Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated survival results from a phase II trial (DESTINY-Breast01)

BACKGROUND

Primary analysis of the multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II DESTINY-Breast01 trial (median follow-up 11.1 months) demonstrated durable antitumor activity with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). We report updated cumulative survival outcomes with a median follow-up of 26.5 months (data cut-off 26 March 2021).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HER2-positive mBC resistant or refractory to T-DM1 received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

The ORR by ICR was 62.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.5% to 69.0%] in patients who received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks (n = 184). Median OS was 29.1 months (95% CI 24.6-36.1 months). Median PFS and DoR were 19.4 months (95% CI 14.1-25.0 months) and 18.2 months (95% CI 15.0 months-not evaluable), respectively. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 183 patients (99.5%), and 99 patients (53.8%) had one or more grade ≥3 TEAEs. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis occurred in 15.8% of patients (n = 29), of which 2.7% (n = 5) were grade 5.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated results provide further evidence of sustained antitumor activity of T-DXd with a consistent safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive mBC.

The impact of age on vitamin D receptor expression, vitamin D metabolism and cytokine production in ex vivo Rhodococcus equi infection of equine alveolar macrophages

Rhodococcus equi (R. equi), a pneumonia-causing intracellular bacterium, results in significant morbidity and mortality in young foals, while healthy adult horses rarely develop disease. Survival and replication within alveolar macrophages (AMφ) are the hallmarks of R. equi's pathogenicity. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) and its ligand, the active vitamin D metabolite 1,25(OH)2D, are important in immune responses to intracellular bacteria. The vitamin D/VDR pathway regulates the downstream production of cytokines in infected human AMφ. The immunomodulatory role of the vitamin D/VDR pathway in equine leukocytes is unknown. The objective of the current study was to determine the impact of R. equi infection and age on synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D, VDR expression, and cytokine production in an ex vivo model of R. equi infection in equine AMφ. AMφ were collected from ten healthy foals at 2-, 4- and 8-weeks old and from nine healthy adult horses once via bronchoalveolar lavage. AMφ were mock infected (CONTROL) or infected with a virulent laboratory strain of R. equi for 7 days (INFECTED). VDR expression was determined via RT-qPCR from cell lysates. 1,25(OH)2D and cytokines were measured in cell supernatant by immunoassays. VDR expression was impacted by age (P = 0.001) with higher expression in AMφ from 8-week-old foals than from 2-week-old foals and adults. There was no significant effect of infection in foal AMφ, but in adults, relative VDR expression was significantly lower in INFECTED AMφ compared to CONTROL AMφ (P = 0.002). There was no effect of age or infection on 1,25(OH)2D concentration (P > 0.37). Mean TNFα production was significantly higher from INFECTED compared to CONTROL AMφ from 4- and 8-week-old foals and adults (P < 0.005). Mean IFNγ production was significantly higher from AMφ from foals at 8-weeks-old compared to 2-weeks-old (P = 0.013) and higher from INFECTED AMφ than from CONTROL AMφ in foals at 4-weeks-old and in adults (P < 0.027). The proportion of samples producing IL-1β and IL-10 was also significantly higher from INFECTED compared to CONTROL AMφ isolated from 4-week-old foals (P < 0.008). Similarly, in adult samples, IL-17 was produced from a greater proportion of INFECTED compared to CONTROL samples (P = 0.031). These data document age-associated changes in VDR expression and cytokine production in equine AMφ in response to R. equi infection. This preliminary investigation supports the need for further research to fully elucidate if the vitamin D pathway has an immunomodulatory role in the horse.

Patient-reported outcomes and hospitalization data in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan or trastuzumab emtansine in the phase III DESTINY-Breast03 study

BACKGROUND

In the DESTINY-Breast03 clinical trial, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) showed superior progression-free survival and overall survival versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and manageable safety in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. Here, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reported along with hospitalization data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients in DESTINY-Breast03 were assessed for prespecified PRO measures, including European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life (EORTC-QoL) questionnaires [the oncology-specific EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-BR45] and the generic EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) visual analogue scale. Analyses included change from baseline, time to definitive deterioration (TDD), and hospitalization-related endpoints.

RESULTS

EORTC QLQ-C30 baseline global health status (GHS) scores for T-DXd (n = 253) and T-DM1 (n = 260) were similar, with no clinically meaningful change (<10-point change from baseline) while on either treatment (median treatment duration: T-DXd, 14.3 months; T-DM1, 6.9 months). TDD analyses of QLQ-C30 GHS (primary PRO variable) and all other prespecified PROs (QLQ-C30 subscales, the QLQ-BR45 arm symptoms scale, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale) suggested T-DXd was numerically favored over T-DM1 based on TDD hazard ratios. Of all randomized patients, 18 (6.9%) receiving T-DXd versus 19 (7.2%) receiving T-DM1 were hospitalized, and the median time to first hospitalization was 219.5 versus 60.0 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In DESTINY-Breast03, EORTC GHS/QoL was maintained on both therapies throughout treatment, indicating that despite the longer treatment duration with T-DXd versus T-DM1, health-related QoL did not worsen on T-DXd. Furthermore, TDD hazard ratios numerically favored T-DXd over T-DM1 in all prespecified variables of interest including pain, suggesting T-DXd may delay time until health-related QoL deterioration compared with T-DM1. Median time to first hospitalization was three times longer with T-DXd versus T-DM1. Together with reported improved efficacy and manageable toxicity, these results support the overall benefit of T-DXd for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the single-arm, phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial, trastuzumab deruxtecan showed robust activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were refractory or resistant to trastuzumab emtansine; a population with scarce effective treatments. In DESTINY-Breast02, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan with treatment of physician's choice in this patient population.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial was conducted at 227 sites (hospitals, university hospitals, clinics, community centres, and private oncology centres) in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Brazil, Israel, and Türkiye. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had unresectable or HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, previously received trastuzumab emtansine, disease progression, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (intravenously at 5·4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or treatment of physician's choice using block randomisation. Treatment of physician's choice was either capecitabine (1250 mg/m2; orally twice per day on days 1-14) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 then 6 mg/kg once per day) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) plus lapatinib (1250 mg orally once per day on days 1-21), with a 21-day schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review in the full analysis set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03523585.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 6, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 608 patients were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=406; two did not receive treatment) or treatment of physician's choice (n=202; seven did not receive treatment). 608 (100%) patients were included in the full analysis set. The median age was 54·2 years (IQR 45·5-63·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 54·7 years (48·0-63·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. 384 (63%) patients were White, 603 (99%) were female, and five (<1%) were male. The median follow-up was 21·5 months (IQR 15·2-28·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 18·6 months (8·8-26·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 17·8 months (95% CI 14·3-20·8) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group versus 6·9 months (5·5-8·4) in the treatment of physician's choice group (HR 0·36 [0·28-0·45]; p<0·0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (293 [73%] of 404 with trastuzumab deruxtecan vs 73 [37%] of 195 with treatment of physician's choice), vomiting (152 [38%] vs 25 [13%]), alopecia (150 [37%] vs eight [4%]), fatigue (147 [36%] vs 52 [27%]), diarrhoea (109 [27%] vs 105 [54%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (seven [2%] vs 100 [51%]). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 213 (53%) patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan versus 86 (44%) receiving treatment of physician's choice; whereas drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 42 (10%; including two grade 5 death events) versus one (<1%).

INTERPRETATION

DESTINY-Breast02 shows the favourable benefit-risk profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer, as previously reported in DESTINY-Breast01, and is the first randomised study to show that one antibody-drug conjugate can overcome resistance to a previous one.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Age-related changes in vitamin D metabolism and vitamin D receptor expression in equine alveolar macrophages: a preliminary study

The vitamin D receptor (VDR)-vitamin D axis modulates pulmonary immunity in people but its role in equine immunity is unknown. Bacterial pneumonia causes high morbidity/mortality in foals and alveolar macrophages (AMφ) are important for pulmonary defenses. Age-related variations in vitamin D-mediated function of AMφ might contribute to the foal's susceptibility to pneumonia. Our aim was to assess the impact of age on equine vitamin D metabolism and VDR expression in AMφ. AMφ and plasma was collected from healthy foals (2, 4 and 8 weeks old) and adult horses (once). AMφ VDR expression was determined via RT-qPCR and plasma vitamin D metabolites quantified via immunoassays. Data were analyzed with linear mixed models. Inactive-vitamin D metabolite concentrations were lowest in foals at 2 weeks and lower at 2 and 4 weeks compared to adults (P < 0.001). Active-vitamin D metabolite concentrations were higher in foals than adults (P < 0.05). VDR expression was detected in AMφ in all animals and was highest in 2-week-old foals. Vitamin D metabolism and AMφ VDR expression are impacted by age in horses. This may have immunological consequences in foals given the key role that the VDR-vitamin D axis has in pulmonary immunity in other species.

Abstract GS2-02: GS2-02 Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Updated survival results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved in the United States and European Union for use in patients (pts) with HER2+ unresectable/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after ≥1 prior anti–HER2 regimen(s). Approval was based on the randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 DESTINY-Breast03 study (NCT03529110), in which T-DXd demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). At the primary interim analysis (data cutoff May 21, 2021), the risk of disease progression or death was reduced by 72% with T-DXd (P &lt; 0.001; Cortes et al. N Engl J Med 2022). Overall survival (OS) data were immature for both treatment groups; although the prespecified cutoff for significance was not reached (NR), a trend toward benefit with T-DXd was observed. With further follow-up, we report results from the prespecified OS analysis of DESTINY-Breast03 (data cutoff July 25, 2022), including updated efficacy and safety.

Methods: Pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane in either the metastatic setting or (neo)adjuvant setting with progression within 6 mo of therapy, who could have received pertuzumab, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg Q3W until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). The key secondary endpoint was OS (80% powered at 2-sided significance level of 5%); other secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), PFS based on investigator assessment, and safety.

Results: 524 pts received either T-DXd (n = 261) or T-DM1 (n = 263). As of the updated data cutoff, median duration of study follow-up was 28.4 mo (range, 0.0-46.9 mo) for T-DXd and 26.5 mo (range, 0.0-45.0 mo) for T-DM1. Median treatment duration was 18.2 mo (range, 0.7-44.0 mo) for T DXd and 6.9 mo (range, 0.7-39.3 mo) for T-DM1. The risk of death was reduced by 36% (HR, 0.64; P = 0.0037) with T-DXd; median OS (mOS) was NR (95% CI, 40.5 mo-not evaluable [NE]), with 72 (27.6%) OS events, for T-DXd vs NR (95% CI, 34.0 mo-NE), with 97 (36.9%) OS events, for T-DM1. Landmark 12-mo OS rate was 94.1% (95% CI, 90.4-96.4) for T-DXd vs 86.0% (95% CI, 81.1-89.8) for T-DM1; 24-mo OS rate was 77.4% (95% CI, 71.7-82.1) for T-DXd vs 69.9% (95% CI, 63.7-75.2) for T-DM1. The P value for OS crossed the prespecified boundary (P = 0.013) and was statistically significant. mPFS by BICR was 28.8 mo (95% CI, 22.4-37.9 mo) with T-DXd, compared with 6.8 mo (95% CI, 5.6-8.2 mo) with T-DM1; HR, 0.33; nominal P &lt; 0.000001. Key efficacy and safety results are shown in the table. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 56.4% of T-DXd-treated pts and 51.7% of T DM1-treated pts. Drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, as evaluated by an independent adjudication committee, was experienced by 39 pts (15.2%) in the T-DXd arm and 8 pts (3.1%) in the T DM1 arm; no adjudicated drug-related grade 4 or 5 events were observed in pts who received T-DXd.

Conclusions: Updated results confirm the superiority of T-DXd compared with T-DM1 for pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with an anti-HER2 therapy, with highly clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit in OS and PFS and a manageable safety profile with longer treatment duration.

Editorial Acknowledgment

Under the guidance of authors, assistance in medical writing and editorial support was provided by Laura Halvorson, PhD, and Rachel Hood, PhD, of ApotheCom, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo.

Funding

This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Table. Summary of Efficacy Results for T-DXd and T-DM1

Citation Format: Sara Hurvitz, Roberto Hegg, Wei-Pang Chung, Seock-Ah Im, William Jacot, Vinod Ganju, Joanne Win Yang Chiu, Binghe Xu, Erika Hamilton, Srinivasan Madhusudan, Hiroji Iwata, Sevilay Altintas, Jan-Willem Henning, Giuseppe Curigliano, José Manuel Pérez-García, Anton Egorov, Yali Liu, Jillian Cathcart, Shahid Ashfaque, Javier Cortés. GS2-02 Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Updated survival results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-02.

Abstract GS2-01: GS2-01 Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician’s choice in patients with HER2+ unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: primary results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast02

In DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) and DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated unprecedented activity in patients (pts) with HER2+ (immunohistochemistry 3+; immunohistochemistry 2+/in situ hybridization+) advanced metastatic breast cancer (mBC), leading to regulatory approvals in several countries for HER2+ unresectable/mBC after a prior anti–HER2-based regimen. DESTINY-Breast02 (NCT03523585) is a phase 3 trial of T-DXd vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). It acts as a confirmatory study for the pivotal phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial. Here we report the primary results of DESTINY-Breast02.

Methods: Pts with HER2+ mBC were randomized 2:1 to receive T-DXd or TPC (trastuzumab + capecitabine or lapatinib + capecitabine) and stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status (HR+/HR-), prior pertuzumab treatment, and history of visceral disease. The primary endpoint of this time-driven primary analysis was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR). The powered secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR, duration of response (DoR) by BICR, PFS by investigator assessment, safety, and others.

Results: 608 pts were randomized to receive T-DXd (n = 406) or TPC (n = 202). Pts receiving T-DXd and TPC had a median age of 54.2 years (range, 22.4-88.5 years) and 54.7 years (range, 24.7-86.5 years), respectively, with a median of 2 (range, 0-10 and range,1-8) prior lines of systemic therapy (excluding hormone therapy) in the metastatic setting. Median treatment duration was 11.3 mo in the T-DXd arm and ~4.5 mo in the TPC arm. Efficacy and safety results are shown in the table below. T-DXd significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.28-0.45; P &lt;0.000001) and OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.86; P = 0.0021) compared with TPC. Confirmed ORR was 69.7% (14% complete response) with T-DXd and 29.2% (5.0% complete response) with TPC. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 52.7% and 44.1% of pts receiving T-DXd and TPC, respectively. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurred in 10.4% of pts with T-DXd vs 0.5% of pts with TPC. In pts receiving T-DXd, most ILD cases (88.1%) were grade 1/2 and grade 5 ILD was reported in 2 (0.5%) pts.

Conclusions: Results from DESTINY-Breast02 confirmed the clinical benefit and superiority of T-DXd over conventional chemotherapy-based regimens in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with T-DM1, as evidenced by significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and OS. These data, together with earlier reported results from the DESTINY-Breast03 study of T-DXd vs T-DM1 solidify T-DXd as an optimal treatment option in pts with progressive HER2+ mBC across broad settings.

Editorial Acknowledgment

Under guidance of the authors, assistance in medical writing and editorial support was provided by Caylin Bosch, PhD, of ApotheCom, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo.

Funding

This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Table. Summary of Efficacy and Safety Results for T-DXd and TPC in Patients With HER2+ mBC Previously Treated With T-DM1

Citation Format: Ian Krop, Yeon H. Park, Sung-Bae Kim, Giuliano Borges, Sercan Aksoy, Joaquin Gavila Gregori, Rebecca Roylance, Elgene Lim, Rinat Yerushalmi, Flora Zagouri, Francois P. Duhoux, Tanja Fehm, Toshimi Takano, Anton Egorov, Iris Wu, Jillian Cathcart, Changan Chu, Fabrice Andre. GS2-01 Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician’s choice in patients with HER2+ unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: primary results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast02 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-01.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

An improvement in progression-free survival was shown with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the progression-free survival interim analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial. The aim of DESTINY-Breast03 was to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done in 169 study centres in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia, and South America. Eligible patients were aged 18 or older, had HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg or trastuzumab emtansine 3·6 mg/kg, both administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by hormone receptor status, previous treatment with pertuzumab, and history of visceral disease, and was managed through an interactive web-based system. Within each stratum, balanced block randomisation was used with a block size of four. Patients and investigators were not masked to the treatment received. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival and this prespecified second overall survival interim analysis reports updated overall survival, efficacy, and safety results. Efficacy analyses were performed using the full analysis set. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03529110.

FINDINGS

Between July 20, 2018, and June 23, 2020, 699 patients were screened for eligibility, 524 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=261) or trastuzumab emtansine (n=263). Median duration of study follow-up was 28·4 months (IQR 22·1-32·9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 26·5 months (14·5-31·3) with trastuzumab emtansine. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 28·8 months (95% CI 22·4-37·9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 6·8 months (5·6-8·2) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio [HR] 0·33 [95% CI 0·26-0·43]; nominal p<0·0001). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 40·5 months-not estimable), with 72 (28%) overall survival events, in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and was not reached (34·0 months-not estimable), with 97 (37%) overall survival events, in the trastuzumab emtansine group (HR 0·64; 95% CI 0·47-0·87]; p=0·0037). The number of grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine (145 [56%] patients versus 135 [52%] patients). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 39 (15%) patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan and eight (3%) patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine, with no grade 4 or 5 events in either group.

INTERPRETATION

Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed a significant improvement in overall survival versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as well as the longest reported median progression-free survival, reaffirming trastuzumab deruxtecan as the standard of care in the second-line setting. A manageable safety profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan was confirmed with longer treatment duration.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A DESTINY-Breast01 Subgroup Analysis

DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We present a subgroup of 24 patients with a history of treated brain metastases (BM), a population with limited treatment options. In patients with BMs, the confirmed objective response rate (cORR) was 58.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.6%-77.9%], and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 18.1 months (95% CI, 6.7-18.1 months). In patients without BMs (n = 160), cORR was 61.3% and mPFS was 16.4 months. Eight patients (47.1%) experienced a best overall intracranial response of partial response or complete response. Seven patients (41.2%) had a best percentage change in brain lesion diameter from baseline consistent with stable disease. Two patients (8.3%) with BMs and two (1.3%) without BMs experienced progression in the brain. The safety profile of T-DXd was consistent with previous studies. The durable clinical activity of T-DXd in this population warrants further investigation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Advances in treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have greatly improved patient outcomes, but intracranial progression remains an important risk for which few therapeutic options are currently available. T-DXd demonstrated durable efficacy in patients with stable, treated BMs. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2711.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with HER2-positive (HER2+) unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer (mBC): Safety follow-up of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03

1000

Background: In the DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110) primary analysis (data cutoff [DCO], May 21, 2021), T-DXd showed superiority over T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ mBC, with a significant improvement of progression-free survival by blinded independent central review (HR, 0.284; 95% CI, 0.217-0.373; P < 0.001), and a safety profile consistent with prior studies. This analysis provides updated safety data with longer follow-up. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to T-DXd or T-DM1. Prespecified safety analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was conducted; endpoints included time to event, duration of event, and resolution. Results: At DCO (September 7, 2021), 116 (45.1%) pts vs 39 (14.9%) pts remained on treatment in the T-DXd vs T-DM1 arms; median treatment duration was 16.1 mo (range, 0.7-33.0) for T-DXd vs 6.9 mo (range, 0.7-28.5) for T-DM1. Any-grade (G), G≥3, and serious AE (SAE) rates were similar for T-DXd vs T-DM1 (99.6% vs 95.4%; 53.3% vs 49.8%; and 21.0% vs 19.2%), while exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs; per pt-year) for G≥3 and SAEs were lower for T-DXd vs T-DM1 (0.42 vs 0.70 and 0.17 vs 0.27). Median time to TEAE associated with drug discontinuation or dose reduction was longer with T-DXd vs T-DM1 (224.0 vs 147.0 d and 96.0 v 19.0 d, respectively). Most TEAEs in ≥20% of pts were hematologic or gastrointestinal. Median time to first onset of select any-G TEAEs was 70.0 vs 42.0 d for anemia, 196.0 vs 168.0 d for lymphopenia, 132.0 vs 8.0 d for thrombocytopenia, 22.0 vs 24.0 d for fatigue, 74.5 vs 92.0 d for leukopenia, and 64.0 vs 105.0 d for neutropenia, with T-DXd vs T-DM1, respectively. In both arms, most nausea and vomiting events were G1/2; while G≥3 events with T-DXd vs T-DM1 were 6.6% vs 0.4% for nausea and 1.6% vs 0.8% for vomiting, respectively. Rates of nausea, vomiting, and alopecia were highest in cycle 1 and lower in subsequent cycles for T-DXd. Rates of hematologic events were generally lower in earlier cycles vs cycle ≥8 in both arms. Rates of adjudicated, drug-related ILD/pneumonitis were 10.9% (1 G2 event since previous DCO) with T-DXd vs 1.9% with T-DM1, with no G4/5 events. Median time to first adjudicated, drug-related ILD/pneumonitis event was 5.9 vs 9.5 mo for T-DXd vs T-DM1, respectively; at DCO, most events resolved (57.1% vs 80.0%), and follow-up is ongoing. Conclusions: In this updated safety analysis, T-DXd demonstrated a tolerable safety profile consistent with prior studies. Despite longer treatment duration with T-DXd, EAIRs of G≥3 and SAEs were lower for T-DXd vs T-DM1. Rates of ILD/pneumonitis for T-DXd were similar to those in the previous DCO. Nausea, vomiting, and alopecia rates decreased over time. This longer safety update reinforces the consistent safety profile of T-DXd, supporting the clinical benefit of T-DXd over T-DM1 in patients with HER2+ mBC. Clinical trial information: NCT03529110.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab emtansine is the current standard treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer whose disease progresses after treatment with a combination of anti-HER2 antibodies and a taxane.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (a HER2 antibody-drug conjugate) with those of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. The primary end point was progression-free survival (as determined by blinded independent central review); secondary end points included overall survival, objective response, and safety.

RESULTS

Among 524 randomly assigned patients, the percentage of those who were alive without disease progression at 12 months was 75.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.8 to 80.7) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 34.1% (95% CI, 27.7 to 40.5) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.37; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive at 12 months was 94.1% (95% CI, 90.3 to 96.4) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 85.9% (95% CI, 80.9 to 89.7) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; prespecified significance boundary not reached). An overall response (a complete or partial response) occurred in 79.7% (95% CI, 74.3 to 84.4) of the patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan and in 34.2% (95% CI, 28.5 to 40.3) of those who received trastuzumab emtansine. The incidence of drug-related adverse events of any grade was 98.1% with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 86.6% with trastuzumab emtansine, and the incidence of drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 45.1% and 39.8%, respectively. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 10.5% of the patients in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and in 1.9% of those in the trastuzumab emtansine group; none of these events were of grade 4 or 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, the risk of disease progression or death was lower among those who received trastuzumab deruxtecan than among those who received trastuzumab emtansine. Treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan was associated with interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; DESTINY-Breast03 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03529110.).

Abstract GS3-01: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) vs. trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC): subgroup analyses from the randomized phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03

Background: T-DXd is a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of pts with advanced HER2+ mBC based on the DESTINY-Breast01 study (NCT03248492). DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110) isa randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study assessing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd vs. T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane. In the primary analysis, T-DXd demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS vs. T-DM1 (Corteset al, ESMO 2021). In this exploratory analysis, we provide additional efficacy and safety data in subgroups, including in pts with brain metastases (BMs). Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd or 3.6 mg/kg T-DM1 Q3W. Pts with clinically stable BMs were eligible. Lesions were measured per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) determined by blinded independent central review (BICR). PFS and overall response rate (ORR) were analyzed for subgroups.Sites of progression and post-end-of-study therapies were also investigated. Results: At data cutoff (May 21, 2021), 524 pts were randomly assigned to T-DXd (n=261) orT-DM1 (n=263). T-DXd demonstrated superior PFS by BICR vs. T-DM1 (HR, 0.28 [95%CI, 0.22-0.37]; P=7.8 x 10-22); median (m) PFS by BICR was not reached (95% CI, 18.5-NE) for T-DXd compared with 6.8 mo (95% CI, 5.6-8.2) forT-DM1. For pts with stable BMs at baseline (n=82), mPFS was 15.0 mo (95% CI,12.5-22.2) for T-DXd vs. 3.0 mo (95% CI, 2.8-5.8) for T-DM1 (HR, 0.25 [95% CI,0.31-0.45)]. Overall, confirmed ORR for T-DXd was 79.7% vs. 34.2% for T-DM1.For patients with stable BMs at baseline, ORR was 67.4% for T-DXd vs. 20.5% forT-DM1. Consistent PFS and ORR benefit was also observed across other subgroups(Table 1). At data cutoff, 84 (32.2%) pts treated with T-DXd had progressive disease (PD) versus 155 (58.9%) with T-DM1. In pts with stable BMs in the T-DXd arm, 48.8% of pts (21/43) had PD. In pts with stable BMs in the T-DM1 arm, 69.2%of pts (27/39) had PD. Data on sites of progression will be presented. Further analyses are underway and will be presented. Overall, the safety profile of T-DXd was manageable and comparable with its known safety profile. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was reported in 27 (10.5%) pts treated with T-DXd and 5 (1.9%) pts treated with T-DM1 overall, with no grade 4 or 5 events. Additional new safety data will be presented. Conclusion: DESTINY-Breast03,the first-reported randomized phase 3 trial comparing T-DXd to standard of care, met the primary endpoint with T-DXd demonstrating superior PFS vs. T-DM1and T-DXd had a manageable safety profile. In this exploratory analysis, consistent PFS and ORR benefit with T-DXd vs. T-DM1 was observed across subgroups in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane, including in pts with BMs.

Table 1.Subgroup Analyses forPFS and ORR of T-DXd versus T-DM1PFS by BICR HR (95% CI)Absolute ORR Difference (T-DXd-T-DM1) (95% CI)All patients (N=524)0.28 (0.22-0.37)45.5 (37.6-53.4)Hormone receptorPositive (n=272)0.32 (0.22-0.46)47.3 (36.1-58.4)Negative (n=248)0.30 (0.20-0.44)43.2 (31.5-55.0)Prior pertuzumabYes (n=320)0.31 (0.22-0.43)46.7 (36.5-56.9)No (n=204)0.30 (0.19-0.47)43.6 (30.5-56.7)Prior lines of therapya0-1 (n=258)0.33 (0.23-0.48)39.3 (27.3-51.2)≥2 (n=266)0.28 (0.19-0.41)51.6 (40.9-62.4)Visceral disease Yes (n=384)0.28 (0.21-0.38)48.3 (39.1-57.6)No (n=140)0.32 (0.17-0.58)39.1 (23.6-54.6)Brain metastases at baseline Yes (n=82)0.25 (0.13-0.45)46.9 (25.6-68.3)No (n=442)0.30 (0.22-0.40)45.5 (36.9-54.1)

Citation Format: Sara Hurvitz, Sung-Bae Kim, Wei-Pang Chung, Seock-Ah Im, Yeon Hee Park, Roberto Hegg, Min-Hwan Kim, Ling-Ming Tseng, Vanessa Petry, Chi-Feng Chung, Hiroji Iwata, Erika Hamilton, Giuseppe Curigliano, Binghe Xu, Caleb Lee, Yali Liu, Jillian Cathcart, Emarjola Bako, Sunil Verma, Javier Cortés. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201a) vs. trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC): subgroup analyses from the randomized phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-01.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases: A subgroup analysis of the DESTINY-Breast01 trial

526

Background: Patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are at high risk of developing brain metastases (BMs), and treatment options are limited once BMs occur. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. On the basis of findings of the phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial (NCT03248492), T-DXd was approved for the treatment of adult pts with HER2+ unresectable or mBC who have received ≥2 prior anti-HER2–based regimens (US and Europe) or had prior chemotherapy and are refractory to or intolerant of standard treatments (Japan). Here we describe a subgroup analysis from DESTINY-Breast01 in pts with a history of BMs. Methods: DESTINY-Breast01 is an ongoing, 2-part, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial of T-DXd in adult pts with HER2+ unresectable or mBC previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine. Pts with baseline BMs that were treated, asymptomatic, and did not require therapy to control symptoms were eligible for enrollment. All treatment to control symptoms had to be completed ≥60 days before randomization. An MRI of the brain every 6 wks was only required for pts with BMs at baseline. Brain lesions were considered non-target lesions, and thus collection of diameter measurements was not required. This analysis includes pts with a history of BMs at baseline who received T-DXd at the approved dose of 5.4 mg/kg every 3 wks. Results: Twenty-four pts with a history of BMs were included (data cutoff, August 1, 2019). In these pts, the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median duration of response (mDoR) per independent central review with T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg were 58.3% (95% CI, 36.6%-77.9%), 18.1 mo (95% CI, 6.7-18.1 mo), and 16.9 mo (95% CI, 5.7-16.9 mo), respectively, and were comparable to those in the total pt population (N = 184) treated at 5.4 mg/kg in the DESTINY-Breast01 study (ORR, 60.9%; mPFS, 16.4 mo; mDoR, 14.8 mo; median follow-up, 11.1 mo). The pattern of disease progression was similar in pts with and without BMs with 8 of 24 pts having progressed (33%; 2 in the brain) in the BMs subgroup and 40 of 160 pts (25%; 2 in the brain) in the non-BMs subgroup, suggesting durable systemic disease control. Baseline diameters of BMs were available for 14 of 24 pts (radiotherapy prior to study enrollment was reported in 12 of 14). Among the pts with information available on baseline BM diameter, the central nervous system response rate per investigators was 50% (7 of 14 pts). Conclusions: T-DXd showed strong clinical activity in both the overall population of pts with HER2+ mBC and the subgroup of pts with BMs. The demonstrable response of BMs to treatment and durable clinical activity of T-DXd in pts with a history of BMs at baseline are promising and warrant further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03248492.

Hypoxia promotes colon cancer dissemination through up-regulation of cell migration-inducing protein (CEMIP)

Hypoxic stress drives cancer progression by causing a transcriptional reprogramming. Recently, KIAA1199 was discovered to be a cell-migration inducing protein (renamed CEMIP) that is upregulated in human cancers. However, the mechanism of induction of CEMIP in cancer was hitherto unknown. Here we demonstrate that hypoxia induces CEMIP expression leading to enhanced cell migration. Immunohistochemistry of human colon cancer tissues revealed that CEMIP is upregulated in cancer cells located at the invasive front or in the submucosa. CEMIP localization inversely correlated with E-cadherin expression, which is characteristic of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Mechanistically, hypoxia-inducible-factor-2α (HIF-2α), but not HIF-1α binds directly to the hypoxia response element within the CEMIP promoter region resulting in increased CEMIP expression. Functional characterization reveals that CEMIP is a downstream effector of HIF-2α-mediated cell migration. Expression of CEMIP was demonstrated to negatively correlate with the expression of Jarid1A, a histone demethylase that removes methyl groups from H3K4me3 (an activation marker for transcription), resulting in altered gene repression. Low oxygen tension inhibits the function of Jarid1A, leading to increased presence of H3K4me3 within the CEMIP promoter. These results provide insight into the upregulation of CEMIP within cancer and can lead to novel treatment strategies targeting this cancer cell migration-promoting gene.

Assessment of Matrix Metalloproteinases by Gelatin Zymography

Matrix metalloproteinases are endopeptidases responsible for remodeling of the extracellular matrix and have been identified as critical contributors to breast cancer progression. Gelatin zymography is a valuable tool which allows the analysis of MMP expression. In this approach, enzymes are resolved electrophoretically on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel copolymerized with the substrate for the MMP of interest. Post electrophoresis, the enzymes are refolded in order for proteolysis of the incorporated substrate to occur. This assay yields valuable information about MMP isoforms or changes in activation and can be used to analyze the role of MMPs in normal versus pathological conditions.