1
|
Elghazaly H, Rugo HS, Azim HA, Swain SM, Arun B, Aapro M, Perez EA, Anderson BO, Penault-Llorca F, Conte P, El Saghir NS, Yip CH, Ghosn M, Poortmans P, Shehata MA, Giuliano AE, Leung JWT, Guarneri V, Gligorov J, Gulluoglu BM, Abdel Aziz H, Frolova M, Sabry M, Balch CM, Orecchia R, El-Zawahry HM, Al-Sukhun S, Abdel Karim K, Kandil A, Paltuev RM, Foheidi M, El-Shinawi M, ElMahdy M, Abulkhair O, Yang W, Aref AT, Bakkach J, Bahie Eldin N, Elghazawy H. Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Consensus and Recommendations for the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2262. [PMID: 34066769 PMCID: PMC8125909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is challenging with several controversies and unmet needs. During the 12th Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Egypt, 2020, a panel of 35 breast cancer experts from 13 countries voted on consensus guidelines for the clinical management of TNBC. The consensus was subsequently updated based on the most recent data evolved lately. Methods: A consensus conference approach adapted from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was utilized. The panellists voted anonymously on each question, and a consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer. The final consensus was later circulated to the panellists for critical revision of important intellectual content. Results and conclusion: These recommendations represent the available clinical evidence and expert opinion when evidence is scarce. The percentage of the consensus votes, levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are presented for each statement. The consensus covered all the aspects of TNBC management starting from defining TNBC to the management of metastatic disease and highlighted the rapidly evolving landscape in this field. Consensus was reached in 70% of the statements (35/50). In addition, areas of warranted research were identified to guide future prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elghazaly
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Hamdy A. Azim
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (H.M.E.-Z.)
| | - Sandra M. Swain
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, MedStar Health, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Matti Aapro
- Breast Center, Clinique de Genolier, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland;
| | - Edith A. Perez
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Benjamin O. Anderson
- Breast Health Global Initiative, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology, Clermont Auvergne University, INSERM U1240 “Molecular Imaging and Theranostic Strategies”, Center Jean Perrin, Montalembert, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Pierfranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Nagi S. El Saghir
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon;
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 47500, Malaysia;
| | - Marwan Ghosn
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Saint Joseph University, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon;
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Mohamed A. Shehata
- Clinical oncology Department, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom 51132, Egypt;
| | - Armando E. Giuliano
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology Division, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
| | - Jessica W. T. Leung
- Department of Breast Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy; (P.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie AP-HP. Sorbonne Université, INSERM U938, 75013 Paris, France;
| | - Bahadir M. Gulluoglu
- Breast & Endocrine Surgery Unit, Marmara University School of Medicine, University Hospital, Istanbul 34722, Turkey;
| | - Hany Abdel Aziz
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Mona Frolova
- Federal State Budgetary Institution “NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 127994 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Mohamed Sabry
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Charles M. Balch
- Surgical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), and University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Heba M. El-Zawahry
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (H.M.E.-Z.)
| | | | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Alaa Kandil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria School of Medicine, Alexandria 21131, Egypt;
| | - Ruslan M. Paltuev
- Russian Association of Oncological Mammology, Department of Breast Tumours of Federal State Budgetary Institution “Petrov Research Institute of Oncology”, 197758 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Meteb Foheidi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Adult Medical Oncology, Princess Noorah Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs-Western Region, Jeddah 22384, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Mohamed El-Shinawi
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt;
- Vice President of Galala University, Galala University, Suez 435611, Egypt
| | - Manal ElMahdy
- Department of Pathology, Ain shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt;
| | - Omalkhair Abulkhair
- Oncology Department, Alfaisal university, Alhabib Hospital, Riyad 11533, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Adel T. Aref
- The School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia;
| | - Joaira Bakkach
- Biomedical Genomics & Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, Abdel Malek Essaadi University, Tangier 90000, Morocco;
| | - Nermean Bahie Eldin
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| | - Hagar Elghazawy
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt; (H.A.A.); (M.S.); (K.A.K.); (N.B.E.); (H.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elghazaly H, Aref AT, Anderson BO, Arun B, Yip CH, Abdelaziz H, Ghosn M, Al-Foheidi M, Cardenosa G, Leung JWT, Gado N, Balch CM, Sabry M, Ezz Elarab L, Giuliano AE, El-Zawahry HM, Abdel Karim K, Nasr A, Maki H, Chung H, Saadeddin A, Abdelwahab MM, Al Tahan FM, Chalabi N, Frolova M, Kamal RM, Shehata MA, Bahie Eldin N, Elghazawy H. The first BGICC consensus and recommendations for breast cancer awareness, early detection and risk reduction in low- and middle-income countries and the MENA region. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:505-513. [PMID: 33559295 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
In low-middle income countries (LMICs) and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, there is an unmet need to establish and improve breast cancer (BC) awareness, early diagnosis and risk reduction programs. During the 12th Breast, Gynecological & Immuno-oncology International Cancer Conference - Egypt 2020, 26 experts from 7 countries worldwide voted to establish the first consensus for BC awareness, early detection and risk reduction in LMICs/MENA region. The panel advised that there is an extreme necessity for a well-developed BC data registries and prospective clinical studies that address alternative modalities/modified BC screening programs in areas of limited resources. The most important recommendations of the panel were: (a) BC awareness campaigns should be promoted to public and all adult age groups; (b) early detection programs should combine geographically distributed mammographic facilities with clinical breast examination (CBE); (c) breast awareness should be encouraged; and (d) intensive surveillance and chemoprevention strategies should be fostered for high-risk women. The panel defined some areas for future clinical research, which included the role of CBE and breast self-examination as an alternative to radiological screening in areas of limited resources, the interval and methodology of BC surveillance in women with increased risk of BC and the use of low dose tamoxifen in BC risk reduction. In LMICs/MENA region, BC awareness and early detection campaigns should take into consideration the specific disease criteria and the socioeconomic status of the target population. The statements with no consensus reached should serve as potential catalyst for future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elghazaly
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Adel T Aref
- School of Public health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Breast Health Global Initiative, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Hany Abdelaziz
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Marwan Ghosn
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Meteb Al-Foheidi
- Princess Noorah Oncology Center/College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gilda Cardenosa
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica W T Leung
- Breast Imaging Department, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nivine Gado
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Charles M Balch
- Surgical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed Sabry
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Lobna Ezz Elarab
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Armando E Giuliano
- Surgical Oncology Division, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Heba M El-Zawahry
- Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Azza Nasr
- Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hussein Maki
- Khartoum Oncology Specialized Center, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Hannah Chung
- Breast Imaging Department, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ahmed Saadeddin
- King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Nivine Chalabi
- Radiology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mona Frolova
- NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Rasha M Kamal
- Radiology Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed A Shehata
- Clinical Oncology Department, Menoufia University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt
| | | | - Hagar Elghazawy
- Clinical Oncology Department, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oualla K, El-Zawahry HM, Arun B, Reuben JM, Woodward WA, Gamal El-Din H, Lim B, Mellas N, Ueno NT, Fouad TM. Novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9:493-511. [PMID: 28717401 PMCID: PMC5502951 DOI: 10.1177/1758834017711380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that is defined by negative estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Treating patients with TNBC remains clinically challenging, as patients are not candidates for endocrine or HER2-directed therapy. As a result, chemotherapy with traditional agents such as anthracyclines and taxanes remains the only available option with moderate success. Recent discoveries have revealed that TNBC is a heterogeneous disease at the clinical, histological and molecular levels. The use of biomarkers to identify distinct subsets of TNBC that derive the greatest benefit from presently approved as well as novel therapeutics has become the main focus of current research. The aim of this review is to explore the clinical and biological complexity of TNBC as well as identify novel therapeutic options that target the various molecular subsets of TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karima Oualla
- Medical Oncology Department, Hassan II University Hospital, Fes, Morocco
| | - Heba M. El-Zawahry
- Department of Medical Oncology, The National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James M. Reuben
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wendy A. Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heba Gamal El-Din
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Bora Lim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA
| | - Nawfel Mellas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hassan II University Hospital, Fes, Morocco
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA
| | - Tamer M. Fouad
- Department of Medical Oncology, The National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Kasr El-Aini Road, Cairo, 11796, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saber MM, Bahnasy AA, El-Zawahry HM, Allahloubi NM, El-Moetii MA, Abd El Fatah RM, Aid S, Ghareeb M. Abstract P1-04-10: Assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTC) by RT/PCR as a surrogate marker for PFS in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p1-04-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Despite significant improvements in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), it remains an incurable disease. The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTC) predicts for progression free survival (PFS) in (MBC) patients. We hypothesized that the change in level of CTCs can be a good surrogate marker for PFS.
Methods: CTC level was determined by flow cytometry (FCM) in the blood of MBC female patients with measurable or non-measurable evaluable disease excluding CNS metastasis 1) before starting taxanes (Docetaxel or Paclitaxel) regimen, 2) after the first cycle, and 3) at assessment of the disease after 3-4 cycles. The breast origin was further confirmed through assessment of CK19, mammaglobin, prolactin inducible peptide (PIP), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the separated CTCs by quantitative real time PCR (QRT-PCR). CTC level and level of these markers were correlated with the clinical features of the patients, response to treatment and PFS.
Results: Sixty-six female patients were enrolled between May 2010 and Jan. 2011. The median age was 48.9 years and duct carcinoma was the main pathologic subtype. After a median follow up period of 20 months, median PFS was 6 months. There was a very strong relation between the selection marker CK-19 and the breast cancer markers (p value = 0.0001). Patients with baseline CTC < 4 had significantly higher median, 6 months and 1 year PFS when compared with those with CTC ≥ 4 (p value = 0.03) while CTC levels did not correlate with PFS in the 2nd & 3rd samples respectively (p value = 0.28). Also patients whose CTC level decreased after treatment had significantly prolonged median PFS compared to patients whose CTC level increased (10 versus 4 months, p = 0.007).
Conclusions: CTCs; measured by RT-PCR were strongly predictive of PFS in MBC. CTC also could be of a great potential value in early assessment of response to chemotherapy after the 1st cycle especially in non-measurable lesions.
Key Words: Circulating tumor cells, metastatic breast cancer, progression free survival and RT-PCR.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-04-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MM Saber
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - AA Bahnasy
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - HM El-Zawahry
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - NM Allahloubi
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - MA El-Moetii
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - S Aid
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - M Ghareeb
- National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
El-Zawahry HM, Zeeneldin AA, Samra MA, Mattar MM, El-Gammal MM, Abd El-Samee A, Darwish T. Cost and outcome of treatment of adults with acute myeloid leukemia at the National Cancer Institute-Egypt. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2007; 19:106-113. [PMID: 19034340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite important advances in the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the majority of patients die of their disease, unless bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is done. Infection and hemorrhage are still the major causes of mortality in AML patients. Progress in therapy and supportive care has led to gradual improvement in the overall results, but further improvements are still needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS The aim of this study is to identify the outcome and costs of adult AML patients treated with conventional chemotherapy (CCT) at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University during the time period from April 1999 to January 2002. Clinical, laboratory characteristics were all recorded. Data regarding different types of therapies given for these patients including response, outcome and costs were also collected. RESULTS The median age of 82 identified AML patients was 34 years. The complete remission (CR) rate after induction with CCT was 52% (42/82 patients) with a median CR duration of 9 months. Twenty-eight percent of patients who achieved CR subsequently relapsed. By January 2003, fifty-eight patients were dead (70.7%). Infections were the major mortality cause, followed by disease progression then bleeding (65% , 28% and 7% respectively). The median treatment cost per patient was 33158 Egyptian Pounds (LE). It was higher for patients who achieved CR compared to those who relapsed and/or died. Drugs contributed by 78 % to the total treatment cost, while hospitalization, investigations and blood-component therapy contributed by 6%, 7% and 8% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Outcome of patients with AML treated at NCI- Cairo University can be enhanced by improvement of supportive therapy; mainly infection control and expanding BMT programs to accommodate all eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba M El-Zawahry
- The Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|