2
|
Gerashchenko BI, Salmina K, Eglitis J, Erenpreisa J. Abstract P3-03-17: Can polyploid tumor cells possessing stem cell features be induced in resistant breast carcinomas? Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p3-03-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Cancer stem cells are believed to be responsible for radio- and chemoresistance of malignant tumors. In vitro studies demonstrate that ionizing radiation is capable of reprogramming cancer cells from non-stem state into stem state [1, 2]. Moreover, the embryonic stemness cassette was found to be expressed in tumor cells (including breast cancer cells) after they were polyploidized as a result of genotoxic stress [2, 3], thus prompting us to suppose that the polyploid cells and their descendants released by depolyploidization can possess stem cell characteristics. The aim of the current work is to test whether polyploid cells having stem cell features can be also induced in vivo, namely in locally advanced breast carcinomas as a result of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), assuming that this process is not autonomous, but rather stipulated by the tumor microenvironment.
The study population consisted of 30 breast cancer patients of age ranged from 31 to 75 y. o. diagnosed in the Latvian Oncology Center of the Riga East University Hospital between 2013 and 2015. The tissue specimens were collected after the patients' informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Ethics regulations. The clinico-pathologic information about these patients, including Ki-67 index and the status of ER, PR and HER2 receptors, was obtained from the aforementioned clinics. The majority of patients (n = 28) had locally advanced breast cancer, predominantly Stage III disease. Both diagnostic biopsy and operation material, such as primary tumors surgically removed after NAC using standard doses of paclitaxel and doxorubicin, were subjected to DNA content analysis with image cytometry. Ploidy-related parameters, such as DNA index and the percentage of cells exceeding 4.5c (presumably proliferating and polyploid cells), were determined. Immunofluorescence staining was applied to evaluate expression of such markers/factors as proliferation (Ki-67), stemness (SOX2 and NANOG) and invasiveness (CD44).
At the time of diagnosis, 14 patients had primary tumors possessing near-triploid clones, and these cases in comparison with 16 other cases comprised of near-euploid clones had 4.5-fold increase of percentages of cells exceeding the ploidy of 4.5c (p < 0.05) and 1.3-fold increase of percentages of cells positive for Ki-67 (p > 0.05). Of 10 cases diagnosed as “triple-negative”, 6 were near-triploid. Among those cases that showed the resistance to NAC (grades 1 and 2 by Miller-Payne histopathologic scoring), 67% were near-triploid. Polyploidization, which in some resistant cases is gained by NAC, was likely to be attributed to near-triploid clones. Notably, polyploid cells were positive for Ki-67, SOX2, NANOG, and CD44. Thus, these non-quiescent polyploid cells can possess the invasiveness and self-renewal features that were also seen in descendants after depolyploidization. Perhaps, reversible polyploidy plays a definite role in gaining the resistance of tumor cells to chemo- and radiotherapy in vivo.
1. Ghisolfi L. et al. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e43628.
2. Lagadec C. et al. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 833-44.
3. Salmina K. et al. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316: 2099-112.
Citation Format: Gerashchenko BI, Salmina K, Eglitis J, Erenpreisa J. Can polyploid tumor cells possessing stem cell features be induced in resistant breast carcinomas? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BI Gerashchenko
- R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology, and Radiobiology, Kyiv, Ukraine; Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - K Salmina
- R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology, and Radiobiology, Kyiv, Ukraine; Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - J Eglitis
- R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology, and Radiobiology, Kyiv, Ukraine; Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| | - J Erenpreisa
- R.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology, and Radiobiology, Kyiv, Ukraine; Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jassem J, Ozmen V, Bacanu F, Drobniene M, Eglitis J, Kahan Z, Lakshmaiah K, Mardiak J, Pienkowski T, Semiglazova T, Stamatovic L, Timcheva C, Vasovics S, Vrbanec D, Zaborek P. Abstract P5-02-02: Factors influencing time to seeking medical advice and start of treatment in breast cancer (BC) patients – an International survey. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p5-02-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background. We earlier reported patient-related factors influencing the delay in first medical advice for signs of BC in selected countries (J Clin Oncol 2012;30[15S]:578s). The present analysis, which includes additional countries, addresses the factors influencing time from first symptoms of BC to initiation of treatment (Total Delay Time; TDT).
Methods. A total of 6,588 female BC patients from 11 countries were surveyed using a uniform questionnaire translated into local languages. TDT was determined using 8 individual scales, including one pertaining to patient delay and 7 related to subsequent steps in a typical diagnostic process. Regression models were constructed using 18 variables concerning diverse contextual and personal patient characteristics. Due to expected differences in the relevant sets of predictors, time between first symptoms and first medical visit (Patient Delay Time; PDT) and time between first medical visit and start of therapy (System Delay Time; SDT) were modeled separately, with multilevel regression.
Results. Mean TDT varied in individual countries from 11.5 to 29.4 weeks (grand mean of 14.3 weeks; see table), with 43% of cases with a delay of >12 weeks. Multilevel regression equation indicated that factors significantly correlated with longer PDT were distrust in the medical system and ignoring disease. Patients with fear of the disease, stronger self-examination habits, at least secondary education, being employed, reporting more support from friends and family, and living in cities of >100,000 inhabitants had shorter PDT. Predictors of shorter SDT included being diagnosed by an oncologist vs. other physician, having at least secondary education, being older than 60 years, having a history of cancer in female relatives and having breast lump vs. other BC symptoms. Indicators of longer SDT were PDT >4 weeks, more than one BC symptom detected by patient, distrust in the medical system, disregard of BC signs, less support from friends and family, and having first medical examination in a public vs. private medical center. Individual countries differed significantly with regard to intercept of the multilevel models and slopes of regression coefficients for selected psychological and behavioral attributes.
Conclusions. An extensive set of variables potentially impacting delay times, mainly related to psychological and behavioral patient attributes, was examined. Several of them strongly determined both PDT and SDT, but their strength differed between individual countries. Both models (for PDT and SDT), although statistically significant, accounted for approximately 20% of variance in time; therefore other variables, e.g. related to the differences in national healthcare systems (not addressed in this study) might have a stronger impact on delays in the initiation of BC therapy and warrant further analyses.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jassem
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - V Ozmen
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - F Bacanu
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Drobniene
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Eglitis
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Z Kahan
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - K Lakshmaiah
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Mardiak
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - T Pienkowski
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - T Semiglazova
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - L Stamatovic
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - C Timcheva
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - S Vasovics
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - D Vrbanec
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| | - P Zaborek
- Medical University of Gdansk, Poland; University of Istanbul, Turkey; Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnus, Lithuania; Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia; University of Szeged, Hungary; Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangaluru, India; National Cancer Institute and Medical School of Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia (Slovak Republic); Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, ECZ, Otwock, Poland; Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia; Chemiotherapy Clinic, Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|