Study of Microorganism Growth Pattern in Nasal Pack of Patients Visiting the Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery

Background Nasal packs are utilized nearly by otorhinolaryngologists for controlling epistaxis and post nasal procedures. Complications have been reported due to them; therefore the use of antibiotics is a common practice among otorhinolaryngologists. Objective To detect microbiological flora associated with nasal packing and find evidence to support the benefit of systemic antibiotics with it. Method A prospective, analytical study was conducted on 51 patients presenting to the Department of ENT, KUSMS from June to September 2015 who required nasal packing. Approval of the local Institutional review committee (IRC) was taken. The mid part of the pack was collected in a sterile bottle under aseptic technique and sent to microbiology department. Specimen collection, culture, identification tests were done according to the guidelines by American Society for Microbiology. Data were collected using the individual patient records and Microsoft Office Excel 2007. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16.0. Result Among the 51 cultures; 33 (64.7%) were positive. In 18 (35.3%) cultures no organism was grown. Statistical analysis did not show significance between duration of pack kept with microbial growth (p=0.051) or the type of pack kept (p=0.212) .It showed significance with foul smell of the pack to the growth (p <0.001). Conclusion Microbiological flora was associated with nasal pack. Antibiotic soaked nasal packs have lesser incidence of positive bacterial growth when compared with plain nasal packs. Nasal packs kept for less than 48 hours have lesser incidence of positive bacterial growth when compared with nasal packs kept for more than 48 hours. Therefore, administering systemic antibiotics in cases when we plan to keep the pack for longer duration is recommended.

Microbiological and Clinical Profile of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates in Kathmandu University Hospital

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients infected by multidrug resistant bacteria is a major challenge. Immunocompromised status, prolonged hospital stay, malignancy, diabetes are some of the risk factors for emergence of multidrug resistance. Our study focused on microbiological and clinical profile of multidrug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted between June 2014-May 2015 in Kathmandu University Hospital. Urine sample from outpatients and inpatients from which Escherichia coli isolated was included. Specimen collection, culture, identification tests were done following guidelines given by American Society for Microbiology.

RESULTS

Total number of urine samples received during the study were 3,554. Escherichia coli isolates were 645(18.14%) and 245(37.98%) were Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producer. Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producers were found more among inpatients 148(60.41%) [p<0.001], patients with underlying urological abnormalities 38 (15.51%) [p=0.0039], pregnant ladies 46(18.77%) [p=0.0028], diabetic patients 27 (11.02%) [p=0.0084], patients who received prior antibiotic therapy 155 (63.26%) [p=0.0043] than Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase non-producer. Malignancy was seen more among Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producer having patients 5 (2.04%) [p=0.031] and all these isolates were more resistant to fluoroquinolones 168(68.57%), Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 239 (97.55%) [p=0.0633], aminoglycosides [p=0.0001] but only 2(0.80%) were resistant to carbapenems.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes, pregnancy, malignancy, prior antibiotic therapy, underlying urological abnormalities were found associated with emergence of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producer in urine samples. Proper antibiotic usage may help to overcome the problem of emergence of antibiotic resistance.

Enteric Opportunistic Parasitic Infections Among HIVSeropositive Patients in Kathmandu, Nepal

Background Enteric opportunistic parasitic infections are the major source of diarrheal disease in developing countries mainly in Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients. Objective The study was to detect enteric parasites causing diarrhea and their association with immune status in HIV-seropositive patients. Methods The present study was conducted in Dirgh-Jeevan Health Care Research Center and Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Public Health Research Laboratory, Kathmandu, Nepal between June 2010 and May 2011 involving 146 Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients. Serostatus from these patients were detected by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent assay. CD4+ T cell counts were done by flow cytometry. Stool was examined for enteric parasites by microscopy with special staining methods. Results A total of 146 HIV sero-positive patients with and without diarrhea age between 20 to 45 years were included in the study. Of the 146 patients, the protozoan parasitic infection was found in 30.13% (44/146). Out of 146 patients, 78 had diarrhea in which parasitic infection was 39 (50%) and 7.35% (5/68) protozoal parasites positive cases did not have diarrhea. A significant difference (p<0.05) was observed in the level of infection of intestinal protozoan between the HIV seropositive with diarrhea and HIV-seropositive without diarrhea. Out of 43 patients whose CD4+ T cells were <200/?l, 29 (67.4%) had opportunistic parasitic infection whereas out of 103 patients whose CD4+ T cells were ?200/?l, only 15 (14.56%) had opportunistic parasitic infection (P < 0.05). Conclusion Enteric opportunistic parasitic infections were detected in 30.1% among HIV-seropositive patients and low CD4+ T count indicated high enteric opportunistic infection. Early detection of enteric parasitic infections will help in the management and to improve the quality of life for HIV-infected individuals. Kathmandu University Medical Journal | Vol.10 | No. 2 | Issue 38 | Apr – June 2012 | Page 14-17 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i2.7336

Hospital-based study in children with rotavirus gastroenteritis and other enteropathogens

BACKGROUND

Rotavirus is the most common cause of life threatening gastroenteritis in infants and young children in the world. The objective of the study is to find out current trends and incidents of rotavirus, including other enteropathogens related with children diarrhoea and lastly identify the most common rotavirus serotypes that circulate in Nepal.

METHODS

A total of 1721 stool samples from less than 5 years of children were collected. Rotavirus in the stool samples were detected by Enzyme Immuno Assay (EIA) and strains were genotyped by Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). Bacteria and parasites were detected by following standard microbiological procedures.

RESULTS

In between 2009 to 2010, of the total 1721, the prevalence of rotavirus was 24.7%. Of them, 906 (52.6%) were collected in the year 2009 and 815(47.5%) in the year 2010. Rotavirus was frequently detected in inpatients (31.6%) than outpatient (16.8%). Rotavirus detection was higher in female (26.4%) than male (23.7%). The prevalence was seen higher in age group 0-23 months in both years. Among six different bacterial isolates, Escherichia coli was most frequently isolated (6.5%). Similarly, Giardia lamblia (1.3%) was most common among six different parasites detected. A total of rotavirus positive 425 stool samples were detected over 2 years (2009-230, and 2010-195), G12P6 was the predominant strain circulating in both (45% in 2009 and 28% in 2010) years. G9P6 emerged in 2010 (6%). There were significant numbers of mixed infections (14.0% in 2009 and 29.8% in 2010). Thirty five samples were partially typed and 15 were completely untyped over the two year period.

CONCLUSIONS

The study helps comprehend the prevalence of rotavirus along with other intestinal pathogens including bacteria and parasites. Major genotypes of rotavirus are also introduced in the study.

Rotavirus Nosocomial Infection in Children under 5 years of age: A Preliminary study in Nepal

Introduction: Rotavirus is one of the most common causes of acute gastroenteritis among infants and young children. The spread of rotavirus infection in pediatric wards can cause acute diarrhoea during hospitalization, and in turn, prolong hospitalization or need, rehospitalization. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of nosocomial infection due to rotavirus and other causal organisms among children less than 5 years of age. Methodology: A cross-sectional study between November 2009 and May 2010 was conducted among 96 pediatric patients in children hospital, Nepal. Stool samples were collected during hospitalization and up to 3 days after discharge from the hospital. Rotavirus antigens were detected by EIA and standard microbiological procedure were applied for other enteric pathogens. Results: The prevalence of nosocomial infection due to rotavirus was 30.2% (29/96). Of them, 16 (55.17%) of the 29 children with nosocomial infection during hospitalization and/or up to 72 hours after discharge developed diarrhoea. The prevalence of symptomatic cases of nosocomial infection was 55.17% (16/29), which involved 16.7% (16/96) of the study subjects, showing a prevalence of 44.82% (13/29) for asymptomatic nosocomial infection consisted of 13.54% (13/96) of the total subjects. Eleven of the 16 symptomatic subjects of nosocomial infection were affected by diarrhoea during hospitalization and five subjects after discharge. Bacteria (8.3%) and protozoa (5.2%) agents were also causing nosocomial infection in children. Conclusions: Children attending hospital may asymptomatically carry enteric pathogens and potentially act as source of nosocomial infection. Due to the relatively high frequency of nosocomial infection in the Children Hospital of Nepal, it is necessary to follow strictly hygienic rules such as isolation of patients with diarrhoea and hand-washing before and after the examination of each patient and cleaning the examination instruments after use in each patient. Key words: Diarrhoea; children; Rotavirus infection; Cross-sectional study; Nepal DOI: 10.3126/jnps.v31i1.3540J Nep Paedtr Soc 2010;31(1):30-34