Does Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Provide Outcome Advantages over Standard Laparoscopic Approaches?

Objective

The aim was to compare clinical outcomes of patients treated with totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TRRYGB) with those treated with the different laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) techniques.

Summary Background Data

The clinical benefit of the robotic approach to bariatric surgery compared to the standard laparoscopic approach is unclear. There are no studies directly comparing outcomes of TRRYGB with different LRYGB techniques.

Methods

Outcomes of 578 obese patients who underwent RYGB between 2011 and 2014 at an academic center were assessed. Multivariable analysis and propensity matching were used for comparing TRRYGB to different LRYGB techniques, including 21-mm EEA circular-stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA, LRYGB-21CS), linear-stapled GJA (LRYGB-LS), and hand-sewn GJA (LRYGB-HS).

Results

The TRRYGB technique required a longer mean operative time compared to the other groups, respectively 204 ± 46 vs. 139 ± 30 min (LRYGB-21CS), 206 ± 37 vs. 158 ± 30 min (LRYGB-LS), and 210 ± 36 vs. 167 ± 30 min (LRYGB-HS). TRRYGB experienced a lower stricture rate (2 vs. 17%, P = 0.003), shorter hospital stay (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 4.3 ± 5.5 days, P = 0.008), and lower readmission rate (12 vs. 28%, P = 0.009). No significant differences in outcomes were observed when comparing RRYGB to LRYGB-LS or LRYGB-HS.

Conclusions

TRRYGB increases operative time compared to all LRYGB techniques. TRRYGB was superior to LRYGB-21CS in terms of significantly shorter hospital stay, lower readmission rate, and less frequent GJA stricture formation. TRRYGB provides no clinical advantages over the LRYGB-LS and LRYGB-HS techniques.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-018-3228-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fast track bariatric surgery: safety of discharge on the first postoperative day after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Fast track recovery pathways have resulted in a multidisciplinary approach to enhance postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility and outcome of early discharge after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

SETTING

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed to identify patients with body mass index≥35 kg/m² who underwent LSG or LRYGB in 2012 and 2013.

METHODS

Patients were allocated to early discharge (ED) when discharged on postoperative (POD) 1 and late discharge (LD) when discharged on POD 2 or 3. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Records of 15,468 LSG and 16,483 LRYGB patients were analyzed; 5220 patients with LSG (33.7%) and 2960 patients with LRYGB (18%) were discharged on POD 1. The early discharge group had significantly fewer co-morbidities and lower rate of complications and readmission. Thirty-day readmission rate in LSG was 2.8% in ED versus 3.6% in LD (P = .008), and in LRGYB, it was 4.3% in ED versus 5.8% in LD (P = .001). Based on multivariate analysis, early discharge was not an independent risk factor for a higher readmission rate after LSG or LRYGB. Predictors of late discharge were age>50 years, body mass index>50 kg/m², Hispanic or non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity, impaired functional status, diabetes on insulin, chronic steroid/immunosuppressant use, bleeding disorder, being on dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, albumin<3.5 mg/dL, longer operative time, and concurrent cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

Discharge on POD 1 after LSG and LRYGB is feasible in a considerable proportion of patients. In this subgroup, early discharge is well tolerated and may be associated with lower complication and readmission rates.