Alloplastic Epidermal Skin Substitute in the Treatment of Burns

The goal of burn wound treatment is to ensure rapid epithelialization in superficial burns and the process of rebuilding the lost skin in deep burns. Topical treatment plays an important role. One of the innovations in the field of synthetic materials dedicated to the treatment of burns is epidermal skin substitutes. Since the introduction of Suprathel®, the alloplastic epidermal substitute, many research results have been published in which the authors investigated the properties and use of this substitute in the treatment of wounds of various origins, including burn wounds. Burn wounds cause both physical and psychological discomfort, which is why ensuring comfort during treatment is extremely important. Alloplastic epidermal substitute, due to its biodegradability, plasticity, no need to remove the dressing until healing, and the associated reduction in pain, is an alternative for treating burns, especially in children.

The Crossroads of the Coagulation System and the Immune System: Interactions and Connections

The coagulation and immune systems, two vital systems in the human body, share intimate connections that fundamentally determine patient health. These systems work together through several common regulatory pathways, including the Tissue Factor (TF) Pathway. Immune cells expressing TF and producing pro-inflammatory cytokines can influence coagulation, while coagulation factors and processes reciprocally impact immune responses by activating immune cells and controlling their functions. These shared pathways contribute to maintaining health and are also involved in various pathological conditions. Dysregulated coagulation, triggered by infection, inflammation, or tissue damage, can result in conditions such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Concurrently, immune dysregulation may lead to coagulation disorders and thrombotic complications. This review elucidates these intricate interactions, emphasizing their roles in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and cancer. Understanding the complex interplay between these systems is critical for disease management and the development of effective treatments. By exploring these common regulatory mechanisms, we can uncover innovative therapeutic strategies targeting these intricate disorders. Thus, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of the mutual interaction between the coagulation and immune systems, highlighting its significance in health maintenance and disease pathology.

Multidisciplinary Treatment in Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Toxic epidermal necrolysis, Leyll's syndrome (TEN), is a rare mucocutaneous blistering disease burdened with high mortality rates. The diagnosis of TEN is based on clinical symptoms and histopathological findings. In approximately 90% of cases, it is a severe adverse reaction to drugs. In TEN, not only is the skin affected, but also mucosa and organs' epithelium. There are no unequivocal recommendations in regard to systemic and topical treatment of the patients. The aim of this paper is to review available literature and propose unified protocols to be discussed. Early management and multidisciplinary treatment are necessary to improve patients' outcome. Treatment of patients with TEN suspicions should be initiated with early drug withdrawal. TEN patients, like patients with burns, require intensive care and multidisciplinary management. Each patient with TEN should be provided with adequate fluid resuscitation, respiratory support, nutritional treatment, pain control, infection prophylaxis, anticoagulant therapy, and gastric ulcer prophylaxis. The key to local treatment of patients with TEN is the use of nonadherent dressings that do not damage the epidermis during the change. The aim of the systemic treatment is purification of the blood stream from the causative agent. The most efficient way to clarify serum of TEN patients' is the combination of plasmapheresis and IVIG. Immunomodulatory therapy can reduce the mortality five times in comparison with the patients with immunosuppression or lack of full protocol.

Correction: Surowiecka et al. Hydrogels in Burn Wound Management-A Review. Gels 2022, 8, 122

In the original publication, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published [...].

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Burn Wound Management

Mesenchymal stem cells have a known regenerative potential and are used in many indications. They secrete many growth factors, including for fibroblasts (FGF), endothelium (VEGF), as well as 14 anti-inflammatory cytokines, and they stimulate tissue regeneration, promoting the secretion of proteins and glycosaminoglycans of extracellular matrices, such as collagen I, II, III, and V, elastin, and also metalloproteinases. They secrete exosomes that contain proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and enzymes. In addition, they show the activity of inactivating free radicals. The aim of this study was an attempt to collect the existing literature on the use of stem cells in the treatment of a burn wound. There were 81 studies included in the analysis. The studies differed in terms of the design, burn wound model, source of stem cells, and methods of cellular therapy application. No major side effects were reported, and cellular therapy reduced the healing time of the burn wound. Few case reports on human models did not report any serious adverse events. However, due to the heterogeneity of the evidence, cellular therapy in burn wound treatment remains an experimental method.

Preliminary Single-Center Experience of Bromelain-Based Eschar Removal in Children with Mixed Deep Dermal and Full Thickness Burns

Introduction: Early eschar removal is the standard management of burns. The goal is to remove all of the necrotic tissue and render the wound suitable for healing or skin grafting. The enzymatic debridement of burn wounds allows for minimally invasive removal of burn eschar. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the demographic characteristics, surgical treatment and outcomes of patients treated with Nexobrid® with patients who had standard surgical excision. Material and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on children who underwent enzymatic debridement. The study group was compared with children treated with the standard of care (SoC). Results: Twelve children (mean age 8 years, range 3 to 15 years) with mixed deep dermal and full thickness burn wounds were treated with Nexobrid®. The mean size of the burns was 29% TBSA. The median percentage TBSA debrided using Nexobrid® was 15% (range 2–27%). In a clinical assessment, enzymatic debridement was effective in removing dead tissue in a single application. No adverse reaction to Nexobrid® and serious complications after enzymatic procedure were recorded in the study group. The estimated relative risk of the need for reconstructive procedures decreases 3.5 times for the study group (RR 3.5, 95%CI 0.9–13.5, p = 0.089). Conclusion: The bromelain-based enzymatic method offers a good and safe debridement option to improve the treatment and life quality of children with severe burns. The main outcome of interest was the number of reconstructive procedures due to scar contractures, which was reduced in the group treated enzymatically compared to the SoC-treated children.

Evaluation of Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement Combined with Laser Doppler Imaging and Healing of Burn Wounds

Background

Accurate estimation of burn depth is crucial for correct treatment decision making. Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement (ED) may improve clinical assessment of burn depth. Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) provides a valuable indicator of burn depth by analyzing microcirculation within tissue beds. This study aimed to evaluate bromelain-based enzymatic debridement combined with laser Doppler imaging and healing of 42 wounds in 19 patients with mixed second- and third-degree thermal burns.

Material/Methods

We included 42 wounds in 19 patients with mixed deep dermal and full-thickness thermal burns. All patients were treated with eschar-specific removal agent for ED. The perfusion of each wound after ED was assessed using LDI. Healing time was estimated by 2 experienced burn surgeons and marked by the observation of epithelization. The usefulness of the LDI performed after ED in predicting healing time was estimated. The findings were analyzed to determine a cut-off value for LDI that indicates if a burn will heal spontaneously.

Results

We observed that burn wounds with higher mean perfusion healed faster. The analysis showed a strong relationship between perfusion after ED and healing time (Spearman rank correlation coefficient=−0.803). A mean perfusion greater than 296.89 indicated that the wound could heal spontaneously and does not require skin grafting.

Conclusions

LDI examination of an already debrided wound allows for a reliable assessment of perfusion at an early stage of treatment. The use of a safe and effective debridement method in conjunction with a non-invasive diagnostic tool could improve burn management.

Application Of The Enzymatic Debridement Of Burn Wounds In Patients During The Covid-19 Epidemic

The unfolding pandemic necessitated optimalization of treatment methods and assurance of the highest precautionary standards to prevent transmission of COVID-19 to burn patients. One of them included an expanded access treatment with the minimally invasive method - enzymatic burn wound debridement using Nexobrid concentrate. The study assessed the effectiveness and usefulness of the expanded treatment project using enzymatic burn wound debridement with Nexobrid concentrate in patients (n=11) during the pandemic (2020) when compared with the results of the same method in a corresponding period of 2019. The concentrate was applied to the wound on the third day following injury at the latest. All patients were treated with the same accepted standards, including initial debridement of the wound, application of Nexobrid concentrate, and removal of devitalized tissue and dressing. Clinical visual assessment of the wound sites confirmed successful debridement of dead tissue following the application of the concentrate. No allergic or adverse reaction, nor significant deterioration of CBC parameters were observed in any patient. Although surgical excision of necrosis is recognized as the method of choice, enzymatic wound debridement using Nexobrid concentrate may contribute to a reduction in epidemiological risk when treating burn patients for several reasons; the procedure can be performed at the patient's bedside, it limits the number of required surgeries, helps to improve medical equipment and supplies management, and saves human resources.

The Role of the Immune System in Pediatric Burns: A Systematic Review

Burns are one of the most common causes of home injuries, characterized by serious damage to the skin and causing the death of affected tissues. In this review, we intended to collect information on the pathophysiological effects of burns in pediatric patients, with particular emphasis on local and systemic responses. A total of 92 articles were included in the review, and the time range of the searched articles was from 2000 to 2021. The occurrence of thermal injuries is a problem that requires special attention in pediatric patients who are still developing. Their exposure to various burns may cause disturbances in the immune response, not only in the area of tissue damage itself but also by disrupting the systemic immune response. The aspect of immunological mechanisms in burns requires further research, and in particular, it is important to focus on younger patients as the existence of subtle differences in wound healing between adults and children may significantly influence the treatment of pediatric patients.

Immunomodulatory treatment of Lyell's syndrome - a simultaneous plasmapheresis and IVIGs therapy

Lyell's syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare but life-threatening condition. It manifests with blistering of skin and mucous due to subepidermal bullae and keratinocyte necrosis. In most cases it is an immune response to drugs or their metabolites. The mortality in TEN is high despite optimal infection and wound control. There are no unequivocal treatment guidelines in TEN. Immunosuppressive treatment may increase the wound infection risk and mortality. The aim of the study was to evaluate a 10-year experience with immunomodulatory therapy in TEN. We perform a combination of plasmapheresis and IVIGs to control the disease. There were 35 patients in the group and we performed a post hoc evaluation. 28 patients received the full protocol and there were 7 patients who did not complete the treatment (single therapy group). The mortality in the test group was 14,29%, and the difference reached statistical significance in comparison with the single therapy group (p<0.05). Our protocol reduced the mortality risk 5 times. Our study proved that simultaneous plasmaphereses with IVIGs administration was safe and improved patients' outcome in TEN.

Genetic Factors of Idiopathic Gigantomastia: Clinical Implications of Aromatase and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms

The role of estrogen, progesterone, their receptors and aromatase in the development of the breast is well documented. In this study we examined the association of genetic variants of progesterone receptor (PGR) and aromatase (CYP19A1) genes with gigantomastia risk. We conducted a case-control study among 124 women: 60 with gigantomastia and 64 controls. We examined the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for CYP19A1 (rs749292 and rs7172156) and PGR (rs1042838). Our results showed that allele G in rs749292 (CYP19A1) increased the risk of gigantomastia, but not significantly (p = 0.09). There is a correlation between rs1042838 (PGR) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in women with gigantomastia-AC genotype correlates with lower WHR and CC with higher WHR. There were no correlations between the onset of gigantomastia, the age of menarche and the length of the menstrual cycle, and rs1042838, rs749292 and rs7172156. We did not find differences in the SNP of PGR (rs1042838) between women with gigantomastia and controls. However, our findings showed more frequent G allele in CYP19A1 (rs749292) in women with gigantomastia.

A Questionnaire-Based Study to Obtain a Consensus from 5 Polish Burns Centers on Eschar Removal by Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement (Nexobrid®) in Burns Following the 2020 Updated European Consensus Guidelines

Background

The supplementary treatment of burns with enzymatic debridement with Nexobrid^® was approved in Europe in 2013. The 2017 European consensus guidelines on the removal of eschar in burns by bromelain-based enzymatic debridement were updated in 2020. This questionnaire-based study aimed to obtain a consensus from 5 Polish burns centers on eschar removal by Nexobrid^® in burns following the 2020 updated European consensus guidelines.

Material/Methods

A panel of 5 experts representing the leading burn treatment centers in Poland (Cracow, Gryfice, Siemanowice Śląskie, Poznań, and Łęczna) was convened. A modified Delphi process was implemented with panel member selection, literature review, 2 rounds of voting in which panelists were asked to evaluate the European consensus and Polish consensus building by data analysis, statements preparation, final voting, and manuscript drafting.

Results

The knowledge and experience of experts from Poland’s leading burn centers resulted in the development of guidelines, formulated as 24 statements representing the following areas: indications and usage, pain management, application principles, post-enzymatic debridement wound dressing, and early and long-term outcomes. An analysis of the 7-point Likert scale polls revealed that 23 of the 24 statements achieved 100% consensus.

Conclusions

The findings from this survey from 5 major centers in Poland supported the main recommendations from the 2020 updated European consensus guidelines on the removal of eschar in burns by Nexobrid^® and may serve as a practical guide for surgeons who care for patients with burns in this country.

The role of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in gigantomastia

INTRODUCTION

Gigantomastia is a rare condition characterised by excessive breast growth. The pathophysiology of mammary enlargement varies depending on the type of gigantomastia: gestational, juvenile virginal, or idiopathic. The study aimed at examining the receptor status (oestrogen receptor α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR)) of breast tissue in adult women with juvenile or idiopathic gigantomastia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 70 women who underwent breast reduction due to juvenile or idiopathic gigantomastia. Control breast specimens were obtained from 18 female cadavers. ERα and PR expressions were detected immunohistochemically in breast gland samples.

RESULTS

Categorised and uncategorised ERα and PR expression did not differ between women with gigantomastia and control women. It was found that in both groups weak (0-30%) ERα and PR expression was the most common. Analysis of categorised data also did not reveal any significant correlations between ERα or PR and the women's age: for the whole group: p = 0.795 (ERα), p = 0.207 (PR), for women with gigantomastia: p = 0.934 (ERα), p = 0.43 (PR), and for control women: p = 0.638 (ERα), p = 0.805 (PR).

CONCLUSIONS

Gigantomastia is not caused by increased expression of ERα and PR. Analysing abnormal sensitivity of these receptors to hormones may be crucial in establishing the increased risk of breast cancer in women with gigantomastia.