1
|
Kaur G, Chauhan AS, Prinja S, Teerawattananon Y, Muniyandi M, Rastogi A, Jyani G, Nagarajan K, Lakshmi P, Gupta A, Selvam JM, Bhansali A, Jain S. Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for diabetes and hypertension in India: an economic modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2021; 7:e65-e73. [PMID: 34774219 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00199-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND India faces a high burden of diabetes and hypertension. Currently, there is a dearth of economic evidence about screening programmes, affected age groups, and frequency of screening for these diseases in Indian settings. We assessed the cost effectiveness of population-based screening for diabetes and hypertension compared with current practice in India for different scenarios, according to type of screening test, population age group, and pattern of health-care use. METHODS We used a hybrid decision model (decision tree and Markov model) to estimate the lifetime costs and consequences from a societal perspective. A meta-analysis was done to assess the effectiveness of population-based screening. Primary data were collected from two Indian states (Haryana and Tamil Nadu) to assess the cost of screening. The data from the National Health System Cost Database and the Costing of Health Services in India study were used to determine the health system cost of diagnostic tests and cost of treating diabetes or hypertension and their complications. A total of 962 patients were recruited to assess out-of-pocket expenditure and quality of life. Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using univariate and multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Finally, we estimated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with alternative scenarios of scaling up primary health care through a health and wellness centre programme for the treatment of diabetes and hypertension. FINDINGS The incremental cost per QALY gained across various strategies for population-based screening for diabetes and hypertension ranged from US$0·02 million to $0·03 million. At the current pattern of health services use, none of the screening strategies of annual screening, screening every 3 years, and screening every 5 years was cost-effective at a threshold of 1-time per capita gross domestic product in India. In the scenario in which health and wellness centres provided primary care to 20% of patients who were newly diagnosed with uncomplicated diabetes or hypertension, screening the group aged between 30 and 65 years every 5 years or 3 years for either diabetes, hypertension, or a comorbid state (both diabetes and hypertension) became cost-effective. If the share of treatment for patients with newly diagnosed uncomplicated diabetes or hypertension at health and wellness centres increases to 70%, from the existing 4% at subcentres and primary health centres, annual population-based screening becomes a cost saving strategy. INTERPRETATION Population-based screening for diabetes and hypertension in India could potentially reduce time to diagnosis and treatment and be cost-effective if it is linked to comprehensive primary health care through health and wellness centres for provision of treatment to patients who screen positive. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunjeet Kaur
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Akashdeep Singh Chauhan
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shankar Prinja
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Yot Teerawattananon
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | - Ashu Rastogi
- Department of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Gaurav Jyani
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Pvm Lakshmi
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ankur Gupta
- Department of Cardiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jerard M Selvam
- Department of Health & Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India
| | - Anil Bhansali
- Department of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sanjay Jain
- Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Viswanathan V, Ganeshkumar P, Selvam JM, Selvavinayagam TS. Referral mechanism and beneficiary adherence in cervical cancer screening program in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu state, India, 2012-2015. Indian J Cancer 2021; 59:39-45. [PMID: 34380836 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_548_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background A screening program for cervical cancer was established in 2011 in Tamil Nadu. Since the inception of the program, coverage, and dropout of screening has not been analyzed. We conducted a study to describe the referral mechanism in the cervical cancer screening program implemented in Tamil Nadu, to estimate the level of adherence to the referral process by the beneficiaries, and to identify strengths and weaknesses related to the referral mechanism in the program. Methods This descriptive study was conducted during 2015-2016 in the Tiruchirappalli administrative district of Tamil Nadu. All women aged 30 years and above, who were screened in public health facilities, were the participants. Using a structured form, we collected the data maintained in the registers at the district health administration. We estimated the screening coverage, follow-up evaluation, and dropout rates at different stages of the referral mechanism. We used SPSS and Epi Info software for analysis. Results Coverage of cervical cancer screening was 4,838(41.6%). We estimated 4,838(41.6%) of screened positives were lost to follow-up for a colposcopy examination. Biopsy samples were obtained from 3425(84%) of those who required a biopsy. Cervical cancer was diagnosed in 159(4.6%) and precancerous lesions in 528(15.4%) women. Conclusion More than half of the target population was screened in public health facilities. The dropout rate was less than half of those screened at the colposcopy evaluation level. Major pitfalls of the program were human resource issues at referral centers and poor maintenance of meaningful data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidhya Viswanathan
- Department of Epidemiology, Indian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Epidemiology, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Parasuraman Ganeshkumar
- Department of Epidemiology, Indian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Epidemiology, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jerard M Selvam
- National Health Mission, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - T S Selvavinayagam
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krishnan S, Sivaram S, Anderson BO, Basu P, Belinson JL, Bhatla N, D'Cruz A, Dhillon PK, Gupta PC, Joshi N, Jhulka PK, Kailash U, Kapambwe S, Katoch VM, Kaur P, Kaur T, Mathur P, Prakash A, Sankaranarayanan R, Selvam JM, Seth T, Shah KV, Shastri S, Siddiqi M, Srivastava A, Trimble E, Rajaraman P, Mehrotra R. Using implementation science to advance cancer prevention in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016; 16:3639-44. [PMID: 25987015 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Oral, cervical and breast cancers, which are either preventable and/or amenable to early detection and treatment, are the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in India. In this paper, we describe implementation science research priorities to catalyze the prevention and control of these cancers in India. Research priorities were organized using a framework based on the implementation science literature and the World Health Organization's definition of health systems. They addressed both community-level as well as health systems-level issues. Community-level or "pull" priorities included the need to identify effective strategies to raise public awareness and understanding of cancer prevention, monitor knowledge levels, and address fear and stigma. Health systems-level or "push" and "infrastructure" priorities included dissemination of evidence- based practices, testing of point-of-care technologies for screening and diagnosis, identification of appropriate service delivery and financing models, and assessment of strategies to enhance the health workforce. Given the extent of available evidence, it is critical that cancer prevention and treatment efforts in India are accelerated. Implementation science research can generate critical insights and evidence to inform this acceleration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suneeta Krishnan
- Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI, San Francisco, USA E-mail :
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajaraman P, Anderson BO, Basu P, Belinson JL, Cruz AD, Dhillon PK, Gupta P, Jawahar TS, Joshi N, Kailash U, Kapambwe S, Katoch VM, Krishnan S, Panda D, Sankaranarayanan R, Selvam JM, Shah KV, Shastri S, Shridhar K, Siddiqi M, Sivaram S, Seth T, Srivastava A, Trimble E, Mehrotra R. Recommendations for screening and early detection of common cancers in India. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16:e352-61. [PMID: 26149887 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00078-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Revised: 03/02/2015] [Accepted: 03/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancers of the breast, uterine cervix, and lip or oral cavity are three of the most common malignancies in India. Together, they account for about 34% of more than 1 million individuals diagnosed with cancer in India each year. At each of these cancer sites, tumours are detectable at early stages when they are most likely to be cured with standard treatment protocols. Recognising the key role that effective early detection and screening programmes could have in reducing the cancer burden, the Indian Institute for Cytology and Preventive Oncology, in collaboration with the US National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health, held a workshop to summarise feasible options and relevant evidence for screening and early detection of common cancers in India. The evidence-based recommendations provided in this Review are intended to act as a guide for policy makers, clinicians, and public health practitioners who are developing and implementing strategies in cancer control for the three most common cancers in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preetha Rajaraman
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Departments of Surgery and Global Health Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Partha Basu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India
| | - Jerome L Belinson
- Preventive Oncology International and Department of Surgery, Women's Health Institute, Lerner School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anil D' Cruz
- Department of Head and Neck Services, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Preet K Dhillon
- Centre for Control of Chronic Conditions, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India
| | - Prakash Gupta
- Healis-Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, India
| | | | - Niranjan Joshi
- Healthcare Technology Innovation Centre, IIT Madras Research Park, Chennai, India
| | - Uma Kailash
- Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology, Noida, India
| | - Sharon Kapambwe
- Africa Centre of Excellence for Women's Cancer Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Research, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Suneeta Krishnan
- Women's Global Health Imperative, Research Triangle Institute International, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dharitri Panda
- Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology, Noida, India
| | - R Sankaranarayanan
- Early Detection & Prevention Section and Screening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Keerti V Shah
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Surendra Shastri
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India
| | - Krithiga Shridhar
- Centre for Control of Chronic Conditions, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India
| | | | - Sudha Sivaram
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tulika Seth
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Edward Trimble
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology, Noida, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Selvam JM. The accuracy of the Xpert®MTB/RIF assay compared to smear microscopy and culture for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2013.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
6
|
Selvam JM, Wares F, Perumal M, Gopi PG, Sudha G, Chandrasekaran V, Santha T. Health-seeking behaviour of new smear-positive TB patients under a DOTS programme in Tamil Nadu, India, 2003. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007; 11:161-7. [PMID: 17263286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although case detection is above 70% in Tamil Nadu after DOTS implementation, an assessment of the timeliness of patient diagnosis and treatment is still needed. OBJECTIVE To study the health-seeking behaviour of new smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients treated at government facilities. METHODS New smear-positive patients diagnosed and treated between January and March 2003 in government facilities of randomly selected blocks in Tamil Nadu were interviewed using a semi-structured interview schedule. RESULTS Of 601 patients interviewed, 65% contacted a provider within 28 days. The first contact was governmental for 47% and non-governmental for 53%. Median total, patient and provider delays were respectively 62, 28 and 28 days; provider delay was 9 days with government and 50 with private provider. In multivariate analysis, patient delay was significantly associated with smoking (P < 0.001) and mode of travel (P < 0.01), and provider delay with first consultation with a private provider (P < 0.001) and distance > 5 km from the health facility (P < 0.01). Twenty-five per cent of patients took more than two actions before diagnosis. CONCLUSION Community awareness of TB needs to be increased. Greater private sector involvement in the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme is essential to reduce provider delay. Referral and sputum transportation to the diagnostic facility should be given priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerard M Selvam
- Office of the World Health Organization Representative to India, New Delhi.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|