Socioeconomic disparities and health literacy: Unraveling the impact on diagnostic and cancer care in Uruguay

BACKGROUND

Disparities in the timely diagnosis and care of cancer patients, particularly concerning geographical, racial/ethnic, and economic factors, remain a global health challenge. This study explores the multifaceted interplay between socioeconomic status, health literacy, and specific patient perceptions regarding care access and treatment options that impact cancer care in Uruguay.

METHODS

Using the Cancer Health Literacy Test, Spanish Version (CHLT-30-DKspa), and a highly comprehensive questionnaire, we dissected the factors influencing the pathway to diagnosis and route of cancer care. This was done to identify delays by analyzing diverse socioeconomic and sex subgroups across multiple healthcare settings.

RESULTS

Patients with lower income took longer to get an appointment after showing symptoms (p = 0.02) and longer to get a diagnosis after having an appointment (p = 0.037). Race/ethnicity also had a significant impact on the length of time from symptoms to first appointment (p =0.019), whereas employment status had a significant impact on patients being susceptible to diagnostic delays beyond the advocated 14-day window (p = 0.02). Higher educational levels were positively associated with increased cancer health literacy scores (p = 0.043), revealing the potential to mitigate delays through health literacy-boosting initiatives. Women had significantly higher self-reported symptom duration before seeking an intervention (p = 0.022). We also found many other significant factors effecting treatment delays and cancer health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

While affirming the global pertinence of socioeconomic- and literacy-focused interventions in enhancing cancer care, the findings underscore a complex, gendered, and perceptually influenced healthcare navigation journey. The results highlight the urgent necessity for strategically crafted, globally relevant interventions that transcend equitable access to integrate literacy, gender sensitivity, and patient-perception alignments in pursuit of optimized global cancer care outcomes.

Radical aggressive treatment among non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion without extra-thoracic disease

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an indicator of advanced disease (stage M1a) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Typically, these patients are candidates for palliative treatment. There is a lack of evidence about the radical surgical treatment in carcinomatous pleuritis with massive effusion. Here, we present data from a specific subset of patients with MPE treated with systemic therapy and aggressive surgical therapy. M1a NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients with MPE and without extra-thoracic disease were included. After receiving systemic therapy, all patients underwent surgical treatment, which included pneumonectomy or lobectomy, plus mediastinal dissection. Following surgery, patients received radiotherapy to thoracic wall and mediastinum. A total of six patients were analyzed. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1, two patients harbored EGFR mutation and were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the other four patients were treated with pemetrexed and platin as first-line treatment. Following systemic therapy, two patients had a pneumonectomy, four patients had a lobectomy plus pleurectomy performed. All patients continued with maintenance systemic therapy, and achieved complete responses, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The media progression-free survival (PFS) time was 15.9 months (95% CI: 15.6-55.5 months). At the last follow-up, all patients were still alive, with 4 of them without signs of macroscopic tumoral activity. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. NSCLC patients with MPE without extra-thoracic disease could benefit from an aggressive surgical approach following standard of care systemic therapy. However, considering the low sample size of this study and the relatively low incidence of MPE without extra-thoracic disease, further prospective multi-center studies are necessary to evaluate aggressive surgery as a therapeutic option.

Face transplant: is it feasible in developing countries?

This article is based on the case of a 28-year-old woman who was involved in a car accident, with diagnosis of polytrauma, loss of left eye, and second- and third-degree burns over the left midface, rendering an exposed area of 8 cm wide and 19 cm length, ranging from glabella to mandible, with skull exposure and loss of left eye.A latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous free flap was transferred into the defect; left eye and nose prosthetics were necessary to restore normal appearance. Excellent results were obtained; reinsertion to patient's normal life and reinstatement of facial appearance were achieved with minimal costs and no postsurgical complications.Analysis of the current situation in developing countries demonstrates that technique and infrastructure do not represent a real challenge to carry on face transplants. However, socioeconomic reality in these societies makes it difficult to establish face transplant as a feasible therapeutic opportunity for the overwhelming majority of patients who are victims of severe facial damage.Therefore, strategies such as latissimus dorsi free flap remains as an excellent therapy to face off our complex facial reconstructive challenges in developing countries such as Mexico.