Comparison of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With or Without Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency

This study aimed to compare continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in cystic fibrosis (CF) according to pancreatic exocrine status.CGM and oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) were realized annually over five years in people with CF (pwCF) aged≥10 years without cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD). CGM parameters in patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and newly diagnosed CFRD were compared according to presence of pancreatic sufficiency (PS) or insufficiency (PI).Overall, 547 OGTTs and 501 CGMs were performed in 147 CF patients, comprising 122 PI and 25 PS. In PS patients, 84% displayed NGT, 12% IGT, and 4% CFRD vs. 58%, 32%, and 10% (p=0.05) in PI. Among participants displaying normal OGTT, time in glucose range (70-140 mg/dl) was significantly increased, 97% (93, 99) vs. 92% (85, 96), p<0.001, and time above glucose range > 140 mg/dl significantly decreased, 1% (0, 2) % vs. 6% (2, 13), in patients with PS compared to those with PI. No significant differences were highlighted in patients with IGT.CGM revealed significant different glucose tolerance abnormalities in PI versus PS, which were undetected by standard 2-hour OGTT glucose.

Retrospective observational study of French patients with cystic fibrosis and a Gly551Asp-CFTR mutation after 1 and 2years of treatment with ivacaftor in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Ivacaftor has been shown to improve lung function and body weight in patients with CF and a gating mutation. Real-world evaluation is warranted to examine its safety and effectiveness over the long term.

METHODS

A retrospective observational multicentre study collected clinical data in the year before and the 2years after ivacaftor initiation in patients with CF and a Gly551Asp-CFTR mutation.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included. Mean absolute change in FEV₁% predicted improved from baseline to Year 1 (8.4%; p<0.001) and Year 2 (7.2%; p=0.006). Statistically significant benefits were observed with increased body mass index, fewer Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus positive cultures, and decreased IV antibiotics and maintenance treatment prescriptions (including azithromycin, Dornase alpha and nutritional supplements). No significant adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The clinical benefits of ivacaftor reported in previous clinical trials were confirmed in a real-world setting two years post-initiation, also reducing treatment burden.