A novel mitochondrial complex I ROS inhibitor partially improves muscle regeneration in adult but not old mice

It is unclear whether mitochondrial dysfunction and redox stress contribute to impaired age-related muscle regenerative capacity. Here we characterized a novel compound, BI4500, that inhibits the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from the quinone site in mitochondrial complex I (site IQ). We tested the hypothesis that ROS release from site IQ contributes to impaired regenerative capacity in aging muscle. Electron transfer system site-specific ROS production was measured in adult and aged mouse isolated muscle mitochondria and permeabilized gastrocnemius fibers. BI4500 inhibited ROS production from site IQ in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50 = ∼985 nM) by inhibiting ROS release without impairing complex I-linked respiration. In vivo BI4500 treatment decreased ROS production from site IQ. Muscle injury and sham injury were induced using barium chloride or vehicle injection to the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in adult and aged male mice. On the same day as injury, mice began a daily gavage of 30 mg/kg BI4500 (BI) or placebo (PLA). Muscle regeneration (H&E, Sirius Red, Pax7) was measured at 5 and 35 days after injury. Muscle injury increased centrally nucleated fibers (CNFs) and fibrosis with no treatment or age effect. There was a significant age by treatment interaction for CNFs at 5- and 35-days post injury with significantly more CNFs in BI adults compared to PLA adults. Muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) recovered significantly more in adult BI mice (-89 ± 365 μm2) compared to old PLA (-599 ± 153 μm2) and old BI (-535 ± 222 μm2, mean ± SD). In situ TA force recovery was measured 35 days after injury and was not significantly different by age or treatment. Inhibition of site IQ ROS partially improves muscle regeneration in adult but not old muscle demonstrating a role for CI ROS in the response to muscle injury. Site IQ ROS does not contribute to impaired regenerative capacity in aging.

Understanding the suitability of established antibiotics for oral inhalation from a pharmacokinetic perspective: an integrated model-based investigation based on rifampicin, ciprofloxacin and tigecycline in vivo data

BACKGROUND

Treating pulmonary infections by administering drugs via oral inhalation represents an attractive alternative to usual routes of administration. However, the local concentrations after inhalation are typically not known and the presumed benefits are derived from experiences with drugs specifically optimized for inhaled administration.

OBJECTIVES

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model was developed to elucidate the pulmonary PK for ciprofloxacin, rifampicin and tigecycline and link it to bacterial PK/PD models. An exemplary sensitivity analysis was performed to potentially guide drug optimization regarding local efficacy for inhaled antibiotics.

METHODS

Detailed pulmonary tissue, endothelial lining fluid and systemic in vivo drug concentration-time profiles were simultaneously measured for all drugs in rats after intravenous infusion. Using this data, a PBPK/PD model was developed, translated to humans and adapted for inhalation. Simulations were performed comparing potential benefits of oral inhalation for treating bronchial infections, covering intracellular pathogens and bacteria residing in the bronchial epithelial lining fluid.

RESULTS

The PBPK/PD model was able to describe pulmonary PK in rats. Often applied optimization parameters for orally inhaled drugs (e.g. high systemic clearance and low oral bioavailability) showed little influence on efficacy and instead mainly increased pulmonary selectivity. Instead, low permeability, a high epithelial efflux ratio and a pronounced post-antibiotic effect represented the most impactful parameters to suggest a benefit of inhalation over systemic administration for locally acting antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The present work might help to develop antibiotics for oral inhalation providing high pulmonary concentrations and fast onset of exposure coupled with lower systemic drug concentrations.

Evaluating prediction methods for glomerular filtration to optimise drug doses in obese and nonobese patients

AIMS

The most suitable method for predicting the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in obesity is currently debated. Therefore, multiple GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods were applied to (morbidly) obese and nonobese patients ranging from moderate renal impairment to glomerular hyperfiltration and their predictions were rated based on observed fosfomycin pharmacokinetics, as this model drug is exclusively eliminated via glomerular filtration.

METHODS

The GFR/creatinine clearance predictions via the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD; indexed and de-indexed by body surface area) and creatinine clearance via the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CLCR_CG ) using different body size descriptors were compared to the fosfomycin clearance (CL_FOF ) from 30 surgical patients (body mass index = 20.1-52.0 kg m^-2 ), receiving 8000 mg as intravenous infusion.

RESULTS

The concordance between CL_FOF and creatinine clearance predictions was highest for CLCR_CG employing either ideal body weight or adjusted body weight (if body mass >1.3 ideal body weight; CLCR_{CG_ABW-Schwartz} , concordance-correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval] = 0.474 [0.156; 0.703], CCC) and GFR predictions via the de-indexed MDRD equation (concordance-correlation coefficient = 0.452 [0.137; 0.685]). The proportion of predicted GFR values within ±30% of the observed CL_FOF (P₃₀  = 72.3-76.7%) was only marginally lower than the reported P₃₀ in the original CKD-EPI and MDRD publications (P₃₀  = 84.1-90.0%).

CONCLUSION

This analysis represents a successful proof-of-concept for evaluating GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods: Across all body mass index classes CLCR_{CG_ABW-Schwartz} or the de-indexed MDRD were most suitable for predicting creatinine clearance/GFR also in (morbidly) obese, CKD stage <3B individuals in therapeutic use. Their application is proposed in optimising doses for vital therapies in obese patients requiring monitoring of renal function (e.g. methotrexate dosing).

Inferring pulmonary exposure based on clinical PK data: accuracy and precision of model-based deconvolution methods

Determining and understanding the target-site exposure in clinical studies remains challenging. This is especially true for oral drug inhalation for local treatment, where the target-site is identical to the site of drug absorption, i.e., the lungs. Modeling and simulation based on clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data may be a valid approach to infer the pulmonary fate of orally inhaled drugs, even without local measurements. In this work, a simulation-estimation study was systematically applied to investigate five published model structures for pulmonary drug absorption. First, these models were compared for structural identifiability and how choosing an inadequate model impacts the inference on pulmonary exposure. Second, in the context of the population approach both sequential and simultaneous parameter estimation methods after intravenous administration and oral inhalation were evaluated with typically applied models. With an adequate model structure and a well-characterized systemic PK after intravenous dosing, the error in inferring pulmonary exposure and retention times was less than twofold in the majority of evaluations. Whether a sequential or simultaneous parameter estimation was applied did not affect the inferred pulmonary PK to a relevant degree. One scenario in the population PK analysis demonstrated biased pulmonary exposure metrics caused by inadequate estimation of systemic PK parameters. Overall, it was demonstrated that empirical modeling of intravenous and inhalation PK datasets provided robust estimates regarding accuracy and bias for the pulmonary exposure and pulmonary retention, even in presence of the high variability after drug inhalation.

A mechanistic framework for a priori pharmacokinetic predictions of orally inhaled drugs

The fate of orally inhaled drugs is determined by pulmonary pharmacokinetic processes such as particle deposition, pulmonary drug dissolution, and mucociliary clearance. Even though each single process has been systematically investigated, a quantitative understanding on the interaction of processes remains limited and therefore identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics for orally inhaled drugs is still challenging. To investigate this complex interplay, the pulmonary processes can be integrated into mathematical models. However, existing modeling attempts considerably simplify these processes or are not systematically evaluated against (clinical) data. In this work, we developed a mathematical framework based on physiologically-structured population equations to integrate all relevant pulmonary processes mechanistically. A tailored numerical resolution strategy was chosen and the mechanistic model was evaluated systematically against data from different clinical studies. Without adapting the mechanistic model or estimating kinetic parameters based on individual study data, the developed model was able to predict simultaneously (i) lung retention profiles of inhaled insoluble particles, (ii) particle size-dependent pharmacokinetics of inhaled monodisperse particles, (iii) pharmacokinetic differences between inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, as well as (iv) pharmacokinetic differences between healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients. Finally, to identify the most impactful optimization criteria for orally inhaled drugs, the developed mechanistic model was applied to investigate the impact of input parameters on both the pulmonary and systemic exposure. Interestingly, the solubility of the inhaled drug did not have any relevant impact on the local and systemic pharmacokinetics. Instead, the pulmonary dissolution rate, the particle size, the tissue affinity, and the systemic clearance were the most impactful potential optimization parameters. In the future, the developed prediction framework should be considered a powerful tool for identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics.

The use of orally inhaled drugs for treating lung diseases is appealing since they have the potential for lung selectivity, i.e. high exposure at the site of action –the lung– without excessive side effects. However, the degree of lung selectivity depends on a large number of factors, including physiochemical properties of drug molecules, patient disease state, and inhalation devices. To predict the impact of these factors on drug exposure and thereby to understand the characteristics of an optimal drug for inhalation, we develop a predictive mathematical framework (a “pharmacokinetic model”). In contrast to previous approaches, our model allows combining knowledge from different sources appropriately and its predictions were able to adequately predict different sets of clinical data. Finally, we compare the impact of different factors and find that the most important factors are the size of the inhaled particles, the affinity of the drug to the lung tissue, as well as the rate of drug dissolution in the lung. In contrast to the common belief, the solubility of a drug in the lining fluids is not found to be relevant. These findings are important to understand how inhaled drugs should be designed to achieve best treatment results in patients.

Towards a Quantitative Mechanistic Understanding of Localized Pulmonary Tissue Retention-A Combined In Vivo/In Silico Approach Based on Four Model Drugs

Increasing affinity to lung tissue is an important strategy to achieve pulmonary retention and to prolong the duration of effect in the lung. As the lung is a very heterogeneous organ, differences in structure and blood flow may influence local pulmonary disposition. Here, a novel lung preparation technique was employed to investigate regional lung distribution of four drugs (salmeterol, fluticasone propionate, linezolid, and indomethacin) after intravenous administration in rats. A semi-mechanistic model was used to describe the observed drug concentrations in the trachea, bronchi, and the alveolar parenchyma based on tissue specific affinities (Kp) and blood flows. The model-based analysis was able to explain the pulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of the two neutral and one basic model drugs, suggesting up to six-fold differences in Kp between trachea and alveolar parenchyma for salmeterol. Applying the same principles, it was not possible to predict the pulmonary PK of indomethacin, indicating that acidic drugs might show different pulmonary PK characteristics. The separate estimates for local Kp, tracheal and bronchial blood flow were reported for the first time. This work highlights the importance of lung physiology- and drug-specific parameters for regional pulmonary tissue retention. Its understanding is key to optimize inhaled drugs for lung diseases.

Inhaled Therapy in Respiratory Disease: The Complex Interplay of Pulmonary Kinetic Processes

The inhalation route is frequently used to administer drugs for the management of respiratory diseases such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Compared with other routes of administration, inhalation offers a number of advantages in the treatment of these diseases. For example, via inhalation, a drug is directly delivered to the target organ, conferring high pulmonary drug concentrations and low systemic drug concentrations. Therefore, drug inhalation is typically associated with high pulmonary efficacy and minimal systemic side effects. The lung, as a target, represents an organ with a complex structure and multiple pulmonary-specific pharmacokinetic processes, including (1) drug particle/droplet deposition; (2) pulmonary drug dissolution; (3) mucociliary and macrophage clearance; (4) absorption to lung tissue; (5) pulmonary tissue retention and tissue metabolism; and (6) absorptive drug clearance to the systemic perfusion. In this review, we describe these pharmacokinetic processes and explain how they may be influenced by drug-, formulation- and device-, and patient-related factors. Furthermore, we highlight the complex interplay between these processes and describe, using the examples of inhaled albuterol, fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and olodaterol, how various sequential or parallel pulmonary processes should be considered in order to comprehend the pulmonary fate of inhaled drugs.

Modeling energy intake and body weight effects of a long-acting amylin analogue

The inhibitory effect of anti-obesity drugs on energy intake (EI) is counter-acted by feedback regulation of the appetite control circuit leading to drug tolerance. This complicates the design and interpretation of EI studies in rodents that are used for anti-obesity drug development. Here, we investigated a synthetic long-acting analogue of the appetite-suppressing peptide hormone amylin (LAMY) in lean and diet-induced obese (DIO) rats. EI and body weight (BW) were measured daily and LAMY concentrations in plasma were assessed using defined time points following subcutaneous administration of the LAMY at different dosing regimens. Overall, 6 pharmacodynamic (PD) studies including a total of 173 rats were considered in this evaluation. Treatment caused a dose-dependent reduction in EI and BW, although multiple dosing indicated the development of tolerance over time. This behavior could be adequately described by a population model including homeostatic feedback of EI and a turnover model describing the relationship between EI and BW. The model was evaluated by testing its ability to predict BW loss in a toxicology study and was utilized to improve the understanding of dosing regimens for obesity therapy. As such, the model proved to be a valuable tool for the design and interpretation of rodent studies used in anti-obesity drug development.

Model-based evaluation of pulmonary pharmacokinetics in asthmatic and COPD patients after oral olodaterol inhalation

AIMS

Olodaterol is an orally inhaled β2 -agonist for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aims of this population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were: (1) to investigate systemic PK and thereby make inferences about pulmonary PK in asthmatic patients, COPD patients and healthy volunteers, and (2) to assess whether differences in pulmonary efficacy might be expected based on pulmonary PK characteristics.

METHODS

Plasma and urine data after olodaterol inhalation were available from six clinical trials comprising 710 patients and healthy volunteers (single and multiple dosing). To investigate the relevance of covariates, full fixed-effect modelling was applied based on a previously developed healthy volunteer systemic disposition model.

RESULTS

A pulmonary model with three parallel absorption processes best described PK after inhalation in patients. The pulmonary bioavailable fraction (PBIO) was 48.7% (46.1-51.3%, 95% confidence interval) in asthma, and 53.6% (51.1-56.2%) in COPD. In asthma 87.2% (85.4-88.8%) of PBIO was slowly absorbed with an absorption half-life of 18.5 h (16.3-21.4 h), whereas in COPD 80.1% (78.0-82.2%) was absorbed with a half-life of 37.8 h (31.1-47.8 h). In healthy volunteers absorption was faster, with a half-life of 18.5 h (16.3-21.4 h) of the slowest absorbed process, which characterized 74.6% (69.1-80.2%) of PBIO.

CONCLUSIONS

The modelling approach successfully described data after olodaterol inhalation in patients and healthy volunteers. Slow pulmonary absorption was demonstrated both in asthma and COPD. Absorption characteristics after olodaterol inhalation indicated even more beneficial lung targeting in patients compared to healthy volunteers.

Investigating pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of inhaled olodaterol in healthy volunteers using a population pharmacokinetic approach

AIMS

Olodaterol, a novel β2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is a long-acting, once-daily inhaled bronchodilator approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aim of the present study was to describe the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of olodaterol after intravenous administration and oral inhalation in healthy volunteers by population pharmacokinetic modelling and thereby to infer its pulmonary fate.

METHODS

Plasma and urine data after intravenous administration (0.5-25 μg) and oral inhalation (2.5-70 μg via the Respimat® inhaler) were available from a total of 148 healthy volunteers (single and multiple dosing). A stepwise model building approach was applied, using population pharmacokinetic modelling. Systemic disposition parameters were fixed to estimates obtained from intravenous data when modelling data after inhalation.

RESULTS

A pharmacokinetic model, including three depot compartments with associated parallel first-order absorption processes (pulmonary model) on top of a four-compartment body model (systemic disposition model), was found to describe the data the best. The dose reaching the lung (pulmonary bioavailable fraction) was estimated to be 49.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.1, 52.7%] of the dose released from the device. A large proportion of the pulmonary bioavailable fraction [70.1% (95% CI 66.8, 73.3%)] was absorbed with a half-life of 21.8 h (95% CI 19.7, 24.4 h).

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of olodaterol after intravenous administration and oral inhalation in healthy volunteers were adequately described. The key finding was that a high proportion of the pulmonary bioavailable fraction had an extended pulmonary residence time. This finding was not expected based on the physicochemical properties of olodaterol.

Pharmacometric Models for Characterizing the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drugs

During the last decades, the importance of modeling and simulation in clinical drug development, with the goal to qualitatively and quantitatively assess and understand mechanisms of pharmacokinetic processes, has strongly increased. However, this increase could not equally be observed for orally inhaled drugs. The objectives of this review are to understand the reasons for this gap and to demonstrate the opportunities that mathematical modeling of pharmacokinetics of orally inhaled drugs offers. To achieve these objectives, this review (i) discusses pulmonary physiological processes and their impact on the pharmacokinetics after drug inhalation, (ii) provides a comprehensive overview of published pharmacokinetic models, (iii) categorizes these models into physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and (clinical data-derived) empirical models, (iv) explores both their (mechanistic) plausibility, and (v) addresses critical aspects of different pharmacometric approaches pertinent for drug inhalation. In summary, pulmonary deposition, dissolution, and absorption are highly complex processes and may represent the major challenge for modeling and simulation of PK after oral drug inhalation. Challenges in relating systemic pharmacokinetics with pulmonary efficacy may be another factor contributing to the limited number of existing pharmacokinetic models for orally inhaled drugs. Investigations comprising in vitro experiments, clinical studies, and more sophisticated mathematical approaches are considered to be necessary for elucidating these highly complex pulmonary processes. With this additional knowledge, the PBPK approach might gain additional attractiveness. Currently, (semi-)mechanistic modeling offers an alternative to generate and investigate hypotheses and to more mechanistically understand the pulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics after oral drug inhalation including the impact of pulmonary diseases.