Spontaneous middle lobe torsion: An institutional case series

OBJECTIVE

Lobar torsion is a rare occurrence in which a portion of the lung is twisted on its bronchovascular pedicle. The vast majority are observed in the acute postoperative period often following right upper lobectomy. Spontaneous middle lobe torsion independent of pulmonary resection is exceptionally rarer; fewer than 15 cases have been recorded. We present an institutional case series of 2 patients postorthotopic liver transplantation who developed spontaneous middle lobe torsion due to large pleural effusions.

METHODS

We provide the medical course as well as intraoperative techniques for our 2 patients along with a review of the literature.

RESULTS

Both patients in this case series underwent orthotopic liver transplant complicated postoperatively by a large pulmonary effusion. Patient one developed an abdominal hematoma requiring evacuation and repair, after which he developed progressive shortness of breath. Bronchoscopy revealed a right middle lobe obstruction; upon thoracotomy, 180-degree torsion with widespread necrosis was evident and the middle lobe was removed. He is doing well to date. Patient 2 experienced postoperative pleural effusion and mucus plugging; computed tomography revealed abrupt middle lobe arterial occlusion prompting urgent operative intervention. Again, the middle lobe was grossly ischemic and dissection revealed a 360-degree torsion around the pedicle. It was resected. He is doing well to date.

CONCLUSIONS

As the result of its rarity, radiographic and clinical diagnosis of spontaneous pulmonary lobar torsion is challenging; a high index of suspicion for spontaneous middle lobe torsion must be maintained to avoid delays in diagnosis. Prompt surgical intervention is essential to improve patient outcomes.

Sequential liver and kidney living donors: Making the ultimate gift twice

There are nearly 150 living donors in the United States who donated more than one solid organ. Using our divisional database, we found 20 individuals who donated a liver and a kidney at different times. We performed a retrospective chart review of these donors, studying their motivating factors, complications and outcomes. The donors included 11 (55%) males and nine females. Thirteen (65%) donated the kidney before the liver. Fourteen (70%) were nondirected donors at the first donation, and four of the six directed donors in the first donation became nondirected in the second donation. Seventeen (85%) were nondirected at the second donation. Common reasons for donating the second time were a good experience with the first donation and knowing that one can donate again. Outcomes and the incidence of early complications were not significantly different after the 2nd versus the 1st donation. All donors recovered and currently are doing well. Our results show a significant number of dual organ donors are nondirected and motivated by their strong desire to help. A positive experience with the 1st donation often was the driving factor for the 2nd. A history of previous organ donation did not negatively impact the 2nd donation.

Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 7226 Patients

Objective

To systematically review and compare the overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival after hepatic resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) versus other risk factors.

Background

Different clinical and tumor characteristics are associated with HCC in the setting of NAFLD in comparison to other risk factors. It is still unclear whether these differences impact patient survival after radical hepatectomies.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies published in the English literature between July 1980 and June 2020 were searched using multiple databases. Patients' baseline characteristics and the hazard ratios (HRs) of the OS and DFS were extracted and meta-analyses were performed.

Results

Fifteen retrospective cohort studies with a total of 7226 patients were included. Among them, 1412 patients (19.5%) had NAFLD and 5814 (80.4%) had other risk factors (eg, viral hepatitis B or C, alcoholic cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis). Summary statistics showed that patients with NAFLD had better DFS (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.90; P = 0.001) than the control group. Subgroups analyses also indicated that the OS favored NAFLD patients versus patients with viral hepatitis B or C (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.96; P = 0.017) or alcoholic and cryptogenic cirrhosis (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-1.0; P = 0.05).

Conclusion

After hepatic resections for HCC, NAFLD patients have better DFS and OS than patients with other risk factors. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression suggested that the survival advantage of NAFLD patients was more pronounced in studies published after 2015 and from Asian centers.

Portal vein thrombosis and renal dysfunction: a national comparative study of liver transplant recipients for NAFLD versus alcoholic cirrhosis

The prevalence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), renal dysfunction (RD), and simultaneous PVT/RD in liver transplantation (LT) is poorly understood. We analyzed the prevalence of PVT, RD, simultaneous PVT/RD, and the outcomes of adult recipients of LT for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) between 2006 and 2016 in the United States. We found that the prevalence of PVT (7.2% → 11.3%), RD (33.8% → 39.2%), and simultaneous PVT/RD (2.4% → 4.5%) has increased significantly over the study period (all P‐values <0.05). NAFLD patients had a higher proportion of PVT (14.8% vs. 9.2%), RD (45.0% vs. 42.1%), and simultaneous PVT/RD (6.5% vs. 3.9%; all P‐values <0.05). 90‐day mortality was 3.8%, 6.3%, 6.8%, and 9.8% for PVT(−)/RD(−), PVT(−)/RD(+), PVT(+)/RD(−), and PVT(+)/RD(+) recipients, respectively (P < 0.01). 5‐year survival was 82.1%, 75.5%, 74.8%, and 71.1% for PVT(−)/RD(−), PVT(−)/RD(+), PVT(+)/RD(−), and PVT(+)/RD(+) recipients, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the prevalence of PVT, RD, and simultaneous PVT/RD has increased among LT recipients, especially for those with NAFLD. The short‐ and long‐term outcomes of recipients with PVT, RD, and simultaneous PVT/RD were inferior to patients without those risk factors irrespective of their indication for LT. No differences in patient outcomes were found between ALD and NAFLD recipients after stratification by risk factors.

Penetrating shrapnel injury to the chest presenting as a delayed tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). A case report

Tracheo-esophageal fistulae (TEF) due to trauma are rare. We report a case of a delayed TEF caused by a shrapnel from a blast.

A 25-year-old male was admitted to the hospital after sustaining a blast injury. A contrast CT scan of the chest and neck revealed the presence of metallic shrapnel in close proximity to the tracheo-esophageal groove at the level of the thoracic inlet. Bronchoscopy revealed 0.5 cm tear in the membranous trachea while esophagoscopy and contrast swallow were normal. Coughs after starting fluid intake triggered a repeat endoscopy that showed a large TEF at 22 cm from the incisors. He underwent surgical repair through a collar incision and limited sternotomy. The TEF extended for 2 cm. The esophagus was repaired in two layers, the membranous trachea was sutured primarily, and an interposition strap muscle flap was placed. A contrast swallow on postoperative day 7 revealed the presence of a small leak into the trachea that was treated conservatively.

Traumatic TEF are rare and should be suspected in patients with injuries to proximal structures. Delay in diagnosis and appropriate management can conceivably lead to death.

Proportional costs in trauma and acute care surgery patients: dominant role of intensive care unit costs

BACKGROUND

Controlling inpatient costs is increasingly important. Identifying proportionately larger cost categories may help focus cost control efforts. The purpose of this study was to identify proportionate patient cost categories in trauma and acute care surgery (TACS) patients and determine subgroups in which the largest opportunities for cost savings might exist.

STUDY DESIGN

Administrative data from our academic, urban, level I trauma center were used to identify all adult TACS patients from FY07 through FY11. We determined, on average, what proportion of the whole each cost category contributed to patients' total costs and examined the same proportions for subgroups of patients.

RESULTS

We identified 6,008 TACS patients. Trauma patients (n = 3,904) made up 65% of the cohort (mean Injury Severity Score 13.2). Payers were: 22% government (Medicare, Medicaid, Champus), 27% private, 43% self-pay/indigent, 3% other, and 5% workers compensation. Nontrauma (general surgery) patients (n = 2,104) made up 35% of the cohort. Payers were: 44% government, 24% private, 29% self-pay/indigent, 2% other, and 1% workers compensation. Total inpatient costs were $141,304,993. Per patient costs rose from $17,245 in FY07 to $26,468 in FY11. In the aggregate, supplies, ICU stays, and ward stays represented the largest proportionate cost categories. On a per patient basis, however, ICU stays were by far the largest cost. Patients with ICU stay greater than 10 days were only 7% of all patients but accounted for 41% of total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma and acute care surgery patients represent a significant and increasing institutional cost. Per patient ICU costs were the largest single category, suggesting that cost control efforts should focus heavily on critically ill patients. Nontrauma patients who require critical care have the highest per patient ICU costs and may represent a previously underappreciated opportunity for cost control.