Parental leave, childcare policies, and workplace bias for hepatology professionals: A national survey

BACKGROUND

The presence of workplace bias around child-rearing and inadequate parental leave may negatively impact childbearing decisions and sex equity in hepatology. This study aimed to understand the influence of parental leave and child-rearing on career advancement in hepatology.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of physician members of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) was distributed through email listserv in January 2021. The 33-item survey included demographic questions, questions about bias, altering training, career plans, family planning, parental leave, and work accommodations.

RESULTS

Among 199 US physician respondents, 65.3% were women, and 83.4% (n = 166) were attendings. Sex and racial differences were reported in several domains, including paid leave, perceptions of bias, and child-rearing. Most women (79.3%) took fewer than the recommended 12 paid weeks of parental leave for their first child (average paid leave 7.5 wk for women and 1.7 for men). A majority (75.2%) of women reported workplace discrimination, including 83.3% of Black and 62.5% of Hispanic women. Twenty percent of women were asked about their/their partners' pregnancy intentions or child-rearing plans during interviews for training. Women were more likely to alter career plans due to child-rearing (30.0% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.030). Women were also more likely to delay having children than men (69.5% vs.35.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Women reported sex and maternity bias in the workplace and during training interviews, which was more frequently experienced by Black and Hispanic women. As two-thirds of women had children during training, it is a particularly influential time to reevaluate programmatic support to address long-term gender disparities in career advancement.

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Directions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. This cancer commonly arises against a background of chronic liver disease. As a result, a patient with HCC requires multidisciplinary care. Treatment options vary widely based on tumor burden and metastases. The most widely utilized staging system is the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, which recommends treatments based on tumor size and the underlying liver disease and functional status of the patient. Treatment options range from surgical resection or transplantation to locoregional therapies with modalities such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization to systemic chemotherapies. Future care involves the development of combination therapies that afford the best tumor response, further clarification of the patients best suited for therapies and the development of new oral chemotherapeutic agents.

Drug-induced liver injury from antiepileptic drugs

Drug-induced liver injury is a potential complication of innumerable medications. Most cases do not occur in a predictable, dose-dependent manner, leading to delayed recognition of a drug's hepatotoxic potential until after its release into the market. The estimated occurrence is 1 in 10,000 to 100,000 patients. However, the rates are likely higher because many cases go unrecognized owing to lack of reporting or missed diagnosis. This article reviews the most commonly associated antiepileptic drugs.

Review article: Drug-induced liver injury--its pathophysiology and evolving diagnostic tools

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality accounting for at least 13% of acute liver failure cases in the US. It is the leading cause of acute liver failure among patients referred for liver transplantation and the most common reason that drugs in development do not obtain FDA approval. The incidence of DILI has been reported to be one in 10,000 to one in 100,000 patients; however, the actual incidence is probably higher due in part to the difficulty of diagnosis.

AIM

To present a review of the current literature on DILI with a focus on its pathophysiology and evolving diagnostic modalities.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search was conducted using the terms 'drug induced liver injury', 'pathophysiology', 'causality', 'diagnosis', 'toxicogenomics' and 'pharmacogenetics'.

RESULTS

Drug-induced liver injury is an area of ongoing research. From the time it was first recognised, our understanding of the pathophysiology, its classification, diagnosis and reporting by established national networks continues to challenge and evolve. Metabonomics, pharmacogenetics, proteomics and transcriptomics are more recent areas of study that have been applied to further the understanding of DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent advances in our understanding of drug-induced liver injury, many aspects of its pathophysiology and clinical impact remain unclear. In addition, genomic-based studies are evolving concepts, which undoubtedly continue to contribute to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury.