1
|
Moehring RW, Yarrington ME, Warren BG, Lokhnygina Y, Atkinson E, Bankston A, Collucio J, David MZ, Davis AE, Davis J, Dionne B, Dyer AP, Jones TM, Klompas M, Kubiak DW, Marsalis J, Omorogbe J, Orajaka P, Parish A, Parker T, Pearson JC, Pearson T, Sarubbi C, Shaw C, Spivey J, Wolf R, Wrenn RH, Dodds Ashley ES, Anderson DJ. Evaluation of an Opt-Out Protocol for Antibiotic De-Escalation in Patients With Suspected Sepsis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:433-442. [PMID: 36167851 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis guidelines recommend daily review to de-escalate or stop antibiotics in appropriate patients. This randomized, controlled trial evaluated an opt-out protocol to decrease unnecessary antibiotics in patients with suspected sepsis. METHODS We evaluated non-intensive care adults on broad-spectrum antibiotics despite negative blood cultures at 10 US hospitals from September 2018 through May 2020. A 23-item safety check excluded patients with ongoing signs of systemic infection, concerning or inadequate microbiologic data, or high-risk conditions. Eligible patients were randomized to the opt-out protocol vs usual care. Primary outcome was post-enrollment antibacterial days of therapy (DOT). Clinicians caring for intervention patients were contacted to encourage antibiotic discontinuation using opt-out language. If continued, clinicians discussed the rationale for continuing antibiotics and de-escalation plans. To evaluate those with zero post-enrollment DOT, hurdle models provided 2 measures: odds ratio of antibiotic continuation and ratio of mean DOT among those who continued antibiotics. RESULTS Among 9606 patients screened, 767 (8%) were enrolled. Intervention patients had 32% lower odds of antibiotic continuation (79% vs 84%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], .47-.98). DOT among those who continued antibiotics were similar (ratio of means, 1.06; 95% CI, .88-1.26). Fewer intervention patients were exposed to extended-spectrum antibiotics (36% vs 44%). Common reasons for continuing antibiotics were treatment of localized infection (76%) and belief that stopping antibiotics was unsafe (31%). Thirty-day safety events were similar. CONCLUSIONS An antibiotic opt-out protocol that targeted patients with suspected sepsis resulted in more antibiotic discontinuations, similar DOT when antibiotics were continued, and no evidence of harm. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT03517007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah W Moehring
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael E Yarrington
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bobby G Warren
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yuliya Lokhnygina
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erica Atkinson
- Department of Pharmacy, Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Lumberton, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison Bankston
- Department of Pharmacy, Piedmont Newnan Hospital, Newnan, Georgia, USA
| | - Julia Collucio
- Department of Pharmacy, Piedmont Atlanta Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael Z David
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Angelina E Davis
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Janice Davis
- Department of Pharmacy, Piedmont Fayette Hospital, Fayette, Georgia, USA
| | - Brandon Dionne
- Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pharmacy and Health Systems Sciences, Northeastern University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - April P Dyer
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Travis M Jones
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Klompas
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David W Kubiak
- Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Marsalis
- Department of Pharmacy, Piedmont Newnan Hospital, Newnan, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Patricia Orajaka
- Department of Pharmacy, Iredell Health, Statesville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd Parker
- Department of Pharmacy, Piedmont Atlanta Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Pearson
- Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tonya Pearson
- Department of Pharmacy, Piedmont Fayette Hospital, Fayette, Georgia, USA
| | - Christina Sarubbi
- Department of Pharmacy, UNC REX Healthcare, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christian Shaw
- Department of Pharmacy, Wilson Medical Center, Wilson, North Carolina, USA
| | - Justin Spivey
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert Wolf
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebekah H Wrenn
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth S Dodds Ashley
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Deverick J Anderson
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moehring RW, Yarrington ME, Warren BG, Lokhnygina Y, Atkinson E, Bankston A, Coluccio J, David MZ, Davis A, Davis J, Dionne B, Dyer A, Jones TM, Klompas M, Kubiak DW, Marsalis J, Omorogbe J, Orajaka P, Parish A, Parker T, Pearson JC, Pearson T, Sarubbi C, Shaw C, Spivey J, Wolf R, Wrenn R, Ashley ED, Anderson DJ. 14. Effects of an Opt-Out Protocol for Antibiotic De-escalation among Selected Patients with Suspected Sepsis: The DETOURS Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021. [PMCID: PMC8643792 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sepsis guidelines recommend daily review to de-escalate or stop antibiotics in appropriate patients. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (NCT03517007) of an opt-out protocol to decrease unnecessary antibiotics in selected patients with suspected sepsis. Methods We evaluated non-ICU adults remaining on broad-spectrum antibiotics with negative blood cultures at 48-96 hours at ten U.S. hospitals during September 2018-May 2020. A 23-item safety check excluded patients with ongoing signs of infection, concerning or inadequate microbiologic data, or high-risk conditions (Figure 1). Eligible patients were randomized to the opt-out protocol vs. usual care. The primary outcome was 30-day post-enrollment antibacterial days of therapy (DOT). Clinicians caring for intervention patients were contacted by a pharmacist or physician to encourage antibiotic discontinuation or de-escalation using opt-out language, discuss rationale for continuing antibiotics, working diagnosis, and de-escalation and duration plans. Hurdle models separately compared the odds of antibiotic continuation and DOT distributions among those who continued antibiotics. Components of the De-Escalating Empiric Therapy: Opting-OUt of Rx in Selected patients with Suspected Sepsis (DETOURS) Trial Protocol ![]()
Results Among 9606 screened, 767 (8%) were enrolled (Figure 2). Common reasons for exclusion were antibiotics given prior to blood culture (35%), positive culture from non-blood sites (26%), and increased oxygen requirement (21%). Intervention patients had 32% lower odds of antibiotic continuation (79% vs. 84%, OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.47, 0.98]). DOT distributions among those who continued antibiotics were similar (ratio of means 1.06 [0.88-1.26], Figure 3). Fewer intervention patients were exposed to extended-spectrum agents (38% vs. 44%). Common reasons for continuing antibiotics were treatment of localized infection (76%) and belief that stopping antibiotics was not safe (31%). Safety outcomes such as mortality, readmission, sepsis relapse, C. difficile, and length of stay did not differ. DETOURS Trial Flow Diagram ![]()
Flow of participants through the DETOURS Trial. Observed Days of Antibiotic Therapy Among Intervention and Control Subjects in the DETOURS Trial ![]()
Post-enrollment days of antibiotic therapy among 767 DETOURS Trial participants in 10 US acute care hospitals within 30 days after enrollment. Dark pink color indicates percent overlap between intervention (purple) and control (light pink) groups. Conclusion In this patient-level randomized trial of a stewardship intervention, the opt-out de-escalation protocol targeting selected patients with suspected sepsis resulted in more antibiotic discontinuations but did not affect safety events. Disclosures Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, UpToDate, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Author Royalties) Michael Z. David, MD PhD, GSK (Board Member) Michael Klompas, MD, MPH, UpToDate (Other Financial or Material Support, Chapter Author)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah W Moehring
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC
| | | | - Bobby G Warren
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC
| | | | - Erica Atkinson
- Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Lumberton, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Angelina Davis
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - April Dyer
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC
| | - Travis M Jones
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC
| | - Michael Klompas
- Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Justin Spivey
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert Wolf
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, California
| | | | | | - Deverick J Anderson
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|