1
|
Negenborn VL, Smit JM, Dikmans REG, Winters HAH, Twisk JWR, Ruhé PQ, Mureau MAM, Tuinder S, Eltahir Y, Posch NAS, van Steveninck-Barends JM, van der Hulst RRWJ, Ritt MJPF, Bouman MB, Mullender MG. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2019; 106:586-595. [PMID: 30835827 PMCID: PMC6593424 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Implant‐based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure and its economic impact is significant. This study aimed to analyse whether a direct one‐stage IBBR with use of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is more cost‐effective than two‐stage (expander‐implant) breast reconstruction. Methods The BRIOS (Breast Reconstruction In One Stage) study was an open‐label multicentre RCT in which women scheduled for skin‐sparing mastectomy and immediate IBBR were randomized between one‐stage IBBR with ADM or two‐stage IBBR. Duration of surgery and hospital stay, and visits for the primary surgery, unplanned and cosmetic procedures were recorded. Costs were estimated at an institutional level. Health status was assessed by means of the EuroQol Five Dimensions 5L questionnaire. Results Fifty‐nine patients (91 breasts) underwent one‐stage IBBR with ADM and 62 patients (92 breasts) two‐stage IBBR. The mean(s.d.) duration of surgery in the one‐stage group was significantly longer than that for two‐stage IBBR for unilateral (2·52(0·55) versus 2·02(0·35) h; P < 0·001) and bilateral (4·03(1·00) versus 3·25(0·58) h; P = 0·017) reconstructions. Costs were higher for one‐stage compared with two‐stage IBBR for both unilateral (€12 448 (95 per cent c.i. 10 722 to 14 387) versus €9871 (9373 to 10 445) respectively; P = 0·025) and bilateral (€16 939 (14 887 to 19 360) versus €13 383 (12 414 to 14 669); P = 0·002) reconstructions. This was partly related to the use of relatively expensive ADM. There was no difference in postoperative health status between the groups. Conclusion One‐stage IBBR with ADM was associated with higher costs, but similar health status, compared with conventional two‐stage IBBR. Registration number: NTR5446 (
http://www.trialregister.nl).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V L Negenborn
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Smit
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - R E G Dikmans
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H A H Winters
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - J W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Q Ruhé
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - M A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Tuinder
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Y Eltahir
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - N A S Posch
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Haga Ziekenhuis, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | | | - R R W J van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Orbis Medical Centrum, Sittard, the Netherlands
| | - M J P F Ritt
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M-B Bouman
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - M G Mullender
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Negenborn VL, Dikmans REG, Bouman MB, Winters HAH, Twisk JWR, Ruhé PQ, Mureau MAM, Smit JM, Tuinder S, Hommes J, Eltahir Y, Posch NAS, van Steveninck-Barends JM, Meesters-Caberg MA, van der Hulst RRWJ, Ritt MJPF, Mullender MG. Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1305-1312. [PMID: 29663320 PMCID: PMC6099293 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the multicentre randomized trial BRIOS (Breast Reconstruction In One Stage), direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) was associated with a markedly higher postoperative complication rate compared with two-stage tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. This study aimed to identify factors that contribute to the occurrence of complications after DTI ADM-assisted breast reconstruction. METHODS Data were obtained from the BRIOS study, including all patients treated with DTI ADM-assisted breast reconstruction. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of postoperative complications. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients (91 breasts) were included, of whom 27 (35 breasts) developed a surgical complication. Reoperations were performed in 29 breasts (32 per cent), with prosthesis removal in 22 (24 per cent). In multivariable analyses, mastectomy weight was associated with complications (odds ratio (OR) 1·94, 95 per cent c.i. 1·33 to 2·83), reoperations (OR 1·70, 1·12 to 2·59) and removal of the implant (OR 1·55, 1·11 to 2·17). Younger patients (OR 1·07, 1·01 to 1·13) and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 4·83, 1·15 to 20·24) more frequently required reoperation. In univariable analyses, adjuvant radiotherapy showed a trend towards more complications (OR 7·23, 0·75 to 69·95) and removal of the implant (OR 5·12, 0·76 to 34·44), without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION Breast size appeared to be the most significant predictor of complications in DTI ADM-assisted breast reconstruction. The technique should preferably be performed in patients with small to moderate sized breasts. Registration number: NTR5446 ( http://www.trialregister.nl).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V L Negenborn
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R E G Dikmans
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M B Bouman
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - H A H Winters
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Q Ruhé
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - M A M Mureau
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J M Smit
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Tuinder
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Hommes
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Y Eltahir
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - N A S Posch
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Haga Ziekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - M A Meesters-Caberg
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - R R W J van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M J P F Ritt
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Mullender
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|