Surgically Targeted Radiation Therapy (STaRT) for Brain Metastases: Initial Experience from a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Resection and intraoperative brachytherapy for patients with large, operable brain metastasis allows for both relief of mass effect and the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) to the resection cavity with a favorable dosimetric profile. The objective of this study was to analyze early patterns-of-care and treatment-related toxicity outcomes for brain metastasis patients treated with surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) using a novel brachytherapy carrier.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with brain metastasis, de novo and recurrent disease, who enrolled onto a prospective multi-institutional observational study (NCT04427384) were the subject of this analysis. Patients underwent resection and immediate implantation of bioresorbable, conformable, 20 mm x 20 mm x 4 mm collagen tile brachytherapy device(s) containing four uniform-intensity Cesium-131 sources. Toxicities were categorized using the CTCAE v5.0 adverse event (AE) criteria.

RESULTS

From 10/2020 to 01/2023, 13 participating sites enrolled and treated 48 patients with 51 metastases (13 with de novo and 35 patients with recurrent brain metastases), and 3 patients had 2 lesions implanted at the same procedure. Median age was 61 years (range: 28-80), 52% were female, and the most common primary types were lung (56%) and breast (13%). The median maximum pre-operative dimension was 3.4 cm (range: 1.7-5.7) and median pre-operative tumor volume 13.7cm3 (range: 1.7-132). 64% had received prior RT with a median time from last RT to STaRT of 14.6 months range: 3.5-57.3). Median KPS at screening was 80 (range: 50-100), and remained stable at post op visit (80, range: 50-100), and at 3-months following treatment (80, range 50-100), respectively (p>0.05). The median time for implantation was 3 minutes (range: 0.4-30). At a median follow-up of 4 months (range: <1-18), no patient experienced a radiation-attributed AE, and only 1 attributable Gr >3 AE was noted (Gr 5 intracerebral hemorrhage deemed probably related to surgery and unrelated to the implanted device).

CONCLUSION

Early results from this prospective multi-center trial demonstrate the feasibility and safety of STaRT. The lack of radiation-related AE, even with short follow-up, is intriguing given the relatively large lesion size and proportion of patients treated for recurrent, previously irradiated disease. Additional follow-up will provide data on tumor control outcomes and radiation necrosis rates using this novel technique.

A Combined Phase 0/2 "Trigger" Trial Evaluating Pamiparib or Olaparib with Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed or Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles and clinical efficacy of PARP1/2 selective inhibitors, pamiparib and olaparib, in newly-diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients in combination with radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this combined phase 0/2 trial presumed newly-diagnosed (Arm A) or recurrent (Arm B) GBM patients received 4 days of pamiparib (60 mg BID) prior to resection either 2-4 or 8-12 hours following the final dose. Arm C enrolled patients with recurrent GBM to 4 days of olaparib (200 mg BID) prior to resection. Enhancing and nonenhancing tumor tissue, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. A PK 'trigger', defined as unbound drug and gt; 5-fold biochemical IC 50 in nonenhancing tumor, determined eligibility for the therapeutic expansion phase 2. PARP inhibition was assessed via ex vivo radiation and quantification of PAR levels compared to non-radiated control. Newly-diagnosed MGMT unmethylated GBMs and recurrent GBMs exceeding the PK threshold were eligible for an expansion phase of pamiparib (Arms A and B) or olaparib (Arm C) with concurrent RT followed by maintenance pamiparib or olaparib. RT was 60 Gy in 30 fractions in newly-diagnosed patients and 40 Gy in 15 fractions in recurrent patients, delivered using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (Arm A, n = 16; Arm B, n = 16; Arm C, n = 6) were enrolled in the initial phase 0 study. The mean unbound concentrations of pamiparib in nonenhancing tumor region for Arm A and Arm B were 167.3 nM and 109.4 nM respectively, and in Arm C the mean unbound concentration of olaparib was 5.2 nM. All patients in the pamiparib arms (n = 32/32) but only 1 of 6 patients in the olaparib Arm C exceeded the PK threshold. Radiation-induced PAR expression was 2.44-fold in untreated control vs 1.16 in Arm A (p<0.05), 0.85 in Arm B (p<0.01) and 1.11 in Arm C patients, respectively. In Arm A, 11 patients had unmethylated tumors, and of those, 7 patients enrolled in phase 2. In Arm B, 9 of the 16 clinically eligible patients with positive PK results were enrolled in phase 2. At a median follow-up of 8.4 months [range: 1.3-15.7 months], the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4, 6.0, and 3.8 months for Arms A (n = 7), B (n = 9), and C (n = 1), respectively. Grade 3+ toxicities related to pamiparib occurred in 4 patients, with 2 adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation. No grade 3+ toxicities were documented in the olaparib arm.

CONCLUSION

Pamiparib achieved pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in nonenhancing GBM tissue and suppressed induction of PAR levels ex vivo post-radiation. The majority of patients with MGMT-unmethylated GBM advanced to the phase 2 portion of the trial, and pamiparib was generally well-tolerated in these patients.

A Combined Phase 0/2 "Trigger" Trial of Niraparib in Combination with Radiation in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Glioblastoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Poly ADP-ribose (PAR) polymerase (PARP) mediates DNA damage response. Niraparib is an investigational PARP1/2-selective inhibitor. We conducted a combined phase 0/2 study to evaluate niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), graduating patients to a phase 2 study evaluating a therapeutic regimen of niraparib with concurrent conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy (RT) in O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated tumors exceeding a prespecified PK threshold in non-enhancing tumor.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with presumed newly-diagnosed GBM were enrolled in a phase 0 study receiving 4 days of niraparib (300 or 200 mg QD) prior to planned resection 3-5 or 8-12 hours following the last dose. Tumor tissue (enhancing and non-enhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound niraparib concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. PARP inhibition was assessed by quantification of PAR induction after 10 Gy ex vivo irradiation in surgical tissue compared to non-irradiated control tissue. A PK 'trigger' determined eligibility for the therapeutic phase 2 expansion portion of the study. This was defined as unbound [niraparib] > 5-fold biochemical IC50 (i.e., 19 nM) in non-enhancing tumor. Patients with MGMT unmethylated tumors exceeding this PK threshold were eligible for expansion phase dosing of niraparib with concurrent RT followed by a maintenance phase of niraparib. Patients with MGMT methylated tumors were not eligible for the expansion phase and proceeded with temozolomide (TMZ) plus RT followed by maintenance TMZ. RT dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

RESULTS

All 29 patients enrolled in the phase 0 portion of the study met the PK threshold. In non-enhancing regions, the mean unbound concentration of niraparib was 258.2 nM. The suppression of PAR levels after ex vivo RT was observed in 79% of the patients (17/22). Sixteen patients had unmethylated tumors, and of those, 11 patients enrolled in phase 2. Five of the 6 initial patients enrolled in phase 2 experienced thrombocytopenia related to niraparib, and 3/5 cases were deemed serious and life-threatening. Consequently, starting dose in both phases was lowered to 200 mg, and no serious AEs were observed thereafter. At a median follow-up of 8.1 months [range: 6.0-12.9 months], 6-month PFS was 64% with 4 patients remaining on treatment and 5 patients ongoing survival follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Niraparib achieves pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in non-enhancing, newly-diagnosed GBM tissue in excess of any other studied PARP inhibitor. When delivered with concurrent RT, niraparib was well-tolerated, with low rates of grade 3+ toxicity. Initial clinical efficacy data are encouraging.

Timing relationships for secondary ischemia in rodents: the effect of venous obstruction

In a previous study, timing relationships were studied for flaps subjected to secondary ischemia by total pedicle interruption. In the current paper, using a rodent epigastric flap, a similar study for flaps subjected to secondary ischemia by venous obstruction was performed. These conditions were designed to mimic a venous thrombosis following flap transfer, as would be performed clinically. In Experiment 1, the time interval between primary and secondary ischemia was varied. When the interval was 72 hr, flaps with secondary ischemia had similar survival to those with primary ischemia. However, when the time interval was 24 hr, flap survival after secondary ischemia was significantly worse than after primary ischemia (p less than 0.01). In Experiment 2, the duration of primary ischemia was varied (15 min, 30 min or 1.5 hr), prior to a fixed interval between primary and secondary ischemia and 5 hr of secondary ischemia. These conditions produced significantly more necrosis than 5 hr of primary ischemia. Thus, even short periods of primary ischemia may have detrimental effects on flap survival after a subsequent period of secondary ischemia. This may have important clinical ramifications.

Timing relationships for secondary ischemia in rodents: the effect of arteriovenous obstruction

The first ischemic insult a tissue suffers is primary (1 degree) ischemia. A second ischemic episode, such as thrombosis after free tissue transfer, may be regarded as secondary (2 degrees) ischemia. Timing relationships were studied in a rodent epigastric-flap model. In a first experiment, the interval between 1 degree ischemia and 2 degrees ischemia was varied. Flaps which had 2 degrees ischemia 12 and 36 hr after the 1 degree episode, had decreased ischemic tolerance, compared with 1 degree ischemic flaps; 2 degrees ischemic flaps, after an interval of 72 hr, had an ischemic tolerance similar to 1 degree ischemic flaps. In a second experiment, the length of the 1 degree ischemia was varied. It was found that as little as 5 min of 1 degree ischemia significantly decreased the subsequent tolerance of 2 degrees ischemia. The possible clinical significance of these results is discussed.

The dorsal rat flap: a discussion of the model and the salutary effect of cimetidine on flap survival

Failure of skin flaps remains a significant clinical problem. The dorsal rat flap, a reliable experimental model, was used to test the efficacy of cimetidine in treating a failing flap. Flaps were elevated in 45 rats divided into three equal groups. Group 1 was a saline control group, Group 2 received cimetidine 250 mg/kg three times a day for 7 days postoperatively, and Group 3 received cimetidine for 1 day before surgery, and then as in Group 2. Necrosis was assessed on the seventh postoperative day. Group 2 had 31.1 +/- 1.3 (mean % +/- SEM) necrosis, significantly better than saline control animals (p less than 0.01) and pretreated animals (p less than 0.05). These results suggest the usefulness of cimetidine in ischemic flap surgery.