1
|
Mani V, Pomer A, Madsen C, Coles CL, Schoenfeld AJ, Weissman JS, Koehlmoos TP. Filling the Gaps in the Pandemic Response: Impact of COVID-19 on Telehealth in the Military Health System. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:1443-1449. [PMID: 38126844 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth use became widespread, allowing for continued health care while minimizing COVID-19 transmission risk for patients and providers. This rapid scale-up highlighted shortcomings of the current telehealth infrastructure in many health systems. We aimed to identify and address gaps in the United States Military Health System (MHS) response to the COVID-19 pandemic related to the implementation and utilization of telehealth. Methods: We conducted semistructured key informant interviews of MHS stakeholders, including policymakers, program managers, and health care providers. We recruited respondents using purposive and snowball sampling until we reached thematic saturation. Interviews were conducted virtually from December 2022 to March 2023 and coded by deductive thematic analysis using NVivo. Results: We interviewed 28 key informants. Several themes emerged from the interviews and were categorized into four defined areas of obstacles to the effective utilization of telehealth: administrative, technical, organizational, and quality issues. While respondents had positive perceptions of telehealth, issues such as billing, licensure portability, network connectivity and technology, and ability to monitor health outcomes represent major barriers in the current system, preventing the potential for further expansion. Conclusions: While the shift to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated robust potential within the MHS, it highlighted shortcomings that impair the utility and expansion of telehealth on a level comparable to that of other large health systems. Future focus should be directed toward generating and implementing actionable recommendations that target these identified challenges in the MHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivitha Mani
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alysa Pomer
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cathaleen Madsen
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christian L Coles
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tracey Pèrez Koehlmoos
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah SK, Xiang L, Manful A, Shah MM, Sharma G, Adler RR, Weissman JS. Development and evaluation of a list of high-risk inpatient procedures in patients 65 years and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:837-841. [PMID: 37991048 PMCID: PMC10947941 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inpatient procedures are common and important health events for older Americans. To facilitate surgical outcomes research, we sought to create and evaluate lists of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for high-risk inpatient procedures, defined as having at least a 1% inpatient mortality. METHODS This retrospective national cohort study analyzes Medicare claims from 2018 for patients 65 years and older undergoing inpatient procedures. Surgical Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) codes in the inpatient claims were used to identify procedures. We identified the primary ICD-10 procedure code for each patient and then compiled all codes with at least a 1% inpatient mortality yielding three separate lists: one list that was blind to elective versus urgent/emergent status, and one each for urgent/emergent and elective procedures. Clinical review by three surgeons was used to remove procedures unlikely to be the proximate cause of mortality. For evaluation, we examined the mortality of each code among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2017, 2019, and 2020 to determine how many of these satisfied the 1% mortality criterion. RESULTS This study included 2,241,419 patients from 2018 undergoing inpatient procedures. The final result included 231 (blind to elective vs urgent/emergent status), 167 (urgent/emergent status), and 119 (elective status) ICD-10 procedure codes for the three lists. Our evaluation from 2017, 2019, and 2020 demonstrated that in our master list, which was blind to elective versus urgent/emergent status, 97.8% of procedures had an inpatient mortality of at least 1%. In our high-risk procedures lists for urgent/emergent and elective procedures, 100% and 94.1% of codes met this requirement. CONCLUSIONS We developed and evaluated lists of ICD-10 codes representing high-risk procedures in patients 65 years and older. These lists will be powerful tools for researchers studying surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir K Shah
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Lingwei Xiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adoma Manful
- School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mihir M Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gaurav Sharma
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Rachel R Adler
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jarman MP, Jin G, Chen A, Losina E, Weissman JS, Berry SD, Salim A. Short-term outcomes of prehospital opioid pain management for older adults with fall-related injury. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024. [PMID: 38418369 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids are recommended for pain management in patients being cared for and transported by emergency medical services, but no specific guidelines exist for older adults with fall-related injury. Prior research suggests prehospital opioid administration can effectively manage pain in older adults, but less is known about safety in this population. We compared short-term safety outcomes, including delirium, disposition, and length of stay, among older adults with fall-related injury according to whether they received prehospital opioid analgesia. METHODS We linked Medicare claims data with prehospital patient care reports for older adults (≥65) with fall-related injury in Illinois between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. We used weighted regression models (logistic, multinomial logistic, and Poisson) to assess the association between prehospital opioid analgesia and incidence of inpatient delirium, hospital disposition, and length of stay. RESULTS Of 28,150 included older adults, 3% received prehospital opioids. Patients receiving prehospital opioids (vs. no prehospital opioids) were less likely to be discharged home from the emergency department (adjusted probability = 0.30 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.34] vs. 0.47 [95% CI: 0.46, 0.48]), more likely to be discharged to a non-home setting after an inpatient admission (adjusted probability = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.48] vs. 0.30 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.31]), had inpatient length of stay 0.4 days shorter (p < 0.001) and ICU length of stay 0.7 days shorter (p = 0.045). Incidence of delirium did not vary between treatment and control groups. CONCLUSIONS Few older adults receive opioid analgesia in the prehospital setting. Prehospital opioid analgesia may be associated with hospital disposition and length of stay for older adults with fall-related injury. However, our findings do not provide evidence of an association with inpatient delirium. These findings should be considered when developing guidelines for prehospital pain management specific to the older adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly P Jarman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ginger Jin
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Annie Chen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elena Losina
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Orthopaedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah D Berry
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Department of Medicine, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ali Salim
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Woemn's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koehlmoos TP, Madsen C, Banaag A, Mitro JP, Schoenfeld AJ, Learn PA, Cooper Z, Weissman JS. The Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-induced Demand Collaboration Project: A Pioneering Military-Civilian Academic Partnership to Build Health Services Research Capacity for the Military Health System. Mil Med 2024; 189:e871-e877. [PMID: 37656504 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Like civilian health systems, the United States Military Health System (MHS) confronts challenges in achieving the aims of reducing cost, and improving quality, access, and safety, but historically has lacked coordinated health services research (HSR) capabilities that enabled knowledge translation and iterative learning from its wealth of data. A military-civilian academic partnership called the Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-Induced Demand Collaboration (EPIC), formed in 2011, demonstrated early proof-of-concept in using the MHS claims database for research focused on drivers of variation in health care. This existing partnership was reorganized in 2015 and its topics expanded to meet the need for HSR in support of emerging priorities and to develop current and HSR capacity within the MHS. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Donabedian framework of structure, process, and outcomes was applied to support the project, through a core of principal investigators, researchers, analysts, and administrators. Within this framework, new researchers and student trainees learn foundations of HSR while performing secondary analysis of claims data from the MHS Data Repository (MDR) focusing on Health and Readiness, Pediatrics, Policy, Surgery, Trauma, and Women's Health. RESULTS Since 2015, the project has trained 25 faculty, staff, and providers; 51 students and residents; 21 research fellows across multiple disciplines; and as of 2022, produced 107 peer-reviewed publications and 130 conference presentations, across all five themes and six cores. Research results have been incorporated into Federal and professional policy guidelines. Major research areas include opioid usage and prescribing, value-based care, and racial disparities. EPIC researchers provide direct support to MHS leaders and enabling expertise to clinical providers. CONCLUSIONS EPIC, through its Donabedian framework and utilization of the MHS Data Repository as a research tool, generates actionable findings and builds capacity for continued HSR across the MHS. Eight years after its reorganization in 2015, EPIC continues to provide a platform for capacity building and knowledge translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Cathaleen Madsen
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Amanda Banaag
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Jessica Pope Mitro
- Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Peter A Learn
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gikandi A, Hallet J, Koerkamp BG, Clark CJ, Lillemoe KD, Narayan RR, Mamon HJ, Zenati MA, Wasif N, Safran DG, Besselink MG, Chang DC, Traeger LN, Weissman JS, Fong ZV. Distinguishing Clinical from Statistical Significances in Contemporary Comparative Effectiveness Research. Ann Surg 2024:00000658-990000000-00793. [PMID: 38390761 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of clinical significance reporting in contemporary comparative effectiveness research (CER). BACKGROUND In CER, a statistically significant difference between study groups may or may not be clinically significant. Misinterpreting statistically significant results could lead to inappropriate recommendations that increase healthcare costs and treatment toxicity. METHODS CER studies from 2022 issues of Annals of Surgery, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Surgical Research, and Journal of the American College of Surgeons were systematically reviewed by two different investigators. The primary outcome of interest was whether authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in the Methods. RESULTS Of 307 reviewed studies, 162 were clinical trials and 145 were observational studies. Authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in 26 studies (8.5%). Clinical significance was defined using clinically validated standards in 25 studies and subjectively in 1 study. Seven studies (2.3%) recommended a change in clinical decision-making, all with primary outcomes achieving statistical significance. Five (71.4%) of these studies did not have clinical significance defined in their methods. In randomized controlled trials with statistically significant results, sample size was inversely correlated with effect size (r=-0.30, P=0.038). CONCLUSION In contemporary CER, most authors do not specify what they consider to be a clinically significant difference in study outcome. Most studies recommending a change in clinical-decision making did so based on statistical significance alone, and clinical significance was usually defined with clinically validated standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Clancy J Clark
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Raja R Narayan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Marco A Zenati
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nabil Wasif
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Dana Gelb Safran
- National Quality Forum, Washington, DC Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | | | - David C Chang
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lara N Traeger
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zhi Ven Fong
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pomer A, Munigala S, Coles CL, Mitro JP, Schoenfeld AJ, Weissman JS, Koehlmoos TP. Correction: The response of the Military Health System (MHS) to the COVID-19 pandemic: a summary of findings from MHS reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:18. [PMID: 38291437 PMCID: PMC10826231 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01109-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alysa Pomer
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
| | - Satish Munigala
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christian L Coles
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jessica Pope Mitro
- Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pomer A, Munigala S, Coles CL, Mitro JP, Schoenfeld AJ, Weissman JS, Koehlmoos TP. The response of the Military Health System (MHS) to the COVID-19 pandemic: a summary of findings from MHS reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:5. [PMID: 38191494 PMCID: PMC10773054 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01093-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused major disruptions to the US Military Health System (MHS). In this study, we evaluated the MHS response to the pandemic to understand the impact of the pandemic response in a large, national, integrated healthcare system providing care for ~ 9 million beneficiaries. METHODS We performed a narrative literature review of 16 internal Department of Defense (DoD) reports, including reviews mandated by the US Congress in response to the pandemic. We categorized the findings using the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework developed by the DoD to assess system efficiency and effectiveness. RESULTS The majority of the findings were in the policy, organization, and personnel categories. Key findings showed that the MHS structure to address surge situations was beneficial during the pandemic response, and the rapid growth of telehealth created the potential impact for improved access to routine and specialized care. However, organizational transition contributed to miscommunication and uneven implementation of policies; disruptions affected clinical training, upskilling, and the supply chain; and staffing shortages contributed to burnout among healthcare workers. CONCLUSION Given its highly integrated, vertical structure, the MHS was in a better position than many civilian healthcare networks to respond efficiently to the pandemic. However, similar to the US civilian sector, the MHS also experienced delays in care, staffing and materiel challenges, and a rapid switch to telehealth. Lessons regarding the importance of communication and preparation for future public health emergency responses are relevant to civilian healthcare systems responding to COVID-19 and other similar public health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alysa Pomer
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, United States of America.
| | - Satish Munigala
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Christian L Coles
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
- Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Jessica Pope Mitro
- Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, United States of America
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
- Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Jager E, Levine AA, Sidey-Gibbons CJ, Udyavar NR, Liu C, Lamaina M, Maggard Gibbons MA, Ko CY, Burstin HR, Haider AH, Hoyt DB, Schoenfeld AJ, Weissman JS, Britt LD. Development and Validation of a Novel Literature-Based Method to Identify Disparity-Sensitive Surgical Quality Metrics. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:856-861. [PMID: 37703495 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparity in surgical care impedes the delivery of uniformly high-quality care. Metrics that quantify disparity in care can help identify areas for needed intervention. A literature-based Disparity-Sensitive Score (DSS) system for surgical care was adapted by the Metrics for Equitable Access and Care in Surgery (MEASUR) group. The alignment between the MEASUR DSS and Delphi ratings of an expert advisory panel (EAP) regarding the disparity sensitivity of surgical quality metrics was assessed. STUDY DESIGN Using DSS criteria MEASUR co-investigators scored 534 surgical metrics which were subsequently rated by the EAP. All scores were converted to a 9-point scale. Agreement between the new measurement technique (ie DSS) and an established subjective technique (ie importance and validity ratings) were assessed using the Bland-Altman method, adjusting for the linear relationship between the paired difference and the paired average. The limit of agreement (LOA) was set at 1.96 SD (95%). RESULTS The percentage of DSS scores inside the LOA was 96.8% (LOA, 0.02 points) for the importance rating and 94.6% (LOA, 1.5 points) for the validity rating. In comparison, 94.4% of the 2 subjective EAP ratings were inside the LOA (0.7 points). CONCLUSIONS Applying the MEASUR DSS criteria using available literature allowed for identification of disparity-sensitive surgical metrics. The results suggest that this literature-based method of selecting quality metrics may be comparable to more complex consensus-based Delphi methods. In fields with robust literature, literature-based composite scores may be used to select quality metrics rather than assembling consensus panels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elzerie de Jager
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Adele A Levine
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Chris J Sidey-Gibbons
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - N Rhea Udyavar
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Charles Liu
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Margherita Lamaina
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Melinda A Maggard Gibbons
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Helen R Burstin
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Adil H Haider
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - David B Hoyt
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - Joel S Weissman
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| | - L D Britt
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (de Jager, Levine, Udyavar, Haider, Schoenfeld, Weissman)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weissman JS, Adler RR, Betancourt J, Tan-McGrory A, Lewis JA, DesRoches CM, Pomer A, Singh E, Liebig A, Ilkhani S, Diviti S. How Hospitals Are Addressing The Effects Of Racism: A Mixed-Methods Study Of Hospital Equity Officers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2023; 42:1402-1410. [PMID: 37782867 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Hospital equity officers have become critical leaders in the effort to address the determinants of health care disparities, including structural racism. In this mixed-methods study, we surveyed a national sample of equity officers and interviewed a subset of respondents to provide additional perspective. About one-half of survey respondents reported at least some obstacles to achieving their health equity objectives, including racist beliefs among people working in their hospitals and health care systems, policies that perpetuate racism, and a lack of staff diversity. To address these challenges, some hospitals are collecting information about instances of racism, reviewing clinical algorithms for evidence of bias, or forming community partnerships. However, in interviews, equity officers pointed out that racism is a public health issue that cannot be adequately addressed solely within the health care system. Given the relative newness of most hospital equity officer positions, our research may be viewed as an early glimpse into the challenges and opportunities of this evolving work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel S Weissman
- Joel S. Weissman , Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel R Adler
- Rachel R. Adler, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University
| | | | - Aswita Tan-McGrory
- Aswita Tan-McGrory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joy A Lewis
- Joy A. Lewis, American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Catherine M DesRoches
- Catherine M. DesRoches, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alysa Pomer
- Alysa Pomer, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Frego N, Labban M, Stone BV, Koelker M, Alkhatib K, Lughezzani G, Buffi NM, Lipsitz SR, Weissman JS, Fletcher SA, Kibel AS, Trinh QD, Cole AP. Effect of type of definitive treatment on race-based differences in prostate cancer-specific survival. Prostate 2023. [PMID: 37150867 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic disparities in prostate cancer (PCa) mortality are partially mediated by inequities in quality of care. Intermediate- and high-risk PCa can be treated with either surgery or radiation, therefore we designed a study to assess the magnitude of race-based differences in cancer-specific survival between these two treatment modalities. METHODS Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) men with localized intermediate- and high-risk PCa, treated with surgery or radiation between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were included in the study and followed until December 2018. Unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses were employed to compare cancer-specific survival by race and treatment modality. A model with an interaction term between race and treatment was used to assess whether the type of treatment amplified or attenuated the effect of race/ethnicity on prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). RESULTS 15,178 (20.1%) NHB and 60,225 (79.9%) NHW men were included in the study. NHB men had a higher cumulative incidence of PCSM (p = 0.005) and were significantly more likely to be treated with radiation than NHW men (aOR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.81-1.97, p < 0.001). In the adjusted models, NHB men were significantly more likely to die from PCa compared with NHW men (aHR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03-1.35, p = 0.014), and radiation was associated with a significantly higher odds of PCSM (aHR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.85-2.38, p < 0.001) compared with surgery. Finally, the interaction between race and treatment on PCSM was not significant, meaning that no race-based differences in PCSM were found within each treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS NHB men with intermediate- and high-risk PCa had a higher rate of PCSM than NWH men in a large national cancer registry, though NHB and NHW men managed with the same treatment achieved similar PCa survival outcomes. The higher tendency for NHB men to receive radiation was similar in magnitude to the difference in cancer survival between racial and ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Frego
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin V Stone
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mara Koelker
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Khalid Alkhatib
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Nicolò M Buffi
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sean A Fletcher
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tjia J, D’Arcangelo N, Carlston D, Bronzi O, Gazarian P, Reich A, Porteny T, Gonzales K, Perez S, Weissman JS, Ladin K. US clinicians' perspectives on advance care planning for persons with dementia: A qualitative study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:1473-1484. [PMID: 36547969 PMCID: PMC10175113 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although advance care planning (ACP) for persons with dementia (PWD) can promote patient-centered care by aligning future healthcare with patient values, few PWD have documented ACPs for reasons incompletely understood. The objective of this paper is to characterize the perceived value of, barriers to, and successful strategies for completing ACP for PWD as reported by frontline clinicians. METHODS Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews (August 2018-December 2019) with clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, social workers) at 11 US health systems. Interviews asked clinicians about their approaches to ACP with PWDs, including how ACP was initiated, what was discussed, how carepartners were involved, how decision-making was approached, and how decision-making capacity was assessed. RESULTS Of 75 participating generalist and specialty clinicians from across the United States, 61% reported conducting ACP with PWD, of whom 19% conducted ACP as early as possible with PWD. Three themes emerged: value of early ACP preserves PWD's autonomy in cases of differing PWD carepartner values, acute medical crises, and clinician paternalism; barriers to ACP with PWD including the dynamic and subjective assessment of patient decision-making capacity, inconsistent awareness of cognitive impairment by clinicians, and the need to balance patient and family carepartner involvement; and strategies to support ACP include clarifying clinicians' roles in ACP, standardizing clinicians' approach to PWD and their carepartners, and making time for ACP and decision-making assessments that allow PWD and carepartner involvement regardless of the patients' capacity. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians found early ACP for PWD valuable in promoting patient-centered care among an at-risk population. In sharing their perspectives on conducting ACP for PWD, clinicians described challenges that are amenable to changes in training, workflow, and material support for clinician time. Clinical practices need sustainable scheduling and financial support models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Tjia
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Noah D’Arcangelo
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA
| | - Daniel Carlston
- Columbia Law School, New York, NY
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, MA
| | - Olivia Bronzi
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA
| | - Priscilla Gazarian
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, MA
| | - Amanda Reich
- Center for Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Thalia Porteny
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Kristina Gonzales
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA
| | - Stephen Perez
- Center for Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clark CJ, Adler R, Xiang L, Shah SK, Cooper Z, Kim DH, Lin KJ, Hsu J, Lipsitz S, Weissman JS. Outcomes for patients with dementia undergoing emergency and elective colorectal surgery: A large multi-institutional comparative cohort study. Am J Surg 2023:S0002-9610(23)00108-3. [PMID: 37031040 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) may result in poor surgical outcomes. The current study aims to characterize the risk of ADRD on outcomes for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS Colorectal surgery patients with and without ADRD from 2007 to 2017 were identified using electronic health record-linked Medicare claims data from two large health systems. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes. RESULTS 5926 patients (median age 74) underwent colorectal surgery of whom 4.8% (n = 285) had ADRD. ADRD patients were more likely to undergo emergent operations (27.7% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001) and be discharged to a facility (49.8% vs 28.9%, p < 0.001). After multi-variable adjustment, ADRD patients were more likely to have complications (61.1% vs 48.3%, p < 0.001) and required longer hospitalization (7.1 vs 6.1 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of ADRD is an independent risk factor for prolonged hospitalization and postoperative complications after colorectal surgery.
Collapse
|
13
|
Veilleux KA, Weissman JS. Does Being Poor and Sick Modify the Effect of Individuals on High-Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) Reporting Delayed/Foregone Care? J Health Care Poor Underserved 2023; 34:673-684. [PMID: 37464525 DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2023.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the influence of being both poor and sick on the association of high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) with delayed/forgone care. FINDINGS In this cross-sectional study that included 14,203 respondents, representing 120 million Americans, individuals insured by HDHPs had 2.23 times the odds of delayed/foregone care compared with non-HDHP insureds. When examined across strata of income and health status, the association yielded similar odds of delayed/foregone care. Additionally, the interaction of being poor and sick on the association of HDHPs to delayed/foregone care was not statistically significant. Meaning. Being insured on a HDHP affected delayed/foregone care largely consistently, regardless of health, income, or combined health/income category.
Collapse
|
14
|
de Jager E, Osman SY, Levine AA, Liu C, Maggard Gibbons MA, Ko CY, Burstin HR, Haider AH, Hoyt DB, Schoenfeld AJ, Britt LD, Weissman JS. Disparity-Sensitive Measures in Surgical Care: A Delphi Panel Consensus. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:135-143. [PMID: 36111798 PMCID: PMC9771907 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the US, disparities in surgical care impede the delivery of uniformly high-quality care to all patients. There is a lack of disparity-sensitive measures related to surgical care. The American College of Surgeons Metrics for Equitable Access and Care in Surgery group, through research and expert consensus, aimed to identify disparity-sensitive measures in surgical care. STUDY DESIGN An environmental scan, systematic literature review, and subspecialty society surveys were conducted to identify potential disparity-sensitive surgical measures. A modified Delphi process was conducted where panelists rated measures on both importance and validity. In addition, a novel literature-based disparity-sensitive scoring process was used. RESULTS We identified 841 potential disparity-sensitive surgical measures. From these, our Delphi and literature-based approaches yielded a consensus list of 125 candidate disparity-sensitive measures. These measures were rated as both valid and important and were supported by the existing literature. CONCLUSION There are profound disparities in surgical care within the US healthcare system. A multidisciplinary Delphi panel identified 125 potential disparity-sensitive surgical measures that could be used to track health disparities, evaluate the impact of focused interventions, and reduce healthcare inequity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elzerie de Jager
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, AUS
| | - Samia Y Osman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Adele A Levine
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Charles Liu
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
- Department of Surgery, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Adil H Haider
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - LD Britt
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shah KB, Shah SK, Manful A, Xiang L, Reich AJ, Semco RS, Tjia J, Ladin K, Weissman JS. Advance care planning billing codes in patients undergoing TAVR is infrequent and associated with adverse TAVR outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:282-287. [PMID: 36165290 PMCID: PMC9870844 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Khanjan B. Shah
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Samir K. Shah
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Adoma Manful
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lingwei Xiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert S Semco
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Keren Ladin
- Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Crawford AM, Lightsey Iv HM, Xiong GX, Ye J, Call CM, Pomer A, Cooper Z, Simpson AK, Koehlmoos TP, Weissman JS, Schoenfeld AJ. Changes in Elective and Urgent Surgery Among TRICARE Beneficiaries During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mil Med 2022; 188:usac391. [PMID: 36519498 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 is known to have altered the capacity to perform surgical procedures in numerous health care settings. The impact of this change within the direct and private-sector settings of the Military Health System has not been effectively explored, particularly as it pertains to disparities in surgical access and shifting of services between sectors. We sought to characterize how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced access to care for surgical procedures within the direct and private-sector settings of the Military Health System. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated claims for patients receiving urgent and elective surgical procedures in March-September 2017, 2019, and 2020. The pre-COVID period consisted of 2017 and 2019 and was compared to 2020. We adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and region of care using multivariable Poisson regression. Subanalyses considered the impact of race and sponsor rank as a proxy for socioeconomic status. RESULTS During the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no significant difference in the adjusted rate of urgent surgical procedures in direct (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03) or private-sector (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) care. This was also true for elective surgeries in both settings. No significant disparities were identified in any of the racial subgroups or proxies for socioeconomic status we considered in direct or private-sector care. CONCLUSIONS We found a similar performance of elective and urgent surgeries in both the private sector and direct care during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, no racial disparities were identified in either care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Harry M Lightsey Iv
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Grace X Xiong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jamie Ye
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Alysa Pomer
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew K Simpson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Tracey P Koehlmoos
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Herrera-Escobar JP, Wang JY, Ye J, Dalton MK, Koehlmoos T, Schoenfeld AJ, Weissman JS, Cooper Z. In-hospital Outcomes for COVID-19 Patients in the Military Health System: Comparison of Military and Civilian Facility Treatment. Mil Med 2022; 188:usac393. [PMID: 36519441 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Beneficiaries of TRICARE, an insurance program of the military health system, can choose to receive care within the private sector (fee-for-service) or direct (budget-based facilities with salaried providers) care setting. Previous studies in several specialties have shown that there are disparities in both resource utilization and outcomes between the two settings. In this study, we sought to determine differences in outcomes between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients treated in the private sector versus direct care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using TRICARE claims data, we identified patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 between March and September 2020. Cases were classified, according to the facility where they were admitted for treatment, as private sector or direct care. We abstracted patient sociodemographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and outcomes including in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilator use, in-hospital complications, and 30-day readmission. We used multivariable regression models, adjusted for covariates, to determine the association between health care settings and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 3,177 patients were included. Of these, 2,147 (68%) and 1,030 (32%) received care in the private sector and direct care settings, respectively. The average age of the study cohort was 52 years (SD = 21), and 84% had at least one medical comorbidity. In adjusted analyses, we found significant differences in the rates of ICU admission, with patients treated in private sector care having lower odds of being admitted to the ICU (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.76). There were no significant differences in the rates of in-hospital mortality, ventilator use, in-hospital complications, and 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSION With the exception of ICU admission rates, which are higher in the direct care setting, we encountered comparable hospital-based outcomes for patients treated for COVID-19 within the military health system, whether care was received under private sector or direct care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Herrera-Escobar
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Joyce Y Wang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Jamie Ye
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Michael K Dalton
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
| | - Tracey Koehlmoos
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Luth EA, Manful A, Weissman JS, Reich A, Ladin K, Semco R, Ganguli I. Practice Billing for Medicare Advance Care Planning Across the USA. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:3869-3876. [PMID: 35083654 PMCID: PMC9640523 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07404-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medicare introduced billing codes in 2016 to encourage clinicians to engage in advance care planning (ACP) and promote goal-concordantend-of-life care, but uptake has been modest. While prior research examined individual-level factors in ACP billing, organization-level factors associated with physician practices billing for ACP remain unknown. OBJECTIVE Examine the role of practices in ACP billing. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study analyzing 2016-2018 national Medicare data. PARTICIPANTS A total of 53,926 practices with at least 10 attributed Medicare beneficiaries. MAIN MEASURES Outcomes were practice-level ACP billing (any use by the practice) and ACP use rate by practice-attributed beneficiaries. Practice characteristics were number of beneficiaries attributed to the practice; percentage of beneficiaries by race, Medicare-Medicaid dual enrollment, sex, and age; practice size; and specialty mix. KEY RESULTS Fifteen percent of practices billed for ACP. In adjusted models, we found higher odds of ACP billing and higher ACP use rates among practices with more primary care physicians (billing AOR: 10.01, 95%CI: 8.81-11.38 for practices with 75-100% (vs 0) primary care physicians), and those serving more Medicare beneficiaries (billing AOR: 4.55, 95%CI 4.08-5.08 for practices with highest (vs lowest) quintile of beneficiaries), and larger shares of female beneficiaries (billing AOR: 3.06, 95% CI 2.01-4.67 for 75-100% (vs <25%) female ). CONCLUSIONS Several years after Medicare introduced ACP reimbursements for physicians, relatively few practices bill for ACP. ACP billing was more likely in large practices with a greater percentage of primary care physicians. To increase ACP billing uptake, policymakers and health system leaders might target interventions to larger practices where a small number of physicians already bill for ACP and to specialty practices that serve as the primary source of care for seriously ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adoma Manful
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keren Ladin
- Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| | | | - Ishani Ganguli
- Harvard Medical School and Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu VY, Pawar A, Weissman JS, Kim DH. Clinical outcomes of cardiovascular procedures in older patients with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:3315-3317. [PMID: 35770876 PMCID: PMC9669092 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Y. Liu
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ajinkya Pawar
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Dae Hyun Kim
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Luth EA, Manful A, Prigerson HG, Xiang L, Reich A, Semco R, Weissman JS. Associations between dementia diagnosis and end-of-life care utilization. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2871-2883. [PMID: 35822659 PMCID: PMC9588556 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is a leading cause of death for older adults and is more common among persons from racial/ethnic minoritized groups, who also tend to experience more intensive end-of-life care. This retrospective cohort study compared end-of-life care in persons with and without dementia and identified dementia's moderating effects on the relationship between race/ethnicity and end-of-life care. METHODS Administrative claims data for 463,590 Medicare fee-for-service decedents from 2016 to 2018 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses examined the association of dementia with 5 intensive and 2 quality of life-focused measures. Intensity measures included hospital admission, ICU admission, receipt of any of 5 intensive procedures (CPR, mechanical ventilation, intubation, dialysis initiation, and feeding tube insertion), hospital death, and Medicare expenditures (last 30 days of life). Quality of life measures included timely hospice care (>3 days before death) and days at home (last 6 months of life). Models were adjusted for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS 54% of Medicare decedents were female, 85% non-Hispanic White, 8% non-Hispanic Black, and 4% Hispanic. Overall, 51% had a dementia diagnosis claim. In adjusted models, decedents with dementia had 16%-29% lower odds of receiving intensive services (AOR hospital death: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.70-0.72; AOR hospital admission: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.83-0.86). Patients with dementia had 45% higher odds of receiving timely hospice (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.42-1.47), but spent 0.74 fewer days at home (adjusted mean: -0.74, 95% CI: (-0.98)-(-0.49)). Compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, persons from racial/ethnic minoritized groups were more likely to receive intensive services. This effect was more pronounced among persons with dementia. CONCLUSIONS Although overall dementia was associated with fewer intensive services near death, beneficiaries from racial/ethnic groups minoritized with dementia experienced more intensive service use. Particular attention is needed to ensure care aligns with the needs and preferences of persons with dementia and from racial/ethnic minoritized groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Luth
- Institute for Health, Healthcare Policy and Aging Research, Department of Family Medicine and Community HealthRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA
| | - Adoma Manful
- School of Medicine, Division of EpidemiologyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
| | - Holly G. Prigerson
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew York CityNew YorkUSA
| | - Lingwei Xiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | - Amanda Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shah SK, Adler RR, Xiang L, Clark CJ, Cooper Z, Finlayson E, Kim DH, Lin KJ, Lipsitz SR, Weissman JS. Patients living with dementia have worse outcomes when undergoing high-risk procedures. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:2838-2846. [PMID: 35637607 PMCID: PMC9588582 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) undergoing inpatient procedures represent a population at elevated risk for adverse outcomes including postoperative complications, mortality, and discharge to a higher level of care. Outcomes may be particularly poor in patients with ADRD undergoing high-risk procedures. We sought to determine traditional (e.g., 30-day mortality) and patient-centered (e.g., discharge disposition) outcomes in patients with ADRD undergoing high-risk inpatient procedures. METHODS This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records linked to fee-for-service Medicare claims data at a tertiary care academic health system. All patients from a large multi-hospital health system undergoing high-risk inpatient procedures from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2017 with continuous Medicare Parts A and B enrollment in the 12 months prior to and 90 days following the procedure were included. RESULTS This study included 6779 patients. 536 (7.9%) had ADRD. A multivariable analysis of outcomes demonstrated higher risks for postoperative complications (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.23-1.81) and 90-day mortality (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.09-1.91]) in patients with ADRD compared to those without. Patients with ADRD were more likely to be discharged to a higher level of care (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.32-2.18) and only 37.3% of patients admitted from home were discharged to home. CONCLUSIONS Compared to those without ADRD, patients living with ADRD undergoing high-risk procedures have poor traditional and patient-centered outcomes including increased risks for 90-day mortality, postoperative complications, longer hospital lengths of stay, and discharge to a higher level of care. These data may be used by patients, their surrogates, and their physicians to help align surgical decision-making with health care goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir K Shah
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel R Adler
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lingwei Xiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Clancy J Clark
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily Finlayson
- Department of Surgery, Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dae Hyun Kim
- Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kueiyu Joshua Lin
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ladin K, Gazarian PK, Reich AJ, Weissman JS, Rodgers PE. Advance Care Planning: The Authors Reply. Health Aff (Millwood) 2022; 41:1061. [PMID: 35787075 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amanda J Reich
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reich AJ, Perez S, Fleming J, Gazarian P, Manful A, Ladin K, Tjia J, Semco R, Prigerson H, Weissman JS, Candrian C. Advance Care Planning Experiences Among Sexual and Gender Minority People. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2222993. [PMID: 35857322 PMCID: PMC9301514 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Advance care planning (ACP) can promote patient-centered end-of-life (EOL) care and is intended to ensure that medical treatments are aligned with patient's values. Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people face greater discrimination in health care settings compared with heterosexual, cisgender people, but it is unknown whether such discrimination occurs in ACP and how it might affect the ACP experiences of SGM people. OBJECTIVES To increase understanding of barriers and facilitators of ACP facing SGM individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This mixed-methods national study of ACP included a telephone survey of self-identified SGM and non-SGM participants in a nationally representative sample drawn from a larger omnibus national panel by SSRS. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of survey participants who identified as SGM. Data were collected from October 2020 to March 2021. EXPOSURES Self-identified SGM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The survey included 4 items from the validated ACP Engagement Survey, adapted to capture experiences of discrimination. Interviews asked about participants' experiences with ACP, including the appointment of medical decision-makers, sharing preferences, and experiences within the health care system more broadly. RESULTS A total of 603 adults participated in the survey, with 201 SGM individuals (mean [SD] age, 45.7 [18.7] years; 101 [50.2%] female; 22 [10.9%] Black, 37 [18.4%] Hispanic, and 140 [69.7%] White individuals) and 402 non-SGM individuals (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [19.2] years; 199 [49.5%] female; 35 [8.7%] Black, 41 [10.2%] Hispanic, and 324 [80.6%] White individuals). Regarding reasons for not completing ACP, SGM respondents, compared with non-SGM respondents, were more likely to say "I don't see the need" (72 [73.5%] vs 131 [57.2%], P = .006) and "I feel discriminated against by others" (12 [12.2%] vs 6 [2.6%], P < .001). Of 25 completed interviews among SGM participants, 3 main themes were identified: how fear and experiences of discrimination affect selection of clinicians and whether to disclose SGM identity; concerns about whether EOL preferences and medical decision-makers would be supported; and a preference to discuss EOL decisions and values outside of clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that fear of disclosing sexual orientation or gender identity information and discrimination are important barriers to ACP for SGM in clinical settings, but discussions of preferences and values still occur between many SGM people and medical decision-makers. More SGM-specific patient-centered care might better support these discussions within the health care system. Furthermore, health systems can facilitate improved engagement by supporting clinician sensitivity training, including guidance on documentation and requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Jane Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen Perez
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester
| | | | - Holly Prigerson
- Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carey Candrian
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Reich AJ, Manful A, Candrian C, Semco RS, Ladin K, Prigerson HG, Weissman JS. Use of Advance Care Planning Codes Among Transgender Medicare Beneficiaries. LGBT Health 2022; 9:520-524. [PMID: 35759464 DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2021.0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We examined the use of advance care planning (ACP) among Medicare beneficiaries who were identified as transgender. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of Medicare claims from 2016 to 2018, comparing ACP visits between transgender and other beneficiaries. Results: Beneficiaries identified as transgender were slightly more likely than those who were dual eligible for Medicaid and Medicare, and the remaining fee-for-service Medicare population, to have received a claim for ACP. However, racial and ethnic differences exist and transgender beneficiaries were more likely to receive an ACP claim from hospice/palliative care clinicians compared with primary care clinicians relative to other beneficiaries. Conclusions: Differences in ACP provision may exacerbate disparities in access to ACP benefits faced by transgender patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Reich
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adoma Manful
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carey Candrian
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Robert S Semco
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Holly G Prigerson
- Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Labban M, Nguyen DD, Briggs L, Cole AP, Lipsitz SR, Iyer HS, Rebbeck T, Weissman JS, Choueiri TK, Trinh QD. Access to definitive treatment and survival for intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer at hospital systems serving health disparity populations. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.6555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6555 Background: Socioeconomic and racial disparities in prostate cancer (PCa) can be attributed to patient-level and physician-level factors. However, there is growing interest in investigating the role of the facility of care in driving cancer disparities. Therefore, we sought to examine receipt of guideline-concordant definitive treatment, time to treatment initiation (TTI), and survival for men with PCa receiving care at hospital systems serving health disparity populations (HSDPs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) among men with intermediate-risk or high-risk PCa eligible for definitive treatment. The primary outcomes were receipt of definitive treatment and TTI within 90 days of diagnosis. The secondary outcome was survival. We defined HSDPs as minority-serving hospitals – facilities in the highest decile of proportion of Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) or Hispanic cancer patients – and/or high-burden safety-net hospitals – facilities in the highest quartile of proportion of underinsured patients. We used mixed-effect models with facility-level random intercept to compare outcomes between HSDPs and non-HSDPs among the entire cohort and among men who received definitive treatment. We evaluated interactions between HSDP status and race for each of the outcomes. Results: The cohort included 821,931 men with intermediate-risk or high-risk PCa. We included 968 non-HSDPs (72.2%) and 373 HSDPs (27.8%) facilities. Treatment at HSDPs was associated with lower odds of receipt of definitive treatment (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.57-0.71; p < 0.001), lower odds of TTI within 90 days of diagnosis (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.68-0.79; p < 0.001), and worse survival (aHR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09; p = 0.003). However, no difference was found in survival among patients who received definitive treatment. NHB men at HSDPs had also worse outcomes than NHB men treated at non-HSDPs as well as NHW men treated at HSDPs (Table). Conclusions: Patients treated at HSDPs were less likely to receive timely definitive treatment and had worse survival. NHB men have worse outcomes than NHW at HSDPs. NHB men with PCa remain largely disadvantaged since they are more likely to be treated at hospitals with worse outcomes and have worse outcomes than other patients at those same institutions. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Logan Briggs
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stuart R. Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hari S. Iyer
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy Rebbeck
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa W Wachterman
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Section of General Internal Medicine (M.W.W.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.W.W., R.S.S., J.S.W.), and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (M.W.W.) - all in Boston; and the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research and the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (E.A.L.)
| | - Elizabeth A Luth
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Section of General Internal Medicine (M.W.W.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.W.W., R.S.S., J.S.W.), and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (M.W.W.) - all in Boston; and the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research and the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (E.A.L.)
| | - Robert S Semco
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Section of General Internal Medicine (M.W.W.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.W.W., R.S.S., J.S.W.), and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (M.W.W.) - all in Boston; and the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research and the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (E.A.L.)
| | - Joel S Weissman
- From the Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Section of General Internal Medicine (M.W.W.), Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.W.W., R.S.S., J.S.W.), and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (M.W.W.) - all in Boston; and the Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research and the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (E.A.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jarman MP, Jin G, Weissman JS, Ash AS, Tjia J, Salim A, Haider A, Cooper Z. Association of Trauma Center Designation With Postdischarge Survival Among Older Adults With Injuries. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e222448. [PMID: 35294541 PMCID: PMC8928003 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Trauma centers improve outcomes for young patients with serious injuries. However, most injury-related hospital admissions and deaths occur in older adults, and it is not clear whether trauma center care provides the same benefit in this population. Objective To examine whether 30- and 365-day mortality of injured older adults is associated with the treating hospital's trauma center level. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, population-based cohort study used Medicare claims data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016, for all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 66 years or older with inpatient admission for traumatic injury in 2014 to 2015. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to June 31, 2021. Preinjury health was measured using 2013 claims, and outcomes were measured through 2016. The population was stratified by anatomical injury pattern. Propensity scores for level I trauma center treatment were estimated using the Abbreviated Injury Scale, age, and residential proximity to trauma center and then used to match beneficiaries from each trauma level (I, II, III, and IV/non-trauma centers) by injury type. Exposure Admitting hospital's trauma center level. Main Outcomes and Measures Case fatality rates (CFRs) at 30 and 365 days after injury, estimated in the matched sample using multivariable, hierarchical logistic regression models. Results A total of 433 169 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 82.9 [8.3] years; 68.4% female; 91.5% White) were included in the analysis. A total of 206 275 (47.6%) were admitted to non-trauma centers and 161 492 (37.3%) to level I or II trauma centers. Patients with isolated extremity fracture had the fewest deaths (365-day CFR ranged from 16.1% [95% CI, 11.2%-22.4%] to 17.4% [95% CI, 11.8%-24.6%] by trauma center status). Patients with both hip fracture and traumatic brain injury had the most deaths (365-day CFRs ranged from 33.4% [95% CI, 25.8%-42.1%] to 35.8% [95% CI, 28.9%-43.5%]). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that older adults do not benefit from existing trauma center care, which is designed with younger patients in mind. There is a critical need to improve trauma care practices to address common injury mechanisms and types of injury in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly P. Jarman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ginger Jin
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arlene S. Ash
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worchester
| | - Ali Salim
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Trauma, Burn and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adil Haider
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Medical College, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Trauma, Burn and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ciersten A Burks
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Hospital Medicine Unit and Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Uribe-Leitz T, Matsas B, Dalton MK, Lutgendorf MA, Moberg E, Schoenfeld AJ, Goralnick E, Weissman JS, Hamlin L, Cooper Z, Koehlmoos TP, Jarman MP. Geospatial Analysis of Access to Emergency Cesarean Delivery for Military and Civilian Populations in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2142835. [PMID: 35006244 PMCID: PMC8749478 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Many women in the US, particularly those living in rural areas, have limited access to obstetric care. Military-civilian partnership could improve access to obstetric care and benefit military personnel, their civilian dependents, and the civilian population as a whole. OBJECTIVE To identify medical facilities within military and civilian geographic areas that present opportunities for military-civilian partnership in obstetric care and to assess whether civilian use of military medical treatment facilities (MTFs) could improve access to emergency cesarean delivery care in the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This geospatial epidemiological population-based cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. ArcGIS Pro software, version 2.7 (Esri), was used to assess population coverage for TRICARE (military insurance) beneficiaries and civilian populations and to estimate 30-minute travel time to 2392 total military and civilian medical facilities that were capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care in the continental US. Data on health insurance coverage for TRICARE beneficiaries and their civilian dependents per county were obtained from the American Community Survey tables available through ArcGIS Pro software. Demographic characteristics of the general population were obtained from the 2020 key demographic indicators published by Esri. Race and ethnicity were not examined because the data used for this study were aggregated and did not include further categorization by race or ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Population coverage rates (measured in percentages) within 30-minute catchment areas, defined as areas that were within a 30-minute travel time to a medical facility capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care. RESULTS A total of 29 MTFs and 2363 civilian hospitals capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery were identified across the contiguous US. Overall, an estimated 167 759 762 women (3 640 000 TRICARE beneficiaries and 164 119 762 civilians) were included in these service areas. The analysis identified 17 of 29 MTFs (58.6%) capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care that were located within 30-minute catchment areas. Of those, 3 MTFs were the only facilities capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care within a 30-minute travel time in those regions, and 14 additional MTFs had catchment areas partially overlapping with civilian hospitals that also covered areas without alternative access to emergency cesarean delivery. Expanded use of these 14 MTFs could enhance access to emergency cesarean delivery care not otherwise covered by current civilian hospitals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, 58.6% of MTFs capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care were located in areas with the potential to improve access to obstetric care within a 30-minute travel time. Maintenance of MTFs in these important access regions could be prioritized in the context of restructuring MTFs. This prioritization has the potential to improve access to emergency cesarean delivery care for underserved civilian populations in the US, particularly among those living in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael K. Dalton
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Monica A. Lutgendorf
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Esther Moberg
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric Goralnick
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lynette Hamlin
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tracey P. Koehlmoos
- Center for Health Services Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Molly P. Jarman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ladin K, Bronzi OC, Gazarian PK, Perugini JM, Porteny T, Reich AJ, Rodgers PE, Perez S, Weissman JS. Understanding The Use Of Medicare Procedure Codes For Advance Care Planning: A National Qualitative Study. Health Aff (Millwood) 2022; 41:112-119. [PMID: 34982632 PMCID: PMC9683633 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
In 2016 Medicare introduced advance care planning Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to reimburse clinicians for time spent providing the service. Despite recent increases, use of these codes remains low for reasons incompletely captured by quantitative research. To further identify barriers and facilitators to code use for Medicare fee-for-service enrollees, we conducted case studies at eleven health systems, including 272 interviews with clinicians, administrators, and key leadership. Five themes related to use of the new codes emerged: code-based constraints to billing, burdening patients with unexpected charges, ethical concerns with billing for discussion of advance care plans, incentives to signal the importance of their use in billing, and increasing both workflow burden and the need for institutional supports and training. Respondents also observed that use was facilitated by health systems' investment in clinician training and in processes to audit the codes' use. Our findings suggest that increased reimbursement, strong institutional commitment and support, and streamlined workflow could improve the use of the new CPT codes to document receipt of and ensure access to Medicare advance care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Amanda J. Reich
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zerhouni YA, Krupka DC, Graham J, Landman A, Li A, Bhatt DL, Nguyen LL, Capatch K, Concheri K, Reich AJ, Wilson N, Weissman JS. UDI2Claims: Planning a Pilot Project to Transmit Identifiers for Implanted Devices to the Insurance Claim. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:e708-e715. [PMID: 30480650 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to problems with the current postmarket surveillance of medical devices, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration mandated device labelers to include a unique device identifier (UDI), composed of a device identifier (DI) and production identifier. Including the DI in insurance claims could be a potent method to monitor implanted devices, yet implementation has lagged because of questions of benefit and operational concerns. METHODS To illustrate the potential benefit of including DIs in claims, rates of 90-day adverse events after implantation using an electronic health record (EHR) were compared with the EHR plus claims, which capture utilization outside that EHR's health system. To explore operations, we planned a pilot project to transmit the DI of implanted devices from the point of care to the claim at two provider/payer pairs. RESULTS By querying claims plus EHR, estimated rates of patients with potential adverse events were as much as 3.75 times higher. For our pilot, our multistakeholder team identified and resolved the following five challenges: (1) capturing the DI at the point of care; (2) selecting a location for the DI on the claim form; (3) transmitting the DI to the claim form; (4) analyzing the claim forms received by the payer; and (5) verifying the quality of the transmitted information. CONCLUSIONS Including DIs on claims could allow more complete data capture of adverse events for implanted devices than the EHR data. We overcame challenges in transmitting the DI to the claim with attention to planning and multistakeholder involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jove Graham
- Care Support Services, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Angela Li
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Kevin Capatch
- Care Support Services, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Amanda J Reich
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natalia Wilson
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Joel S Weissman
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Allar BG, Rahman S, Eruchalu CN, Mou D, Ortega G, Reich A, Pusic AL, Brook CD, Weissman JS, Bergmark RW. Barriers to Collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Surgical Patients with Limited English Proficiency. J Am Coll Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.07.245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
33
|
Dalton MK, Remick KN, Mathias M, Trinh QD, Cooper Z, Elster EA, Weissman JS. Analysis of Surgical Volume in Military Medical Treatment Facilities and Clinical Combat Readiness of US Military Surgeons. JAMA Surg 2021; 157:43-50. [PMID: 34705038 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Low surgical volume in the US Military Health System (MHS) has been identified as a challenge to military surgeon readiness. The Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, in partnership with the American College of Surgeons, developed the Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSA) Clinical Readiness Program that includes a tool for quantifying the clinical readiness value of surgeon workload, known as the KSA metric. Objective To describe changes in US military general surgeon procedural volume and readiness using the KSA metric. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed general surgery workload performed across the MHS, including military and civilian facilities, between fiscal year 2015 and 2019 and the calculated KSA metric value. The surgeon-level readiness among military general surgeons was calculated based on the KSA metric readiness threshold. Data were obtained from TRICARE, the US Department of Defense health insurance product. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were general surgery procedural volumes and the KSA metric point value of those procedures across the MHS as well as the number of military general surgeons meeting the KSA metric readiness threshold. Aggregate facility and regional market-level claims data were used to calculate the procedural volumes and KSA metric readiness value of those procedures. Annual adjusted KSA metric points earned were used to determine the number of individual US military general surgeons meeting the readiness threshold. Results The number of general surgery procedures generating KSAs in military hospitals decreased 25.6%, from 128 377 in 2015 to 95 461 in 2019, with a 19.1% decrease in the number of general surgeon KSA points (from 7 155 563 to 5 790 001). From 2015 to 2019, there was a 3.2% increase in both the number of procedures (from 419 980 to 433 495) and KSA points (from 21 071 033 to 21 748 984) in civilian care settings. The proportion of military general surgeons meeting the KSA metric readiness threshold decreased from 16.7% (n = 97) in 2015 to 10.1% (n = 68) in 2019. Conclusions and Relevance This study noted that the number of KSA metric points and procedural volume in military hospitals has been decreasing since 2015, whereas both measures have increased in civilian facilities. The findings suggest that loss of surgical workload has resulted in further decreases in military surgeon readiness and may require substantial changes in patient care flow in the MHS to reverse the change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Dalton
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Kyle N Remick
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric A Elster
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zogg CK, Lichtman JH, Dalton MK, Learn PA, Schoenfeld AJ, Perez Koehlmoos T, Weissman JS, Cooper Z. In defense of Direct Care: Limiting access to military hospitals could worsen quality and safety. Health Serv Res 2021; 57:723-733. [PMID: 34608642 PMCID: PMC9264466 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ongoing health care reforms within the US Military Health System (MHS) are expected to shift >1.9 million MHS beneficiaries from military treatment facilities (MTFs) into local civilian hospitals over the next 1-2 years. The objective of this study was to examine how such health care reforms are likely to affect the quality of MHS care. DATA SOURCES Adult MHS beneficiaries, aged 18-64 years, treated in MTFs (under a program known as Direct Care) were compared against (1) MHS beneficiaries treated in locally available civilian hospitals (under a program known as Purchased Care) and (2) similarly-aged adult civilian patients across the United States. MHS beneficiaries in Direct and Purchased Care were identified from fiscal-year 2016-2018 MHS inpatient claims. National inpatients were identified in the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. DATA COLLECTION Differences in quality were compared using two sets of quality metrics endorsed by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): Inpatient Quality Indicators, 19 quality metrics that look at differences in in-hospital mortality, and Patient Safety Indicators, 18 quality metrics that look at differences in in-hospital morbidity and adverse events. Among MHS beneficiaries (Direct and Purchased Care), we further simulated what changes in quality indicators might look like under various proposed scenarios of reduced access to Direct Care. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS A total of 502,252 MHS admissions from 37 MTFs and surrounding civilian hospitals were included (326,076 Direct Care, 179,176 Purchased Care). Nationwide, 9.34 million adult admissions from 2453 hospitals were included. On average, MHS beneficiaries treated in MTFs experienced better inpatient quality and improved patient safety compared with MHS beneficiaries treated in locally available civilian hospitals (e.g., summary observed-to-expected ratio for medical mortality: 0.98 vs. 1.03, p < 0.001) and adult patients across the United States (0.98 vs. 1.02, p < 0.001). Simulations of proposed changes resulted in consistently worse outcomes for MHS patients, whether reducing MTF access by 10%, 20%, or 50% nationwide; limiting MTF access to active-duty beneficiaries; or closing MTFs with the worst performance on patient safety (p < 0.001 for overall quality indicators for each). CONCLUSIONS Reducing access to MTFs could result in significant harm to MHS patients. The results underscore the importance of health-policy planning based on evidence-based evaluation and the need to consider the consequential downstream effects caused by changes in access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl K Zogg
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Judith H Lichtman
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael K Dalton
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter A Learn
- F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
- F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Adler JT, Xiang L, Weissman JS, Rodrigue JR, Patzer RE, Waikar SS, Tsai TC. Association of Public Reporting of Medicare Dialysis Facility Quality Ratings With Access to Kidney Transplantation. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2126719. [PMID: 34559227 PMCID: PMC8463939 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Improving the quality of dialysis care and access to kidney transplantation for patients with end-stage kidney disease is a national clinical and policy priority. The role of dialysis facility quality in increasing access to kidney transplantation is not known. OBJECTIVE To determine whether patient, facility, and kidney transplant waitlisting characteristics are associated with variations in dialysis center quality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study is an analysis of US Renal Data System data and Medicare Dialysis Facility Compare (DFC) data from 2013 to 2018. Participants included all adult (aged ≥18 years) patients in the US Renal Data System beginning long-term dialysis in the US from 2013 to 2017 with follow-up through the end of 2018. Patients with a prior kidney transplant and matched Medicare DFC star ratings to each annual cohort of recipients were excluded. Patients at facilities without a star rating in that year were also excluded. Data analysis was performed from January to April 2021. EXPOSURES Dialysis center quality, as defined by Medicare DFC star ratings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing incident dialysis who were waitlisted within 1 year of dialysis initiation. Secondary outcomes were patient and facility characteristics. RESULTS Of 507 581 patients beginning long-term dialysis in the US from 2013 to 2017, 291 802 (57.4%) were male, 266 517 (52.5%) were White, and the median (interquartile range) age was 65 (55-75) years. Of 5869 dialysis facilities in 2017, 132 (2.2%) were 1-star, 436 (7.4%) were 2-star, 2047 (34.9%) were 3-star, 1660 (28.3%) were 4-star, and 1594 (27.2%) were 5-star. Higher-quality dialysis facilities were associated with 47% higher odds of transplant waitlisting (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.39-1.57 for 5-star facilities vs 1-star facilities; P < .001). Black patients were less likely than White patients to be waitlisted for transplantation (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.72-0.76). In addition, patients at for-profit (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81) and rural (OR, 0.63; 95%, CI 0.58-0.68) facilities were less likely to be waitlisted for transplantation compared with those at nonprofit and urban facilities, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, patients at higher-quality dialysis facilities had higher odds than patients at lower-quality facilities of being waitlisted for kidney transplantation within 1 year. Waitlisting rates for kidney transplantation should be considered for integration into the current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services DFC star ratings to incentivize dialysis facility referral to transplant centers, inform patient choice, and drive quality improvement by increasing transplant waitlisting rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lingwei Xiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James R. Rodrigue
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel E. Patzer
- Department of Surgery, Emory Medical School, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Medicine, Emory Medical School, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sushrut S. Waikar
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas C. Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dalton MK, Manful A, Jarman MP, Pisano AJ, Learn PA, Koehlmoos TP, Weissman JS, Cooper Z, Schoenfeld AJ. Long-term prescription opioid use among US military service members injured in combat. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91:S213-S220. [PMID: 34324474 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the Global War on Terrorism, many US Military service members sustained injuries with potentially long-lasting functional limitations and chronic pain. We sought to understand the patterns of prescription opioid use among service members injured in combat. METHODS We queried the Military Health System Data Repository to identify service members injured in combat between 2007 and 2011. Sociodemographics, injury characteristics, treatment information, and costs of care were abstracted for all eligible patients. We surveyed for prescription opioid utilization subsequent to hospital discharge and through 2018. Negative binomial regression was used to identify factors associated with cumulative prescription opioid use. RESULTS We identified 3,981 service members with combat-related injuries presenting during the study period. The median age was 24 years (interquartile range [IQR], 22-29 years), 98.5% were male, and the median follow-up was 3.3 years. During the study period, 98% (n = 3,910) of patients were prescribed opioids at least once and were prescribed opioids for a median of 29 days (IQR, 9-85 days) per patient-year of follow-up. While nearly all patients (96%; n = 3,157) discontinued use within 6 months, 91% (n = 2,882) were prescribed opioids again after initially discontinuing opioids. Following regression analysis, patients with preinjury opioid exposure, more severe injuries, blast injuries, and enlisted rank had higher cumulative opioid use. Patients who discontinued opioids within 6 months had an unadjusted median total health care cost of US $97,800 (IQR, US $42,364-237,135) compared with US $230,524 (IQR, US $134,387-370,102) among those who did not discontinue opioids within 6 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Nearly all service members injured in combat were prescribed opioids during treatment, and the vast majority experienced multiple episodes of prescription opioid use. Only 4% of the population met the criteria for sustained prescription opioid use at 6 months following discharge. Early discontinuation may not translate to long-term opioid cessation in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiology study, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Dalton
- From the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery (M.K.D., A.M., M.P.J., J.S.W., Z.C., A.J.S.) and Department of Orthopedic Surgery (A.J.P., A.J.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (P.A.L.) and Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (T.P.K.), F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Weissman JS, Reich AJ, Prigerson HG, Gazarian P, Tjia J, Kim D, Rodgers P, Manful A. Association of Advance Care Planning Visits With Intensity of Health Care for Medicare Beneficiaries With Serious Illness at the End of Life. JAMA Health Forum 2021; 2:e211829. [PMID: 35977213 PMCID: PMC8796875 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Question What is the association of a billed advance care planning (ACP) visit with intensive use of health care services at the end of life (EOL) for Medicare beneficiaries with serious illness? Findings In this cohort study of claims data of 955 777 Medicare beneficiaries with serious illness who died in 2017 and 2018, billed ACP visits that occurred during the decedents’ EOL course but before the last month of life were relatively uncommon. However, their occurrence was associated with less intensive use of EOL health care services. Meaning The findings of this cohort study suggest that ACP is associated with less intensive use of EOL health care services. Importance Advance care planning (ACP) is intended to maximize the concordance of preferences with end-of-life (EOL) care and is assumed to lead to less intensive use of health care services. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services began reimbursing clinicians for ACP discussions with patients in 2016. Objective To determine whether billed ACP visits are associated with intensive use of health care services at EOL. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective patient-level cohort analysis of seriously ill patients included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who met criteria for serious illness from January 1 to December 31, 2016, and died from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Analyses were completed from November 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Five measures of EOL health care services used (inpatient admission, emergency department visit, and/or intensive care unit stay within 30 days of death; in-hospital death; and timing of first hospice bill) and a measure of EOL expenditures. Analyses were adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and expenditure by hospital referral region (high, medium, or low). The primary exposure was receipt of a billed ACP service classified as none, timely (>1 month before death), or late (first ACP visit ≤1 month before death). Results Of the 955 777 Medicare beneficiaries who met criteria for serious illness in 2016 and died in 2017 or 2018, 522 737 (54.7%) were women, 764 666 (80.0%) were 75 years or older, and 822 684 (86.1%) were non-Hispanic White individuals. Among the study population, 81 131 (8.5%) had a timely ACP visit, and an additional 22 804 (2.4%) had a late ACP visit. After multivariable adjustment, compared with patients without any billed ACP visit, patients with a timely ACP visit experienced significantly less intensive EOL care on 4 of 5 measures, including in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84-0.87), hospital admission (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.85), intensive care unit admission (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88), and emergency department visit (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.82-0.84). Only small or insignificant differences in late hospice use or mean total EOL expenditures were noted. Compared with patients without ACP, patients with late ACP experienced more intensive EOL care, including in-hospital death (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.19-1.26), hospital admission (aOR, 5.28; 95% CI, 5.07-5.50), intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.53-1.62), and emergency department visit (aOR, 3.87; 95% CI, 3.72-4.02). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of US Medicare beneficiaries, billed ACP services during the EOL course of patients with serious illness were relatively uncommon, but if they occurred before the last month of life, they were associated with less intensive use of EOL services. Further research on the variables affecting hospice use and expenditures in the EOL period and the differential effect of late ACP is recommended to understand the relative role of ACP in achieving goal-concordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amanda J. Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Holly G. Prigerson
- Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Priscilla Gazarian
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
| | - Dae Kim
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Phil Rodgers
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Adoma Manful
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nguyen DD, Paciotti M, Marchese M, Cole AP, Cone EB, Kibel AS, Ortega G, Lipsitz SR, Weissman JS, Trinh QD. Effect of Medicaid Expansion on Receipt of Definitive Treatment and Time to Treatment Initiation by Racial and Ethnic Minorities and at Minority-Serving Hospitals: A Patient-Level and Facility-Level Analysis of Breast, Colon, Lung, and Prostate Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:e654-e665. [PMID: 33974827 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to investigate the association between Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act and access to stage-appropriate definitive treatment for breast, colon, non-small-cell lung, and prostate cancer for underserved racial and ethnic minorities and at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs). METHODS We conducted a retrospective, difference-in-differences study including minority patients with nonmetastatic breast, colon, non-small-cell lung, and prostate cancer and patients treated at MSHs between the age of 40 and 64, with tumors at stages eligible for definitive treatment from the National Cancer Database. We not only defined non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic cancer patients as racial and ethnic minorities but also report findings for non-Hispanic Black cancer patients separately. We examined the effect of Medicaid expansion on receipt of stage-appropriate definitive therapy, time to treatment initiation (TTI) within 30 days of diagnosis, and TTI within 90 days of diagnosis. RESULTS Receipt of definitive treatment for minorities in expansion states did not change compared with minority patients in nonexpansion states. The proportion of racial and ethnic minorities in expansion states receiving treatment within 30 days increased (difference-in-differences: +3.62%; 95% CI, 1.63 to 5.61; P < .001) compared with minority patients in nonexpansion states; there was no change for TTI within 90 days. Analysis focused on Black cancer patients yielded similar results. In analyses stratified by MSH status, there was no change in receipt of definitive therapy, TTI within 30 days, and TTI within 90 days when comparing MSHs in expansion states with MSHs in nonexpansion states. CONCLUSION In our cohort of cancer patients with treatment-eligible disease, we found no significant association between Medicaid expansion and changes in receipt of definitive treatment for breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer for racial and ethnic minorities and at MSHs. Medicaid expansion was associated with improved TTI at the patient level for racial and ethnic minorities, but not at the facility level for MSHs. Targeted interventions addressing the needs of MSHs are still needed to continue mitigating national facility-level disparities in cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David-Dan Nguyen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maya Marchese
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eugene B Cone
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gezzer Ortega
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sokas C, Lee KC, Sturgeon D, Streid J, Lipsitz SR, Weissman JS, Kim DH, Cooper Z. Preoperative Frailty Status and Intensity of End-of-Life Care Among Older Adults After Emergency Surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:66-74.e3. [PMID: 33212144 PMCID: PMC8124083 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Emergency general surgery (EGS) is common and highly morbid for older adults, particularly for those who are frail. However, there are little data on the quality of end-of-life care (EOLC) for this population. OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the association of frailty with intensity of EOLC for older adults with and without frailty who undergo EGS but die within one year. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 100% Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, ≥66 years, who underwent one of five EGS procedures with the highest mortality (partial colectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer disease repair, adhesiolysis, or laparotomy) between 2008 and 2014 and died within one year. A validated claims-based frailty index (CFI) identified patients who were not frail (CFI < 0.15), prefrail (0.15 ≤ CFI < 0.25), mildly frail (0.25 ≤ CFI < 0.35), and moderately to severe frail (CFI ≥ 0.35). Multivariable adjusted logistic or Poisson regression compared post-discharge and EOL healthcare utilization. RESULTS Among 138,916 older EGS adults who died within one year, 32.2% were not frail, 31.7% were prefrail, 29.8% had mild frailty and 6.3% had moderate-to-severe frailty. Decedents with any degree of frailty experienced high-intensity EOLC (P < 0.01), low rates of hospice use (P < 0.01), and fewer days at home. Of those who survived the index hospitalization but died within one year, moderate-to-severely frail decedents had the highest odds of visiting an emergency department (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, CI = 1.13-1.27), rehospitalization (OR = 1.23, CI = 1.16-1.31), or an intensive care unit admission (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.13-1.30) in the last 30 days of life compared to nonfrail decedents. CONCLUSION While all older patients undergoing EGS have poor end-of-life outcomes, frail EGS patients receive the highest intensity EOLC and represent a vulnerable population for whom targeted interventions could limit burdensome treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Sokas
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine C Lee
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Daniel Sturgeon
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dae H Kim
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dalton MK, Jarman MP, Manful A, Koehlmoos TP, Cooper Z, Weissman JS, Schoenfeld AJ. Long-Term Healthcare Expenditures Following Combat-Related Traumatic Brain Injury. Mil Med 2021; 187:513-517. [PMID: 34173828 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most common injuries resulting from U.S. Military engagements since 2001. Long-term consequences in terms of healthcare utilization are unknown. We sought to evaluate healthcare expenditures among U.S. military service members with TBI, as compared to a matched cohort of uninjured individuals. METHODS We identified service members who were treated for an isolated combat-related TBI between 2007 and 2011. Controls consisted of hospitalized active duty service members, without any history of combat-related injury, matched by age, biologic sex, year of hospitalization, and duration of follow-up. Median total healthcare expenditures over the entire surveillance period represented our primary outcome. Expenditures in the first year (365 days) following injury (hospitalization for controls) and for subsequent years (366th day to last healthcare encounter) were considered secondarily. Negative binomial regression was used to identify the adjusted influence of TBI. RESULTS The TBI cohort consisted of 634 individuals, and there were 1,268 controls. Healthcare expenditures among those with moderate/severe TBI (median $154,335; interquartile range [IQR] $88,088-$360,977) were significantly higher as compared to individuals with mild TBI (median $113,951; IQR $66,663-$210,014) and controls (median $43,077; IQR $24,403-$83,590; P < .001). Most expenditures were incurred during the first year following injury. CONCLUSION This investigation represents the first continuous observation of healthcare utilization among individuals with combat-related TBI. Our findings speak to continued consumption of health care well beyond the immediate postinjury period, resulting in total expenditures approximately six to seven times higher than those of service members hospitalized for noncombat-related reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Dalton
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Molly P Jarman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Adoma Manful
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Tracey P Koehlmoos
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Phillips WW, Copeland J, Hofferberth SC, Armitage JR, Fox S, Kruithoff M, de Forcrand C, Catalano PJ, Lathan CS, Weissman JS, Odell DD, Colson YL. Lung Cancer Strategist Program: A novel care delivery model to improve timeliness of diagnosis and treatment in high-risk patients. Healthc (Amst) 2021; 9:100563. [PMID: 34186305 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer is challenged by complex diagnostic pathways and fragmented care that can lead to care disparities for vulnerable patients. METHODS A multi-institutional, multidisciplinary conference was convened to address the complexity of lung cancer care particularly in patients at high-risk for treatment delay. The resulting care delivery model, called the Lung Cancer Strategist Program (LCSP), was led by a thoracic-trained advanced practice provider (APP) with emphasis on expedited surgery and early oncologic consultation in the assessment of a newly diagnosed suspicious lung nodule. We performed a retrospective review to evaluate care efficiency and oncologic outcomes in the first 100 LCSP patients compared to 100 concurrent patients managed via routine surgical referral. RESULTS In the 78 LCSP and 41 routine referral patients managed via nodule surveillance, LCSP patients had a shorter time from suspicious finding to work-up (3 vs. 26 days, p < 0.001) and to surveillance decision (12.5 vs. 39 days, p < 0.001). In the 22 LCSP and 59 routine referral patients treated for intrathoracic malignancy, LCSP patients had fewer hospital visits (4 vs 6, p < 0.001), clinicians seen (1.5 vs. 2, p = 0.08), and diagnostic studies (4 vs 5, p = 0.01) with a shorter time to diagnosis (30.5 vs. 48 days, p = 0.02) and treatment (40.5 vs. 68.5 days, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Patient triage through a thoracic-trained APP in consultation with surgical, medical, and radiation oncology facilitates rapid assessment of benign versus malignant lesions with reduced time to diagnosis and treatment, even among patients at high-risk for treatment delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W Phillips
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Copeland
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sophie C Hofferberth
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julee R Armitage
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sam Fox
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret Kruithoff
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claire de Forcrand
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul J Catalano
- Department of Biostatistics & Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Joel S Weissman
- JSW - Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David D Odell
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yolonda L Colson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Weissman JS, Gazarian P, Reich A, Tjia J, Prigerson HG, Sturgeon D, Manful A. Recent Trends in the Use of Medicare Advance Care Planning Codes. J Palliat Med 2021; 23:1568-1570. [PMID: 33306008 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Priscilla Gazarian
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amanda Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Holly G Prigerson
- Cornell Center for Research on End-of-Life Care, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Sturgeon
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adoma Manful
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shah SK, Manful A, Reich AJ, Semco RS, Tjia J, Ladin K, Weissman JS. Advance care planning among Medicare beneficiaries with dementia undergoing surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:2273-2281. [PMID: 34014561 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Advance care planning (ACP), in which patients or their surrogates discuss goals and preferences for care with physicians, attorneys, friends, and family, is an important approach to help align goals with actual treatment. ACP may be particularly valuable in patients with advanced serious illnesses such as Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) for whom surgery carries significant risks. OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency, timing, and factors associated with ACP billing in Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD undergoing nontrauma inpatient surgery. DESIGN This national cohort study analyzes Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 to 2017. All patients had a 6-month lookback and follow-up period. SETTING National Medicare fee-for-service data. PARTICIPANTS All patients with ADRD, defined according to the Chronic Conditions Warehouse, undergoing inpatient surgery from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017. EXPOSURES Patient demographics, medical history, and procedural outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME ACP billing codes from 6 months before to 6 months after admission for inpatient surgery. RESULTS This study included 289,428 patients with ADRD undergoing surgery, of whom 21,754 (7.5%) had billed ACP within the 6 months before and after surgical admission. In a multivariable analysis, patients of white race, male sex, and residence in the Southern and Midwestern United States were at the highest risk of not receiving ACP. Of all patients who received ACP, 5960 (27.4%) did so before surgery while 12,658 (52.8%) received ACP after surgery. Timing of ACP after surgery was associated with an Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3 or higher (1.23, p = 0.045) and major postoperative complication or death (odds ratio 1.52, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Overall ACP billing code use is low among Medicare patients with ADRD undergoing surgery. Billed ACP appears to have a reactive pattern, occurring most commonly after surgery and in association with postoperative mortality and complications. Additional study is warranted to understand barriers to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir K Shah
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Adoma Manful
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert S Semco
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wilson NA, Reich AJ, Graham J, Bhatt DL, Nguyen LL, Weissman JS. Patient perspectives on the need for implanted device information: Implications for a post-procedural communication framework. Health Expect 2021; 24:1391-1402. [PMID: 33974346 PMCID: PMC8369078 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making and patient-centred communication have become part of pre-procedural decisions and perioperative care across medical specialties. However, gaps exist in patient communication about the implanted device received and the benefits in sharing information about their procedure and device. OBJECTIVE To understand the patients' knowledge of identifying information for their implanted devices and perspectives on sharing their implanted device information. METHODS Four focus groups were conducted with patients who had received a cardiac or vascular implanted device from one of the study sites within the previous 6 months. Data were transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS Five themes emerged: lack of awareness of identifying information on implanted devices; value of information on implanted devices; varying trust with sharing device information; perceived risk with sharing device information; and lack of consensus on a systematic process for tracking implanted devices. DISCUSSION Patients desire post-procedural information on their implanted device and a designated plan for longitudinal follow-up, but lack trust and perceive risk with broadly sharing their implanted device information. CONCLUSION After receiving an implanted device, post-procedural patient communication needs to be expanded to include identifying information on the device including the unique device identifier, how long-term tracking will be supported and the process for notification in case of a problem with the device. This communication should also include education on how sharing device information supports patients' long-term health care, post-market safety surveillance and research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The research team included members who were also patients with implanted devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia A Wilson
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Louis L Nguyen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Friedlander DF, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP, Marchese M, Lipsitz SR, Weissman JS, Schoenfeld AJ, Ortega G, Trinh QD. Where Is the Value in Ambulatory Versus Inpatient Surgery? Ann Surg 2021; 273:909-916. [PMID: 31460878 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of index surgical care setting on perioperative costs and readmission rates across 4 common elective general surgery procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Facility fees seem to be a driving force behind rising US healthcare costs, and inpatient-based fees are significantly higher than those associated with ambulatory services. Little is known about factors influencing where patients undergo elective surgery. METHODS All-payer claims data from the 2014 New York and Florida Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project were used to identify 73,724 individuals undergoing an index hernia repair, primary total or partial thyroidectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic appendectomy in either the inpatient or ambulatory care setting. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted gamma generalized linear and logistic regression was employed to compare costs and 30-day readmission between inpatient and ambulatory-based surgery, respectively. RESULTS Approximately 87% of index surgical cases were performed in the ambulatory setting. Adjusted mean index surgical costs were significantly lower among ambulatory versus inpatient cases for all 4 procedures (P < 0.001 for all). Adjusted odds of experiencing a 30-day readmission after thyroidectomy [odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53-0.93; P = 0.03], hernia repair (OR 0.28, 95% CI, 0.20-0.40; P < 0.001), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR 0.37, 95% CI, 0.32-0.43; P < 0.001) were lower in the ambulatory versus inpatient setting. Readmission rates among ambulatory versus inpatient-based laparoscopic appendectomy were comparable (OR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.31-1.26; P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS Ambulatory surgery offers significant costs savings and generally superior 30-day outcomes relative to inpatient-based care for appropriately selected patients across 4 common elective general surgery procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David F Friedlander
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urological Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marieke J Krimphove
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urological Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urological Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maya Marchese
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urological Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gezzer Ortega
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Urological Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Solomon DH, Weissman JS, Choi H, Atlas SJ, Berardinelli C, Dedier J, Fischer MA, Fitzgerald J, Hinteregger E, Johnsen B, Marini DD, McLean R, Murray F, Neogi T, Oertel LB, Pillinger MH, Riggs KR, Saag K, Suh D, Watkins J, Barry MJ. Designing a Strategy Trial for the Management of Gout: The Use of a Modified Delphi Panel. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021; 3:341-348. [PMID: 33932149 PMCID: PMC8126754 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Disagreement exists between rheumatology and primary care societies regarding gout management. This paper describes a formal process for gathering input from stakeholders in the planning of a trial to compare gout management strategies. METHODS We recruited patients, nurses, physician assistants, primary care clinicians, and rheumatologists to participate in a modified Delphi panel (mDP) to provide input on design of a trial focused on optimal management for primary care patients with gout. The 16 panelists received a plain-language briefing document that discussed the rationale for the trial, key clinical issues in gout, and aspects of trial design. The panelists also received information and considerations on nine voting questions (VQs), judged to be the key design questions. Cognitive interviews with panelists ensured that the VQs were understood by the range of panelists involved in the mDP. Panelists were asked to score all VQs from 1 (definitely no) to 9 (definitely yes). Two voting rounds were conducted-round 1 by email and round 2 by video conference. RESULTS The VQs were modified through the cognitive interviews. The round 1 voting resulted in consensus on eight items, with consensus defined as median voting score in the same tercile (1-3, 4-6 or 7-9). Re-voting at the meeting (round 2) reached consensus on the remaining item. CONCLUSION An mDP with various stakeholders facilitated consensus on the design of a trial of different management strategies for chronic gout. This method may be useful for designing trials of clinical questions with substantial disagreement across stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hyon Choi
- Massachusetts General HospitalBoston
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert McLean
- Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ken Saag
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
| | - Dong Suh
- Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonMassachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Krupka DC, Graham J, Wilson NA, Li A, Landman AB, Bhatt DL, Nguyen LL, Reich AJ, Gupta A, Zerhouni YA, Capatch KJ, Concheri KP, Weissman JS. Transmitting Device Identifiers of Implants From the Point of Care to Insurers: A Demonstration Project. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:223-230. [PMID: 33734207 PMCID: PMC7984755 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For implanted devices, an effective postmarket surveillance system does not exist. For medications, the Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel Initiative plays that role, relying mainly on drug codes in insurance claims. Unique device identifiers (UDIs) could play an analogous role for implants, but there is no mandate for providers to include UDIs in claims or for payers to record them. Objections have been raised to incorporating UDIs into claims based on a potential burden on providers. METHODS To assess this purported barrier, we modified information systems at 2 provider-payer dyads to allow for the transmission of UDI data from provider to payer. In addition, to illustrate the potential benefit of including device data in claims, we used our data to compare rates of 90-day adverse events after implantation using the electronic health record (EHR) alone with the EHR plus claims. RESULTS The software system modifications were modest and performed as designed. Moreover, the level of difficulty of their development and implementation was comparable to that associated with a typical new release of an existing system. In addition, our data demonstrated the ability of claims-based data plus EHR data to reveal a larger percentage of postprocedure adverse events than data from EHRs alone. CONCLUSIONS Modifying information systems to allow for the transmission of UDI data from providers to payers should not impose a substantial burden on either. Implementation of a postmarket surveillance system based on such data in claims will require, however, the development of a system analogous to Sentinel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan C. Krupka
- From the Twin Peaks Group, LLC, Lexington, Massachusetts
| | - Jove Graham
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Natalia A. Wilson
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Angela Li
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
| | | | - Deepak L. Bhatt
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Amanda J. Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Avni Gupta
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Yasmin A. Zerhouni
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Kevin J. Capatch
- System Support Services, Geisinger Health, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Joel S. Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ashana DC, D’Arcangelo N, Gazarian PK, Gupta A, Perez S, Reich AJ, Tjia J, Halpern SD, Weissman JS, Ladin K. "Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021; 77:339-346. [PMID: 33780534 PMCID: PMC8824574 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structurally marginalized groups experience disproportionately low rates of advance care planning (ACP). To improve equitable patient-centered end-of-life care, we examine barriers and facilitators to ACP among clinicians as they are central participants in these discussions. METHOD In this national study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively selected clinicians from 6 diverse health systems between August 2018 and June 2019. Thematic analysis yielded themes characterizing clinicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to ACP among patients, and patient-centered ways of overcoming them. RESULTS Among 74 participants, 49 (66.2%) were physicians, 16.2% were nurses, and 13.5% were social workers. Most worked in primary care (35.1%), geriatrics (21.1%), and palliative care (19.3%) settings. Clinicians most frequently expressed difficulty discussing ACP with certain racial and ethnic groups (African American, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American) (31.1%), non-native English speakers (24.3%), and those with certain religious beliefs (Catholic, Orthodox Jewish, and Muslim) (13.5%). Clinicians were more likely to attribute barriers to ACP completion to patients (62.2%), than to clinicians (35.1%) or health systems (37.8%). Three themes characterized clinicians' difficulty approaching ACP (preconceived views of patients' preferences, narrow definitions of successful ACP, and lack of institutional resources), while the final theme illustrated facilitators to ACP (acknowledging bias and rejecting stereotypes, mission-driven focus on ACP, and acceptance of all preferences). CONCLUSIONS Most clinicians avoided ACP with certain racial and ethnic groups, those with limited English fluency, and persons with certain religious beliefs. Our findings provide evidence to support development of clinician-level and institutional-level interventions and to reduce disparities in ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepshikha Charan Ashana
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Noah D’Arcangelo
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Priscilla K Gazarian
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Avni Gupta
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Stephen Perez
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
| | - Scott D Halpern
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA,Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA,Department of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA,Address correspondence to: Keren Ladin, PhD, MSc, Department of Community Health, Tufts University, 574 Boston Avenue, Suite 216, Medford, MA 02155, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Adler JT, Tsai TC, Jin G, Cron DC, Ross-Driscoll KH, Malek SK, Tullius SG, Weissman JS. Association of balanced abdominal organ transplant center volumes with patient outcomes. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14217. [PMID: 33405324 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The volume-outcome relationship for organ-specific transplantation is well-described; it is unknown if the relative balance of kidney compared with liver volumes within an institution relates to organ-specific outcomes. We assessed the association between relative balance within a transplant center and outcomes. METHODS National retrospective analysis of isolated kidney and liver transplants in United States 2005-2014 followed through 2019. Latent class analysis defined transplant center phenotypes. Multivariate Cox models estimated death-censored graft loss and mortality. RESULTS Latent class analysis identified four phenotypes: kidney only (n = 117), kidney dominant (n = 36), mixed/balanced (n = 90), and liver dominant (n = 13). Compared to mixed centers, the risk of kidney graft loss was higher at kidney-dominant (HR 1.07, p < .001) and liver-dominant (HR 1.10, p < .001) centers, while kidney-only (HR 1.06, p = .01) centers had higher mortality. Liver graft loss was not associated with phenotype, but risk of patient death was lower (HR 0.93, p = .02) at liver dominant and higher (HR 1.06, p = .02) at kidney-dominant centers. CONCLUSIONS A mixed phenotype was associated with improved kidney transplant outcomes, whereas liver transplant outcomes were best at liver-dominant centers. While these findings need to be verified with center-level resources, optimization of shared resources could improve patient and organ outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel T Adler
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas C Tsai
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ginger Jin
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David C Cron
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine H Ross-Driscoll
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sayeed K Malek
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefan G Tullius
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dalton MK, Mjåset C, Manful A, Helgeson MD, Wynn-Jones W, Cooper Z, Koehlmoos TP, Weissman JS. Strategies for spinal surgery reimbursement: bundling in the working-age population. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:112. [PMID: 33530994 PMCID: PMC7852105 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06112-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Bundled payments for spine surgery, which is known for having high overall cost with wide variation, have been previously studied in older adults. However, there has been limited work examining bundled payments in working-age patients. We sought to identify the variation in the cost of spine surgery among working age adults in a large, national insurance claims database. Methods We queried the TRICARE claims database for all patients, aged 18–64, undergoing cervical and non-cervical spinal fusion surgery between 2012 and 2014. We calculated the case mix adjusted, price standardized payments for all aspects of care during the 60-, 90-, and 180-day periods post operation. Variation was assessed by stratifying Hospital Referral Regions into quintiles. Results After adjusting for case mix, there was significant variation in the cost of both cervical ($10,538.23, 60% of first quintile) and non-cervical ($20,155.59, 74%). Relative variation in total cost decreased from 60- to 180-days (63 to 55% and 76 to 69%). Index hospitalization was the primary driver of costs and variation for both cervical (1st-to-5th quintile range: $11,033–$19,960) and non-cervical ($18,565–$36,844) followed by readmissions for cervical ($0–$11,521) and non-cervical ($0–$13,932). Even at the highest quintile, post-acute care remained the lowest contribution to overall cost ($2070 & $2984). Conclusions There is wide variation in the cost of spine surgery across the United States for working age adults, driven largely by index procedure and readmissions costs. Our findings suggest that implementing episodes longer than the current 90-day standard would do little to better control cost variation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06112-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Dalton
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
| | - Christer Mjåset
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.,Commonwealth Fund Harkness Fellowship, 1 East 75th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Adoma Manful
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA
| | - Melvin D Helgeson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - William Wynn-Jones
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.,Commonwealth Fund Harkness Fellowship, 1 East 75th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA
| | - Tracey P Koehlmoos
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20184, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA
| |
Collapse
|