Dyslexia: the link with visual deficits

Some research reports suggest that visual anomalies may have a causative role in dyslexia, and on this basis certain forms of therapy have been proposed. Recently, we have published the initial results of a matched group study which found dyslexia to be associated with binocular instability, reduced amplitude of accommodation, and reduced contrast sensitivity for both low spatial frequencies and uniform field flicker. The binocular instability was best identified by measuring the vergence amplitude: a modified Dunlop test failed to differentiate reliably between the two groups. Here, we report a significant correlation between flicker threshold and binocular instability, thus linking sensory and motor visual correlates of dyslexia. We also present further new analyses on the interaction between optometric variables and the psychometric measurement of coding skills. The results of these analyses disagree with a recent claim that binocular vision anomalies might cause poor performance at coding tasks. Our studies indicate that visual characteristics are not the major aetiological factors in specific reading difficulty.

Effect of pattern glare and colored overlays on a stimulated-reading task in dyslexics and normal readers

Scotopic sensitivity syndrome or the Irlen syndrome describes symptoms of asthenopia anamolous visual performance experienced while reading that are lessened by colored filters. One putative explantation for this condition relates to pattern glare: a hypersensitivity to repetitive patterns, including lines of print on a page. Experiment 1 used a placebo-controlled paradigm to investigate the effect of pattern glare and colored overlays on performance at a simulated reading visual search task. Despite the fact that the subjects were university students, the results showed a tendency, of border-line significance, to support the conclusion that colored filters seem to improve reading through ameliorating pattern glare. In experiment 2 we compared the prevalence of pattern glare in matched groups of dyslexic children and good readers. The dyslexic group reported more pattern glare, but also reported more glare from a control stimulus. Pattern glare in the dyslexic group was directly correlated with flicker sensitivity. The results are related to recent research on visual processing and ocular-motor function in dyslexia.

An investigation of some sensory and refractive visual factors in dyslexia

The role of visual factors in dyslexia has been a long-standing source of controversy. Recent research has suggested that there may be a deficit of the transient visual subsystem in dyslexia. The evidence for this hypothesis comes principally from investigations of spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity and visual persistence. This evidence is reviewed and it is noted that previous work has never applied two of these purported "tests of transient function" to the same subject group. The hypothesised transient system deficit in dyslexia was investigated in a study comparing 43 control with 39 dyslexic children who were matched for age, sex, and intelligence. Comprehensive psychometric and optometric data were obtained, including visual acuities and refractive errors. The spatial contrast sensitivity function was determined in such a way as to investigate further the findings of Lovegrove, Martin, Bowling, Blackwood, Badcock and Paxton [(1982) Neuropsychology, 20, 309-315] and Martin and Lovegrove [(1984) Neuropsychologia, 22, 73-77]. It might be expected, from the work of Merigan and Maunsell [(1990) Neuroscience, 5, 347-352], that a better test of magno-cellular function would be to investigate the modulation threshold for a virtually uniform field that was flickering sinusoidally at 10 Hz. This temporal contrast sensitivity was studied in a similar way to Brannan and Williams [(1988) Clinical Vision Sciences, 3, 137-142]. A non-verbal simulated reading visual search task was used to investigate the effect of any visual deficits on a test that was, in its low-level visual requirements, similar to reading. The following factors were found to be significantly associated with dyslexia: reduced visual acuity, impaired flicker detection at 10 Hz, reduced low spatial frequency contrast sensitivity, and slightly slower performance at a simulated reading visual search task. The two alleged "tests of transient function" were only weakly correlated with one another (r = 0.183), suggesting that these variables do not measure the same function. Much of the dyslexic group's slightly slower performance at the simulated reading task could be accounted for by the psychometric variable of visual sequential memory. Like reading, the simulated reading task requires the accurate perception of sequential characters. Hence, it seems unlikely that the low-level visual deficits in the dyslexic group were major causes of their poor reading performance. Alternative explanations for the results are discussed.

Investigation of accommodative and binocular function in dyslexia

The visual correlates of dyslexia are the subject of controversy, and much evidence suggests that they may include some aspects of binocular and accommodative function. These factors were investigated in 43 control and 39 dyslexic children, who were matched for age, sex and performance intelligence quotient. The dyslexic group exhibited significantly lower positive and negative vergence reserves, and vergence instability when the eyes were dissociated at near. Their amplitudes of accommodation also were significantly reduced. However, other measures including dissociated and associated heterophoria and accommodative lag and facility were similar in both groups. The stability of motor ocular dominance, as assessed with a modified Dunlop test, was similar in both groups. The results of a simulated reading visual search task suggested that the vergence and accommodative dysfunction were not a major cause of the dyslexia. Further analyses, using reading-age matched groups, suggested that these ocular motor correlates were not attributable to the better reading performance in the control group. The most likely remaining explanation is that they are, in most cases, non-causal correlates of the dyslexia.