1
|
Brown JMC, Zaben M, Ormonde C, Sharouf F, Spencer R, Bhatt H, Siebzehnrubl FA, Gray WP. A high-density 3-dimensional culture model of human glioblastoma for rapid screening of therapeutic resistance. Biochem Pharmacol 2023; 208:115410. [PMID: 36632958 PMCID: PMC10840506 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is among the most lethal cancers, with no known cure. A multitude of therapeutics are being developed or in clinical trials, but currently there are no ways to predict which patient may benefit the most from which drug. Assays that allow prediction of the tumor's response to anti-cancer drugs may improve clinical decision-making. Here, we present a high-density 3D primary cell culture model for short-term testing from resected glioblastoma tissue that is set up on the day of surgery, established within 7 days and viable for at least 3 weeks. High-density 3D cultures contain tumor and host cells, including microglia, and retain key histopathological characteristics of their parent tumors, including proliferative activity, expression of the marker GFAP, and presence of giant cells. This provides a proof-of-concept that 3D primary cultures may be useful to model tumor heterogeneity. Importantly, we show that high-density 3D cultures can be used to test chemotherapy response within a 2-3-week timeframe and are predictive of patient response to Temozolomide therapy. Thus, primary high-density 3D cultures could be a useful tool for brain cancer research and prediction of therapeutic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M C Brown
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
| | - M Zaben
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; B.R.A.I.N Biomedical Research Unit, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
| | - C Ormonde
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom; B.R.A.I.N Biomedical Research Unit, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
| | - F Sharouf
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; B.R.A.I.N Biomedical Research Unit, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
| | - R Spencer
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; B.R.A.I.N Biomedical Research Unit, Cardiff University, United Kingdom
| | - H Bhatt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - F A Siebzehnrubl
- School of Biosciences, European Cancer Stem Cell Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, United Kingdom.
| | - W P Gray
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; B.R.A.I.N Biomedical Research Unit, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arce P, Bolst D, Bordage MC, Brown JMC, Cirrone P, Cortés-Giraldo MA, Cutajar D, Cuttone G, Desorgher L, Dondero P, Dotti A, Faddegon B, Fedon C, Guatelli S, Incerti S, Ivanchenko V, Konstantinov D, Kyriakou I, Latyshev G, Le A, Mancini-Terracciano C, Maire M, Mantero A, Novak M, Omachi C, Pandola L, Perales A, Perrot Y, Petringa G, Quesada JM, Ramos-Méndez J, Romano F, Rosenfeld AB, Sarmiento LG, Sakata D, Sasaki T, Sechopoulos I, Simpson EC, Toshito T, Wright DH. Report on G4-Med, a Geant4 benchmarking system for medical physics applications developed by the Geant4 Medical Simulation Benchmarking Group. Med Phys 2021; 48:19-56. [PMID: 32392626 PMCID: PMC8054528 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geant4 is a Monte Carlo code extensively used in medical physics for a wide range of applications, such as dosimetry, micro- and nanodosimetry, imaging, radiation protection, and nuclear medicine. Geant4 is continuously evolving, so it is crucial to have a system that benchmarks this Monte Carlo code for medical physics against reference data and to perform regression testing. AIMS To respond to these needs, we developed G4-Med, a benchmarking and regression testing system of Geant4 for medical physics. MATERIALS AND METHODS G4-Med currently includes 18 tests. They range from the benchmarking of fundamental physics quantities to the testing of Monte Carlo simulation setups typical of medical physics applications. Both electromagnetic and hadronic physics processes and models within the prebuilt Geant4 physics lists are tested. The tests included in G4-Med are executed on the CERN computing infrastructure via the use of the geant-val web application, developed at CERN for Geant4 testing. The physical observables can be compared to reference data for benchmarking and to results of previous Geant4 versions for regression testing purposes. RESULTS This paper describes the tests included in G4-Med and shows the results derived from the benchmarking of Geant4 10.5 against reference data. DISCUSSION Our results indicate that the Geant4 electromagnetic physics constructor G4EmStandardPhysics_option4 gives a good agreement with the reference data for all the tests. The QGSP_BIC_HP physics list provided an overall adequate description of the physics involved in hadron therapy, including proton and carbon ion therapy. New tests should be included in the next stage of the project to extend the benchmarking to other physical quantities and application scenarios of interest for medical physics. CONCLUSION The results presented and discussed in this paper will aid users in tailoring physics lists to their particular application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D Bolst
- Centre For Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - M-C Bordage
- CRCT (INSERM and Paul Sabatier University), Toulouse, France
| | - J M C Brown
- Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - D Cutajar
- Centre For Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | | | - L Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics (IRA), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - A Dotti
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B Faddegon
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - C Fedon
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S Guatelli
- Centre For Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - S Incerti
- Université de Bordeaux, CNRS/IN2P3, UMR5797, Centre d'Études Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan, Gradignan, France
| | - V Ivanchenko
- Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
- CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - D Konstantinov
- NRC "Kurchatov Institute" - IHEP, Protvino, Russian Federation
| | - I Kyriakou
- Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - G Latyshev
- NRC "Kurchatov Institute" - IHEP, Protvino, Russian Federation
| | - A Le
- Centre For Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - C Omachi
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - A Perales
- Medical Physics Department of Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Y Perrot
- IRSN, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | | | | | - F Romano
- INFN Catania Section, Catania, Italy
- Medical Physics Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - A B Rosenfeld
- Centre For Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | | | - D Sakata
- Centre For Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | | | - I Sechopoulos
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Center for Screening (LRCB), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E C Simpson
- Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - T Toshito
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - D H Wright
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown JMC, Brunner SE, Schaart DR. A High Count-Rate and Depth-of-Interaction Resolving Single-Layered One-Side Readout Pixelated Scintillator Crystal Array for PET Applications. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2020. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2948106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
4
|
Schuemann J, McNamara AL, Warmenhoven JW, Henthorn NT, Kirkby KJ, Merchant MJ, Ingram S, Paganetti H, Held KD, Ramos-Mendez J, Faddegon B, Perl J, Goodhead DT, Plante I, Rabus H, Nettelbeck H, Friedland W, Kundrát P, Ottolenghi A, Baiocco G, Barbieri S, Dingfelder M, Incerti S, Villagrasa C, Bueno M, Bernal MA, Guatelli S, Sakata D, Brown JMC, Francis Z, Kyriakou I, Lampe N, Ballarini F, Carante MP, Davídková M, Štěpán V, Jia X, Cucinotta FA, Schulte R, Stewart RD, Carlson DJ, Galer S, Kuncic Z, Lacombe S, Milligan J, Cho SH, Sawakuchi G, Inaniwa T, Sato T, Li W, Solov'yov AV, Surdutovich E, Durante M, Prise KM, McMahon SJ. A New Standard DNA Damage (SDD) Data Format. Radiat Res 2018; 191:76-92. [PMID: 30407901 DOI: 10.1667/rr15209.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of radiation-induced cellular damage has greatly improved over the past few decades. Despite this progress, there are still many obstacles to fully understand how radiation interacts with biologically relevant cellular components, such as DNA, to cause observable end points such as cell killing. Damage in DNA is identified as a major route of cell killing. One hurdle when modeling biological effects is the difficulty in directly comparing results generated by members of different research groups. Multiple Monte Carlo codes have been developed to simulate damage induction at the DNA scale, while at the same time various groups have developed models that describe DNA repair processes with varying levels of detail. These repair models are intrinsically linked to the damage model employed in their development, making it difficult to disentangle systematic effects in either part of the modeling chain. These modeling chains typically consist of track-structure Monte Carlo simulations of the physical interactions creating direct damages to DNA, followed by simulations of the production and initial reactions of chemical species causing so-called "indirect" damages. After the induction of DNA damage, DNA repair models combine the simulated damage patterns with biological models to determine the biological consequences of the damage. To date, the effect of the environment, such as molecular oxygen (normoxic vs. hypoxic), has been poorly considered. We propose a new standard DNA damage (SDD) data format to unify the interface between the simulation of damage induction in DNA and the biological modeling of DNA repair processes, and introduce the effect of the environment (molecular oxygen or other compounds) as a flexible parameter. Such a standard greatly facilitates inter-model comparisons, providing an ideal environment to tease out model assumptions and identify persistent, underlying mechanisms. Through inter-model comparisons, this unified standard has the potential to greatly advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of radiation-induced DNA damage and the resulting observable biological effects when radiation parameters and/or environmental conditions change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Schuemann
- a Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A L McNamara
- a Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J W Warmenhoven
- b Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - N T Henthorn
- b Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - K J Kirkby
- b Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - M J Merchant
- b Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - S Ingram
- b Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - H Paganetti
- a Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - K D Held
- a Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J Ramos-Mendez
- c Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - B Faddegon
- c Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - J Perl
- d SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California
| | - D T Goodhead
- e Medical Research Council, Harwell, United Kingdom
| | | | - H Rabus
- g Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany.,h Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany
| | - H Nettelbeck
- g Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany.,h Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany
| | - W Friedland
- h Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.,i Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - P Kundrát
- i Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - A Ottolenghi
- j Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Baiocco
- h Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.,j Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - S Barbieri
- h Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.,j Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Dingfelder
- k Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - S Incerti
- l CNRS, IN2P3, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France.,m University of Bordeaux, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | - C Villagrasa
- h Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.,n Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire, F-92262 Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France
| | - M Bueno
- n Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire, F-92262 Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France
| | - M A Bernal
- o Applied Physics Department, Gleb Wataghin Institute of Physics, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - S Guatelli
- p Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - D Sakata
- p Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - J M C Brown
- q Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Z Francis
- r Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - I Kyriakou
- s Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece
| | - N Lampe
- l CNRS, IN2P3, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | - F Ballarini
- j Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,t Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pavia, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - M P Carante
- j Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,t Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pavia, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - M Davídková
- u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, Czech Republic
| | - V Štěpán
- u Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, Czech Republic
| | - X Jia
- v Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - F A Cucinotta
- w Health Physics and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada
| | - R Schulte
- x Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
| | - R D Stewart
- y Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - D J Carlson
- z Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - S Galer
- aa Medical Radiation Science Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - Z Kuncic
- bb School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S Lacombe
- cc Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (UMR 8214) University Paris-Sud, CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
| | | | - S H Cho
- ee Department of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - G Sawakuchi
- ee Department of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - T Inaniwa
- ff Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - T Sato
- gg Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Tokai 319-1196, Japan
| | - W Li
- i Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.,hh Task Group 7.7 "Internal Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany
| | - A V Solov'yov
- ii MBN Research Center, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - E Surdutovich
- jj Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan
| | - M Durante
- kk GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K M Prise
- ll Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - S J McMahon
- ll Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Incerti S, Kyriakou I, Bernal MA, Bordage MC, Francis Z, Guatelli S, Ivanchenko V, Karamitros M, Lampe N, Lee SB, Meylan S, Min CH, Shin WG, Nieminen P, Sakata D, Tang N, Villagrasa C, Tran HN, Brown JMC. Geant4-DNA example applications for track structure simulations in liquid water: A report from the Geant4-DNA Project. Med Phys 2018; 45. [PMID: 29901835 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This Special Report presents a description of Geant4-DNA user applications dedicated to the simulation of track structures (TS) in liquid water and associated physical quantities (e.g., range, stopping power, mean free path…). These example applications are included in the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit and are available in open access. Each application is described and comparisons to recent international recommendations are shown (e.g., ICRU, MIRD), when available. The influence of physics models available in Geant4-DNA for the simulation of electron interactions in liquid water is discussed. Thanks to these applications, the authors show that the most recent sets of physics models available in Geant4-DNA (the so-called "option4" and "option 6" sets) enable more accurate simulation of stopping powers, dose point kernels, and W-values in liquid water, than the default set of models ("option 2") initially provided in Geant4-DNA. They also serve as reference applications for Geant4-DNA users interested in TS simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Incerti
- University of Bordeaux, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170, Gradignan, France
- CNRS, IN2P3, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170, Gradignan, France
| | - I Kyriakou
- Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina Medical School, 45110, Ioannina, Greece
| | - M A Bernal
- Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - M C Bordage
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
- Inserm, UMR1037 CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Z Francis
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Université Saint Joseph, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - S Guatelli
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Illawarra Health & Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - V Ivanchenko
- Geant4 Associates International Ltd., Hebden Bridge, UK
- Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
| | - M Karamitros
- Radiation Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
| | - N Lampe
- Vicinity Centres, Data Science & Insights, Office Tower One, 1341 Dandenong Rd, Chadstone, Victoria, 3148, Australia
| | - S B Lee
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - S Meylan
- SymAlgo Technologies, 75 rue Léon Frot, 75011, Paris, France
| | - C H Min
- Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - W G Shin
- Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | | | - D Sakata
- University of Bordeaux, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170, Gradignan, France
- CNRS, IN2P3, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170, Gradignan, France
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - N Tang
- IRSN, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - C Villagrasa
- IRSN, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sureté Nucléaire, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - H N Tran
- Division of Nuclear Physics, Advanced Institute of Materials Science, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - J M C Brown
- Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Apostolakis J, Asai M, Bagulya A, Brown JMC, Burkhardt H, Chikuma N, Cortes-Giraldo MA, Elles S, Grichine V, Guatelli S, Incerti S, Ivanchenko VN, Jacquemier J, Kadri O, Maire M, Pandola L, Sawkey D, Toshito T, Urban L, Yamashita T. Progress in Geant4 Electromagnetic Physics Modelling and Validation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/664/7/072021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
7
|
Brown JMC, Solomon S, Tinker RA. Development of an energy discriminate CR-39(®) nuclear track etch dosimeter for Radon-220 gas measurements. J Environ Radioact 2011; 102:901-905. [PMID: 20980083 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2009] [Revised: 09/10/2010] [Accepted: 09/28/2010] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
An energy discriminate CR-39(®) nuclear track etch dosimeter for use in a (220)Rn and (222)Rn gas monitor has been developed and experimentally assessed. It utilises a thin film of Mylar(®) C to attenuate the alpha particle energies to allow only the damage tracks created by the 8.785 MeV alpha particles emitted from (212)Po of the (232)Th decay chain to be registered in the CR-39(®) plaque, allowing for the direct measurement of (220)Rn gas concentrations. The dosimeter was developed through a combination of experimental investigations and theoretical simulations using the Monte Carlo ion transport modelling program Stopping and Range of Ions in Materials (SRIM 2008). A film thickness of 54 μm has been shown to attenuate all alpha energies less then 7.7 MeV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M C Brown
- Environmental & Radiation Health Branch, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Yallambie, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|