The anatomic organization of evoked potentials in rat parietal cortex: electrically evoked commissural responses

1. Two 8 x 8 channel microelectrode arrays were positioned over 3.5 x 3.5 mm2 areas in homologous regions of right and left parietal cortex of four rats. Potentials were evoked by delivering epicortical electrical stimulation to each electrode on one hemisphere while mapping the commissural response from the contralateral array. Spatial distributions of the electrically evoked potential (EECP) complex were compared directly with cytochrome oxidase-stained sections of the recorded region. 2. Electrode sites most capable of eliciting a commissural EECP were arranged along a diagonal band extending medially from the rostral to caudal region of each electrode array, approximating the pattern of dysgranular cortex separating primary auditory (Te1) from primary somatosensory (Par1) cortex. Electrode sites in the rostromedial and caudolateral region were ineffectual in eliciting an EECP in either hemisphere. Stimulation sites within secondary visual cortex (Oc2L) also produced strong responses. Only weak responses were elicited from stimulation of Te1 and no EECP could be evoked when stimulating within Par1. 3. When an EECP in the maximally sensitive diagonal region was elicited, its spatial distribution was typically asymmetrical throughout the recording array; the response was largest along a diagonal region also extending medially from the rostral to caudal area of each electrode array. Thus the pattern of EECP in each hemisphere closely matched the pattern of electrically excitable regions in the contralateral hemisphere. 4. The EECP was usually heterogeneous. EECP distributions within the strongly responding diagonal area often formed two regions of maximum amplitude separated by a less active zone. Although responses in Te1 were significantly weaker than those in the adjacent dysgranular cortex, they also revealed a heterogeneous spatial distribution with multiple closely spaced maxima. Only responses in Oc2L appeared consistently homogeneous, with a single maximum representing the EECP. 5. These results provide functional evidence supporting a model of parietal cortex in which there are two basic types of recipient regions, densely granular regions, which are the termination sites of specific thalamocortical fibers, and dysgranular or agranular regions, which receive both ipsilateral and contralateral projections. The functional parceling of rodent parietal cortex on the basis of the spatial and temporal distribution of the epicortical evoked potential complex may be superimposed onto the anatomic parceling into granular and dysgranular zones. Implications for stages of sensory information processing are discussed.

Anatomic organization of evoked potentials in rat parietotemporal cortex: somatosensory and auditory responses

1. Two 8 x 8-channel microelectrode arrays were used to map epicortical field potentials from a 3.5 x 3.5-mm2 area in homologous regions of right and left parietotemporal cortex of four rats. Potentials were evoked with bilaterally presented click stimuli and with bilateral tactile stimulation of the 25 major vibrissae. The spatial distribution of temporal components of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and auditory evoked potential (AEP) complex were compared directly with cytochrome oxidase-stained sections of the recorded region. 2. Epicortical responses in both hemispheres to bilateral vibrissal stimuli consisted of a biphasic sharp wave (P1a-N1) constrained to the vibrissa/barrel granular region of primary somatosensory cortex (SmI). A slightly later sharp positive wave (P1b) was localized to secondary somatosensory cortex (SmII) and to perigranular cortex medial to the vibrissa/barrel field. The SEP complex ended with a biphasic slow wave (P2-N2). The P2 was centered on SmI and spread to dysgranular lateral cortex, caudal to but excluding SmII. The N2 was centered on SmII and spread to dysgranular cortex caudal to but excluding SmI. 3. The anatomic organization of the AEP in many ways approximated that of the SEP in the same animals. The timing and morphology of the AEP were nearly identical to the SEP. The AEP consisted of a P1a-N1 sharp wave constrained to the estimated region of primary auditory cortex (AI) in the lateral parietotemporal region, a later P1b localized to secondary auditory cortex (AII), and subsequent slow waves (P2 and N2) that were centered on AI and AII, respectively, and spread to dysgranular regions overlapping the distributions of the P2 and N2 of the SEP complex. 4. These data suggest that the basic neural generators for the SEP and AEP in parietotemporal cortex are quite similar, and provide evidence for the functional anatomy of each temporal component of the sensory evoked potential complex. It is concluded that the early fast waves of the SEP and AEP are modality specific and may represent the parallel activation of primary and secondary sensory cortex through established parallel afferent projections from lateral and medial thalamic nuclei. The later slow waves of the SEP and AEP appear to selectively involve primary and secondary sensory cortex but are more widely distributed, possibly reflecting a less modality-specific level of information processing in dysgranular cortex.