The association of painful and non-painful morbidities with frailty: a cross sectional analysis of a cohort of community dwelling older people in England

INTRODUCTION

The association between chronic pain and frailty might indicate that pain is an independent driver of frailty but might alternatively be explained by inclusion within frailty identification tools of morbidities that commonly lead to chronic pain. This research examines the extent to which the association of pain with frailty might be attributed to morbidities.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of older people in a UK cohort with or at risk of musculoskeletal problems or frailty (Investigating Musculoskeletal Health and Wellbeing study), used multivariable logistic regression and Z-tests to assess the degrees of associations of pain (McGill Pain Rating Index), and painful and non-painful morbidity counts with frailty (modified FRAIL questionnaire).

RESULTS

Data were from 2,185 participants, 56% female, median age 73 (range 60 to 96) years. 430 (20%) participants were classified as frail. In a fully adjusted standardised model, pain (aOR 2.07 (95%CI 1.83 to 2.33) and 'any' morbidity aOR (1.74 (95%CI 1.54 to 1.97) were both significantly associated with frailty. When morbidity was subclassified as painful or non-painful, painful (aOR 1.48 (95%CI 1.30 to 1.68) and non-painful (aOR1.39 (95%CI 1.24 to 1.56)) morbidities each were associated with frailty, as also was pain (aOR 2.07 (95%CI 1.83 to 2.34, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain is associated with frailty, over and above any effect of painful and non-painful morbidities. This forms the justification for future research which focuses on pain management in the identification, prevention, and treatment of frailty.

1321 THE ASSOCIATION OF PAINFUL AND NON-PAINFUL COMORBIDITIES WITH FRAILTY

Introduction

Chronic pain is associated with frailty. We hypothesised that painful comorbidities would be more strongly associated with frailty than non-painful comorbidities.

Method

Data were from Investigating Musculoskeletal Health and Wellbeing, a UK-based cohort of people with or at risk of musculoskeletal problems or frailty. Average pain over the previous month was assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The original FRAIL questionnaire comprises five self-report items: Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses and Loss of weight. In this study risk of frailty was operationalised using a modified FRAIL questionnaire, omitting the “illnesses” item which related to comorbidities. Comorbidities were classified as either ‘painful’ or ‘non-painful’ based on the International Association for the Study of Pain chronic pain classification criteria. Ordinal logistic regression models explored associations of comorbidity counts with frailty.

Results

Cross-sectional data were from 2473 participants, 57% female, median age 72 (range 40 to 96) years. 518 (21%) participants were classified as frail. Mean (SD) pain score was 5.5 (2.5). Median (IQR) painful comorbidities was 2 (1 to 3) and non-painful 1 (0 to 2). Highest comorbidity frequency: arthritis (66%) and hypertension (38%). Pain was associated with frailty (OR 1.58 (1.52 to 1.64)). Painful comorbidities (aOR 1.64 (1.54 to 1.75) and non-painful comorbidities (aOR 1.31 (1.21 to 1.41)) were both associated with frailty when included in the same multivariable model adjusted for age, sex and BMI.

Conclusions

Painful comorbidities were most strongly associated with frailty, although non-painful comorbidities also contributed. Pain and frailty are interconnected, and this might in part be due to comorbidities or their treatments. These findings provide justification for further research to identify the mechanisms through which pain is involved in frailty and to include pain management in interventions to ameliorate frailty.

Optimal management of older people with frailty non-weight bearing after lower limb fracture: a scoping review

Background

Patients with lower limb fractures who are non-weight bearing are at risk of the complications of the associated immobility and disability, particularly people with frailty, but there is lack of clarity about what constitutes optimal care for such patients. A scoping literature review was conducted to explore what evidence is available for the management of this patient group.

Methods

MEDLINE (PubMed) CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane databases of published literature and the HMIC and SIGLE sites for grey literature were searched for primary research studies and expert reports, using an iterative approach initially including the key term ‘non-weight bearing’. All study types were included. Analysis was by narrative synthesis.

Results

No papers were identified from a search using the key phrase ‘non-weight bearing’. With this term removed, 11 indirectly relevant articles on lower limb fractures were retrieved from the searches of the electronic databases comprising three observational studies, five non-systematic review articles, a systematic review, an opinion piece and a survey of expert opinion that had relevance to restricted weight bearing patients. The observational studies indicated depression, cognition and nutrition affect outcome and hence have indirect relevance to management. The non-systematic reviews articles emphasised the importance of maintaining strength and range of movement during immobilisation and advised an orthogeriatric model of care. Fourteen UK and 97 non-UK guidelines relevant to fragility fractures, falls and osteoporosis management were found in the grey literature, but none made specific recommendations regarding the management of any period of non-weight bearing.

Discussion

These findings provide a summary of the evidence base that can be used in the development of a clinical guideline for these patients but is not sufficient. We propose that, a guideline should be developed for these patients using an expert consensus process.

The Nottingham Spinal Health (NoSH) Study: a cohort study of patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures

Patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures were elderly, multimorbid and frail and lead to poor outcomes. Their hospital treatment needs to consider this alongside their acute fracture. A systematic organised model of care, such as an adaptation of orthogeriatric hip fracture care, will offer a more holistic approach potentially improving their outcomes.

PURPOSE

Patients admitted to hospital with vertebral fragility fractures are elderly and have complex care needs who may benefit from specialist multidisciplinary input. To date, their characteristics and outcomes have not been reported sufficiently. This study aims to justify such a service.

METHODS

Patients admitted with an acute vertebral fragility fracture over 12 months were prospectively recruited from a university hospital in England. Data were collected soon after their admission, at discharge from hospital and 6 months after their hospital discharge on their characteristics, pain, physical functioning, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Data from 90 participants were analysed. They were mainly elderly (mean age 79.7 years), multimorbid (69% had ≥ 3 comorbid condition), frail (56% had a Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥ 5), cognitively impaired (54% had a MoCA score of < 23) and at high risk of falls (65% had fallen ≥ 2 in the previous year). Eighteen percent died at 6 months. At 6 months post-hospital discharge, 12% required a new care home admission, 37% still reported their pain to be severe and physical functioning was worse compared with their preadmission state.

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalised with vertebral fragility fractures were elderly, multimorbid, frail and are susceptible to persistent pain and disability. Their treatment in hospital needs to consider this alongside their acute fracture. A systematic organised model of care, such as an adaptation of orthogeriatric hip fracture care, will offer a more holistic approach potentially improving their outcomes.

Chair based exercise in community settings: a cluster randomised feasibility study

Background

Some older people who find standard exercise programmes too strenuous may be encouraged to exercise while remaining seated - chair based exercises (CBE). We previously developed a consensus CBE programme (CCBE) following a modified Delphi process. We firstly needed to test the feasibility and acceptability of this treatment approach and explore how best to evaluate it before undertaking a definitive trial.

Methods

A feasibility study with a cluster randomised controlled trial component was undertaken to 1. Examine the acceptability, feasibility and tolerability of the intervention and 2. Assess the feasibility of running a trial across 12 community settings (4 day centres, 4 care homes, 4 community groups). Centres were randomised to either CCBE, group reminiscence or usual care. Outcomes were collected to assess the feasibility of the trial parameters: level of recruitment interest and eligibility, randomisation, adverse events, retention, completion of health outcomes, missing data and delivery of the CCBE. Semi- structured interviews were conducted with participants and care staff following the intervention to explore acceptability.

Results

48% (89 out of 184 contacted) of eligible centres were interested in participating with 12 recruited purposively. 73% (94) of the 128 older people screened consented to take part with 83 older people then randomised following mobility testing. Recruitment required greater staffing levels and resources due to 49% of participants requiring a consultee declaration. There was a high dropout rate (40%) primarily due to participants no longer attending the centres. The CCBE intervention was delivered once a week in day centres and community groups and twice a week in care homes. Older people and care staff found the CCBE intervention largely acceptable.

Conclusion

There was a good level of interest from centres and older people and the CCBE intervention was largely welcomed. The trial design and governance procedures would need to be revised to maximise recruitment and retention. If the motivation for a future trial is physical health then this study has identified that further work to develop the CCBE delivery model is warranted to ensure it can be delivered at a frequency to elicit physiological change. If the motivation for a future trial is psychological outcomes then this study has identified that the current delivery model is feasible.

Trial registration

ISRCTN27271501. Date registered: 30/01/2018.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0769-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Description of an Occupational Therapy Intervention Aimed at Improving Outdoor Mobility

After a stroke people can find outdoor mobility difficult, but a targeted occupational therapy intervention has been shown to help people to get out of the house more often. This study describes the intervention.

The occupational therapists who provided the intervention kept records of the number and duration of therapy sessions, the goal of therapy and the activities undertaken. As part of the trial, functional and mobility outcome assessments were completed by the participants 4 and 10 months after recruitment and were used to compare the goals set with the goals achieved and the mobility performance.

Eighty-six participants were randomised to, and 78 received, the intervention. They received a median of 6 (mean 4.7, SD 1.9) sessions, with an average of 40 minutes per session. Sixty (77%) of the participants achieved their primary goal. Those who did not had greater functional limitations at the start of the study than those who did. Walking was the most common goal (17/78, 22%) and the most performed activity (135 times, 33%). Thirteen participants achieved walking and 12 of these were still walking outside at the 10-month assessment.

Three-quarters of people with stroke were therefore able to achieve their outdoor mobility goals after an occupational therapy intervention.

The Use of Transport by Stroke Patients

The objectives of this research were to survey the use of transport by stroke patients in the community and study its relationship to their activities of daily living and mood.

The records of 90 consecutive stroke patients receiving community occupational therapy in a rehabilitation trial were surveyed for entries of therapy related to transport. A further 50 stroke patients in the same study were surveyed about their use of transport one year after discharge from hospital.

In the survey of occupational therapy notes, a transport assessment had been recorded for all 90 patients. Of these, 22 patients had been given leaflets describing the range of transport options locally but had been unable to use these options.

In the survey of transport use, 42/50 (84%) patients surveyed at one year responded. Twenty-one (50%) had used transport on their own, six of whom scored <26/66 on the Extended Activities of Daily Living scale (indicating that they needed help in most activities of daily living). Twenty-one (50%) patients had not travelled alone, four of whom scored >48/66 on the Extended Activities of Daily Living scale (very able in activities of daily living). Only 1 (2%) patient had used specialist transport and 22 (52%) reported that they did not get out as much as they wished.

Despite receiving advice, these patients did not use specialist transport options, yet many still wanted to get out more. The reason for this is unclear but it is not due simply to physical disability.

Using an interview study of transport use by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation

Introduction: Many people who have had a stroke want to get out of their house more often. This study explored attitudes and barriers to the use of transport with the aim of informing rehabilitation.

Method: Semi-structured interview study of 24 community-dwelling people who had had a stroke, purposively sampled to find people with a variety of recent experiences of transport. Interviews were taped and transcribed. Analysis was by constant comparative methodology, to develop emerging themes and concepts.

Results: Interviewees wanted to travel for specific purposes but also for its own sake. Many could no longer use their car. This gave them less flexibility to travel and reduced their autonomy. Barriers to using alternative forms of transport were fear of injury or embarrassment from falling, an associated lack of confidence, inadequate information about transport services, perceptions about the cost of taxis and pavement vehicles (scooters) and environmental factors such as the weather. Those who could drive, or who lived with someone who did, gave the most positive descriptions of transport use. Those reliant on family or friends felt they could ask only for help getting to health-related appointments and those who used specialist transport services provided the most negative descriptions of transport.

Conclusions: Many of the barriers to transport use after stroke may be amenable to intervention. An intervention package capable of re-enabling people to drive or be driven, to use a pavement scooter safely, to provide information about the alternatives and to encourage best use of public transport is worth developing.

Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a service to prevent falls in the community would help reduce the rate of falls in older people who call an emergency ambulance when they fall but are not taken to hospital.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Community covered by four primary care trusts, England.

PARTICIPANTS

204 adults aged more than 60 living at home or in residential care who had fallen and called an emergency ambulance but were not taken to hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Referral to community fall prevention services or standard medical and social care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of falls over 12 months, ascertained from monthly diaries. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Barthel index, Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, and falls efficacy scale at baseline and by postal questionnaire at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

102 people were allocated to each group. 99 (97%) participants in the intervention group received the intervention. Falls diaries were analysed for 88.6 person years in the intervention group and 84.5 person years in the control group. The incidence rates of falls per year were 3.46 in the intervention group and 7.68 in the control group (incidence rate ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.58, P<0.001). The intervention group achieved higher scores on the Barthel index and Nottingham extended activities of daily living and lower scores on the falls efficacy scale (all P<0.05) at the 12 month follow-up. The number of times an emergency ambulance was called because of a fall was significantly different during follow-up (incidence rate ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.92, P=0.018).

CONCLUSION

A service to prevent falls in the community reduced the fall rate and improved clinical outcome in the high risk group of older people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall but are not taken to hospital.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67535605.

Therapy-based rehabilitation services for patients living at home more than one year after stroke

BACKGROUND

Current practice of rehabilitation intervention mainly concentrates on the first six months of stroke. At present, there is no agreed consensus about the benefits of such a service more than one year after stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain whether therapy-based rehabilitation services can influence outcome one year or more after stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the trials registers of the following Cochrane Review Groups: Stroke Group (last searched September 2007), Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (last searched October 2006) and Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (last searched October 2006). We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2006), EMBASE (1980 to October 2006), CINAHL (1982 to October 2006), AMED (1985 to October 2006), PEDro (1952 to October 2006), British Nursing Index (1993 to October 2006), DARE (1994 to October 2006), HMIC (1979 to October 2006) and NHS EED (1991 to October 2006). We also searched dissertation databases and ongoing trials and research registers, scanned reference lists and contacted researchers and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of community-based stroke patients, in which at least 75% were recruited one year after stroke and received a therapy-based rehabilitation intervention that was compared with conventional care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data on a number of pre-specified outcomes. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants who had deteriorated or were dependent in personal activities of daily living at the end of scheduled follow up.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five trials of 487 participants that were eligible for the review. Overall, there was inconclusive evidence as to whether therapy-based rehabilitation intervention one year after stroke was able to influence any relevant patient or carer outcome. Trials varied in design, type of interventions provided, quality, and outcomes assessed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the dearth of evidence investigating long-term therapy-based rehabilitation interventions for patients with stroke.

Occupational therapy for patients with problems in personal activities of daily living after stroke: systematic review of randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether occupational therapy focused specifically on personal activities of daily living improves recovery for patients after stroke.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane stroke group trials register, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycLIT, AMED, Wilson Social Sciences Abstracts, Science Citation Index, Social Science Citation, Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Dissertations Abstracts register, Occupational Therapy Research Index, scanning reference lists, personal communication with authors, and hand searching.

REVIEW METHODS

Trials were included if they evaluated the effect of occupational therapy focused on practice of personal activities of daily living or where performance in such activities was the target of the occupational therapy intervention in a stroke population. Original data were sought from trialists. Two reviewers independently reviewed each trial for methodological quality. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Nine randomised controlled trials including 1258 participants met the inclusion criteria. Occupational therapy delivered to patients after stroke and targeted towards personal activities of daily living increased performance scores (standardised mean difference 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.32, P=0.01) and reduced the risk of poor outcome (death, deterioration or dependency in personal activities of daily living) (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.87, P=0.003). For every 100 people who received occupational therapy focused on personal activities of daily living, 11 (95% confidence interval 7 to 30) would be spared a poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Occupational therapy focused on improving personal activities of daily living after stroke can improve performance and reduce the risk of deterioration in these abilities. Focused occupational therapy should be available to everyone who has had a stroke.

Person-centred dementia services are feasible, but can they be sustained?

BACKGROUND

we evaluated a specialist community-based dementia service to establish whether high quality care was being delivered and the conditions for doing so. The service was in an urban part of Rushcliffe Primary Care Trust, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom. The service comprised an assessment team of an occupational therapist, a community psychiatric nurse and a community care officer, supported by 235 h per week of care delivered by a team of specially trained community care workers.

METHODS

a qualitative study was performed using non-participant observation, semi-structured interviews and focus groups, and analysed using a thematic framework approach. There were 2 focus groups involving staff, 11 interviews of staff and stakeholders, and interviews of 15 carers of people with dementia.

RESULTS

the care provided was appreciated by carers, and the service was approved by staff and stakeholders. Care was delivered using a rehabilitative style that aimed to maintain personhood, rather than to promote independence. Clients were usually referred with the object of preventing unwanted admission to institutional care but, over time, moving into an institution ceased to be a uniformly undesirable outcome. The service's resources were reduced during the evaluation period, in part to meet mental health needs in intermediate care services.

CONCLUSIONS

an appropriately resourced and constructed specialist service using an adaptive rehabilitation approach aimed at maintaining personhood can deliver good individualised care to people with dementia, but specific and appropriate commissioning for these services is needed to nurture them.

Methodological understandings and misunderstandings in interprofessional research: experiences of researching transitional rehabilitation for older people

Drawing on our shared experience of a mixed-methods evaluation of a rehabilitation scheme for older people in six residential care homes in Nottingham, this paper examines the challenges and rewards of interprofessional research. A social anthropologist, social work academic and medical academic respectively, we explore understandings and misunderstandings that arose during the two-year research process as we sought to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and an ethnographic study conducted in parallel. We identify ways in which it was possible to overcome the danger of fragmentation, which we argue may be inherent in interprofessional research. This includes a recognition that researchers from different disciplinary backgrounds may use different "key symbols" to view the world but that professional knowledge and expertise may enable researchers to transcend such disciplinary boundaries and to hear what each is saying to the other for the benefit of improved collaboration.

Economic analysis of an early discharge rehabilitation service for older people

OBJECTIVE

to measure the cost-effectiveness of an early discharge and rehabilitation service (EDRS) in Nottingham, UK.

DESIGN

data were collected during a randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

cost and cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted from the perspective of service providers (health and social services) over a period of 12 months. Resource variables included were the EDRS intervention, the initial acute hospital admission (from randomisation), readmission to hospital, hospital outpatient visits, stays in nursing and residential homes, general practitioner contact, community health services and social services. The effectiveness measure was the EuroQol EQ-5D score, from which quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were calculated. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as cost per QALY gained.

RESULTS

at 12 months the mean untransformed total cost for the EDRS was 8,361 pound sterling compared to 10,088 pound sterling for usual care, a saving of 1,727 pound sterling (P = 0.05). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed a high probability that the EDRS was cost effective across a range of monetary values for a QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

the Nottingham EDRS was likely to be more cost effective than usual care.

Away from home: an ethnographic study of a transitional rehabilitation scheme for older people in the UK

While intermediate care is an international phenomenon, it is particularly developed in the UK where it is a central element of the Government's response to the care needs for older people (The National Service Framework of Older People. London: HMSO). In the UK, intermediate care services are proliferating despite lack of evidence of effectiveness. We present the findings of an ethnographic study of an intermediate care scheme in six residential care homes that examined the perspectives of three key groups--older people, care home managers and rehabilitation staff. We discovered a consensus among managers and rehabilitation staff that the scheme was successful, yet no such agreement existed amongst older people. We also found that the scheme created the conditions for the emergence of a more optimistic vision of the potential of older people, with rehabilitation assistants seeing core elements of their work in a new light. However, much of what was characterised as 'rehabilitation' was more a process of adaptation to the norms, expectations and values of the institution. Our findings point in positive and negative directions: positive in that this scheme may have generated a new culture of more personalised care amongst experienced care staff, and negative in showing the limitations of a rehabilitation scheme that is not based within a person's own living environment. Our findings have implications for policy makers, researchers and managers of services.

Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an occupational therapy intervention to improve outdoor mobility after stroke.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

General practice registers, social services departments, a primary care rehabilitation service, and a geriatric day hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

168 community dwelling people with a clinical diagnosis of stroke in previous 36 months: 86 were allocated to the intervention group and 82 to the control group.

INTERVENTIONS

Leaflets describing local transport services for disabled people (control group) and leaflets with assessment and up to seven intervention sessions by an occupational therapist (intervention group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Responses to postal questionnaires at four and 10 months: primary outcome measure was response to whether participant got out of the house as much as he or she would like, and secondary outcome measures were response to how many journeys outdoors had been made in the past month and scores on the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, Nottingham leisure questionnaire, and general health questionnaire.

RESULTS

Participants in the treatment group were more likely to get out of the house as often as they wanted at both four months (relative risk 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 2.37) and 10 months (1.74, 1.24 to 2.44). The treatment group reported more journeys outdoors in the month before assessment at both four months (median 37 in intervention group, 14 in control group: P < 0.01) and 10 months (median 42 in intervention group, 14 in control group: P < 0.01). At four months the mobility scores on the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale were significantly higher in the intervention group, but there were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. No significant differences were observed in these measures at 10 months.

CONCLUSION

A targeted occupational therapy intervention at home increases outdoor mobility in people after stroke.

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Community Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Trials of occupational therapy for stroke patients living in the community have varied in their findings. It is unclear why these discrepancies have occurred.

METHODS

Trials were identified from searches of the Cochrane Library and other sources. The primary outcome measure was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) score at the end of intervention. Secondary outcome measures included the Barthel Index or the Rivermead ADL (Personal ADL), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ), and death. Data were analyzed using linear or logistic regression with a random effect for trial and adjustment for age, gender, baseline dependency, and method of follow-up. Subgroup analyses compared any occupational therapy intervention with control.

RESULTS

We included 8 single-blind randomized controlled trials incorporating 1143 patients. Occupational therapy was associated with higher NEADL scores at the end of intervention (weighted mean difference [WMD], 1.30 points, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.47 to 2.13) and higher leisure scores at the end of intervention (WMD, 1.51 points; 95% CI, 0.24 to 2.79). Occupational therapy emphasizing activities of daily living (ADL) was associated with improved end of intervention NEADL (WMD, 1.61 points; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.49) and personal activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.91), but not NLQ. Leisure-based occupational therapy improved end of intervention NLQ (WMD, 1.96 points; 95% CI, 0.27 to 3.66) but not NEADL or PADL.

CONCLUSIONS

Community occupational therapy significantly improved personal and extended activities of daily living and leisure activity in patients with stroke. Better outcomes were found with targeted interventions.

A study of interventions and related outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of occupational therapy and leisure therapy for community stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a detailed analysis of therapy provided in a multicentred randomized controlled trial of activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure (TOTAL), testing the hypothesis that specific interventions given in the trial affected specific aspects of outcome.

SUBJECTS

Three hundred and nine stroke patients who had been randomly allocated to receive either occupational therapy aimed at ADL activities (n = 156) or leisure (n = 153).

MEASURES

Number, duration and type of activity undertaken per patient. Barthel Index, Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (EADL) and Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ) six months after entry to the study.

METHOD

Activities that had been used in treatment were coded and categorized. Frequently used activities identified. These activities were matched to items from the six-month outcome measures. Patient independence in these outcome items was compared between the leisure and ADL groups.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nine therapy record forms were returned. Patients received a median of ten sessions with a median duration of 55 minutes. The ADL group received significantly more, mobility training, transfer training, cleaning, dressing, cooking and bathing training (chi-squared, p < 0.05). Sport, creative activities, games, hobbies, gardening, entertainment and shopping were used significantly more in the leisure group (chi-squared, p < 0.05) than the ADL group. Fifteen items from the outcome measures were identified as specific to these interventions. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome on these 15 items between the ADL and leisure groups (chi-squared, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that specific ADL or leisure interventions led to improvements in specific relevant outcomes. We believe that these findings should prompt a review of the relationship between process and outcome of occupational therapy.

Evaluation of cognitive assessment in stroke rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of cognitive assessment on the functional outcome of stroke patients and quality of life for both patients and their carers.

DESIGN

A multicentre, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and twenty-eight stroke patients were recruited from hospital wards in three UK centres.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were screened for cognitive impairment and randomly allocated to either routine care (116 patients) or routine care plus a detailed cognitive assessment (112 patients).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome was assessed three and six months after recruitment by an independent assessor blind to the intervention on Extended ADL, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, General Health Questionnaire-28 for patients and carers and Carer Strain Index.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in patients' functional outcome, perceived cognitive ability, level of psychological distress or satisfaction with care. There was a trend for the assessment group to have lower levels of carer strain (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of information about cognitive assessment in stroke rehabilitation may decrease carer strain.