1
|
King W, Gorrepati VS, Draganov P, Aihara H, Karasik M, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Hoffman BJ, Yang D. Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:266-267. [PMID: 37455057 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - V Subhash Gorrepati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brenda J Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King W, Draganov P, Gorrepati VS, Hayat M, Aihara H, Karasik M, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Yang D. Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a Western multicenter prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:1045-1051. [PMID: 36731578 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recent Western studies support the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions throughout the GI tract. Although admission for observation after ESD is standard in Asia, a more selective approach may optimize resource utilization. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after ESD and factors associated with admission. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort of patients undergoing ESD (2016-2021). The primary end points were safety of SDD and factors associated with post-ESD admission. RESULTS Of 831 patients (median age, 67 years; 57% male) undergoing 831 ESDs (240 performed in the esophagus, 126 in the stomach, and 465 in the colorectum; median lesion size, 44 mm), 588 (71%) were SDD versus 243 (29%) admissions. Delayed bleeding and perforation occurred in 12 (2%) and 4 (.7%) of SDD patients, respectively; only 1 (.2%) required surgery. Of the 243 admissions, 223 (92%) were discharged after ≤24 hours of observation. Interestingly, larger lesion size (>44 mm) was not associated with higher admission rate (odds ratio [OR], .5; 95% confidence interval [CI], .3-.8; P = .001). Lesions in the upper GI tract versus colon (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6; P = .01), invasive cancer (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1; P = .01), and adverse events (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P = .001) were independent factors for admission. Admissions were more likely performed by endoscopists with ESD volume <50 cases (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.3; P = .001) with procedure time >75 minutes (OR, 13.5; 95% CI, 8.5-21.3; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS SDD after ESD can be safe and feasible. Patients with invasive cancer, lesions in the upper GI tract, longer procedure times, or procedures performed by low-volume ESD endoscopists are more likely to be admitted postprocedure. Risk stratification of patients for SDD after ESD should help optimize resource utilization and enhance ESD uptake in the West. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William King
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - V Subhash Gorrepati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maham Hayat
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gudenkauf FJ, Mehta A, Ferri L, Aihara H, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Jue TL, Munroe CA, Boparai ES, Mehta NA, Bhatt A, Kumta NA, Othman MO, Mercado M, Javaid H, Aadam AA, Siegel A, James TW, Grimm IS, DeWitt JM, Novikov A, Schlachterman A, Kowalski T, Samarasena J, Hashimoto R, Chehade NEH, Lee JG, Chang K, Su B, Ujiki MB, Sharaiha RZ, Carr-Locke DL, Chen A, Chen M, Chen YI, Tomizawa Y, von Renteln D, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA, Bechara R, Karasik M, Patel NJ, Fukami N, Nishimura M, Hanada Y, Song LMWK, Laszkowska M, Wang AY, Hwang JH, Friedland S, Sethi A, Ngamruengphong S. Factors Associated With Advanced Histological Diagnosis and Upstaging After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Gastric Neoplasia. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023; 25:2-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
|
4
|
Yang D, King W, Aihara H, Karasik MS, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Jawaid SA, Perbtani YB, Hoffman BJ, Akki AS, Schlachterman A, Coman RM, Wang AY, Draganov PV. Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on histologic diagnosis in Barrett's esophagus visible neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:626-633. [PMID: 34906544 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data are limited on the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a potential diagnostic and staging tool in Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and factors associated with change of histologic diagnosis by ESD compared with pre-ESD histology. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for BE visible neoplasia. A change in histologic diagnosis was defined as "upstaged" or "downstaged" if the ESD specimen had a higher or lower degree, respectively, of dysplasia or neoplasia when compared with pre-ESD specimens. RESULTS Two hundred five patients (median age, 69 years; 81% men) with BE visible neoplasia underwent ESD from 2016 to 2021. Baseline histology was obtained using forceps (n = 182) or EMR (n = 23). ESD changed the histologic diagnosis in 55.1% of cases (113/205), of which 68.1% were upstaged and 31.9% downstaged. The frequency of change in diagnosis after ESD was similar whether baseline histology was obtained using forceps (55.5%) or EMR (52.2%) (P = .83). In aggregate, 23.9% of cases (49/205) were upstaged to invasive cancer on ESD histopathology. On multivariate analysis, lesions in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 confidence interval, 1.1-3.9; P = .02) and prior radiofrequency ablation (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5; P = .02) were predictors of change in histologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS ESD led to a change of diagnosis in more than half of patients with BE visible neoplasia. Selective ESD can serve as a potential diagnostic and staging tool, particularly in those with suspected invasive disease. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - William King
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael S Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Salmaan A Jawaid
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brenda J Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ashwin S Akki
- Department of Pathology Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roxana M Coman
- Division of Hospital Gastroenterology, Atrium/Navicent Health, Mercer University, College of Medicine, Macon, Georgia, USA
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ortiz O, Rex DK, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law R, Wallace MB, Elias PA, MacKenzie TA, Pohl H, Pellisé M. Factors associated with complete clip closure after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1150-1159. [PMID: 33291159 DOI: 10.1055/a-1332-6727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM : Delayed bleeding is a common adverse event following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal polyps. Prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of nonpedunculated polyps larger than 20 mm reduces the incidence of severe delayed bleeding, especially in proximal polyps. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with complete prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of large polyps. METHODS : This is a post hoc analysis of the CLIP study (NCT01936948). All patients randomized to the clip group were included. Main outcome was complete clip closure of the mucosal resection defect. The defect was considered completely closed when no remaining mucosal defect was visible and clips were less than 1 cm apart. Factors associated with complete closure were evaluated in multivariable analysis. RESULTS : In total, 458 patients (age 65, 58 % men) with 494 large polyps were included. Complete clip closure of the resection defect was achieved for 338 polyps (68.4 %); closure was not complete for 156 (31.6 %). Factors associated with complete closure in adjusted analysis were smaller polyp size (odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter decrease [95 % confidence interval 1.02-1.08]), good access (OR 3.58 [1.94-9.59]), complete submucosal lifting (OR 2.28 [1.36-3.90]), en bloc resection (OR 5.75 [1.48-22.39]), and serrated histology (OR 2.74 [1.35-5.56]). CONCLUSIONS : Complete clip closure was not achieved for almost one in three resected large nonpedunculated polyps. While stable access and en bloc resection facilitate clip closure, most factors associated with clip closure are not modifiable. This highlights the need for alternative closure options and measures to prevent bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oswaldo Ortiz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew T Moyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Omid Sanaei
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Firas H Al-Kawas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Stuart R Gordon
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Abraham Mathew
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John M Levenick
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Fadi Antaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Medical Center (CHUM) and Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Gill
- Division of Gastroenterology, James A. Haley VA, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Pooja A Elias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Todd A MacKenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Department for Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.,Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ngamruengphong S, Ferri L, Aihara H, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Perbtani YB, Jue TL, Munroe CA, Boparai ES, Mehta NA, Bhatt A, Kumta NA, Othman MO, Mercado M, Javaid H, Aadam AA, Siegel A, James TW, Grimm IS, DeWitt JM, Novikov A, Schlachterman A, Kowalski T, Samarasena J, Hashimoto R, Chehade NEH, Lee J, Chang K, Su B, Ujiki MB, Mehta A, Sharaiha RZ, Carr-Locke DL, Chen A, Chen M, Chen YI, Pourmousavi Khoshknab M, Wang R, Kerdsirichairat T, Tomizawa Y, von Renteln D, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA, Bechara R, Karasik M, Patel NJ, Fukami N, Nishimura M, Hanada Y, Wong Kee Song LM, Laszkowska M, Wang AY, Hwang JH, Friedland S, Sethi A, Kalloo AN. Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North America. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1611-1619.e1. [PMID: 32565290 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment option for superficial gastric neoplasia in Asia, but there are few data on outcomes of gastric ESD from North America. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in North America. METHODS We analyzed data from 347 patients who underwent gastric ESD at 25 centers, from 2010 through 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details and related adverse events, treatment outcomes, local recurrence, and vital status at the last follow up. For the 277 patients with available follow-up data, the median interval between initial ESD and last clinical or endoscopic evaluation was 364 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of en bloc and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes included curative resection, rates of adverse events and recurrence, and gastric cancer-related death. RESULTS Ninety patients (26%) had low-grade adenomas or dysplasia, 82 patients (24%) had high-grade dysplasia, 139 patients (40%) had early gastric cancer, and 36 patients (10%) had neuroendocrine tumors. Proportions of en bloc and R0 resection for all lesions were 92%/82%, for early gastric cancers were 94%/75%, for adenomas and low-grade dysplasia were 93%/ 92%, for high-grade dysplasia were 89%/ 87%, and for neuroendocrine tumors were 92%/75%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.6% of patients; 82% of these were treated successfully with endoscopic therapy. Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.6% of patients. No delayed perforation or procedure-related deaths were observed. There were local recurrences in 3.9% of cases; all occurred after non-curative ESD resection. Metachronous lesions were identified in 14 patients (6.9%). One of 277 patients with clinical follow up died of metachronous gastric cancer that occurred 2.5 years after the initial ESD. CONCLUSIONS ESD is a highly effective treatment for superficial gastric neoplasia and should be considered as a viable option for patients in North America. The risk of local recurrence is low and occurs exclusively after non-curative resection. Careful endoscopic surveillance is necessary to identify and treat metachronous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Dennis J Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Terry L Jue
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Craig A Munroe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Eshandeep S Boparai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Neal A Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amit Bhatt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Mercado
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Huma Javaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amanda Siegel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Theodore W James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John M DeWitt
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Aleksey Novikov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Kowalski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason Samarasena
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Rintaro Hashimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Nabil El Hage Chehade
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - John Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Bailey Su
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Michael B Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Amit Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Reem Z Sharaiha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David L Carr-Locke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Alex Chen
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael Chen
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Rui Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Yutaka Tomizawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert Bechara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Karasik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Neej J Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Norio Fukami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Makoto Nishimura
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yuri Hanada
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Monika Laszkowska
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Shai Friedland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Antony N Kalloo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Draganov PV, Aihara H, Karasik MS, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Jawaid SA, Westerveld D, Perbtani YB, Hoffman BJ, Schlachterman A, Siegel A, Coman RM, Wang AY, Yang D. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study. Gastroenterology 2021; 160:2317-2327.e2. [PMID: 33610532 PMCID: PMC8783061 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Asia has been shown to be superior to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and surgery for the management of selected early gastrointestinal cancers. We aimed to evaluate technical outcomes of ESD in North America. METHODS We conducted a multicenter prospective study on ESD across 10 centers in the United States and Canada between April 2016 and April 2020. End points included rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events, factors associated with failed resection, and recurrence post-R0 resection. RESULTS Six hundred and ninety-two patients (median age, 66 years; 57.8% were men) underwent ESD (median lesion size, 40 mm; interquartile range, 25-52 mm) for lesions in the esophagus (n = 181), stomach (n = 101), duodenum (n = 11), colon (n = 211) and rectum (n = 188). En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.5%, 84.2%, and 78.3%, respectively. Bleeding and perforation were reported in 2.3% and 2.9% of the cases, respectively. Only 1 patient (0.14%) required surgery for adverse events. On multivariable analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis was associated with failed en bloc, R0, and curative resection and higher risk for adverse events. Overall recurrence was 5.8% (31 of 532) at a mean follow-up of 13.3 months (range, 1-60 months). CONCLUSIONS In this large multicenter prospective North American experience, we demonstrate that ESD can be performed safely, effectively, and is associated with a low recurrence rate. The technical resection outcomes achieved in this study are in line with the current established consensus quality parameters and further support the implementation of ESD for the treatment of select gastrointestinal neoplasms; ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02989818.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael S. Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mohamed O. Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B. Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Salmaan A. Jawaid
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Donevan Westerveld
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Yaseen B. Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brenda J. Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amanda Siegel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Roxana M. Coman
- Division of Hospital Gastroenterology, Atrium/Navicent Health, Mercer University, College of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
| | - Andrew Y. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hajifathalian K, Ichkhanian Y, Dawod Q, Meining A, Schmidt A, Glaser N, Vosoughi K, Diehl DL, Grimm IS, James T, Templeton AW, Samarasena JB, Chehade NEH, Lee JG, Chang KJ, Mizrahi M, Barawi M, Irani S, Friedland S, Korc P, Aadam AA, Al-Haddad M, Kowalski TE, Smallfield G, Ginsberg GG, Fukami N, Lajin M, Kumta NA, Tang SJ, Naga Y, Amateau SK, Kasmin F, Goetz M, Seewald S, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, Mahdev S, Mukewar S, Sampath K, Carr-Locke DL, Khashab MA, Sharaiha RZ. Full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract lesions: the first international experience. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1291-E1301. [PMID: 33015330 PMCID: PMC7508667 DOI: 10.1055/a-1216-1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD) provides a novel treatment option for lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection techniques. There are limited data on the efficacy and safety of FTRD for resection of upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) lesions. Patients and methods This was an international multicenter retrospective study, including patients who had an endoscopic resection of an upper GIT lesion using the FTRD between January 2017 and February 2019. Results Fifty-six patients from 13 centers were included. The most common lesions were mesenchymal neoplasms (n = 23, 41 %), adenomas (n = 7, 13 %), and hamartomas (n = 6, 11 %). Eighty-four percent of lesions were located in the stomach, and 14 % in the duodenum. The average size of lesions was 14 mm (range 3 to 33 mm). Deployment of the FTRD was technically successful in 93 % of patients (n = 52) leading to complete and partial resection in 43 (77 %) and 9 (16 %) patients, respectively. Overall, the FTRD led to negative histological margins (R0 resection) in 38 (68 %) of patients. A total of 12 (21 %) mild or moderate adverse events (AEs) were reported. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 31 patients (55 %), on average 88 days after the procedure (IQR 68-138 days). Of these, 30 patients (97 %) did not have any residual or recurrent lesion on endoscopic examination and biopsy, with residual adenoma in one patient (3 %). Conclusions Our results suggest a high technical success rate and an acceptable histologically complete resection rate, with a low risk of AEs and early recurrence for FTRD resection of upper GIT lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Hajifathalian
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Yervant Ichkhanian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Qais Dawod
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Alexander Meining
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nicholas Glaser
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kia Vosoughi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - David L. Diehl
- Interventional and Experimental Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Theodore James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Adam W. Templeton
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Jason B. Samarasena
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Nabil El Hage Chehade
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - John G. Lee
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Kenneth J. Chang
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Meir Mizrahi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Advanced Endoscopy, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States
| | - Mohammed Barawi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ascension St. John hospital, Detroit, Michigan, United States
| | - Shayan Irani
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United Stats
| | - Shai Friedland
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Paul Korc
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, California, United States
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | | | - George Smallfield
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia United States
| | - Gregory G. Ginsberg
- Gastroenterology Division, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Norio Fukami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
| | - Michael Lajin
- SHARP Grossmont Hospital, La Mesa, California, United States
| | - Nikhil A. Kumta
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
| | - Shou-jiang Tang
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
| | - Yehia Naga
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States
| | - Stuart K. Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Franklin Kasmin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Martin Goetz
- Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Centre of Gastroenterology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | | | - Srihari Mahdev
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Saurabh Mukewar
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kartik Sampath
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - David L. Carr-Locke
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Reem Z. Sharaiha
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reed CC, Grimm IS. Aortoenteric fistula complicating lumen-apposing metal stent placement for a benign anastomotic stricture. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:779-780. [PMID: 32298673 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Craig C Reed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law RJ, Elias PA, Pellise M, Mackenzie TA, Rex DK. Effects of Blended (Yellow) vs Forced Coagulation (Blue) Currents on Adverse Events, Complete Resection, or Polyp Recurrence After Polypectomy in a Large Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:119-128.e2. [PMID: 32173478 PMCID: PMC8262363 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is debate over the type of electrosurgical setting that should be used for polyp resection. Some endoscopists use a type of blended current (yellow), whereas others prefer coagulation (blue). We performed a single-blinded, randomized trial to determine whether type of electrosurgical setting affects risk of adverse events or recurrence. METHODS Patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps 20 mm or larger (n = 928) were randomly assigned, in a 2 × 2 design, to groups that received clip closure or no clip closure of the resection defect (primary intervention) and then to either a blended current (Endocut Q) or coagulation current (forced coagulation) (Erbe Inc) (secondary intervention and focus of the study). The study was performed at multiple centers, from April 2013 through October 2017. Patients were evaluated 30 days after the procedure (n = 919), and 675 patients underwent a surveillance colonoscopy at a median of 6 months after the procedure. The primary outcome was any severe adverse event in a per patient analysis. Secondary outcomes were complete resection and recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy in a per polyp analysis. RESULTS Serious adverse events occurred in 7.2% of patients in the Endocut group and 7.9% of patients in the forced coagulation group, with no significant differences in the occurrence of types of events. There were no significant differences between groups in proportions of polyps that were completely removed (96% in the Endocut group vs 95% in the forced coagulation group) or the proportion of polyps found to have recurred at surveillance colonoscopy (17% and 17%, respectively). Procedural characteristics were comparable, except that 17% of patients in the Endocut group had immediate bleeding that required an intervention, compared with 11% in the forced coagulation group (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS In a randomized trial to compare 2 commonly used electrosurgical settings for the resection of large colorectal polyps (Endocut vs forced coagulation), we found no difference in risk of serious adverse events, complete resection rate, or polyp recurrence. Electrosurgical settings can therefore be selected based on endoscopist expertise and preference. Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT01936948.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center White River Junction, Vermont.
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew T. Moyer
- Matthew T. Moyer, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Muhammad K. Hasan
- Muhammad K. Hasan, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Douglas Pleskow, Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - B. Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Mouen A. Khashab, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Omid Sanaei
- Mouen A. Khashab, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Firas H. Al-Kawas
- Mouen A. Khashab, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland,Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart R. Gordon
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Abraham Mathew
- Matthew T. Moyer, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - John M. Levenick
- Matthew T. Moyer, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Harry R. Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Fadi Antaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Medical Center and Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Seth D. Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jeffrey A. Gill
- Division of Gastroenterology James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ryan J. Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Pooja A. Elias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Maria Pellise
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Todd A. Mackenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Department for Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Douglas K. Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grimm IS, Kroch DA, Peery AF. Surgery for benign colorectal polyps: changing behavior patterns. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:231-232. [PMID: 32586555 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel A Kroch
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne F Peery
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
James TW, Greenberg S, Grimm IS, Baron TH. EUS-guided gastroenteric anastomosis as a bridge to definitive treatment in benign gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:537-542. [PMID: 31759034 PMCID: PMC7039740 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has typically been managed surgically. However, many patients are poor operative candidates because of comorbidities. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has previously demonstrated efficacy as a definitive treatment for benign and malignant GOO; however, limited data exist on use as a bridge to resolution of the obstruction in an attempt to avoid or delay definitive surgery. METHODS A retrospective series of consecutive patients who underwent EUS-GE between January 2013 and July 2019 for benign GOO at a tertiary referral center were included in the study. The primary outcome was the rate of definitive surgery; secondary outcomes included technical success and rate of adverse events. RESULTS During the study period, 22 patients with benign GOO underwent EUS-GE (40% female; mean age, 54.2 years). The mean procedure time was 66 minutes, and technical success was achieved in 21. Five patients developed recurrent GOO while the LAMS was in place after a mean dwell time of 228 days; 1 patient was converted to surgical GE. LAMSs were removed electively in 18 patients after GOO resolution and a mean dwell time of 270 days; 1 patient developed a recurrent GOO after LAMS removal and was converted to surgical GE. The rate of recurrent GOO after LAMS removal was 5.6%. Three severe adverse events occurred in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GE was able to prevent surgery for GOO in 83.3% of cases. LAMSs needed to stay in place for a mean of 8.5 months to allow resolution of GOO, and there was a low rate of recurrent GOO (5.6%) after LAMS removal. Prospective, randomized trials comparing surgical and endoscopic anastomoses are needed in patients with benign causes of GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore W. James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Sydney Greenberg
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Todd H. Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law RJ, Elias PA, Pellise M, Wallace MB, Mackenzie TA, Rex DK. Clip Closure Prevents Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:977-984.e3. [PMID: 30885778 PMCID: PMC8224988 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Bleeding is the most common severe complication after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colon polyps and is associated with significant morbidity and cost. We examined whether prophylactic closure of the mucosal defect with hemoclips after polyp resection reduces the risk of bleeding. METHODS We performed a multicenter, randomized trial of patients with a large nonpedunculated colon polyp (≥20 mm) at 18 medical centers in North America and Spain from April 2013 through October 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to groups that underwent endoscopic closure with a clip (clip group) or no closure (control group) and followed. The primary outcome, postprocedure bleeding, was defined as a severe bleeding event that required hospitalization, a blood transfusion, colonoscopy, surgery, or another invasive intervention within 30 days after completion of the colonoscopy. Subgroup analyses included postprocedure bleeding with polyp location, polyp size, or use of periprocedural antithrombotic medications. We also examined the risk of any serious adverse event. RESULTS A total of 919 patients were randomly assigned to groups and completed follow-up. Postprocedure bleeding occurred in 3.5% of patients in the clip group and 7.1% in the control group (absolute risk difference [ARD] 3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7%-6.5%). Among 615 patients (66.9%) with a proximal large polyp, the risk of bleeding in the clip group was 3.3% and in the control group was 9.6% (ARD 6.3%; 95% CI 2.5%-10.1%); among patients with a distal large polyp, the risks were 4.0% in the clip group and 1.4% in the control group (ARD -2.6%; 95% CI -6.3% to -1.1%). The effect of clip closure was independent of antithrombotic medications or polyp size. Serious adverse events occurred in 4.8% of patients in the clip group and 9.5% of patients in the control group (ARD 4.6%; 95% CI 1.3%-8.0%). CONCLUSIONS In a randomized trial, we found that endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect following resection of large colon polyps reduces risk of postprocedure bleeding. The protective effect appeared to be restricted to large polyps located in the proximal colon. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01936948.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, White River Junction, Vermont.
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew T. Moyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Muhammad K. Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - B. Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Mouen A. Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Omid Sanaei
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Firas H. Al-Kawas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart R. Gordon
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Abraham Mathew
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John M. Levenick
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Harry R. Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Fadi Antaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Medical Center (CHUM) and Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Seth D. Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jeffrey A. Gill
- Division of Gastroenterology James A. Haley VA, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ryan J. Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Pooja A. Elias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Maria Pellise
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael B. Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Todd A. Mackenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Department for Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Douglas K. Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Grimm
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sarah K McGill
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Grimm
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel A Kroch
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joel V Brill
- Predictive Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abdelfatah MM, Barakat M, Othman MO, Grimm IS, Uedo N. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in submucosal early gastric cancer according to the expanded criteria: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:26-32. [PMID: 30298447 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6451-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For successful endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC), absolute criteria for a curative en bloc resection were initially established to include predominantly differentiated mucosal lesions ≤ 2 cm in diameter without ulceration. These indications were subsequently expanded to include larger, ulcerated, and predominantly undifferentiated mucosal lesions. In addition, differentiated type adenocarcinomas ≤ 3 cm with slight submucosal invasion of < 500 µm (pT1b1) are regarded as "curative" under the expanded criteria. However, data derived from studies of surgical specimens in patients with pT1b1 EGC have yielded varying rates of lymph node metastasis (LNM). METHOD A systemic review was conducted using the pooled analysis to calculate the incidence of LNM in pT1b1 EGC, and to investigate whether using a cut-off value of < 300 µm would decrease the risk of LNM in patients with submucosal EGC. RESULTS Nineteen articles were included. 1507 patients with pT1b1 EGC met the expanded indications. The incidence of LNM was 3% (45 out of 1507 patients). In a subgroup analysis of three studies, there was no significant difference in the LNM between pT1b EGC < 300 µm and < 500 µm [3/121(2.5%) vs. 5/180 (2.8%)] (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.22-3.54). CONCLUSION Overall, expanding the indications for endoscopic resection of EGC to include lesions ≤ 3 cm T1b1 is associated with a potential risk of LNM of 3%. In countries outside of Japan, we found a slightly higher risk of LNM (4.0%). These estimates of LNM should be incorporated into decisions regarding further management of patients with EGC ≤ 3 cm who are found to have slight submucosal invasion (< 500 µm) in an ESD specimen. Standardization of specimen handling and histological evaluation is essential if the Japanese results of endoscopic treatment for EGC are to be successfully applied in other parts of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M Abdelfatah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
| | - Mohamed Barakat
- Department of Internal Medicine, NYC Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Noriya Uedo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abdelfatah MM, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Relief of dysphagia due to advanced achalasia by endoscopic creation of an esophagogastric bypass anastomosis through an epiphrenic diverticulum. VideoGIE 2018; 2:201-202. [PMID: 29905308 PMCID: PMC5991549 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2017.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M Abdelfatah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian S Grimm
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
In 2008, a new treatment modality for esophageal achalasia was introduced—peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM is a procedure performed endoscopically, which allows transection of the muscular fibers of the distal esophagus and of the lower esophageal sphincter. The procedure is therefore similar to a laparoscopic Heller myotomy without a fundoplication. Short-term studies have shown that POEM is very effective in relieving dysphagia and regurgitation, but concerns have been raised about the incidence of post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux. Prospective and randomized trials will be needed to determine the role of this new procedure in the treatment algorithm of esophageal achalasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A. Kroch
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kroch DA, Grimm IS. POEM for Achalasia. Am Surg 2018; 84:489-495. [PMID: 29712594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In 2008, a new treatment modality for esophageal achalasia was introduced-peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM is a procedure performed endoscopically, which allows transection of the muscular fibers of the distal esophagus and of the lower esophageal sphincter. The procedure is therefore similar to a laparoscopic Heller myotomy without a fundoplication. Short-term studies have shown that POEM is very effective in relieving dysphagia and regurgitation, but concerns have been raised about the incidence of post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux. Prospective and randomized trials will be needed to determine the role of this new procedure in the treatment algorithm of esophageal achalasia.
Collapse
|
21
|
Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD, McGill SK, Crockett SD, Barker A, Koruda M, Grimm IS. Increasing Rates of Surgery for Patients With Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps in the United States. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:1352-1360.e3. [PMID: 29317277 PMCID: PMC5880740 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 12/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite the availability of endoscopic therapy, many patients in the United States undergo surgical resection for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. We aimed to quantify and examine trends in the use of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps in a nationally representative sample. METHODS We analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample for 2000 through 2014. We included all adult patients who underwent elective colectomy or proctectomy and had a diagnosis of either nonmalignant colorectal polyp or colorectal cancer. We compared trends in surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps with surgery for colorectal cancer and calculated age, sex, race, region, and teaching status/bed-size-specific incidence rates of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. RESULTS From 2000 through 2014, there were 1,230,458 surgeries for nonmalignant colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer in the United States. Among those surgeries, 25% were performed for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. The incidence of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps has increased significantly, from 5.9 in 2000 to 9.4 in 2014 per 100,000 adults (incidence rate difference, 3.56; 95% confidence interval 3.40-3.72), while the incidence of surgery for colorectal cancer has significantly decreased, from 31.5 to 24.7 surgeries per 100,000 adults (incidence rate difference, -6.80; 95% confidence interval -7.11 to -6.49). The incidence of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps has been increasing among individuals age 20 to 79, in men and women and including all races and ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of a large, nationally representative sample, we found that surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps is common and has significantly increased over the past 14 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F. Peery
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine S. Cools
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Paula D. Strassle
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sarah K McGill
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Seth D. Crockett
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Aubrey Barker
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mark Koruda
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abdelfatah MM, Grimm IS, Gangarosa LM, Baron TH. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:495-500. [PMID: 28882575 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Two second-generation, flexible EUS fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles have been marketed recently in the United States. Thus far, there have been no comparative studies of the diagnostic yield of these needles. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield achieved with FNB by using 1 needle during 1 time period and the other needle during a second time period. METHODS Consecutive patients with solid lesions undergoing EUS-FNB by using 1 of two 22-gauge FNB needles (Franseen needle or fork-tip) at 2 different time intervals were included. The final diagnosis was based on positive pathology results. In cases of a negative pathology result, the final diagnosis was based on clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTS A total of 194 lesions (97 in each group) were sampled in 179 patients. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was used in 12% of cases. The overall diagnostic yield was lower in the Franseen needle group compared with the fork-tip needle group (61/97 [63%] vs 75/97 [77%], odds ratio (OR) 2.01, 1.07-3.8; P = .027). Similarly, subanalysis of the yield for solid pancreatic masses demonstrated a lower yield with the Franseen needle (34/53 [64%] vs 40/47 [85%], OR 3.4, 9.1-8.9; P = .017). Multivariate analysis controlling for the number of passes, site, and lesion size did not have any effect on diagnostic yield. There were no adverse events in either group. CONCLUSION In this first, large, single-center comparative cohort study of 2 new, second-generation EUS-FNB needles of different design, the diagnostic yield when used primarily without ROSE was high in both groups but was significantly higher when a fork-tip needle was used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M Abdelfatah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Carolina University, Greenville, Chapel Hill North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa M Gangarosa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Peery AF, Shaheen NJ, Cools KS, Baron TH, Koruda M, Galanko JA, Grimm IS. Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:243-250.e2. [PMID: 28408327 PMCID: PMC5634910 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite evidence that most nonmalignant colorectal polyps can be managed endoscopically, a substantial proportion of patients with a nonmalignant colorectal polyp are still sent to surgery. Risks associated with this surgery are not well characterized. We describe 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality and explore risk factors for adverse events in patients undergoing surgical resection for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. METHODS We analyzed data collected prospectively as part of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Our analysis included 12,732 patients who underwent elective surgery for a nonmalignant colorectal polyp from 2011 through 2014. We report adverse events within 30 days of the index surgery. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality was .7%. The risk of a major postoperative adverse event was 14%. Within 30 days of resection, 7.8% of patients were readmitted and 3.6% of patients had a second major surgery. The index surgery resulted in a colostomy in 1.8% and ileostomy in .4% of patients. Patients who had surgical resection of a nonmalignant polyp in the rectum or anal canal compared with the colon had a risk ratio of 1.58 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.28) for surgical site infection and 6.51 (95% confidence interval, 4.97-8.52) for ostomy. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for a nonmalignant colorectal polyp is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A better understanding of the risks and benefits associated with surgical management of nonmalignant colorectal polyps will better inform discussions regarding the relative merits of management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F. Peery
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katherine S. Cools
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Todd H. Baron
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mark Koruda
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joseph A. Galanko
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore W James
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Law R, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Endoscopic transgastric pancreatic fistula anastomosis as treatment for a refractory pancreatic duct leak after distal pancreatectomy. Endoscopy 2017; 48 Suppl 1:E210. [PMID: 27310891 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-109052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen YI, Itoi T, Baron TH, Nieto J, Haito-Chavez Y, Grimm IS, Ismail A, Ngamruengphong S, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Alawad AS, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. Erratum to: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2017; 31:3765. [PMID: 28717868 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5723-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Takao Itoi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jose Nieto
- Borland-Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yamile Haito-Chavez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amr Ismail
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Majidah Bukhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gulara Hajiyeva
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ahmad S Alawad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grimm IS. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Management of Esophageal Disorders. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2017; 13:428-430. [PMID: 28867972 PMCID: PMC5572974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Grimm
- Professor of Medicine Director, GI Procedures Department of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Kawara F, Grimm IS, Hoshi N, Abe H, Ohara Y, Morita Y, Umegaki E, Azuma T. Peroral endoscopic myotomy using FlushKnife BT: a single-center series. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E663-E669. [PMID: 28691051 PMCID: PMC5500118 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an evolving new treatment strategy for achalasia. Although several kinds of electrosurgical knives have been used in performing POEM, the best device has yet to be determined. The FlushKnife BT is a waterjet-emitting short needle-knife with a small ball tip (BT) that offers the potential to perform all aspects of POEM with a single device. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficiency of the FlushKnife BT for POEM. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 54 consecutive patients with achalasia and other spastic esophageal motility disorders, such as jackhammer esophagus or distal esophageal spasm, who underwent POEM between January 2016 and August 2016, were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS The median operation time was 73.0 minutes (range 39 - 184 minutes). All procedures were completed using only the FlushKnife BT without changing to any other electrosurgical instrument. The median number of additional submucosal injections with an injection needle was 0 (range 0 - 1). Endoscopic vessel sealing was performed a mean of 3 times (range 0 - 7). The median number of bleeding episodes requiring treatment with hemostatic forceps was 0 (range 0 - 5). There were no significant adverse events. Seven of 52 patients (13.5 %) reported symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease such as heartburn or acid reflux at 3 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The FlushKnife BT enabled POEM to be performed with very few device exchanges, either for re-injection or to control intraoperative bleeding. In this uncontrolled case series, the ability of the FlushKnife BT to perform nearly all aspects of the POEM procedure seems to make it particularly well suited to this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinwa Tanaka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takashi Toyonaga
- Department of Endoscopy, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan,Corresponding author Takashi Toyonaga, MD Department of EndoscopyKobe University Hospital7-5-1 Chu-o-kuKusunoki-Cho, KobeHyogo 650-0017Japan+81-78-3826309
| | - Fumiaki Kawara
- Department of Endoscopy, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Namiko Hoshi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Abe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Ohara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Morita
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Eiji Umegaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takeshi Azuma
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Irani S, Jalaj S, Ross A, Larsen M, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Use of a lumen-apposing metal stent to treat GI strictures (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:1285-1289. [PMID: 27633158 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Benign GI strictures occur typically in the esophagus and pyloric channel but can occur anywhere in the GI tract and at anastomotic sites. Such strictures can be treated with dilation, incisional therapy, steroid injection, and stents. Our aim was to describe the use of a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) to treat short, benign GI strictures. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent LAMS placement for various benign strictures at 2 tertiary care centers from August 2014 to November 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The main outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, stent migration, and adverse events. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (7 males, 18 females) with a median age of 54 years (33-85 years) underwent 28 LAMS placements to treat various benign strictures. The location of the strictures included esophagogastric anastomoses (n=4), gastrojejunal anastomoses (n=13), pylorus (n=6), vertical banded gastroplasty (n=1), and ileocolonic anastomosis (n=1). Twenty patients had been previously treated with dilation alone (9 patients with ≥3 dilations), 11 patients with dilation and steroid injection, 2 patients with additional needle-knife therapy, and 1 patient with placement of a traditional fully covered self-expandable metal stent. A 15-mm internal diameter LAMS was placed in all patients; 3 patients had been treated previously with a 10-mm LAMS. Technical success was achieved in all patients, whereas clinical success was achieved in 15 of 25 patients (60%) who completed a minimum of 6 months of follow-up after placement. Median stent dwell time was 92 days (range, 3-273 days). Stent migration was seen in 2 of 28 stent placements (7%). Four of 25 patients (16%) developed 5 moderate adverse events (pain requiring removal, 2; new stricture formation, 2; bleeding, 1). Median follow-up was 301 days after stent placement. Study limitations include the small, select group of patients, the retrospective study design, and short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS LAMS placement for benign GI strictures is technically easy and safe with low migration rates and may be an option to treat selected patients with short-length strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Irani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sujai Jalaj
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Ross
- Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Michael Larsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Khan MA, Grimm IS, Ali B, Nollan R, Tombazzi C, Ismail MK, Baron TH. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E363-E375. [PMID: 28497108 PMCID: PMC5425293 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is variable, and partly dependent upon rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) by a cytopathologist. Second generation fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are being increasingly used to obtain core histological tissue samples. Aims Studies comparing the diagnostic yield of EUS guided FNA versus FNB have reached conflicting conclusions. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic yield of FNA with FNB, and specifically evaluating the diagnostic value of ROSE while comparing the two types of needles. Methods We searched several databases from inception to 10 April 2016 to identify studies comparing diagnostic yield of second generation FNB needles with standard FNA needles. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for categorical outcomes of interest (diagnostic adequacy, diagnostic accuracy, and optimal quality histological cores obtained). Standard mean difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous variables (number of passes required for diagnosis). These were pooled using random effects model of meta-analysis to account for heterogeneity. Meta-regression was conducted to evaluate the effect of ROSE on various outcomes of interest. Results Fifteen studies with a total of 1024 patients were included in the analysis. We found no significant difference in diagnostic adequacy [RR 0.98 (0.91, 1.06), (I2 = 51 %)]. Although not statistically significant (P = 0.06), by meta-regression, in the absence of ROSE, FNB showed a relatively better diagnostic adequacy. For solid pancreatic lesions only, there was no difference in diagnostic adequacy [RR 0.96 (0.86, 1.09), (I2 = 66 %)]. By meta-regression, in the absence of ROSE, FNB was associated with better diagnostic adequacy (P = 0.02). There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy [RR 0.99 (0.95, 1.03), (I2 = 27 %)] or optimal quality core histological sample procurement [RR 0.97 (0.89, 1.05), (I2 = 9.6 %)]. However, FNB established diagnosis with fewer passes [SMD 0.93 (0.45, 1.42), (I2 = 84 %)]. The absence of ROSE was associated with a higher SMD, i. e., in the presence of an onsite pathologist, FNA required relatively fewer passes to establish the diagnosis than in the absence of an onsite pathologist. Conclusions There is no significant difference in the diagnostic yield between FNA and FNB, when FNA is accompanied by ROSE. However, in the absence of ROSE, FNB is associated with a relatively better diagnostic adequacy in solid pancreatic lesions. Also, FNB requires fewer passes to establish the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bilal Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Richard Nollan
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center Library, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Claudio Tombazzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Mohammad Kashif Ismail
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Todd H. Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baron TH, Grimm IS, Irani S. Lumen-apposing covered self-expandable metal stents for short-length gastrointestinal strictures: Will they take hold? Endoscopy 2017; 49:315-316. [PMID: 28351100 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Shayan Irani
- Digestive Disease Institute at Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Law R, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Modified percutaneous assisted transprosthetic endoscopic therapy for transgastric ERCP in a gastric bypass patient. Endoscopy 2016; 48 Suppl 1 UCTN:E16-7. [PMID: 26800194 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-110593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84:1040-1046. [PMID: 27345131 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS FNA is the primary method of EUS tissue acquisition. In an attempt to improve our yield of EUS-guided tissue acquisition, we compared fine-needle biopsy (FNB) sampling without rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) with FNA with ROSE and assessed the concordance of FNA and FNB sampling. METHODS This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients. Patients underwent FNB sampling and FNA of the same single lesion, with the same needle gauge and number of passes. FNA with ROSE was performed with a standard FNA needle. FNB sampling was performed with a new dedicated core needle. FNA samples were assessed with ROSE, and a final interpretation was provided by cytopathology staff; FNB samples were analyzed by surgical pathologists, each not made aware of the other's opinion. RESULTS Thirty-three patients underwent 312 passes in 42 different lesions. A diagnosis of malignancy was more likely with FNB sampling than with FNA (72.7% vs 66.7%, P = .727), although statistical significance was not reached. FNA and FNB sampling had similar sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies for cancer (81.5% vs 88.9%, 100% vs 100%, and 84.8% vs 90.9%, respectively). FNB sampling provided qualitative information not reported on FNA, such as degree of differentiation in malignancy, metastatic origin, and rate of proliferation in neuroendocrine tumors. CONCLUSIONS FNB sampling without ROSE using a dedicated core needle performed as well as FNA with ROSE in this small cohort, suggesting that FNB sampling with this new core needle may eliminate the need for an onsite cytopathologic assessment, without loss of diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sujai Jalaj
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chen YI, Itoi T, Baron TH, Nieto J, Haito-Chavez Y, Grimm IS, Ismail A, Ngamruengphong S, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Alawad AS, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:2946-2952. [PMID: 27834024 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5311-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic enteral stenting (ES) in malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is limited by high rates of stent obstruction. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel procedure that potentially offers sustained patency without tumor ingrowth/overgrowth. The aim of this study is to compare EUS-GE with ES in terms of (1) symptom recurrence and need for re-intervention, (2) technical success (proper stent positioning as determined via endoscopy and fluoroscopy), (3) clinical success (ability to tolerate oral intake without vomiting), and (4) procedure-related adverse events (AEs). METHODS Multicenter retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent either EUS-GE at four centers between 2013 and 2015 or ES at one center between 2008 and 2010. RESULTS A total of 82 patients (mean age 66-years ± 13.5 and 40.2% female) were identified: 30 in EUS-GE and 52 in ES. Technical and clinical success was not significantly different: 86.7% EUS-GE versus 94.2% ES (p = 0.2) and 83.3% EUS-GE versus 67.3% ES (p = 0.12), respectively. Symptom recurrence and need for re-intervention, however, was significantly lower in the EUS-GE group (4.0 vs. 28.6%, (p = 0.015). Post-procedure mean length of hospitalization was comparable at 11.3 days ± 6.6 for EUS-GE versus 9.5 days ± 8.3 for ES (p = 0.3). Rates and severity of AEs (as per the ASGE lexicon) were also similar (16.7 vs. 11.5%, p = 0.5). On multivariable analysis, ES was independently associated with need for re-intervention (OR 12.8, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION EUS-GE may be ideal for malignant GOO with comparable effectiveness and safety to ES while being associated with fewer symptom recurrence and requirements for re-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Takao Itoi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jose Nieto
- Borland-Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yamile Haito-Chavez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amr Ismail
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Majidah Bukhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gulara Hajiyeva
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ahmad S Alawad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Baron TH, Grimm IS. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transmural Drainage for Palliation of Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Obstruction in Patients With an Inaccessible Papilla: Approaching the Tipping Point? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:1020-1. [PMID: 26972983 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Revised: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Novel approach to recanalizing an occluded cystic duct after cholecystoduodenostomy by lumen-apposing metal mesh stent for malignant obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83:1286-7. [PMID: 26684605 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S. Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H. Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA,Corresponding author Todd Huntley Baron, MD Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine101 Manning DriveChapel Hill, North Carolina 27514USA+1-984-974-0744
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Efficacy of Endoscopically Created Bypass Anastomosis in Treatment of Afferent Limb Syndrome: A Single-Center Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:633-7. [PMID: 26674590 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Revised: 11/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Afferent limb syndrome is a postoperative complication of gastrointestinal surgery, resulting from obstruction of a biliary-enteric limb. Surgery has been the cornerstone of treatment for this condition, but advances in endoscopic and percutaneous techniques could offer less-invasive options. Creation of an internal endoscopic anastomosis between the obstructed afferent limb and an adjacent gastrointestinal lumen can relieve symptoms and might provide a long-term solution. We report the efficacy of endoscopic treatment of afferent limb syndrome using lumen-apposing self-expandable metal stents to create 3 types of enteric anastomoses: a jejunojejunostomy, 2 gastrojejunostomies, and a duodenuojejunostomy in patients who developed afferent limb obstruction following a resection for pancreaticobiliary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Removal of buried gastroduodenal stents after drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: Silence of the LAMS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83:853-4. [PMID: 26975290 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Law R, Grimm IS, Stavas JM, Baron TH. Conversion of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy to Internal Transmural Gallbladder Drainage Using an Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided, Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:476-80. [PMID: 26528802 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with acute cholecystitis sometimes require placement of percutaneous cholecystostomy catheters, either as a bridge to surgery or as primary therapy. In patients who cannot undergo surgery, subsequent removal of the catheter can lead to recurrence of cholecystitis, whereas leaving the drain in place can cause adverse events. We investigated internalization of percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage catheters, using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) as an alternative treatment strategy. Seven patients (median age, 57 years; 6 men) underwent EUS-guided cholecystoenterostomy for internalization of gallbladder drainage with EUS-guided placement of a 10- or 15-mm LAMS. All had initially been treated with placement of a percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter for cholecystitis and were later deemed unfit for cholecystectomy. Technical success was achieved in all patients in 1 endoscopic session, with subsequent removal of all percutaneous drains. Two patients required placement of self-expandable metal stents within the LAMS to successfully bridge the gallbladder and gastrointestinal lumen. No adverse events occurred after a median follow-up of 2.5 months. EUS-guided cholecystoenterostomy using a LAMS is therefore a viable option for internal gallbladder drainage in patients who have a percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter and are poor candidates for cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joseph M Stavas
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy for treatment of pancreatic ductal obstruction in a post-Whipple procedure patient. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2015; 2:e000068. [PMID: 26697188 PMCID: PMC4681786 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We report a case of a woman with a medical history of classic Whipple surgery who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic drainage due to smouldering acute pancreatitis secondary to an obstructing pancreatic ductal stone. A gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis was created anterogradely, with dilation of both the anastomoses in the same procedure, with subsequent decompression of the pancreatic duct. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is often impossible to perform in patients with post-Whipple procedure anatomy due to inaccessibility to the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis. EUS-guided pancreatic drainage may be offered in these patients in whom the pancreatic duct cannot be accessed at ERP. It has been used as a platform for access to and drainage of the pancreatic duct either by rendezvous or transmural drainage. However, only one of four patients achieve successful completion of the rendezvous procedure. There are limited data regarding safety and long-term outcome of this procedure, as well as scant guidelines on the optimal time for leaving stents in place. We believe definitive endoscopic therapy should be attempted, whenever possible, after relief of obstruction. In our case, we expect that stent occlusion is inevitable and that long-term drainage is possible due to drainage occurring between the stent and the stone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
- Gastroenterology Department , Centro Hospitalar São João , Porto , Portugal ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Grimm IS, Ngamruengphong S, Aguila G, El Zein M, Kalloo AN, Baron TH. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: the first U.S. clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2015. [PMID: 26215646 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There are limitations to enteral self-expandable metal stents and surgical gastrojejunostomy in the treatment of patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel procedure that potentially offers long-lasting luminal patency without the risk of tumor ingrowth and/or overgrowth, while avoiding the morbidity of a surgical procedure. The aims of this study were to report the first U.S. clinical experience with EUS-GE in terms of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events and to detail the technical aspects of performing EUS-GE. METHODS This was a retrospective study from two tertiary-care centers. EUS-GE was performed by using either the direct EUS-GE or balloon-assisted EUS-GE technique. Technical success was defined as adequate positioning and deployment of the stent as determined endoscopically and radiologically. Clinical success was defined as the patient's ability to tolerate oral intake without vomiting. RESULTS A total of 10 patients underwent attempted EUS-GE. Malignant GOO was present in 3 patients, whereas benign obstruction was found in the remaining 7. One patient had complete GOO and underwent successful direct EUS-GE. In the remaining 9 patients, balloon-assisted EUS-GE was attempted and was successful in 8. Thus, technical success occurred in 9 patients (90%). There were no procedure-related adverse events. Mean procedure time was 96 minutes (range 45-152 minutes), and mean length of hospital stay was 2.2 days. Clinical success with resumption of solid oral intake was achieved in all 9 patients (100%) who underwent successful EUS-GE. A total of 8 patients were able to tolerate almost a normal diet and/or full diet, and 1 patient tolerated a soft diet. There was no symptom recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 150 days. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GE is a promising new technique for the treatment of symptoms of benign and malignant GOO. Prospective, multicenter trials are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouen A Khashab
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gerard Aguila
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mohamad El Zein
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anthony N Kalloo
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Baron TH, Grimm IS, Gerber DA. Liver transplantation after endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholecystoduodenostomy for acute cholecystitis: A note of caution. Liver Transpl 2015; 21:1322-3. [PMID: 25980928 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Revised: 04/28/2015] [Accepted: 05/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Baron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - David A Gerber
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Law R, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Endoscopic transhepatic cholangiography with antegrade transanastomotic stent placement in a liver transplantation patient with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82:568-9. [PMID: 25975530 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Law R, Grimm IS, Baron TH. EUS-guided gastroduodenostomy for gastric outlet obstruction related to chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82:567-8. [PMID: 26005009 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 04/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|