Perceived physical fatigability improves after an exercise intervention among breast cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Among breast cancer populations, exercise interventions resulted in positive but relatively small improvements on fatigue, which may be due to insensitive measures of global fatigue. Perceived fatigability-whole-body tiredness anchored to standardized tasks/activities of a specific intensity and duration-may help to detect effective exercise interventions reducing fatigue in oncology. We examined whether perceived physical fatigability improved after an exercise intervention.

METHODS

This single center randomized clinical trial of 49 breast cancer survivors was conducted from 2015 to 2017, among which 41 participants (22 = exercise, 19 = control) completed the trial and reported their perceived physical fatigability at the first (Visit 1) and the last visit (Visit 3) over 6-14 weeks. Perceived physical fatigability was measured using the 10-item, self-administered Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) scored 0-50. The mean differences of perceived physical fatigability between Visit 3 and Visit 1 were computed and compared by intervention groups using two sample t test.

RESULTS

Among the 41 women in the study (mean age 54.9 ± 9.8 years; 80% white), sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and baseline fatigue level were similar by intervention groups, except for antiestrogen use. Post-intervention changes (mean ∆ ± SE) of PFS Physical scores were greater in the exercise group (- 4.4 ± 1.4; - 22.5%) than the control group (0.2 ± 1.4; + 1.0%) (p = .022).

CONCLUSION

The PFS captured a reduction in fatigue after the exercise intervention among breast cancer survivors. These findings aid mounting efforts to reduce fatigue in oncology by introducing a more sensitive instrument to measure perceived physical fatigability to better evaluate patient-reported outcomes in future cancer trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02770781.

Perceived physical fatigability improves after an exercise intervention among breast cancer survivors: A pilot randomized clinical trial

12050

Background: Among breast cancer populations, exercise interventions resulted in positive but relatively small improvements on fatigue, which may have been masked by using single-item, non-specific measures of global fatigue. Perceived fatigability – whole-body tiredness anchored to standardized tasks/activities of specific intensity and duration – accounts for self-pacing bias as an individual likely titrates their usual activities and exertion level to avoid exhaustion. We examined whether this novel fatigability measure could replace global fatigue in an exercise intervention trial in breast cancer survivors. Methods: This pilot single-center randomized clinical trial of 49 breast cancer survivors was conducted from 2015-17, among which 41 participants (exercise = 22, control = 19) completed the trial and reported their perceived physical fatigability and global fatigue at the first (V1) and the last visit (V3). Perceived physical fatigability was measured using the 10-item, self-administered Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) scored 0-50, higher PFS Physical scores = greater fatigability. Global fatigue was assessed with a single question “I have a lack of energy” scored 0 “not at all” to 4 “very much” from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Subscale (FACT-ES). The exercise intervention consisted of three one-on-one training sessions over 6-14 weeks, plus two optional email/phone consultations. The trainer developed a personalized, home-based exercise program with a goal of achieving the recommended ≥150 minutes/week of moderate to vigorous exercise based on ACSM guidelines. Those randomized to the control group met the trainer for V1 and again 6-14 weeks later at V3, but no exercise prescription was provided. We computed mean differences in perceived physical fatigability and global fatigue between V3 and V1 and compared by intervention groups. Results: Among the 41 women in the study (mean age = 54.9±9.8 years; 80% white), sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were similar by intervention groups, except for antiestrogen use. Post-intervention changes (mean ± SE) in PFS Physical scores were -4.4±1.4 (-22.5%) in the exercise group and 0.2±1.4 (+1.0%) in the control group (p =.022), whereas change in global fatigue scores were -0.64±0.23 in the exercise group and 0.00±0.22 in the control group (p =.054). Conclusions: These findings add to mounting evidence that an exercise intervention reduces fatigue among breast cancer survivors. Importantly, the PFS showed a clinically meaningful reduction after the exercise intervention that was masked when using global fatigue as the measurement. Therefore, the PFS serves as a more sensitive instrument to measure perceived physical fatigability and can better evaluate patient-reported outcomes in future cancer trials, especially those focused on cancer survivorship. Clinical trial information: NCT 02770781.

Living life post cancer treatment (LLPCT): An assessment of a 12-week multidimensional wellness intervention to improve quality of life and physical activity in cancer survivors

12052

Background: Cancer survivors face unique health challenges with implications on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical, social, and emotional wellbeing. With advancements in cancer treatment and aging populations, the prevalence of cancer survivors is expected to grow prompting the need for improved survivorship care delivery and comprehensive rehabilitative services. Living Life Post Cancer Treatment (LLPCT) is a community-based 12-week program that provides multidimensional support to patients of any cancer diagnosis transitioning from active treatment to post-treatment life. This single-arm intervention study aims to assess the program’s impact on HRQoL and physical activity in cancer survivors. Methods: A total of 125 participants within 2 years of treatment completion were enrolled in a 12-week program comprised of 9 sessions of engaging workshops, personalized exercise training, and nutrition and psychosocial counseling with an interprofessional team of oncology providers, social workers, exercise trainers, and dietitians. The program consisted of 8 consecutive weekly sessions followed by a 1-month follow-up session at week 12. Ninety-six (77%) participants completed the eighth or ninth session of the program and were included in the analysis. A series of questionnaires were administered at baseline and weeks 8 and 12. Primary outcomes assessed were HRQoL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire and physical activity using average daily steps by pedometer and 2-minute step test performance. Results: Among the 96 participants (mean age 60.4 ± 11.7) who completed the program, the majority were female, white, and married. Post-intervention median FACT-G scores significantly increased from baseline at weeks 8 (+8.8, p = 0.002) and 12 (+7.3, p < 0.001). Average daily steps by pedometer increased by 1063 (p = 0.003) and 1233 (p = 0.015) and 2-minute step test performance increased by 18 (p < 0.001) and 21 (p < 0.001) steps at weeks 8 and 12, respectively. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction and improved self-efficacy to incorporate lifestyle modifications. Conclusions: These findings suggest that this 12-week intervention improves HRQoL and step-based physical activity levels in cancer survivors and could serve as a multidimensional model for post-treatment support. Further research is needed to determine if these benefits are sustained long-term.

Effects of a personal trainer led exercise intervention on physical activity and physical function of breast cancer survivors

e23053

Background: Regular exercise is an important tool to address physical and emotional effects of breast cancer treatment. However, many breast cancer survivors do not meet minimum recommended levels of physical activity. This study examines effects of a personal trainer led exercise intervention on physical activity levels and physical function in breast cancer survivors. Methods: Women who completed active treatment for breast cancer were recruited from oncology clinics and survivorship programs from September 2015-to September 2017. Subjects were randomized to an immediate exercise or a wait-list control group. The intervention included 3 personal training sessions over a period of up to 30 weeks. Physical activity and function were assessed before and after intervention by pedometer (7-day record) and endurance step test (steps in 2 minutes). Results: 60 women were randomized to immediate intervention (n = 31) or wait-list control (n = 29). Subjects were an average of (mean ± SD) 56 ± 10 years old and 2 ± 1 years since breast cancer diagnosis. At baseline, the exercise group averaged (mean ± SD) 5236 ± 2214 steps/day and 101 ± 23 steps on 2-minute step test while the control group averaged 5856 ± 2916 steps/day and 106 ± 23 steps on 2-minute step test. After intervention, change (mean ∆ ± SD) was 143 ± 1842 steps/day in the exercise group and 79 ± 1862 steps/day in the control group ( p= 0.9). On the 2-minute step test, the exercise group increased 18 ± 20 steps and the control group increased 9 ± 12 steps ( p= 0.07). Conclusions: While there was some improvement in physical function after the personal-trainer led intervention, the short duration and intensity of the intervention may have diminished the effects. Our results suggest a multi-faceted approach may be needed to support significant changes in breast cancer survivors’ physical activity. Future efforts employing a multidisciplinary team, which includes a certified personal trainer, and with larger patient samples may help address this possibility. Clinical trial information: NCT02770781.