1
|
Yildirim HC, Kupik GE, Mustafayev TZ, Berber T, Yavuz B, Cetinayak O, Akagunduz O, Bıcakcı BC, Arslan SA, Soykut ED, Gundog M, Figen M, Teke F, Canyilmaz E, Birgi SD, Duzova M, İgdem S, Abakay CD, Atasoy B, Kaydihan N, Parvizi M, Uslu GH, Saginc H, Akman F, Ozyar E. A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in IMRT era from a nonendemic population: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Cancer Group Study (TROD 01-001). Head Neck 2023; 45:1194-1205. [PMID: 36854873 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a nonendemic population. METHODS In a national, retrospective, multicenteric study, 563 patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy at 22 centers between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. RESULTS Median age was 48 (9-83), age distribution was bimodal, 74.1% were male, and 78.7% were stage III-IVA. Keratinizing and undifferentiated carcinoma rates were 3.9% and 81.2%. Patients were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (48.9%), or radiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy (25%) or adjuvant chemotherapy (19.5%). After 34 (6-78) months follow-up, 8.2% locoregional and 8% distant relapse were observed. Three-year overall survival was 89.5% and was lower in patients with age ≥50, male sex, keratinizing histology, T4, N3 and advanced stage (III-IVA). CONCLUSIONS Patients with NPC in Turkey have mixed clinical features of both east and west. Survival outcomes are comparable to other reported series; however, the rate of distant metastases seems to be lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halil Cumhur Yildirim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gulnihan Eren Kupik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Teuta Zoto Mustafayev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tanju Berber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Prof Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Berrin Yavuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Oguz Cetinayak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Akagunduz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | - Ela Delikgoz Soykut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Mete Gundog
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Metin Figen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatma Teke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Emine Canyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Sumerya Duru Birgi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mursel Duzova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Sefik İgdem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Candan Demiroz Abakay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Beste Atasoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nuri Kaydihan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Bahcelievler Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murtaza Parvizi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Gonca Hanedan Uslu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Trabzon Kanuni Education and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Halil Saginc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Fadime Akman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Enis Ozyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saginc H, Baltalarli PB, Sagtas E, Coskun ME. Analysis of Survival of Patients with Brain Metastases According to Prognostic Indexes and Treatment Strategies. Turk Neurosurg 2020; 30:822-831. [PMID: 32091122 DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.26398-19.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM To retrospectively evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with brain metastases (BMs) who had been treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and Gamma Knife (GK) according to prognostic factors and prognostic index scores. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 91 patients with BMs who had been treated with WBRT and/or GK between 2014 and 2017. The patients with BMs were retrospectively evaluated regarding age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, basic score for BM (BS-BM), Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) index, primary tumour type, extracranial metastases, primary tumour control, number of BMs, and brain metastasectomy. A univariate analysis of the OS was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, supplemented by the log-rank test. We also applied a multivariate survival analysis using the Cox regression model. RESULTS The median OS for all patients with BMs was 6 months. Meanwhile, the median OSs for those with WBRT, GK, and WBRT-GK treatment were 6, 4, and 15 months, respectively (p=0.00). In the multivariate analysis, the female sex (p=0.030), brain metastasectomy (p=0.047), treatment with WBRT-GK (p=0.001), and the controlled primary tumour (p=0.007) significantly correlated with the OS. Furthermore, the BS-BM (p=0.022) was closely related with the OS compared to the RPA and DS-GPA in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION The BS-BM was found to better predict the survival of patients with BMs according to the prognostic index scores in the multivariate analysis. Thus, our data suggest that the BS-BM is the most appropriate prognostic index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halil Saginc
- Denizli State Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Denizli, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|