Predictors and Barriers to Condom Use in the African Cohort Study

Consistent condom use is an inexpensive and efficacious HIV prevention strategy. Understanding factors associated with condom use and barriers to use can inform strategies to increase condom uptake. The ongoing African Cohort Study prospectively enrolls adults at 12 clinical sites in Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Nigeria. At enrollment, participants are asked about condom use at last sex with a regular partner. Robust Poisson regression models were used to evaluate predictors of self-reported condom use. Participants who reported not using condoms were asked to provide reasons. From January 2013 to September 2019, 2482 participants reported having at least one regular sexual partner in the preceding 6 months. Of those, 1577 (63.5%) reported using a condom at last sex. Condom use was more common among older participants, males, HIV-infected participants, and those with an HIV-infected partner. Married participants, those with a partner of unknown HIV status, and those reporting alcohol use were less likely to report condom use at last sex. Condom use at last sex also varied significantly by clinical site. Partner disapproval or refusal to use a condom was a consistent driver of disparities in condom use among participants who were HIV infected, female, and aged 18-24 years. Effective HIV prevention programs should integrate condom education with the tools necessary to negotiate condom use with regular partners.

Introduction of an in-house PCR for routine identification of M. tuberculosis in a low-income country

SETTING

National Tuberculosis (TB) Treatment Centre, Makerere University Medical School and Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the introduction of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assay for identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) into routine practice.

DESIGN

Routine diagnostic specimens were processed and inoculated into Bactec 12B vials and monitored daily. At a growth index (GI) > or =10, 0.5 ml of the 12B broth was removed and assayed with PCR. The same 12B vial was analyzed using the Bactec NAP method at GI > or =500. Vials at various levels of GI were included. Recurrent cost and time required to perform PCR and NAP were compared.

RESULTS

Initially, 71 specimens were analyzed; of these, 68 were NAP-positive while 69 were PCR-positive for MTC. PCR resulted in a 75% reduction in cost for a single test compared with Bactec NAP. PCR has been successfully incorporated into routine practice, and 432 samples have been analyzed. In addition, isolates from solid media were also well identified by PCR. With PCR, more samples can be analyzed at a time, it is faster and is less labor intensive.

CONCLUSION

PCR is a reliable and cheaper alternative for the identification of MTC.