Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM 2)

AIM

FOLFUGEM 1 (leucovorin 400 mg/m2 combined with 5-flurorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 then 5-FU 2-3 g/m2/46 hours and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 30 min) in patients with locally-advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma appeared to be toxic (neutropenia and alopecia). The aims of this phase II multicentric study were to evaluate the response rate, clinical benefit and tolerance of a new scheme of combined leucovorin, 5-FU and gemcitabine (FOLFUGEM 2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

FOLFUGEM 2 associated leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in 2 hours followed by 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 in 22 hours, then gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 (10 mg/m2/min) with cycles every 14 days. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (1000 then 1250 mg/m2) when NCI/CTC toxicity was < or = grade 2.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included (locally-advanced tumor: N = 13 and metastatic: N = 45). Among the 39 patients with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (28.2%, 95% confidence interval: 14-42%) and 11 had stable disease (28.2%). On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 19% (95% confidence interval: 9-29%). Clinical benefit rate was 46%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.1 and 7.2 months, respectively. There were 13% grade 3-4 neutropenia and 36% complete alopecia.

CONCLUSION

FOLFUGEM 2 schema has an antitumoral effect in advanced pancreatic cancer and has an acceptable toxicity which appears to be less than that of FOLFUGEM 1.

[Small bowel perforation and occlusion after migration of biliary and cystogastric prosthesis]

We report on two cases of intestinal complications associated with the migration of biliary and cystogastrostomy stents. In the first case, intestinal perforation occurred after migration of an Amsterdam type biliary stent. In the second case, a double pig tail endoprosthesis induced intestinal occlusion which was successfully managed without surgery. Complications after intestinal migration of biliopancreatic stents are very rare and usually involve the colon. Our observations point out the potential gravity of intestinal migration of biliopancreatic stents and, as in the second case, the possible resolution of stent related intestinal occlusion after medical management.