"Arias-Stella reaction"-like changes in endocervical glandular epithelium in cervical smears during pregnancy and postpartum states--a potential diagnostic pitfall

A wide spectrum of histologic changes has been described throughout the female genital tract during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Of these, the endometrial glandular changes referred to as the Arias-Stella reaction have classically been a diagnostic pitfall in histologic sections. Pregnancy-related changes are also reflected in cytologic material obtained from the cervix and vagina. Both glandular and stromal alterations may be seen. The changes involving endocervical glandular epithelium are often alarming enough to cause diagnostic difficulties, especially when the history of pregnancy is not provided. We report 13 cases where marked glandular changes led to diagnostic misinterpretations. These were characterized by cyto- and karyomegaly, a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, round to oval nuclei with smudgy chromatin imparting a ground glass appearance, frequent intranuclear inclusions, and vacuolated to dense variable cytoplasm. The cytologic diagnoses ranged from "glandular atypia" to "suspicious for adenocarcinoma." Follow-up was available in 11/13 cases. In 9/11 cases, subsequent cervical smears on multiple occasions were negative. Cervical biopsies and/or dilatation and curettage in 4/11 cases did not show significant glandular abnormalities. The glandular changes encountered in cytologic material were similar to those described histologically in the Arias-Stella reaction involving the cervix. This similarity and the fact that these changes disappeared upon termination of the pregnancy favors the presumption that they represent the Arias-Stella reaction. Awareness of these changes during pregnancy and postpartum may prevent interpretive errors and unnecessary surgical procedures.

Intraluminal antibiotic treatment of central venous catheter infections in patients receiving parenteral nutrition at home

We carried out an open, uncontrolled, prospective study to evaluate intraluminal antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections arising from subcutaneously tunneled central venous catheters in patients receiving parenteral nutrition therapy at home. Seven bacterial infections were treated with intraluminal antibiotics (mean duration, 8.6 days) sometimes accompanied by systemic antibiotics (mean duration, 2.1 days). All seven infections were cured. Two infections caused by Candida species were treated with intraluminal amphotericin B. Fungal infections was suppressed during treatment but later relapsed, as confirmed by pulsed field DNA electrophoresis typing of bloodstream isolates. The concentration of antibiotic was assayed in intraluminal fluid from catheters of patients receiving treatment with vancomycin or gentamicin. The concentration was initially approximately 5 mg/mL, and it remained at > or = 2.5 mg/mL throughout the period that the solution was locked in the catheter. Our findings show that intraluminal therapy is effective against selected bacterial infections and can suppress fungal infections in subcutaneously tunneled catheters.

The human papillomavirus status of invasive cervical adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathological and outcome analysis

Accumulating evidence highlights the human papillomavirus (HPV) as a risk factor for cervical adenocarcinoma. However, the part played by the HPV in predicting tumor outcome or the increasing frequency of cervical adenocarcinoma is incompletely studied. In a retrospective study the association between HPV status and the clinicopathological characteristics of 77 cases of cervical adenocarcinoma was investigated. The data were then analyzed for temporal differences in HPV status and to identify outcome predictors. Human papillomavirus status was determined by dot blot hybridization using probes for HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35, followed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the dot blot negative cases. Seven type-specific and consensus HPV primers were used. Human papillomavirus type 16, 18, or 33 was present in 53 (70%) cases. Human papillomavirus status did not correlate with disease outcome or any clinicopathological variable, except that tumors presenting in and after 1981 were more frequently HPV positive than those presenting before 1981 (P = .014). In a multivariate analysis only clinical stage at presentation was predictive of disease outcome. Because temporal differences in clinicopathological characteristics were not identified, the increasing frequency of cervical adenocarcinoma may relate to a more important oncogenic role for the HPV in tumors presenting after 1980.

Adenocarcinoma in situ of the endocervix: human papillomavirus determination by dot blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction amplification

The frequency of human papillomavirus (HPV) in series of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) ranges from 6 to 100%. Some of this variability can be attributed to small study numbers and such technical considerations as the sensitivity of the hybridization method employed. Consequently, the role of the HPV in AIS oncogenesis is unclear. The frequency and relative distribution of HPV DNA types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35 in 37 cases of AIS were determined and correlated with clinical variables. All cases were first typed by dot blot hybridization (DBH), and those found to be HPV negative were subsequently typed by polymerase chain reaction amplification with DBH enhancement (PCR/DBH). The HPV DNA positivity rate was 27% by DBH alone and 52% by PCR/DBH amplification. Combining the results of both methods, the overall HPV positivity rate was 66%: HPV 18 in 15 cases (43%), HPV 16 in eight cases (23%). The HPV status did not correlate with any clinical variable. This study showed that the sensitivity of the hybridization method is principally accountable for the variable frequency of HPV in AIS. The identification of only high-risk oncogenic HPV types in two-thirds of the cases suggests a significant role for the virus in AIS oncogenesis; HPV status, however, does not delineate a clinical profile.

The human papillomavirus status of 114 endocervical adenocarcinoma cases by dot blot hybridization

The reported rate of human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in cases of endocervical adenocarcinoma averages 38% (range, 0% to 100%) and, in contrast to cervical squamous cell carcinoma, HPV type 18 rather than type 16 is the predominant type. The HPV positivity rate and distribution of types (status) in 114 endocervical adenocarcinoma cases (37 in situ and 77 invasive) were determined by dot blot hybridization using biotinylated probes to HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35. Human papillomavirus DNA was present in 27% of in situ and in 44% of invasive adenocarcinomas, and in nearly all histologic subtypes of invasive adenocarcinoma. Human papillomavirus status was not predictive of tumor grade, volume, depth of invasion, lymph-vascular space involvement, age at presentation, or year of diagnosis. Type of HPV might influence the histologic subtype of invasive adenocarcinoma, as HPV type 16 predominated in the adenosquamous carcinomas while HPV type 18 was more frequently found in all other subtypes. Since only types 16, 18, and 33 were identified, an oncogenic role for HPV in endocervical carcinogenesis was supported.

Fibroadenoma of the breast: diagnostic pitfalls of fine-needle aspiration

On fine-needle aspiration (FNA), fibroadenomas have a characteristic cytological appearance, although occasional cases are misinterpreted as carcinomas and vice versa. In a review of 521 breast aspirates correlated with the subsequent histology, six of 87 fibroadenomas (7%) were malignant or suspicious of malignancy on FNA (false positives). Following cytological review, four were still suspicious of malignancy because of cellular dyscohesion and prominent nucleoli, while two were fibroadenomas. On FNA, four of 145 carcinomas (3%) were diagnosed as fibroadenomas (false negatives). On review, three were malignant or suspicious of malignancy, while one was consistent with a fibroadenoma. Three false negative diagnoses were due to underappreciation of single malignant cells present between epithelial groupings typical of a fibroadenoma, while one was due to undersampling of the carcinoma. Cytologically, some fibroadenomas are sufficiently atypical that histological confirmation is necessary to exclude a malignancy. Misinterpreting carcinomas as fibroadenomas could be avoided by careful study of the morphology of isolated cells.