Edouard P, Vernay D, Martin S, Hirsch P, Bardoux S, Grange C, Claus D, Claise JM. Proximal row carpectomy: Is early postoperative mobilisation the right rehabilitation protocol?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010;
96:513-20. [PMID:
20538538 DOI:
10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.011]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2009] [Revised: 12/08/2009] [Accepted: 02/18/2010] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
To determine the feasibility and interest of an early rehabilitation protocol with no initial immobilisation after proximal row carpectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Thirteen patients were included in this retrospective study. Range of motion (ROM) and wrist strength (grip strength and grasp strength) were evaluated 3 and 6 weeks after surgery on the both wrists (operated and non-operated). Postoperatively, patients had no immobilisation of the wrist, and began a rehabilitation program immediately after surgery in the department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation under multidisciplinary team supervision. The same surgical technique was used for all patients by the same surgeon.
RESULTS
Six weeks after PRC, there was a 25-51% deficit in passive ROM and 54-64% deficit in active ROM compared to the corresponding non-operated wrist. Six weeks after PRC, mean overall grip strength was nearly 55% and Jamar dynamometer grip strength was 51% of the contralateral side.
DISCUSSION
This study shows that immediate immobilisation following PRC is unnecessary, and that early rehabilitation is of the essence. Early rehabilitation could reduce the delay necessary to recover range of motion and strength, and probably the time to return to work.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 4, prospective cohort study.
Collapse