Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pneumonia is often associated with hyperinflammation. Despite the disproportionate incidence of Covid-19 among underserved and racial and ethnic minority populations, the safety and efficacy of the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab in patients from these populations who are hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia are unclear.

METHODS

We randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia who were not receiving mechanical ventilation to receive standard care plus one or two doses of either tocilizumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously) or placebo. Site selection was focused on the inclusion of sites enrolling high-risk and minority populations. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death by day 28.

RESULTS

A total of 389 patients underwent randomization, and the modified intention-to-treat population included 249 patients in the tocilizumab group and 128 patients in the placebo group; 56.0% were Hispanic or Latino, 14.9% were Black, 12.7% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 12.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 3.7% were of other or unknown race or ethnic group. The cumulative percentage of patients who had received mechanical ventilation or who had died by day 28 was 12.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 16.9) in the tocilizumab group and 19.3% (95% CI, 13.3 to 27.4) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for mechanical ventilation or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.97; P = 0.04 by the log-rank test). Clinical failure as assessed in a time-to-event analysis favored tocilizumab over placebo (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.93). Death from any cause by day 28 occurred in 10.4% of the patients in the tocilizumab group and 8.6% of those in the placebo group (weighted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.2 to 7.8). In the safety population, serious adverse events occurred in 38 of 250 patients (15.2%) in the tocilizumab group and 25 of 127 patients (19.7%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients with Covid-19 pneumonia who were not receiving mechanical ventilation, tocilizumab reduced the likelihood of progression to the composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death, but it did not improve survival. No new safety signals were identified. (Funded by Genentech; EMPACTA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04372186.).

Analysis of efficacy and safety of POM as a replacement therapy for lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma pts refractory to a lenalidomide-containing combination regimen

e19528

Background: Pomalidomide (POM) is a third –generation immunomodulatory drug shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) for patients (pts) previously treated with bortezomib and lenalidomide (LEN) and in combination with dexamethasone it has been shown to overcome resistance in RRMM. In this phase 2 trial, we are evaluating the efficacy, safety and tolerability of POM as a replacement therapy for LEN for pts who have progressed receiving a LEN combination regimen. Methods: This is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label and non-randomized study. Pts who have failed a combination regimen containing LEN were treated with POM along with all of the other drugs previously used in the regimen. POM administered orally (dose is determined based on the previous regimen) on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, whereas other drugs are administered using the same schedule(s), dose(s) and drug combination as the last LEN-containing regimen that the patient received and failed. The planned enrollment on the study will be 45 pts. Results: To date, a total of 29 pts have been enrolled, 25 pts are evaluable and 12 pts have discontinued treatment. Of the evaluable pts, 9 (36%) and 16 (64%) received 3mg and 4mg of POM, respectively. The median age of all pts was 72 years (range, 52-81), and 17 (68%) were males. Pts have received a median of 3 prior treatments (range, 1-7). The median follow-up time for all pts is 3.1 months (range, 0.2-8.1). Amongst evaluable pts, 5 (23.8%) pts achieved at least a minimal response, 10 (47.6%) pts showed stable disease while 6 (28.6%) pts exhibited disease progression. At the time of data cutoff, only 17 pts have completed more than 1 full cycle of treatment; and, thus, the overall response and clinical benefit rates are fairly low (14.3% and 23.8%, respectively) but expected to improve with further follow up. The median PFS for the cohort was 7.6 months. Common ≥ Gr3 adverse events were neutropenia (8%), hypomania (4%) and leukopenia (4%). Conclusions: We show thatPOM appears to be promising replacement therapy for LEN in RRMM pts who have progressed within receiving a LEN combination regimen.

B-F1RST: Assessment of novel blood-based biomarkers in patients with first-line advanced or metastatic NSCLC receiving atezolizumab monotherapy

TPS9103

Background: The anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody atezolizumab inhibits the interaction of PD-L1 with its receptors PD-1 and B7.1, thereby restoring T-cell immunity. In the Phase III OAK study, patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC had improved mOS in the atezolizumab arm (13.8 mo) vs the docetaxel arm (9.6 mo) (HR 0.73 [95%CI: 0.62, 0.87]; P= 0.0003), irrespective of PD-L1 expression or histology. A Phase III clinical trial of atezolizumab monotherapy for first-line, PD-L1–selected patients with NSCLC is underway; however, first-line atezolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC treatment in a biomarker-unselected population has not yet been investigated. Current assays to measure PD-L1 expression by IHC require tumor biopsies, which can be difficult to obtain in some patients. Novel blood-based biomarkers will be evaluated retrospectively in B-F1RST (Blood-First-Line Ready Screening Trial) in patients receiving atezolizumab monotherapy in first-line NSCLC. Methods: A Phase II, open-label, single-arm study, B-F1RST (NCT02848651), will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in PD-L1–unselected patients with first-line locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Eligibility criteria include stage IIIB-IVB NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 and adequate hematologic and end-organ function. Exclusion criteria include the presence of EGFRmutations or ALKfusions, active CNS metastases and prior immunotherapy for NSCLC. Patients will receive atezolizumab 1200 mg IV q3w until disease progression or loss of clinical benefit. Prospective collection of blood samples is mandatory; collection of tissue biopsies is optional. The co-primary endpoints of the study are investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST v1.1 for the efficacy objective and PFS per RECIST v1.1 for evaluating blood-based predictive biomarkers for atezolizumab efficacy, including mutation status. Approximately 150 patients will be enrolled at 25 or more centers in the United States. Clinical trial information: NCT02848651.

A randomized Phase II trial of the tumor vascular disrupting agent CA4P (fosbretabulin tromethamine) with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

Combretastatin A4-phosphate, fosbretabulin tromethamine (CA4P) is a vascular disrupting agent that targets tumor vasculature. This study evaluated the safety of CA4P when combined with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in chemotherapy-naïve subjects with advanced nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

Adult subjects with confirmed American Joint Committee on Cancer six stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1 were randomized to receive six cycles (treatment phase) of paclitaxel (200 mg/m²), carboplatin (area under the concentration versus time curve 6), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 and repeated every 21 days, or this regimen plus CA4P (60 mg/m²) on days 7, 14, and 21 of each cycle. Subjects could then receive additional maintenance treatment (excluding carboplatin and paclitaxel) for up to 1 year.

Results

Sixty-three subjects were randomized, 31 to control and 32 to CA4P, and 19 (61.3%) and 17 (53.1%), respectively, completed the treatment phase. Exposure to study treatment and dose modifications were comparable between the randomized groups. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between groups, with increased neutropenia, leukopenia, and hypertension in the CA4P group. Deaths, serious adverse events, and early discontinuations from treatment were comparable between the randomized treatment groups. The overall tumor response rate with CA4P was 50% versus 32% in controls. Overall and progression-free survival rates were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

CA4P plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab appears to be a tolerable regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in subjects with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Abstract A97: Final phase 1/2a results evaluating the cyclodextrin-containing nanoparticle CRLX101 in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies

Introduction: Topoisomerase-1-inhibiting camptothecin (CPT) and derivatives such as irinotecan (CPT-11) and topotecan demonstrate clinical utility across multiple cancer types. Use of these agents remains limited by insufficient tumor exposure and high systemic toxicity. A novel cyclodextrin-containing polymer conjugate of CPT that self-assembles into nanoparticles, CRLX101 delivers sustained levels of active CPT into cancer cells while substantially reducing systemic exposure. In vitro and in vivo data suggest superior activity of CRLX101 in multiple tumor models. Efforts are made now to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CRLX101 in human patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

Experimental Procedures: CRLX101 was administered intravenously over 1 hour every other week (EOW) to patients (pts.) with advanced and multiply pre-treated solid tumor malignancies. In phase 1, 24 pts. received CRLX101 at 5 escalating dose levels. Following identification of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), a 38 patient phase 2a MTD-expansion cohort was enrolled at 3 clinical sites.

Summary of Data: As of a data cut-off of 6/1/11, 62 total pts. (31 F; 31 M) received CRLX101 at doses ranging from 6 mg/m2 to 18 mg/m2 of CPT equivalent per dose. In phase 1, 2 pts. (18 mg/m2) experienced dose limiting toxicity of CTCAE v3.0 grade (G)4 thrombocytopenia with one of these pts. additionally experiencing G4 neutropenia. An MTD/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CRLX101 was established at 15 mg/m2 EOW. Among 44 phase 1 or 2a pts. receiving the MTD/RP2D, most common grade 3/4 adverse events considered by investigators to be at least possibly related to study drug included neutropenia (9 events observed among 6 pts.) and lymphopenia (3 events observed among 2 pts.). Phase 2a pts. received CRLX101 for periods of time ranging from 1 day to approximately 13 months (mos.) with an average duration of 3.3 mos. Among 36 evaluable phase 2a pts. receiving the MTD, mean plasma Cmax and AUCall were 306 μg./L. and 27.1 mg./L.*hr. (polymer-unconjugated) and 8260 μg./L. and 300 mg./L.*hr. (polymer-conjugated), respectively. Mean urinary clearance of polymer-conjugated and free CPT over the 0–8 hr., 8–24 hr., and 24–48 hr. collection intervals post CRLX101 dosing were 0.0299, 0.0074, and 0.0062 L./hr. (polymer-conjugated) and 0.0888, 0.0898, and 0.1010 L./hr. (free CPT), respectively. Among all phase 2a pts., overall median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.7 mos., with mPFS of 4.4 mos. observed among 21 NSCLC pts. (4.8 mos. excluding 6/21 pts. with squamous cell histology). At time of data cut-off, 6 pts. (incl. 3 NSCLC pts.) remain on therapy. Notably, of the 21 NSCLC pts. in phase 2a (with an average of 3 prior regimens of chemotherapy), 66.7% (14/21) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥ 3 mos. and 14.3% (3/21) achieved SD ≥ 6 mos.

Conclusions: CRLX101 appears to be extremely well tolerated with an MTD/RP2D of 15 mg/m2 EOW. Pharmacokinetics are linear and suggest prolonged duration of CPT tumor exposure. Similarly, extended periods of stable disease observed across multiple tumor types are encouraging and merit further investigation. Patients are currently being enrolled into a multinational randomized clinical trial in 2nd/3rd line NSCLC and additional studies in renal cell cancer, small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and gastric cancer are being developed.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A97.