Real-World Safety and Effectiveness After 5 Years of Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Black and Hispanic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in ESTEEM

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials have included low numbers of patients from racial and ethnic minority populations; therefore, it is uncertain whether differences exist in response to disease-modifying therapies. We evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment over 5 years in four patient cohorts: Black, non-Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic people with relapsing-remitting MS.

METHODS

ESTEEM is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective study evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in people with MS. The analysis included patients newly prescribed DMF in routine practice at 393 sites globally.

RESULTS

Overall, 5251 patients were analyzed (220 Black, 5031 non-Black; 105 Hispanic, 5146 non-Hispanic). Median (min-max) months of follow-up was 32 (0-72) for Black, 29 (1-77) for Hispanic, and 41 (0-85) for both the non-Black and non-Hispanic populations. In total, 39 (18%) Black and 29 (28%) Hispanic patients reported adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation versus 1126 (22%) non-Black and 1136 (22%) non-Hispanic patients; gastrointestinal disorders were the most common in all subgroups. Median lymphocyte counts decreased by 37% in Black, 40% in non-Black, 10% in Hispanic, and 39% in non-Hispanic patients in the first year, then remained stable and above the lower limit of normal in most patients. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (95% confidence intervals) up to 5 years were 0.054 (0.038-0.078) for Black, 0.077 (0.072-0.081) for non-Black, 0.069 (0.043-0.112) for Hispanic, and 0.076 (0.072-0.081) for non-Hispanic populations, representing reductions of 91-92% compared with ARR 12 months before study entry (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of DMF in these subgroups was consistent with the overall ESTEEM population. Relapse rates remained low in Black and Hispanic patients, and consistent with non-Black and non-Hispanic patients. These data demonstrate a comparable real-world treatment benefit of DMF in Black and Hispanic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02047097.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Diroximel Fumarate, Ponesimod, and Teriflunomide for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Diroximel fumarate (DRF), ponesimod (PON), and teriflunomide (TERI) are oral disease-modifying therapies approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. No randomized trials have compared DRF versus PON or TERI.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this analysis were to compare DRF versus PON and DRF versus TERI for clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

We used individual patient data from EVOLVE-MS-1, a 2-year, open-label, single-arm, phase III trial of DRF (n = 1057), and aggregated data from OPTIMUM, a 2-year, double-blind, phase III trial comparing PON (n = 567) and TERI (n = 566). To account for cross-trial differences, EVOLVE-MS-1 data were weighted to match OPTIMUM's average baseline characteristics using an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison. We examined the outcomes of annualized relapse rate (ARR), 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), 24-week CDP, absence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions, and absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions.

RESULTS

After weighting, we did not observe strong evidence of differences between DRF and PON for ARR [DRF versus PON incidence rate difference (IRD) -0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.08, 0.04; incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.92; 95% CI 0.61, 1.2], 12-week CDP [risk difference (RD) -2.5%; 95% CI -6.3, 1.2; risk ratio (RR) 0.76; 95% CI 0.38, 1.1], 24-week CDP (RD -2.7%; 95% CI -6.0, 0.63; RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.28, 1.0), and absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions (RD -2.5%; 95% CI -13, 7.4; RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.70, 1.2). However, a higher proportion of DRF-treated patients were free of Gd+ T1 lesions than PON-treated patients (RD 11%; 95% CI 6.0, 16; RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.06, 1.2). Compared with TERI, DRF showed improved ARR (IRD -0.08; 95% CI -0.15, -0.01; IRR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50, 0.94), 12-week CDP (RD -4.2%; 95% CI -7.9, -0.48; RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.38, 0.90), 24-week CDP (RD -4.3%; 95% CI -7.7, -1.1; RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26, 0.81), and absence of Gd+ T1 lesions (RD 25%; 95% CI 19, 30; RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3, 1.5). However, DRF and TERI did not appear to differ significantly with respect to absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions when based on comparisons using the overall EVOLVE-MS-1 sample (RD 8.5%; 95% CI -0.93, 18; RR 1.3; 95% CI 0.94, 1.6), or in a sensitivity analysis restricted to newly enrolled EVOLVE-MS-1 patients (RD 2.7%; 95% CI -9.1, 14; RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.68, 1.5).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe differences between DRF and PON for ARR, CDP, and absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, but there was a higher proportion of patients free of Gd+ T1 lesions among DRF-treated patients than PON-treated patients. DRF had improved efficacy versus TERI for all clinical and radiological outcomes, except for absence of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

EVOLVE-MS-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02634307); OPTIMUM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02425644).

Real-World Analysis Affirms the High Persistence and Adherence Observed with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to disease-modifying therapies is key for achieving optimal outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate approved for treatment of relapsing forms of MS. It has the same pharmacologically active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and similar efficacy and safety profiles, but with demonstrated fewer gastrointestinal (GI) related adverse events (AEs). There are limited data characterizing persistence and adherence to DRF in the real world.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of the AcariaHealth Specialty Pharmacy Program included patients with MS initiating DRF from 1 December 2019 to 30 January 2021. This analysis evaluated persistence, measured as proportion of patients remaining on therapy; discontinuation rate due to GI AEs; and adherence measured by proportion of days covered (PDC).

RESULTS

Overall, 1143 patients were included; 433 (37.9%) patients had been treated with prior DMF and switched to DRF. Persistence was high in both groups: the estimated proportion of patients remaining on DRF at 16 months was 82.3% [95% confidence internal (CI) 77.2-86.3%], and 90.1% (95% CI 82.2-94.6%) in the DMF to DRF group. Fifty-two (4.5%) patients overall and 15 (3.5%) in the DMF switch subgroup discontinued DRF due to GI AEs. Mean PDC was 90.8% (95% CI 89.2-92.5%), and 85.4% (95% CI 83.3-87.4%) of patients achieved PDC ≥ 80% in the overall population. In the DMF to DRF group, mean PDC was 90.7% (95% CI 88.0-93.5%), and 84.8% (95% CI 81.4-88.1%) of patients achieved PDC ≥ 80%.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of  > 1000 patients treated with DRF in real-world clinical practice, overall persistence at 16 months was high, treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs was low, and patients were highly adherent to therapy. Of 433 patients who switched from DMF to DRF, most (> 90%) were able to tolerate and persist on DRF after switching. Graphical abstract available for this article.