1
|
Hussain SA, Lester JF, Jackson R, Gornall M, Qureshi M, Elliott A, Crabb SJ, Huddart RA, Vasudev N, Birtle AJ, Worlding J, James ND, Parikh O, Vilarino-Varela M, Alonzi R, Linch MD, Riaz IB, Catto JWF, Powles T, Jones RJ. Addition of nintedanib or placebo to neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NEOBLADE): a double-blind, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:650-658. [PMID: 35421369 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00158-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence is common after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We investigated the effect of adding nintedanib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on response and survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS NEOBLADE was a parallel-arm, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy with nintedanib or placebo in locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were recruited from 15 hospitals in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to nintedanib or placebo using permuted blocks with random block sizes of two or four, stratified by centre and glomerular filtration rate. Treatments were allocated using an interactive web-based system, and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study. Patients received oral nintedanib (150 mg or 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks) or placebo, in addition to usual neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-weekly cycle. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate, assessed at cystectomy or at day 8 of cyclde 3 (plus or minus 7 days) if cystectomy did not occur. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with EudraCT, 2012-004895-01, and ISRCTN, 56349930, and has completed planned recruitment. FINDINGS Between Dec 4, 2014, and Sept 3, 2018, 120 patients were recruited and were randomly allocated to receive nintedanib (n=57) or placebo (n=63). The median follow-up for the study was 33·5 months (IQR 14·0-44·0). Pathological complete response in the intention-to-treat population was reached in 21 (37%) of 57 patients in the nintedanib group and 20 (32%) of 63 in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 1·25, 70% CI 0·84-1·87; p=0·28). Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed in 53 (93%) of 57 participants who received nintedanib and 50 (79%) of 63 patients in the placebo group (OR 1·65, 95% CI 0·74-3·65; p=0·24). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were thromboembolic events (17 [30%] of 57 patients in the nintedanib group vs 13 [21%] of 63 patients in the placebo group [OR 1·63, 95% CI 0·71-3·76; p=0·29]) and decreased neutrophil count (22 [39%] in the nintedanib group vs seven [11%] in the placebo group [5·03, 1·95-13·00; p=0·0006]). 45 treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in the nintedanib group and 43 occurred in the placebo group. One treatment-related death occurred in the placebo group, which was due to myocardial infarction. INTERPRETATION The addition of nintedanib to chemotherapy was safe but did not improve the rate of pathological complete response in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed A Hussain
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | - Richard Jackson
- Department of Oncology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matthew Gornall
- Department of Oncology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Muneeb Qureshi
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Simon J Crabb
- Department of Oncology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Robert A Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Nicholas D James
- Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Omi Parikh
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | | | | | - Mark D Linch
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Robert J Jones
- University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dearnaley D, Hinder V, Hijab A, Horan G, Srihari N, Rich P, Houston JG, Henry AM, Gibbs S, Venkitaraman R, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Miners A, Mason M, Pedley I, Payne H, Brock S, Wade R, Robinson A, Din O, Lees K, Graham J, Worlding J, Murray J, Parker C, Griffin C, Sohaib A, Hall E. Observation versus screening spinal MRI and pre-emptive treatment for spinal cord compression in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and spinal metastases in the UK (PROMPTS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:501-513. [PMID: 35279270 PMCID: PMC8960282 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis of malignant spinal cord compression (SCC) is crucial because pretreatment neurological status is the major determinant of outcome. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, SCC is a clinically significant cause of disease-related morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether screening for SCC with spinal MRI, and pre-emptive treatment if radiological SCC (rSCC) was detected, reduced the incidence of clinical SCC (cSCC) in asymptomatic patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and spinal metastasis. METHODS We did a parallel-group, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were recruited from 45 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, with an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, asymptomatic spinal metastasis, no previous SCC, and no spinal MRI in the past 12 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation algorithm with a random element (balancing factors were treatment centre, alkaline phosphatase [normal vs raised, with the upper limit of normal being defined at each participating laboratory], number of previous systemic treatments [first-line vs second-line or later], previous spinal treatment, and imaging of thorax and abdomen), to no MRI (control group) or screening spinal MRI (intervention group). Serious adverse events were monitored in the 24 h after screening MRI in the intervention group. Participants with screen-detected rSCC were offered pre-emptive treatment (radiotherapy or surgical decompression was recommended per treating physician's recommendation) and 6-monthly spinal MRI. All patients were followed up every 3 months, and then at month 30 and 36. The primary endpoint was time to and incidence of confirmed cSCC in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all patients randomly assigned), with the primary timepoint of interest being 1 year after randomisation. The study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN74112318, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between Feb 26, 2013, and April 25, 2017, 420 patients were randomly assigned to the control (n=210) or screening MRI (n=210) groups. Median age was 74 years (IQR 68 to 79), 222 (53%) of 420 patients had normal alkaline phosphatase, and median prostate-specific antigen concentration was 48 ng/mL (IQR 17 to 162). Screening MRI detected rSCC in 61 (31%) of 200 patients with assessable scans in the intervention group. As of data cutoff (April 23, 2020), at a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 13 to 31), time to cSCC was not significantly improved with screening (hazard ratio 0·64 [95% CI 0·37 to 1·11]; Gray's test p=0·12). 1-year cSCC rates were 6·7% (95% CI 3·8-10·6; 14 of 210 patients) for the control group and 4·3% (2·1-7·7; nine of 210 patients) for the intervention group (difference -2·4% [95% CI -4·2 to 0·1]). Median time to cSCC was not reached in either group. No serious adverse events were reported within 24 h of screening. INTERPRETATION Despite the substantial incidence of rSCC detected in the intervention group, the rate of cSCC in both groups was low at a median of 22 months of follow-up. Routine use of screening MRI and pre-emptive treatment to prevent cSCC is not warranted in patients with asymptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with spinal metastasis. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Victoria Hinder
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Adham Hijab
- Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gail Horan
- Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn, UK
| | - Narayanan Srihari
- Clinical Oncology, The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - Philip Rich
- Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Graeme Houston
- Imaging Science and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Ann M Henry
- Clinical Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephanie Gibbs
- Clinical Oncology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ram Venkitaraman
- Clinical Oncology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK
| | - Clare Cruickshank
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Shama Hassan
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Alec Miners
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ian Pedley
- Clinical Oncology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Heather Payne
- Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susannah Brock
- Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| | - Robert Wade
- Clinical Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Angus Robinson
- Clinical Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Omar Din
- Clinical Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kathryn Lees
- Clinical Oncology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK
| | - John Graham
- Clinical Oncology, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Jane Worlding
- Oncology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Julia Murray
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Griffin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Aslam Sohaib
- Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joffe JK, Cafferty FH, Murphy L, Rustin GJS, Sohaib SA, Gabe R, Stenning SP, James E, Noor D, Wade S, Schiavone F, Swift S, Dunwoodie E, Hall M, Sharma A, Braybrooke J, Shamash J, Logue J, Taylor HH, Hennig I, White J, Rudman S, Worlding J, Bloomfield D, Faust G, Glen H, Jones R, Seckl M, MacDonald G, Sreenivasan T, Kumar S, Protheroe A, Venkitaraman R, Mazhar D, Coyle V, Highley M, Geldart T, Laing R, Kaplan RS, Huddart RA. Imaging Modality and Frequency in Surveillance of Stage I Seminoma Testicular Cancer: Results From a Randomized, Phase III, Noninferiority Trial (TRISST). J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2468-2478. [PMID: 35298280 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Survival in stage I seminoma is almost 100%. Computed tomography (CT) surveillance is an international standard of care, avoiding adjuvant therapy. In this young population, minimizing irradiation is vital. The Trial of Imaging and Surveillance in Seminoma Testis (TRISST) assessed whether magnetic resonance images (MRIs) or a reduced scan schedule could be used without an unacceptable increase in advanced relapses. METHODS A phase III, noninferiority, factorial trial. Eligible participants had undergone orchiectomy for stage I seminoma with no adjuvant therapy planned. Random assignment was to seven CTs (6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months); seven MRIs (same schedule); three CTs (6, 18, and 36 months); or three MRIs. The primary outcome was 6-year incidence of Royal Marsden Hospital stage ≥ IIC relapse (> 5 cm), aiming to exclude increases ≥ 5.7% (from 5.7% to 11.4%) with MRI (v CT) or three scans (v 7); target N = 660, all contributing to both comparisons. Secondary outcomes include relapse ≥ 3 cm, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS Six hundred sixty-nine patients enrolled (35 UK centers, 2008-2014); mean tumor size was 2.9 cm, and 358 (54%) were low risk (< 4 cm, no rete testis invasion). With a median follow-up of 72 months, 82 (12%) relapsed. Stage ≥ IIC relapse was rare (10 events). Although statistically noninferior, more events occurred with three scans (nine, 2.8%) versus seven scans (one, 0.3%): 2.5% absolute increase, 90% CI (1.0 to 4.1). Only 4/9 could have potentially been detected earlier with seven scans. Noninferiority of MRI versus CT was also shown; fewer events occurred with MRI (two [0.6%] v eight [2.6%]), 1.9% decrease (-3.5 to -0.3). Per-protocol analyses confirmed noninferiority. Five-year survival was 99%, with no tumor-related deaths. CONCLUSION Surveillance is a safe management approach-advanced relapse is rare, salvage treatment successful, and outcomes excellent, regardless of imaging frequency or modality. MRI can be recommended to reduce irradiation; and no adverse impact on long-term outcomes was seen with a reduced schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura Murphy
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Syed A Sohaib
- Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Dipa Noor
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simona Wade
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sarah Swift
- St James University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Marcia Hall
- Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom.,Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anand Sharma
- Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Braybrooke
- Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Shamash
- Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomews Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Logue
- The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Henry H Taylor
- Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | - Ivo Hennig
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jeff White
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Rudman
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Worlding
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - David Bloomfield
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, Sussex Cancer Centre, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Guy Faust
- Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, United Kingdom
| | - Hilary Glen
- University Hospital Ayr, Ayr, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tom Geldart
- University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Laing
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert A Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Langley RE, Gilbert DC, Duong T, Clarke NW, Nankivell M, Rosen SD, Mangar S, Macnair A, Sundaram SK, Laniado ME, Dixit S, Madaan S, Manetta C, Pope A, Scrase CD, Mckay S, Muazzam IA, Collins GN, Worlding J, Williams ST, Paez E, Robinson A, McFarlane J, Deighan JV, Marshall J, Forcat S, Weiss M, Kockelbergh R, Alhasso A, Kynaston H, Parmar M. Transdermal oestradiol for androgen suppression in prostate cancer: long-term cardiovascular outcomes from the randomised Prostate Adenocarcinoma Transcutaneous Hormone (PATCH) trial programme. Lancet 2021; 397:581-591. [PMID: 33581820 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00100-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen suppression is a central component of prostate cancer management but causes substantial long-term toxicity. Transdermal administration of oestradiol (tE2) circumvents first-pass hepatic metabolism and, therefore, should avoid the cardiovascular toxicity seen with oral oestrogen and the oestrogen-depletion effects seen with luteinising hormone releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa). We present long-term cardiovascular follow-up data from the Prostate Adenocarcinoma Transcutaneous Hormone (PATCH) trial programme. METHODS PATCH is a seamless phase 2/3, randomised, multicentre trial programme at 52 study sites in the UK. Men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer were randomly allocated (1:2 from August, 2007 then 1:1 from February, 2011) to either LHRHa according to local practice or tE2 patches (four 100 μg patches per 24 h, changed twice weekly, reducing to three patches twice weekly if castrate at 4 weeks [defined as testosterone ≤1·7 nmol/L]). Randomisation was done using a computer-based minimisation algorithm and was stratified by several factors, including disease stage, age, smoking status, and family history of cardiac disease. The primary outcome of this analysis was cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Cardiovascular events, including heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, thromboembolic stroke, and other thromboembolic events, were confirmed using predefined criteria and source data. Sudden or unexpected deaths were attributed to a cardiovascular category if a confirmatory post-mortem report was available and as other relevant events if no post-mortem report was available. PATCH is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN70406718; the study is ongoing and adaptive. FINDINGS Between Aug 14, 2007, and July 30, 2019, 1694 men were randomly allocated either LHRHa (n=790) or tE2 patches (n=904). Overall, median follow-up was 3·9 (IQR 2·4-7·0) years. Respective castration rates at 1 month and 3 months were 65% and 93% among patients assigned LHRHa and 83% and 93% among those allocated tE2. 157 events from 145 men met predefined cardiovascular criteria, with a further ten sudden deaths with no post-mortem report (total 167 events in 153 men). 26 (2%) of 1694 patients had fatal cardiovascular events, 15 (2%) of 790 assigned LHRHa and 11 (1%) of 904 allocated tE2. The time to first cardiovascular event did not differ between treatments (hazard ratio 1·11, 95% CI 0·80-1·53; p=0·54 [including sudden deaths without post-mortem report]; 1·20, 0·86-1·68; p=0·29 [confirmed group only]). 30 (34%) of 89 cardiovascular events in patients assigned tE2 occurred more than 3 months after tE2 was stopped or changed to LHRHa. The most frequent adverse events were gynaecomastia (all grades), with 279 (38%) events in 730 patients who received LHRHa versus 690 (86%) in 807 patients who received tE2 (p<0·0001) and hot flushes (all grades) in 628 (86%) of those who received LHRHa versus 280 (35%) who received tE2 (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Long-term data comparing tE2 patches with LHRHa show no evidence of a difference between treatments in cardiovascular mortality or morbidity. Oestrogens administered transdermally should be reconsidered for androgen suppression in the management of prostate cancer. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Langley
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK.
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Trinh Duong
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Noel W Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Nankivell
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Stuart D Rosen
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Stephen Mangar
- Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Archie Macnair
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | | | - Marc E Laniado
- Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | | | - Sanjeev Madaan
- Department of Urology & Nephrology, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - Caroline Manetta
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Alvan Pope
- The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Stephen Mckay
- Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Iqtedar A Muazzam
- Castle Hill Hospital, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham, UK
| | - Gerald N Collins
- Macclesfield District General Hospital, East Cheshire NHS Trust, Macclesfield, UK
| | | | | | - Edgar Paez
- Newcastle Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - John V Deighan
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - John Marshall
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Silvia Forcat
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Melanie Weiss
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Howard Kynaston
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University Medical School, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mahesh Parmar
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Units at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hussain SA, Lester JF, Jackson R, Gornall M, Elliott A, Crabb SJ, Huddart RA, Vasudev N, Birtle AJ, Worlding J, James ND, Parikh O, Vilarino varela M, Alonzi R, Linch MD, Powles T, Jones RJ. Phase II randomized placebo-controlled neoadjuvant trial of nintedanib or placebo with gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced muscle invasive bladder cancer (NEO-BLADE). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.6_suppl.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
438 Background: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Improves overall survival in patients with MIBC. Nintedanib is an orally available, potent, small molecule, triple kinase inhibitor with the potential to further benefit patient prognosis. Methods: NEO-BLADE was designed as a randomised, placebo controlled phase II study (n=120) to compare the addition of nintedanib (N) (150mg/200mg BD) to a combination of Gemcitabine (G) and Cisplatin (C). The study was powered (80%, alpha=15% [one sided]) to detect an improvement in the histological complete response rate of 20% (OR = 2.37). Results: 120 patients were recruited from 15 sites between 04/Dec/2014 and 03/Sep/2018 (22% Female) with 109 patients evaluable. Complete response (CR) rates ( by ITT) were 22/57 (38.6%) and 25/63 (39.7%) for patients treated with/without N. Pathological CR on ITT was 21/57 (36.8%) and 20/63 (31.74%); For pathological evaluable patients it was 21/41 (51. 22% ) and 20/45 ( 44.44%) respectively. Patients treated with N showed a benefit in terms of PFS and OS with 12 month PFS rates of 89.0% and 74.1% in the Nintedanib and Placebo group respectively. P= 0.038 and HR (CI) 0.479 (0.236, 0.976). OS at 12/24 months N 96.26%/ 88.87% while in Placebo group 82.83%,/69.36%. P=0.022, HR (CI) 0.389 (0.168, 0.902). Toxicity was reported in terms of grade 3 adverse events [12/63 (19%) Placebo, 23/57 (40%) N] and Serious Adverse Events [35/63 (56%) Placebo, 34/57 (53%) N]. In terms of thromboembolic events, this was observed in 16/57 (28%) of patients treated with N and 13/63 (21%) without N (P=0.461). Conclusions: The study failed to reach its primary endpoint in demonstrating an improvement in pathological response rate between N and Placebo when given alongside G and C. The trial met its secondary end point in improvement of progression free survival and over all survival at 12 months and 24 months. Safety data from this placebo -controlled study confirms triplets can be given safely. There are efficacy signals with improvement in PFS and OS and the regimen warrants further investigation in randomised phase III trial. Translational studies to assess bio markers of response are planned. Clinical trial information: 11977.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed A. Hussain
- University of Sheffield, Academic Unit of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Simon J. Crabb
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Jane Worlding
- University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | - Omi Parikh
- Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mark David Linch
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert J. Jones
- University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gollins S, West N, Sebag-Montefiore D, Myint AS, Saunders M, Susnerwala S, Quirke P, Essapen S, Samuel L, Sizer B, Worlding J, Southward K, Hemmings G, Tinkler-Hundal E, Taylor M, Bottomley D, Chambers P, Lawrie E, Lopes A, Beare S. Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:1286-1294. [PMID: 28859058 PMCID: PMC5672930 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain. METHODS In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen. RESULTS Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90%CI: 73-88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty-four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P=0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.03, P=0.055). CONCLUSIONS This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gollins
- Department of Oncology, North Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Bodelwyddan, Denbighshire LL18 5UJ, UK
| | - Nick West
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | | | - Arthur Sun Myint
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Clatterbridge Road, Wirral CH63 4JY, UK
| | - Mark Saunders
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | | | - Phil Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Level 4 Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | | | - Leslie Samuel
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Bruce Sizer
- Colchester General Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester CO4 5JL, UK
| | - Jane Worlding
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Katie Southward
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Gemma Hemmings
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Emma Tinkler-Hundal
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Morag Taylor
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Daniel Bottomley
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Philip Chambers
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Emma Lawrie
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| | - Andre Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Athmanathan S, Worlding J, Baragwanath P, Williams N, Manolopoulos S, Brown M, Correa P. P-217 Chemoradiotherapy with Image-Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (IG-VMAT) and Image-Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) to treat Squamous Anal Cancer. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw199.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
8
|
Bhattacharya S, Vijayasekar C, Worlding J, Mathew G. Octreotide in chemotherapy induced diarrhoea in colorectal cancer: a review article. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2009; 72:289-295. [PMID: 19902860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea (CID) is well known in cancer management. The risk is greater when the primary cancer is colorectal. This article aims towards assessing the role of octreotide in CID through an extensive literature search. METHODS After searching through PUBMED, MEDLINE and the Cochrane library, only those studies which were published over the last 20 years in English and where at least the majority of the cohort were colorectal patients, were included. Two randomized trials, four non-randomized studies and two case-series publications were thus considered. RESULTS It was seen in both the randomized studies, that octreotide had much better outcome as compared to loperamide in treating severe CID. Among 88 patients from the non-randomized studies with severe CID, the primary cancer was colorectal in 79 patients. 61 patients had drug-resistant CID. Within a maximum of 96 hours, octreotide reduced CID by > or = 2 grades in 91% of 88 patients and in 88.52% patients with drug-resistant CID. CONCLUSION Octreotide is effective in treating severe CID, resistant to other modes of treatment. It is associated with a few minor adverse effects. Though expensive, octreotide could be considered as first line medication in CID of grades 3 or above. Its use in lower grades of CID would not be cost effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bhattacharya
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, George Eliot Hospital, Nuneaton, UK CV107DJ.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Welch IM, Davison PA, Worlding J, Read NW. Effect of ileal infusion of lipid on jejunal motor patterns after a nutrient and nonnutrient meal. Am J Physiol 1988; 255:G800-6. [PMID: 3202173 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1988.255.6.g800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
To investigate how ileal lipid delays small bowel transit, pressure activity was recorded at multiple sites in the human small intestine during ileal infusion of either lipid or saline. Initial studies showed that ileal lipid reduced the contraction rate in the jejunum but not in the duodenum or ileum. The effect of ileal lipid was further investigated by recording pressures at seven sites in the jejunum after ingestion of either a nutrient or a nonnutrient meal. The nutrient meal induced an irregular motility pattern; ileal lipid significantly reduced the contraction rate, the percentage of contractions involved in propagated events, the mean length of propagation, and the propagation index. The nonnutrient meal induced a pattern containing discrete clusters of contractions. Ileal lipid significantly reduced the occurrence of contraction clusters and the mean length of propagation. Thus, although the delay in small bowel transit observed during ileal infusion of lipid can be explained by reductions in the rate and the degree of propagation of jejunal contractions, the mechanism varies according to the type of meal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Welch
- Sub-Department of Human Gastrointestinal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brown NJ, Worlding J, Rumsey RD, Read NW. The effect of guar gum on the distribution of a radiolabelled meal in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat. Br J Nutr 1988; 59:223-31. [PMID: 2833922 DOI: 10.1079/bjn19880029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
1. The effect of addition of guar gum (5 and 10 g/l) to a radiolabelled, homogenized, baked-bean test meal on the distribution of that meal in the gastrointestinal tract was investigated in groups of male rats killed at 25, 50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 min after gavage. 2. Addition of 5 and 10 g guar gum/l significantly increased the proportion of the meal remaining in the stomach at 25 and 50 min after gavage (P less than 0.01). 3. The heads of the control meal and meals containing guar gum reached the distal intestine within 25 min after gavage but radioactivity was not observed in the caecum until 100 min after administration of each of the meals. Addition of guar gum (5 and 10 g/l) delayed caecal filling even though the head of each meal reached the caecum at the same time after gavage. 4. The geometric centres of guar-gum-containing meals were proximal to that of the control meal at all times after gavage. 5. The observed delay in the passage of a guar-gum-containing meal through the stomach and small intestine is probably due to the viscous nature of the meal resisting the propulsive and mixing effects of the gastrointestinal contractions, thereby reducing access of the glucose to the absorptive epithelium. This could contribute to the observed reductions in postprandial glycaemia seen in previous studies after incorporating guar gum into a meal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Brown
- Physiology Department, University of Sheffield, Western Bank
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|