Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy From the First to the "Fourth Trimester": A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Pregnancy and childbirth are risk factors for developing pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), and this continues postpartum ("fourth trimester"). Knowledge of PFDs among women of childbearing age is lacking and presents an opportunity for education.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the increase in knowledge of PFDs in patients who received written handouts versus interactive workshops as measured by the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized clinical trial of pregnant patients 18 years or older. Patients either received written handouts only or received handouts and attended an interactive workshop. Handouts were created in collaboration with communication specialists focusing on risk factors and prevention strategies. The primary outcome was the change in PIKQ score. Secondary outcomes were Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score and postpartum phone interviews of workshop group participants. Questionnaires were assessed at recruitment and 6 weeks postpartum. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test compared continuous variables, and the Fisher exact test compared categorical variables.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients were randomized. Demographics were similar between groups. Median PIKQ score change showed no difference between groups (P = 0.37). Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 scores were similar between groups at baseline (P = 0.78) and postpartum (P = 0.82). Quantile regression showed posteducation PIKQ scores were significantly higher in the workshop (21.00 vs 17.00; P = 0.011) and written (21.00 vs 17.00; P < 0.001) groups. Phone interviews showed consistent themes: (1) greater awareness of PFDs, (2) more likely to discuss PFDs, and (3) relief that PFDs are treatable. Fifty-nine percent of patients preferred learning through workshops compared with the handouts.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups showed improvement in knowledge of PFDs. Well-written, illustrated handouts were effective in increasing patient knowledge of PFDs.

A boot camp translation of Alzheimer's disease in Hispanic/Latino communities

Introduction

Hispanics/Latinos (H/Ls) are significantly underrepresented in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research participant samples. This exclusion limits our interpretation of research findings and understanding of the causes of brain health disparities. The Engaging Communities of Hispanics/Latinos for Aging Research (ECHAR) Network was created to engage, educate, and motivate H/Ls for participation in brain aging research by addressing several barriers to inclusion, including health literacy and AD-related communication.

Methods

We used a novel community-engaged method-Boot Camp Translation (BCT)-to translate medical jargon into action-based, community-relevant messages. H/L community members (n = 39) were recruited from three cities to work with local research teams and co-develop culturally responsive AD-related messaging. BCT meetings leveraged various techniques to identify key messages, the target audience for the messages, and methods to disseminate these messages. Themes were constructed collaboratively between BCT facilitators and community members as the group iteratively refined the conceptual framework and language for the main messages, with the goal to make AD messaging accessible for H/L community members.

Results

H/L community members showed significant improvements in subjective understanding (Cohen's d = 0.75; P < 0.001) and objective knowledge of Alzheimer's disease (Cohen's d = 0.79; P < 0.001) at BCT completion. H/L community members identified key messages that converged for all three cities. These were related to reducing stigma, emphasizing brain health and risk mitigation, and acknowledging the impact of AD on multi-generational families/households. Participants also recommended sharing these messages with H/Ls across the lifespan using multi-media avenues.

Discussion

The collaborative efforts identified culturally responsive and community-relevant messaging that may help address health literacy barriers contributing to AD-related disparities in H/L communities.

HIGHLIGHTS

Hispanics/Latinos are underrepresented in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research despite increased risk.Limited ADRD health literacy may act as a recruitment barrier.Boot Camp Translation (BCT) is a process that targets health communication.We carried out BCT in three cities to co-develop ADRD messaging.Results highlight regional similarities and differences in ADRD communication.

"Things Are Happening That I Don't Understand": A Narrative Exploration of the Chaos of Living with Pelvic Floor Disorders

Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), including fecal and urinary incontinence as well as pelvic organ prolapse, are common medical issues faced by one-third of all women across the lifespan. Despite this prevalence, many women are unaware of them, have highly stigmatized perceptions of them, and thus do not actively seek support or treatment for them. Given that PFDs can drastically impact quality of life to the point of social isolation and depression, this study examines chaos and desire as both lived and storied constructs that ultimately influence whether and how women with PFDs assert control over their social and corporeal disruption. Guided by narrative sensibilities and informed by semi-structured interviews with 22 women living with varying PFDs, our analysis highlights how chaos serves as a catalyst for continued chaos (i.e. barriers to seeking medical care), mitigation (i.e. resignation and/or public bodily containment), and/or change (i.e. motivations to seek medical care). These findings offer both theoretical and practical implications for helping individuals grappling with the dis-ease of PFDs (i.e. patients, providers, and practitioners) to envision and act otherwise.

Rural-urban differences in estimated life expectancy associated with neighborhood-level cumulative social and environmental determinants

Diverse neighborhood-level environmental and social impacts on health are well documented. While studies typically examine these impacts individually, examining potential health impacts from multiple sources as a whole can provide a broader context of overall neighborhood-level health impacts compared to examining each component independently. This study examined the association between cumulative neighborhood-level potential health impacts on health and expected life expectancy within neighborhoods (census tracts) across Texas using the Neighborhood Potential Health Impact Score tool. Among urban census tract neighborhoods, a difference of nearly 5 years was estimated between neighborhoods with the least health promoting cumulative health impacts compared to neighborhoods with the most health promoting cumulative health impacts. Differences were observed between rural and urban census tract neighborhoods, with rural areas having less variability in expected life expectancy associated with neighborhood-level cumulative potential health impacts compared to urban areas.