Investigating health and treatment measures during the Arbaeen procession 2022: A qualitative study

AIMS

The Arbaeen procession is one of the largest religious gatherings in which tens of millions of people participate every year. The presence of many people in this religious gathering highlights the necessity of planning to reduce incidents related to pilgrims in the field of health and to ensure their timely access to health and treatment services. The current research was conducted with the aim of investigating and analyzing the health field in the Arbaeen procession of 2022.

METHODOLOGY

This was a qualitative study, in which in-depth and semistructured interviews were conducted. The target population comprised healthcare policymakers, managers, and providers of the Arbaeen procession in 2022. The interview and data collection guide were developed using the World Health Organization's recommendations. Data collection was continued till data saturation. Directed content analysis was used to analyze the data. Different strategies were applied to increase the validity and reliability of the results of this study.

FINDING

Data saturation was reached after 33 interviews. In total, eight main topics were identified, including follow-up of disease and trauma, promotion of public health, education and health system, cooperation and coordination in the field of health, information and communication management, response operations, support and resource management, and security and safety.

CONCLUSION

Essential health issues in Arbaeen procession were identified in this research, which may be considered as an evidence-based guide for planners, planners, and executive managers of this religious community. The findings of this research may be used in other marches and public gatherings.

Civil-Military Coordination (CIMIC) Model in Natural Disasters in Iran

Objective:

The present study aimed at codifying a native model of civil-military coordination (CIMIC) in natural disasters in Iran.

Methods:

This manuscript is a part of a larger study. The present cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 using a two-stage Delphi technique. The factors confirmed by the technique were prioritized via a pairwise questionnaire. In doing so, 24 elites and experts in civil-military coordination were presented with the indicators in the course of classic Delphi technique and pairwise comparison. At the end, the nationalized model was finalized by sending the model to ten experts and asking their ideas.

Results:

The results obtained from the two rounds of Delphi indicated that 36 coordination factors could be classified into three primary classes of staff, stuff, and system. All factors were confirmed by the experts. Considering the weight of each class, “staff” and “stuff” classes were considered to be the highest and lowest priorities, respectively.

Conclusion:

Application of the coordination factors in the context of military and civil organizations leads to a better response to natural disasters. The organizations in charge of responding to disasters should be obliged to apply this model in the highest organizational commitment level as the final goals of disaster management. The results of the present study can be applied for codification of a comprehensive plan for assessing the civil-military coordination in natural disasters.

Prognostic factors in the persistence of posttraumatic epilepsy after penetrating head injuries sustained in war

Object

The goal of this paper was to investigate the long-term outcome and the possible prognostic factors that might have influenced the persistence of posttraumatic epilepsy after penetrating head injuries sustained during the Iraq–Iran war (1980–1988).

Methods

In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated 189 patients who sustained penetrating head injury and suffered posttraumatic epilepsy during the Iraq–Iran war (mean 18.6 ± 4.7 years after injury). The probabilities of persistent seizures (seizure occurrence in the past 2 years) in different periods after injury were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The possible prognostic factors (patients and injury characteristics, clinical findings, and seizure characteristics) were studied using log-rank and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The probability of persistent seizures was 86.4% after 16 years and 74.7% after 21 years. In patients with < 3 pieces of shrapnel or no sphincter disturbances during seizure attacks, the probability of being seizure free after these 16 and 21 years was significantly higher.

Conclusions

Early seizures, prophylactic antiepileptics drugs, and surgical intervention did not significantly affect long-term outcome in regard to persistence of seizures.

Severity of chronic pain affects health care utilization after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

While the association between chronic pain and high health care utilization is a known issue in the general population, this relation has not been well studied among kidney transplantation patients.

METHODS

The subjects were first-time kidney transplant recipients engrafted between 2003 and 2006 and 6 months to 5 years postoperatively. Using SF-36 Bodily Pain Scale, patients were categorized in three groups: group I, those with scores over 66.6; group II, between 66.6 and 33.3; and group III, over 33.3. The subjects' health care utilization was prospectively assessed by recording the number of hospital admission days and the frequency of home nurse visits, outpatient physician visits, and emergency department visits for any medical reason in a 6-month period.

RESULTS

A stepwise increase in the frequency of patients admitted to the hospital (P=.017), and those referred to emergency departments (P=.007) was correlated with greater severity of pain in the three groups. However, the frequency of patients having outpatient physician visits (P=.30) or home nurse visits (P=.387) did not vary significantly. Similarly, with increased pain severity, an increase was observed in the number of emergency department visits (P=.005) and duration of hospital stays (P=.049), but not in the number of home nurse (P=.890) or physician visits (P=.112).

CONCLUSION

The severity of pain seems to increase the amount of health care use among kidney transplant patients. To minimize associated costs, appropriate pain rehabilitation programs are suggested.

Pain Affects Health-Related Quality of Life in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is prevalent in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. We do not fully know the intensity of chronic pain experienced by kidney recipients in comparison to those on chronic hemodialysis and healthy controls. Moreover, the effect of chronic pain on kidney recipients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is yet to be comprehensively addressed. We designed this study to find an answer to these questions.

METHODS

In this case control study, we studied 205 kidney recipients, 69 hemodialysis patients, and 100 healthy controls, who were matched for age, sex, monthly family income, and educational level. The patients were evaluated for the intensity of chronic pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). HRQoL was measured with Short Form 36 (SF-36) in the kidney recipients. Chronic pain intensity was compared in the study groups, and in the kidney recipients the correlation between SF-36 subscores and severity of pain was assessed.

RESULTS

Severity of pain in the kidney recipients was lower than the hemodialysis patients, but more than the healthy controls (P=.001). The VAS pain score negatively correlated with the scores of SF- 36 total (r=-.329, P=01), mental health (r=-.190, P=07), physical health (r=-.275, P=.001), physical function (r=-.339, P=.001), role limitation due to physical problems (r=-.478, P=.001), role limitation due to emotional problems (r=-.326, P=.001), and bodily pain (r=-.894, P=.001).

DISCUSSION

The intensity of chronic pain experienced by the kidney recipients is less than that experienced by patients under chronic hemodialysis, but higher than healthy subjects. Focusing on chronic pain as a cause of post-renal transplantation morbidity is expected to improve post-renal transplantation quality of life.

Which Primary Diagnosis Has the Highest in-Hospital Mortality Rate for Kidney Recipients?

OBJECTIVES

Although "in-hospital mortality" for several post-renal transplantation complications has been reported in various studies, there is no single published single-center study that compares their hospital mortality rates. We sought to rank the primary diagnoses post-renal transplantation by means of in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

We selected 404 consecutive rehospitalizations following kidney transplantation from 2003 to 2005. The causes of rehospitalization were categorized into infection, allograft rejection, surgical complication, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), malignancy, medication complications, and miscellaneous. Fatality was defined as the relative frequency of death due to the same cause among all admissions.

RESULTS

The mortality rate (MR) was 5.7%. From the 23 cases of death, 17 (74%) had a functioning kidney at the time of death. The MR was 40% for CVA, 14.3% for surgical complications, 11.1% for miscellaneous, 5.3% for drug complications, 7% for infections, and 4.8% for graft rejection (P=.002). No death was observed among cases with a diagnosis of malignancy or nephrolithiasis. Inpatient mortality was higher among those with more than one diagnosis at admission: 42.9% for more than two diagnosis, 7.1% for those with two diagnosis, and 4.2% for those with one diagnosis (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The in-patient mortality ranking is totally different from the ranking of causes of death in renal recipients. In other words, infection is the leading cause of death due to high incidence, and not high fatality. More rare complications, including CVA and surgical complications, are more often fatal.