Tunneled island pedicle flap reconstruction for upper lateral cutaneous lip defects

BACKGROUND

Esthetic upper lateral cutaneous lip reconstruction preserves the apical triangle, nasolabial fold symmetry, and free margin position. The tunneled island pedicle flap (IPF) is a novel single-stage reconstruction to achieve these goals.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the technique and patient and surgeon-reported outcomes for the tunneled IPF reconstruction of upper lateral cutaneous lip defects.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of consecutive tunneled IPF reconstruction following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) at a tertiary care center between 2014 and 2020. Patients rated their scars using the validated Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and independent surgeons rated scars using the validated Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS). Descriptive statistics were generated for patient demographics and tumor defect characteristics.

RESULTS

Twenty upper lateral cutaneous lip defects were repaired with the tunneled IPF. Surgeons rated scars with a composite OSAS score of 11.83 ± 4.29 (mean, SD) [scale of 5 (normal skin) to 50 (worst scar imaginable)] and an overall scar score of 2.81 ± 1.11 [scale of 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar imaginable)]. Patients rated their scars with a composite PSAS score of 10 ± 5.39 [scale of 6 (best possible score) to 60 (worst)] and with an overall score of 2.2 ± 1.78 [scale of 1 (normal skin) and 10 (very different from normal skin)]. One flap was surgically revised for pincushioning, but none experienced necrosis, hematoma, or infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The tunneled IPF is a single-stage reconstruction for upper lateral cutaneous lip defects with favorable scar ratings by patients and observers.

Development of a core outcome set for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma trials: identification of core domains and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The lack of uniformity in the outcomes reported in clinical studies of the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) complicates efforts to compare treatment effectiveness across trials.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a core outcome set (COS), a minimum set of agreed-upon outcomes to be measured in all clinical trials of a given disease or outcome, for the treatment of cSCC.

METHODS

One hundred and nine outcomes were identified via a systematic literature review and interviews with 28 stakeholders. After consolidation of this long list, 55 candidate outcomes were rated by 19 physician and 10 patient stakeholders, in two rounds of Delphi exercises. Outcomes scored 'critically important' (score of 7, 8 or 9) by ≥ 70% of patients and ≥ 70% of physicians were provisionally included. At the consensus meeting, after discussion and voting of 44 international experts and patients, the provisional list was reduced to a final core set, for which consensus was achieved among all meeting participants.

RESULTS

A core set of seven outcomes was finalized at the consensus meeting: (i) serious or persistent adverse events, (ii) patient-reported quality of life, (iii) complete response, (iv) partial response, (v) recurrence-free survival, (vi) progression-free survival and (vii) disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to increase the comparability of results across trials and to reduce selective reporting bias, cSCC researchers should consider reporting these core outcomes. Further work needs to be performed to identify the measures that should be reported for each of these outcomes.

Laser treatment for scars and wounds

A complex array of reparative tissue mechanisms occur in the skin after epithelial barrier disruption and many patients develop abnormal healing responses that result in inadequate restoration of the cutaneous surface. Consequently, this may manifest in various maladies such as ulceration if re-epithelialization fails to occur or a hypertrophic scar or keloid if the wound healing process becomes too exuberant. Cutaneous injuries that result in scar tissue formation or ulceration are relatively common and lead patients to seek treatment for cosmetic or functional improvement. Laser technology has evolved over the past few decades to become the treatment of choice for many types of scars. Animal models and in vitro studies have also shown lasers to facilitate more rapid resolution of cutaneous ulceration, although this has yet to be consistently observed in humans. The evidence that addresses the use of lasers for scars and chronic wounds will be reviewed herein.