Quantitative Analysis of Serial Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Enzalutamide

BACKGROUND

The emergence of positron emission tomography (PET) in prostate cancer is impacting clinical practice, but little is known about PET imaging as a tool to determine treatment failure in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate PET imaging dynamics in mCRPC patients on enzalutamide with stable computed tomography (CT) and technetium-99m (Tc99) bone scans.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

All patients were on treatment with enzalutamide for first-line mCRPC in a clinical trial at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA). A volunteer sample had serial 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET in parallel with CT and Tc99. Regions of interest (ROIs) on NaF were analyzed quantitatively for response.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to enzalutamide with/without a cancer immunotherapy, Prostvac.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

A post hoc, descriptive analysis was performed comparing the changes seen on CT and Tc99 as per RECIST 1.1 with NaF PET scans including the use of a quantitative analysis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Eighteen mCRPC patients had 67 NaF scans. A total of 233 ROIs resolved after treatment, 52 (22%) of which eventually retuned while on therapy. In all, 394 new ROIs were seen, but 112(28%) resolved subsequently. Of 18 patients, 14 had new ROIs that ultimately resolved after appearing. Many patients experienced progression in a minority of lesions, and one patient with radiation intervention to oligoprogression had a remarkable response. This study is limited by its small number of patients and post hoc nature.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight the dynamic nature of NaF PET in mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide, where not all new findings were ultimately related to disease progression. This analysis also provides a potential strategy to identify and intervene in oligoprogression in prostate cancer.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this small analysis of patients with prostate cancer on enzalutamide, changes on 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were not always associated with treatment failure. Caution may be indicated when using PET imaging to determine whether new therapy is needed.

420 PROSTVAC in combination with nivolumab enhanced immune cell infiltration in prostate cancer

Background

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common non-cutaneous diagnosed cancer among men in USA.1 Although clinical outcomes are favorable for patients with localized disease, 20–30% of patients will develop metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) and have poor prognosis. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, provides benefit to a small subset of PC patients, which is thought to be partially due to its known cold tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Combination studies are needed to enhance benefit.2 Prostvac is a therapeutic cancer vaccine engineered to activate an immune response against prostate-specific Antigen (PSA).3 Prostvac alone could induce systemic immune response by increasing immune-cell infiltrates in and around the tumor.4 In this study, we are exploring the effect of Prostvac in combination with nivolumab in TIME in prostate cancer.

Methods

We treated locally advanced prostate cancer patients (n=6) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with neoadjuvant Prostvac in combination with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor. Dynamic changes in TIME before and after treatment were studied using multiplex immunofluorescence (Opal Method). Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded sections from matched pre-treated prostate biopsies and post-treated RP samples were stained with a validated T cell panel (DAPI, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, Ki67, Pan CK and PD-L1). To analyze the data, TIME was segmented into 3 compartments: intratumoral, invasive margin and benign.

Results

Combination immunotherapy significantly increased CD4+ T cell density in the invasive margin (mean 211.5 cells/mm2 vs 592.2 cells/mm2, p<0.05), with similar trend in the intratumoral and the benign compartments. CD8+ T cell density increased after treatment in the invasive margin (mean 47.25 cells/mm2 vs 157cells/mm2) and the benign compartment. 5/6 and 4/6 patients showed more than 2-fold increase of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the TIME, respectively, in at least one of the three compartments. Increased proliferative indices in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were also seen after treatment. Tregs were present in low frequencies in TIME (maximum of 12 cells/mm2) with no significant changes. Moreover, a significant drop in tumor cell Ki67 after treatment (mean 252.8 cells/mm2 vs 100.5 cells/332, p<0.05) suggests that the combination may control tumor growth.

Conclusions

The combination of Neoadjuvant Prostvac and nivolumab was associated with increased immune cell infiltration in a cohort of early prostate cancer patients. A broader examination of the TIME and the role immune cells undertake to control tumor growth is on-going.

Trial Registration

NCT02933255

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin (Internet) 2020;70:7–3

Zhao SG, Lehrer J, Chang SL, et al. The immune landscape of prostate cancer and nomination of PD-L2 as a potential therapeutic target. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;111:301–10.

Madan RA, Arlen PM, Mohebtash M, et al. Prostvac-VF: a vectorbased vaccine targeting PSA in prostate cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009;18:1001–11

Abdul Sater H, Marté JL, Donahue RN, et al. Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC prior to radical prostatectomy enhances T-cell infiltration into the tumor immune microenvironment in men with prostate cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(1):655–64

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in compliance with ethical standard and was approved by the NIH IRB, 17C-0007. All patients participating in this study gave an informed consent before taking part.

Abstract 1586: Recovery and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in cryopreserved metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patient samples

Introduction: Current CTC detection platforms require the processing of patient blood within 48 hrs after collection to preserve CTC integrity and biomarker expression. Here we demonstrate the recovery of CTCs from banked patient blood samples that have been cryopreserved for up to 7 years. Our results show that cryopreserved CTCs have equivalent morphology and protein expression patterns as CTCs in freshly processed blood and are suitable for genomic analyses. This process enables retrospective studies of banked patient blood samples inclusive of CTC enumeration, biomarker quantification, FISH and genomic analysis via the Epic Platform.

Methods: 30 cryopreserved mCRPC patient blood samples were sent to Epic Sciences alongside 10 matched fresh blood draws (&lt;48 h after draw). All nucleated cells from mCRPC patient samples or cell line-spiked healthy donor (HD) controls were plated onto glass slides and subjected to IF staining, CTC identification by fluorescent scanners and algorithmic analysis. Traditional CTCs (CK+, CD45-, intact DAPI nuclei and morphologically distinct) and CK- CTCs (CK-, CD45-, intact and distinct) were identified. Androgen receptor (AR) expression was assessed by IF staining and PTEN status determined by FISH. Relative CTC enumeration, morphology, protein expression and genomic status were compared between freshly processed and cryopreserved samples.

Results: Initial testing in VCaP (AR+) and PC3 (AR-) cell line-spiked HD blood demonstrated preservation of cell morphology and biomarker expression. In VCaP, CK signal decreased 20% and AR decreased 6% after freezing, but CK and AR expression were 90- and 8-fold higher than negative controls, respectively. In patients, CTCs were detected in 7/10 freshly processed samples and in equal relative abundance in 6/10 matched frozen samples. Cryopreserved CTCs retain CK and AR expression as compared to freshly processed samples: there were no significant differences in mean CK or AR expression among all matched samples compared, and% AR+ CTCs correlated strongly between fresh and frozen samples (r2 = 0.96). Furthermore, PTEN FISH on cryopreserved CTCs resulted in a near-equal percentage of PTEN variant cells as compared to matched fresh draws. After concordance studies, an additional 20 frozen mCRPC patient samples were processed: CTCs were detected in 16/20 samples, with 11/20 harboring AR+ CTCs.

Conclusion: Recovery of CTCs in cryopreserved patient blood samples is feasible using the Epic Platform. These data demonstrate concordance of CTC recovery, protein characterization and genomic analysis in an initial cohort of cryopreserved mCRPC samples. Further studies characterizing cryopreserved CTCs in mCRPC and in cancers of other tissues are warranted, with the goal of enabling retrospective protein and genomic characterization of banked patient samples.

Citation Format: David Lu, Melissa Harvey, Ravi Madan, Christopher Heery, Jennifer Marte, Sharon Beasley, Mark Landers, Rachel Krupa, Jessica Louw, Justin Wahl, Natalee Bales, Dena Marrinucci, Jeffrey Schlom, James Gulley, Ryan Dittamore. Recovery and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in cryopreserved metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patient samples. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1586. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1586

Detection and Characterization of Circulating Tumour Cells from Frozen Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

Retrospective analysis of patient tumour samples is a cornerstone of clinical research. CTC biomarker characterization offers a non-invasive method to analyse patient samples. However, current CTC technologies require prospective blood collection, thereby reducing the ability to utilize archived clinical cohorts with long-term outcome data. We sought to investigate CTC recovery from frozen, archived patient PBMC pellets. Matched samples from both mCRPC patients and mock samples, which were prepared by spiking healthy donor blood with cultured prostate cancer cell line cells, were processed “fresh” via Epic CTC Platform or from “frozen” PBMC pellets. Samples were analysed for CTC enumeration and biomarker characterization via immunofluorescent (IF) biomarkers, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and CTC morphology. In the frozen patient PMBC samples, the median CTC recovery was 18%, compared to the freshly processed blood. However, abundance and localization of cytokeratin (CK) and androgen receptor (AR) protein, as measured by IF, were largely concordant between the fresh and frozen CTCs. Furthermore, a FISH analysis of PTEN loss showed high concordance in fresh vs. frozen. The observed data indicate that CTC biomarker characterization from frozen archival samples is feasible and representative of prospectively collected samples.

Clinical safety of a viral vector based prostate cancer vaccine strategy

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this phase I study was to evaluate the clinical safety of a vaccine using recombinant vaccinia virus (prime) and recombinant fowlpox virus (boost) in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with prostate cancer. The vaccines contained transgenes for prostate specific antigen, a triad of co-stimulatory molecules and a tumor antigen whose amino acid sequence had been modified to enhance its immunogenicity. Secondary end points were immunological and clinical responses, changes in prostate specific antigen velocity, and the kinetics of vaccinia virus clearance from the vaccination site, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, urine and saliva.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 15 patients enrolled in this study had metastatic prostate cancer. Patients were given recombinant fowlpox-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules alone or recombinant vaccinia-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules followed by recombinant fowlpox-prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules on a prime and boost schedule with or without recombinant-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor protein or recombinant fowlpox-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor vector. Prostate specific antigen specific immune responses were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay for interferon-gamma production. Polymerase chain reaction for vaccinia DNA and a plaque assay for live virus were also used.

RESULTS

Some grade 2 toxicity was seen in patients who received a higher dose of recombinant fowlpox-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor but no toxicity exceeded grade 2. Viable vaccinia was detected after vaccination at the site swab of 1 of 4 patients analyzed. Prostate specific antigen specific immune responses were seen in 4 of 6 patients who were HLA-A2+ and decreases in serum prostate specific antigen velocity were observed in 9 of 15.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the safety and preliminary immunogenicity results of this trial we recommend initiating a randomized, phase II study of prostate specific antigen/triad of co-stimulatory molecules vaccines in patients with less advanced prostate cancer.

A randomized phase II study of concurrent docetaxel plus vaccine versus vaccine alone in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Docetaxel has activity against androgen-independent prostate cancer and preclinical studies have shown that taxane-based chemotherapy can enhance antitumor response of vaccines. The primary objective of this study was to determine if concurrent docetaxel (with dexamethasone) had any effect on generating an immune response to the vaccine. Secondary end points were whether vaccine could be given safely with docetaxel and the clinical outcome of the treatment regimen.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The vaccination regimen was composed of (a) recombinant vaccinia virus (rV) that expresses the prostate-specific antigen gene (rV-PSA) admixed with (b) rV that expresses the B7.1 costimulatory gene (rV-B7.1), and (c) sequential booster vaccinations with recombinant fowlpox virus (rF-) containing the PSA gene (rF-PSA). Patients received granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor with each vaccination. Twenty-eight patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomized to receive either vaccine and weekly docetaxel or vaccine alone. Patients on the vaccine alone arm were allowed to cross over to receive docetaxel alone at time of disease progression. The ELISPOT assay was used to monitor immune responses for PSA-specific T cells.

RESULTS

The median increase in these T-cell precursors to PSA was 3.33-fold in both arms following 3 months of therapy. In addition, immune responses to other prostate cancer-associated tumor antigens were also detected postvaccination. Eleven patients who progressed on vaccine alone crossed over to receive docetaxel at time of progression. Median progression-free survival on docetaxel was 6.1 months after receiving vaccine compared with 3.7 months with the same regimen in a historical control.

CONCLUSION

This is the first clinical trial to show that docetaxel can be administered safely with immunotherapy without inhibiting vaccine specific T-cell responses. Furthermore, patients previously vaccinated with an anticancer vaccine may respond longer to docetaxel compared with a historical control of patients receiving docetaxel alone. Larger prospective clinical studies will be required to validate these findings.

Antiandrogen, vaccine and combination therapy in patients with nonmetastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE

There is no current standard treatment for patients with prostate cancer who have received hormonal therapy but have an increasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) without radiographic evidence of metastasis. This trial was designed to analyze toxicity, immunogenicity and time to treatment failure using vaccine, antiandrogen therapy or their sequential use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 42 patients were randomized to receive vaccine vs antiandrogen therapy with nilutamide. The vaccine consisted of recombinant vaccinia viruses containing the PSA and B7.1 costimulatory genes as prime vaccinations, and avipox-PSA as boosters. After 6 months patients with an increasing PSA and no metastasis may receive a combination of both treatments.

RESULTS

Three patients on nilutamide were removed from study secondary to grade 3 toxicities but no grade 3 toxicities were attributed to vaccine. In the vaccine arm median time to treatment failure was 9.9 months with 13 of 21 decreases in PSA velocity vs 7.6 months with 16 of 21 decreases in PSA velocity in the nilutamide arm (p =0.28). Of the patients in the nilutamide arm 8 had vaccine added at the time of PSA progression. Median time to treatment failure with combined therapy was 5.2 months, with a median duration from study entry of 15.9 months. Of the patients in the vaccine arm 12 had nilutamide added at the time of PSA progression. Median time to treatment failure with combined therapy was 13.9 months and a median of 25.9 months from initiation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are merited to investigate the role of combining vaccine with antiandrogen therapy or vaccine followed by vaccine plus antiandrogen therapy in this patient population.

Combining a recombinant cancer vaccine with standard definitive radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Many patients with clinically localized prostate cancer develop biochemical failure despite excellent local therapy perhaps due to occult metastatic disease. One potential solution is the utilization of a well-tolerated systemic therapy (e.g., vaccine) in concert with local therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We present a randomized phase II clinical trial designed to determine if a poxviral vaccine encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can induce a PSA-specific T-cell response when combined with radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Thirty patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio into vaccine plus radiotherapy or radiotherapy-only arms. Those patients in the combination arm received a "priming" vaccine with recombinant vaccinia (rV) PSA plus r V containing the T-cell costimulatory molecule B7.1 (rV-B7.1) followed by monthly booster vaccines with recombinant fowlpox PSA. The vaccines were given with local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and low-dose systemic interleukin-2. Standard external beam radiation therapy was given between the fourth and the sixth vaccinations.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 19 patients in the combination arm completed all eight vaccinations and 13 of these 17 patients had increases in PSA-specific T cells of at least 3-fold versus no detectable increases in the radiotherapy-only arm (P < 0.0005). There was also evidence of de novo generation of T cells to well-described prostate-associated antigens not found in the vaccine, providing indirect evidence of immune-mediated tumor killing. The vaccine was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

This vaccine regimen can be safely given in patients undergoing radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer, with the majority of patients generating a PSA-specific cellular immune response to vaccine.