiko Knoop
| | - S Ewig
- Thoraxzentrum Ruhrgebiet, Department of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, Evk Herne
| | - A Kreuter
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Helios St. Elisabeth Klinik
| | - U Knoop
- Gemeinschaftspraxis, Dr. med. Umut Knoop & Dr. med. Heiko Knoop
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roerink ME, Lenders JWM, Schmits IC, Pistorius AMA, Smit JW, Knoop H, van der Meer JWM. Postural orthostatic tachycardia is not a useful diagnostic marker for chronic fatigue syndrome. J Intern Med 2017; 281:179-188. [PMID: 27696568 DOI: 10.1111/joim.12564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is considered a diagnostic marker for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to (i) compare POTS prevalence in a CFS cohort with fatigued patients not meeting CFS criteria, and (ii) assess activity, impairment and response to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in CFS patients with POTS (POTS-CFS) and without POTS (non-POTS-CFS). METHODS Prospective cohort study at the Radboud University Medical Centre in the Netherlands. Between June 2013 and December 2014, 863 consecutive patients with persistent fatigue were screened. Patients underwent an active standing test, filled out questionnaires and wore an activity-sensing device for a period of 12 days. RESULTS A total of 419 patients with CFS and 341 non-CFS fatigued patients were included in the study. POTS prevalence in adult patients with CFS was 5.7% vs. 6.9% in non-CFS adults (P = 0.54). In adolescents, prevalence rates were 18.2% and 17.4%, respectively (P = 0.93). Adult patients with POTS-CFS were younger (30 ± 12 vs. 40 ± 13 years, P = 0.001) and had a higher supine heart rate (71 ± 11 vs. 65 ± 9 beats per min, P = 0.009) compared with non-POTS-CFS patients. Severity and activity patterns did not differ between groups. In patients with CFS, criteria for Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID) were met in 76% of adults and 67% of adolescents. In these patients with CFS fulfilling the SEID criteria, the prevalence of POTS was not different from that in the overall CFS population. POTS-CFS adolescents had less clinically significant improvement after CBT than non-POTS-CFS adolescents (58% vs. 88%, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION In adults with CFS, the prevalence of POTS was low, was not different from the rate in non-CFS fatigued patients and was not related to disease severity or treatment outcome. In POTS-CFS adolescents, CBT was less successful than in non-POTS-CFS patients. The evaluation of POTS appears to be of limited value for the diagnosis of CFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Roerink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J W M Lenders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - I C Schmits
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A M A Pistorius
- Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J W Smit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W M van der Meer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hanssen DJC, Knoop H, Rosmalen JGM. [The prognosis of medically unexplained symptoms]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2017; 161:D1680. [PMID: 29098971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
- The condition where someone has physical symptoms for a number of weeks for which no clear somatic cause can be found, is known as medically unexplained symptoms (MUS).- In this article we give an overview of current insights into the prognosis of MUS.- Extensive somatic testing in patients diagnosed with MUS by a physician, rarely results in a somatic diagnosis.- In approximately half of these patients, MUS disappear spontaneously within one year.- Symptom-related characteristics - such as experiencing multiple physical symptoms simultaneously-, and psychological characteristics - such as unhelpful thoughts - are predictors of an unfavourable prognosis for MUS.- Close monitoring of patients with MUS enables timely interventions, and may help to prevent MUS following an unfavourable course. Existing guidelines may help in choosing treatment and tailoring it to the individual patient.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, de Lugt M, Kleijer EFW, de Roos WK, Balk E, Verhagen CAHHVM, Knoop H. The Distress Thermometer for screening for severe fatigue in newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology 2016; 26:693-697. [PMID: 27362532 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Revised: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Internationally, the Distress Thermometer and associated Problem List are increasingly used in oncology as screening tools for psychological distress. Cancer-related fatigue is common but often overlooked in clinical practice. We examined if severe fatigue in cancer patients can be identified with the fatigue item of the Problem List. METHODS Newly diagnosed breast (N = 334) and colorectal (N = 179) cancer patients were screened for severe fatigue, which was defined as having a positive score on the fatigue item of the Problem List. The Fatigue Severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength was used as gold standard measure for severe fatigue. RESULTS In total, 78% of breast cancer patients and 81% of colorectal cancer patients were correctly identified with the fatigue item. The sensitivity was 89% in breast cancer patients and 91% in colorectal cancer patients. The specificity was 75% in breast cancer patients and 77% in colorectal cancer patients. The positive predictive value was 53% in breast cancer patients and 64% in colorectal cancer patients, whereas the negative predictive value was 95% in both tumor types. CONCLUSIONS The fatigue item of the Problem List performs satisfactorily as a quick screening tool for severe fatigue. However, a positive screen should be followed up with a more thorough assessment of fatigue, ie, a questionnaire with a validated cutoff point. Given time pressure of clinicians, this already implemented and brief screening tool may prevent severe fatigue from going undetected in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J G Abrahams
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M F M Gielissen
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M de Lugt
- Department of Medical Psychology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - E F W Kleijer
- Department of Education and Training, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - E Balk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - C A H H V M Verhagen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abrahams H, Gielissen M, Schmits I, Verhagen C, Rovers M, Knoop H. Risk factors, prevalence, and course of severe fatigue after breast cancer treatment: a meta-analysis involving 12 327 breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:965-974. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
26
|
Janse A, Wiborg JF, Bleijenberg G, Tummers M, Knoop H. The efficacy of guided self-instruction for patients with idiopathic chronic fatigue: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2016; 84:377-88. [DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
27
|
Günther S, Behr J, Knoop H. Medikamenten-induzierte pulmonale Hypertonie – eine aktuelle Übersicht. Pneumologie 2016; 70:320-7. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-108315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Günther
- Univ. Paris-Sud, Faculté de Médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Frankreich
| | - J. Behr
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Asklepios Fachkliniken München Gauting
| | - H. Knoop
- Medizinische Klinik III – Pneumologie, Allergologie, Schlaf- und Beatmungsmedizin, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum (UK RUB)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Knoop H, Knoop U, Pranada A, Behn M, Ringshausen FC. Eine interstitielle Lungenerkrankung (ILD) und/oder eine seltene (zusätzliche?) Diagnose: COP oder MOTT? Pneumologie 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
29
|
Abrahams HJG, Gielissen MFM, Goedendorp MM, Berends T, Peters MEWJ, Poort H, Verhagen CAHHVM, Knoop H. A randomized controlled trial of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy for severely fatigued breast cancer survivors (CHANGE-study): study protocol. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:765. [PMID: 26500019 PMCID: PMC4619089 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1787-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About one third of breast cancer survivors suffer from persistent severe fatigue after completion of curative cancer treatment. Face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (F2F CBT), especially designed for fatigue in cancer survivors, was found effective in reducing fatigue. However, this intervention is intensive and treatment capacity is limited. To extend treatment options, a web-based version of CBT requiring less therapist time was developed. This intervention is aimed at changing fatigue-perpetuating cognitions and behaviors. The efficacy of web-based CBT will be examined in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHODS In total, 132 severely fatigued breast cancer survivors will be recruited and randomized to either an intervention condition or care as usual (ratio 1:1). Participants will be assessed at baseline and 6 months thereafter. The intervention group will receive web-based CBT, consisting of three F2F sessions and maximally eight web-based modules over a period of 6 months. The care as usual group will be on a waiting list for regular F2F CBT. The total duration of the waiting list is 6 months. The primary outcome of the study is fatigue severity. Secondary outcomes are functional impairments, psychological distress and quality of life. DISCUSSION If web-based CBT is effective, it will provide an additional treatment option for fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Web-based CBT is expected to be less time-consuming for therapists than regular F2F CBT, which would result in an increased treatment capacity. Moreover, the intervention would become more easily accessible for a larger number of patients, and patients can save travel time and costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Registry--NTR4309.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J G Abrahams
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M F M Gielissen
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - T Berends
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M E W J Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - H Poort
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - C A H H V M Verhagen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Center for Chronic Fatigue (ECCF), Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 916, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Poort H, Peters M, Verhagen S, Verhoeven J, Van der Graaf W, Knoop H. 1564 No need for gate keeping by professionals: Cancer patients want to be informed about intervention studies targeting fatigue. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)30654-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
31
|
Poort H, Gielissen M, Tielen R, Vlenterie M, Custers J, Prins J, Verhagen S, Knoop H, Graaf WVD. 3443 Severe fatigue in GIST patients: Prevalence, impact and factors associated with fatigue. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31916-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
32
|
Verspaandonk J, Coenders M, Bleijenberg G, Lobbestael J, Knoop H. The role of the partner and relationship satisfaction on treatment outcome in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol Med 2015; 45:2345-2352. [PMID: 25732090 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291715000288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) leads to a significant decrease in CFS-related symptoms and disability. The primary objective of this study was to explore whether partners' solicitous responses and patients' and partners' perceived relationship satisfaction had an effect on treatment outcome. METHOD The treatment outcome of a cohort of 204 consecutively referred patients treated with CBT was analysed. At baseline, CFS patients completed the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire. The Checklist Individual Strength subscale Fatigue and the Sickness Impact Profile total scores completed by CFS patients post-treatment were used as measures of clinically significant improvement. Partners completed the Family Response Questionnaire, the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and the Causal Attribution List. Logistic regression analyses were performed with clinically significant improvement in fatigue and disability as dependent variables and scores on questionnaires at baseline as predictors. RESULTS Solicitous responses of the partner were associated with less clinically significant improvement in fatigue and disability. Partners more often reported solicitous responses when they perceived CFS as a severe condition. Patients' relationship dissatisfaction was negatively associated with clinically significant improvement in fatigue. CONCLUSIONS Partners' solicitous responses and illness perceptions at the start of the therapy can negatively affect the outcome of CBT for CFS. We emphasize the importance of addressing this in therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Verspaandonk
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre,Nijmegen,The Netherlands
| | - M Coenders
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences,Utrecht University,The Netherlands
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre,Nijmegen,The Netherlands
| | - J Lobbestael
- Faculty of Clinical Psychological Science,Maastricht University,The Netherlands and RINO Zuid,Postdoctoral Education Institute,Eindhoven,The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Medical Centre,Nijmegen,The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Knoop H, Günther S, Heyer CM, Koch A, Theile A, Knoop U. The Good, The Bad and The Ugly – Fallbericht eines Patienten mit Pulmonaler Hypertonie (PH), idiopathischer Lungenfibrose (IPF) und nicht-kleinzelligem Lungenkarzinom (NSCLC). Pneumologie 2015. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1544741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
34
|
van Leeuwen N, Bossema ER, Knoop H, Kruize AA, Bootsma H, Bijlsma JWJ, Geenen R. Psychological profiles in patients with Sjogren's syndrome related to fatigue: a cluster analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014; 54:776-83. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
35
|
Rongen-van Dartel SAA, Repping-Wuts H, van Hoogmoed D, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, van Riel PLCM, Fransen J. Relationship between objectively assessed physical activity and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: inverse correlation of activity and fatigue. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66:852-60. [PMID: 24339437 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Accepted: 11/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fatigue is generally associated with low physical activity in patients with various chronic medical conditions. However, such an association has not been reported among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objectives of this study were to investigate whether daily activity level is associated with fatigue in patients with RA, and whether pain, disability, coping, and/or cognition are associated with the level of daily activity. METHODS Patients with RA who visited our outpatient clinic were recruited consecutively. Fatigue severity was measured using the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20). Physical activity was measured for 14 consecutive days using an ankle-worn actometer. The daily activity level of each patient was calculated, and each patient was classified as having a low or high activity level with respect to the group average. Data were analyzed by linear regression. RESULTS A total of 167 patients were included in the analysis; 25% had a low activity level and 75% had a high activity level. A regression analysis revealed that higher activity levels were associated with reduced fatigue (P = 0.008). The mean ± SD CIS fatigue score was 30.9 ± 12.3 among the patients with a high activity level and 35.7 ± 12.8 among the patients with a low activity level (P = 0.03). Pain, disability, coping, and cognition were not associated significantly with daily activity level. CONCLUSION Among patients with RA, a higher level of daily physical activity was associated with reduced levels of fatigue. This relationship was not explained by differences in sex, age, disease duration, pain, disability, or other fatigue-related factors.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rongen-van Dartel S, Repping-Wuts H, Donders R, van Hoogmoed D, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, van Riel P, Fransen J. THU0263 Factors Associated with Fatigue in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multidimensional “Path Analysis” Model. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.1637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
37
|
Goedendorp MM, Bleijenberg G, Knoop H. Response to 'Underperformance of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients at neurocognitive tests should be assessed objectively'. J Psychosom Res 2014; 76:340. [PMID: 24630188 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 12/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M M Goedendorp
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen; Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
| | - G Bleijenberg
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
| | - H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Knoop H, Knoop U, Heyer CM, Neid M, Scheeler M, Suermann M, Koch A. Herz beißt Lunge – oder umgekehrt? Fallbericht eines Patienten mit hypertropher nicht-obstruktiver Kardiomyopathie (HNCM) und UIP. Pneumologie 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
39
|
Wolter F, Knoop H, Suermann M, Behr J. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), Non-specific Interstitial Pneumonia (NSIP), CTD-ILD (Interstitielle Lungenerkrankung (ILD) bei Bindegewebserkrankungen), Sarkoidose – ein Vergleich der Progressionsraten unterschiedlicher interstitieller Lungenerkrankungen und des Effekts von Pirfenidon bei IPF. Pneumologie 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
40
|
Million PM, Knoop H, Suermann M, Weber A, Behr J. Asbestose – lungenfunktioneller Verlauf in einer retrospektiven Längsschnittstudie. Pneumologie 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
41
|
Knoop U, Dietrich JW, Heyer CM, Koch A, Knoop H. "Still crazy after all these years"--tuberculosis as an old disease with diverse facets in a thirty-five-year-old male patient. Pneumologie 2013; 68:206-7. [PMID: 24301553 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
We report about a thirty-five-year-old male patient with miliary TB as first manifestation of HIV-infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Knoop
- Department of Internal Medicine III - Respiratory Medicine, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany
| | - J W Dietrich
- Department of Internal Medicine I - Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany
| | - C M Heyer
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany
| | - A Koch
- Department of Internal Medicine III - Respiratory Medicine, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany
| | - H Knoop
- Department of Internal Medicine III - Respiratory Medicine, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
van Dartel S, Repping H, Knoop H, van Hoogmoed D, Bleijenberg G, van Riel P, Fransen J. AB0428 The association between physical activity measured by actigraphy and fatigue in patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
43
|
Van Dartel S, Repping H, van Hoogmoed D, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, van Riel P, Fransen J. THU0592 Longitudinal Measurement of Fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Which Factors Predict Fatigue? Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
44
|
van Dartel S, Repping-Wuts H, Knoop H, van Hoogmoed D, Bleijenberg G, van Riel P, Fransen J. AB0429 The association between psychosocial factors and physical activity measured by actigraphy in patient with rheumatoid arthritis:. Ann Rheum Dis 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
45
|
Knoop H, Knoop U, Dazert S, Ewig S, Heyer CM, Tannapfel A, Gurr A. [Chronic rhinosinusitis--a common piece in pneumological puzzles]. Pneumologie 2013; 67:162-173. [PMID: 23463530 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Thoraxzentrum Ruhrgebiet, Klinik für Pneumologie und Infektiologie, EVK Herne--Betriebsstelle Eickel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Knoop H, Knoop U, Behr J, Heyer CM, Kuert S, Roggenland D, Suermann M, Dietrich JW. Syndrome of inadequate antidiuretic hormone secretion in pulmonary tuberculosis - a therapeutic challenge. Pneumologie 2013; 67:219-22. [PMID: 23420227 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
A forty-nine-year-old female patient with pulmonary tuberculosis developed syndrome of inadequate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Consequent restriction of fluid intake as a therapeutic measure was just as ineffective as a medication with tolvaptan which was performed later on. A probable explanation for the inefficacy of the aquaretic drug is an interaction of rifampicine and tolvaptan. This case report gives a short summary of SIADH in pulmonary TB and discusses possible reasons for the difficult antituberculotic treatment in this patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Department of Internal Medicine III - Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitaetsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
In a 63 year-old female patient with oesophageal carcinoma a tracheal perforation by an oesophageal stent was diagnosed. A first attempt of tracheal stenting was not successful due to spontaneous dislocation of the stent. Therefore, a shorter stent was chosen and correctly placed in a second session. This case report on an oesophagotracheal fistula provides a summary of this complication in advanced oesophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Thoraxzentrum Ruhrgebiet, Klinik für Pneumologie und Infektiologie, EVK Herne - Betriebsstelle Eickel.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tummers M, Knoop H, van Dam A, Bleijenberg G. Implementing a minimal intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome in a mental health centre: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med 2012; 42:2205-2215. [PMID: 22354999 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291712000232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an effective but intensive treatment, requiring trained therapists. A minimal intervention based on CBT for CFS, guided self-instruction, was shown to be an effective treatment when delivered in a tertiary treatment centre. Implementing this intervention in a community-based mental health centre (MHC) will increase the treatment capacity for CFS patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of guided self-instruction for CFS implemented in an MHC, delivered by nurses. METHOD One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly assigned to either guided self-instruction (n=62) or a waiting list (n=61). Randomization was computer generated, with allocation by numbered sealed envelopes. Group allocation was open to all those involved. Patients fulfilled US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for CFS. Primary outcome variables were fatigue severity and physical and social functioning, measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) respectively. RESULTS After 6 months, patients who followed guided self-instruction reported a significantly larger decrease in fatigue compared to the waiting list [mean difference -8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.8 to -12.4, controlled effect size 0.70]. There was no significant difference in physical and social functioning. However, post-hoc analyses showed a significant decrease in fatigue and physical disabilities following the intervention in a subgroup of patients with physical disabilities at baseline (SF-36 physical functioning ⩽70). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of guided self-instruction in a community-based MHC was partially successful. The minimal intervention can be effectively implemented for CFS patients with physical impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tummers
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Knoop H, Knoop U, Heining L, Magin T, Richardsen G, Wolf R, Ewig S. [Catch me if you can--a case of endobronchial lipoma]. Pneumologie 2012; 66:558-9. [PMID: 22532049 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Incidentally, a lesion in the right upper pulmonary lobe was found in a 74-year-old male patient. The flexible bronchoscopy revealed an endobrochial lipoma in the right lower lobe as the only pathological finding. Due to multiple co-morbidities, no intervention was performed initially. Since the endobronchial lipoma increased in size during follow-up, it was removed by cryoextraction. This case report on an endobronchial lipoma includes a short summary of this rare benign lung tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Thoraxzentrum Ruhrgebiet, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Herne-Betriebsstelle Eickel, Klinik für Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Herne.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Knoop H, van Kessel K, Moss-Morris R. Which cognitions and behaviours mediate the positive effect of cognitive behavioural therapy on fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis? Psychol Med 2012; 42:205-213. [PMID: 21672300 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291711000924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic fatigue is a common symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). A randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) was more effective in reducing MS fatigue than relaxation training (RT). The aim of the current study was to analyse additional data from this trial to determine whether (1) CBT compared to RT leads to significantly greater changes in cognitions and behaviours hypothesized to perpetuate MS fatigue; (2) changes in these variables mediate the effect of CBT on MS fatigue; and (3) these mediation effects are independent of changes in mood. METHOD Seventy patients (CBT, n=35; RT, n=35) completed the Cognitive and Behavioural Responses to Symptoms Questionnaire (CBSQ), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) modified to measure negative representations of fatigue, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ), pre- and post-therapy. Multiple mediation analysis was used to determine which variables mediated the change in fatigue. RESULTS Avoidance behaviour and three cognitive variables (symptom focusing, believing symptoms are a sign of damage and a negative representation of fatigue) improved significantly more in the CBT than the RT group. Mediation analysis showed that changing negative representations of fatigue mediated the decrease in severity of fatigue. Change in anxiety covaried with reduction in fatigue but the mediation effect for negative representations of fatigue remained when controlling for improvements in mood. CONCLUSIONS Change in beliefs about fatigue play a crucial role in CBT for MS fatigue. These beliefs and the role of anxiety deserve more attention in the further development of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Knoop
- Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|