1
|
Lin F, Chhapekar SS, Vieira CC, Da Silva MP, Rojas A, Lee D, Liu N, Pardo EM, Lee YC, Dong Z, Pinheiro JB, Ploper LD, Rupe J, Chen P, Wang D, Nguyen HT. Correction to: Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective. Theor Appl Genet 2022; 135:3873-3874. [PMID: 36315288 PMCID: PMC9729306 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04226-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Lin
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Sushil Satish Chhapekar
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
| | - Caio Canella Vieira
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Marcos Paulo Da Silva
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
| | - Alejandro Rojas
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
| | - Dongho Lee
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Nianxi Liu
- Soybean Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun,, 130033 Jilin China
| | - Esteban Mariano Pardo
- Instituto de Tecnología Agroindustrial del Noroeste Argentino (ITANOA) [Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)], Av. William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC, Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
| | - Yi-Chen Lee
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Zhimin Dong
- Soybean Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun,, 130033 Jilin China
| | - Jose Baldin Pinheiro
- Departamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (ESALQ/USP), PO Box 9, Piracicaba, SP 13418-900 Brazil
| | - Leonardo Daniel Ploper
- Instituto de Tecnología Agroindustrial del Noroeste Argentino (ITANOA) [Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)], Av. William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC, Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
| | - John Rupe
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
| | - Pengyin Chen
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Dechun Wang
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Henry T. Nguyen
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin F, Chhapekar SS, Vieira CC, Da Silva MP, Rojas A, Lee D, Liu N, Pardo EM, Lee YC, Dong Z, Pinheiro JB, Ploper LD, Rupe J, Chen P, Wang D, Nguyen HT. Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective. Theor Appl Genet 2022; 135:3773-3872. [PMID: 35790543 PMCID: PMC9729162 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04101-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE This review provides a comprehensive atlas of QTLs, genes, and alleles conferring resistance to 28 important diseases in all major soybean production regions in the world. Breeding disease-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] varieties is a common goal for soybean breeding programs to ensure the sustainability and growth of soybean production worldwide. However, due to global climate change, soybean breeders are facing strong challenges to defeat diseases. Marker-assisted selection and genomic selection have been demonstrated to be successful methods in quickly integrating vertical resistance or horizontal resistance into improved soybean varieties, where vertical resistance refers to R genes and major effect QTLs, and horizontal resistance is a combination of major and minor effect genes or QTLs. This review summarized more than 800 resistant loci/alleles and their tightly linked markers for 28 soybean diseases worldwide, caused by nematodes, oomycetes, fungi, bacteria, and viruses. The major breakthroughs in the discovery of disease resistance gene atlas of soybean were also emphasized which include: (1) identification and characterization of vertical resistance genes reside rhg1 and Rhg4 for soybean cyst nematode, and exploration of the underlying regulation mechanisms through copy number variation and (2) map-based cloning and characterization of Rps11 conferring resistance to 80% isolates of Phytophthora sojae across the USA. In this review, we also highlight the validated QTLs in overlapping genomic regions from at least two studies and applied a consistent naming nomenclature for these QTLs. Our review provides a comprehensive summary of important resistant genes/QTLs and can be used as a toolbox for soybean improvement. Finally, the summarized genetic knowledge sheds light on future directions of accelerated soybean breeding and translational genomics studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Lin
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Sushil Satish Chhapekar
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
| | - Caio Canella Vieira
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Marcos Paulo Da Silva
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
| | - Alejandro Rojas
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
| | - Dongho Lee
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Nianxi Liu
- Soybean Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun,, 130033 Jilin China
| | - Esteban Mariano Pardo
- Instituto de Tecnología Agroindustrial del Noroeste Argentino (ITANOA) [Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)], Av. William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC, Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
| | - Yi-Chen Lee
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Zhimin Dong
- Soybean Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun,, 130033 Jilin China
| | - Jose Baldin Pinheiro
- Departamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” (ESALQ/USP), PO Box 9, Piracicaba, SP 13418-900 Brazil
| | - Leonardo Daniel Ploper
- Instituto de Tecnología Agroindustrial del Noroeste Argentino (ITANOA) [Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)], Av. William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC, Las Talitas, Tucumán, Argentina
| | - John Rupe
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
| | - Pengyin Chen
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
- Fisher Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
| | - Dechun Wang
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA
| | - Henry T. Nguyen
- Division of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pimentel MF, Srour AY, Warner AJ, Bond JP, Bradley CA, Rupe J, Chilvers MI, Rojas JA, Jacobs JL, Little CR, Robertson AE, Giesler LJ, Malvick D, Wise K, Tenuta A, Fakhoury AM. Ecology and diversity of culturable fungal species associated with soybean seedling diseases in the Midwestern United States. J Appl Microbiol 2022; 132:3797-3811. [PMID: 35226387 PMCID: PMC9311804 DOI: 10.1111/jam.15507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To isolate and characterize fungi associated with diseased soybean seedlings in Midwestern soybean production fields and to determine the influence of environmental and edaphic factors on their incidence. METHODS AND RESULTS Seedlings were collected from fields with seedling disease history in 2012 and 2013 for fungal isolation. Environmental and edaphic data associated with each field was collected. 3036 fungal isolates were obtained and assigned to 76 species. The most abundant genera recovered were Fusarium (73%) and Trichoderma (11.2%). Other genera included Mortierella, Clonostachys, Rhizoctonia, Alternaria, Mucor, Phoma, Macrophomina and Phomopsis. Most recovered species are known soybean pathogens. However, non-pathogenic organisms were also isolated. Crop history, soil density, water source, precipitation and temperature were the main factors influencing the abundance of fungal species. CONCLUSION Key fungal species associated with soybean seedling diseases occurring in several US production regions were characterized. This work also identified major environment and edaphic factors affecting the abundance and occurrence of these species. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY The identification and characterization of the main pathogens associated with seedling diseases across major soybean-producing areas could help manage those pathogens, and devise more effective and sustainable practices to reduce the damage they cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirian F. Pimentel
- Department of Agricultural SciencesSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleIllinoisUSA
| | - Ali Y. Srour
- USDA, ARS, New England Plant, Soil, and Water LaboratoryOronoMaineUSA
| | | | - Jason P. Bond
- Department of Agricultural SciencesSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleIllinoisUSA
| | - Carl A. Bradley
- Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of Kentucky Research and Educational CenterPrincetonKentuckyUSA
| | - John Rupe
- Department of Entomology and Plant PathologyUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleArkansasUSA
| | - Martin I. Chilvers
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMichiganUSA
| | - J. Alejandro Rojas
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMichiganUSA
| | - Janette L. Jacobs
- Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMichiganUSA
| | | | - Alison E. Robertson
- Department of Plant Pathology and MicrobiologyIowa State UniversityAmesIowaUSA
| | - Loren J. Giesler
- Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of Nebraska‐LincolnLincolnNebraskaUSA
| | - Dean Malvick
- Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Kiersten Wise
- Department of Botany and Plant PathologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Albert Tenuta
- Ontario Ministry of AgricultureFood and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA)RidgetownOntarioUSA
| | - Ahmad M. Fakhoury
- Department of Agricultural SciencesSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu Q, Mueller GM, Wheller T, Trappe JM, Rupe J. Book Reviews. Mycologia 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/00275514.1998.12027010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuxin Wu
- Department of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois 60605
| | | | - Terri Wheller
- Texas A & M Agricultural & Experiment Station, Rt. 3, Box 219, Lubbock, Texas 79401
| | - James M. Trappe
- Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-750
| | - John Rupe
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li S, Sciumbato G, Rupe J, Shannon G, Chen P, Boykin D. Evaluation of Commercial Soybean Cultivars for Reaction to Phomopsis Seed Decay. Plant Dis 2017; 101:1990-1997. [PMID: 30677383 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-02-17-0204-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Phomopsis seed decay (PSD), caused by Phomopsis longicolla (syn. Diaporthe longicolla), is an economically important soybean disease causing poor seed quality. Planting resistant cultivars is one of the most effective means to control PSD. In this study, 16 commercially available maturity groups IV and V soybean cultivars, including two previously identified PSD-resistant and two PSD-susceptible checks, were evaluated for seed infection by P. longicolla in inoculated and noninoculated plots, and harvested promptly or with a 2-week delay in harvest. The test was conducted at Stoneville, Mississippi, in 2012 and 2013. Seed infection by P. longicolla ranged from 0.5 to 76%, and seed germination ranged from 18 to 97%. One MG IV cultivar (Morsoy R2 491) and five MG V cultivars (Progeny 5650, Progeny 5706, Asgrow 5606, Asgrow 5831, and Dyna-Gro33C59) had significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower percent seed infected by P. longicolla than their respective susceptible checks and other cultivars in the same tests. Information obtained from this study will be useful for soybean growers and breeders for selection of cultivars for planting or breeding and future genetic studies in the development of cultivars with improved resistance to PSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxian Li
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Crop Genetics Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
| | - Gabe Sciumbato
- Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS 38776
| | - John Rupe
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
| | - Grover Shannon
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873
| | - Pengyin Chen
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Portageville, MO 63873
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li S, Rupe J, Chen P, Shannon G, Wrather A, Boykin D. Evaluation of Diverse Soybean Germplasm for Resistance to Phomopsis Seed Decay. Plant Dis 2015; 99:1517-1525. [PMID: 30695950 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-04-14-0429-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Phomopsis seed decay (PSD), caused primarily by the fungal pathogen Phomopsis longicolla, is one of the most important diseases reducing seed quality and yield of soybean. Few cultivars have been identified as resistant. To identify new sources of resistance to PSD, 135 soybean germplasm accessions, originating from 28 countries, were field screened in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Missouri in 2009. Based on seed assays of natural field infection by P. longicolla in 2009, 42 lines, including the most resistant and susceptible lines, were reevaluated in the field in 2010, 2011, and 2012 with P. longicolla-inoculated and noninoculated treatments. Six maturity group (MG) III (PI 189891, PI 398697, PI 417361, PI 504481, PI 504488, and PI 88490), four MG IV (PI 158765, PI 235335, PI 346308, and PI 416779), and five MG V (PI 381659, PI 381668, PI 407749, PI 417567, and PI 476920) lines had significantly lower percent seed infection by P. longicolla than the susceptible checks and other lines in the same test (P ≤ 0.05). They appeared to have some levels of resistance to PSD. These new sources of PSD resistance can be used in developing soybean breeding lines or cultivars with resistance to PSD, and for genetic mapping of PSD resistance genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxian Li
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Crop Genetics Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
| | - John Rupe
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
| | | | - Grover Shannon
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Portageville 63873
| | - Allen Wrather
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Portageville 63873
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alloatti J, Li S, Chen P, Jaureguy L, Smith SF, Florez-Palacios L, Orazaly M, Rupe J. Screening a Diverse Soybean Germplasm Collection for Reaction to Purple Seed Stain Caused by Cercospora kikuchii. Plant Dis 2015; 99:1140-1146. [PMID: 30695935 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-09-14-0878-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Purple seed stain (PSS), caused by Cercospora kikuchii, is a prevalent soybean disease that causes latent seed infection, seed decay, purple seed discoloration, and overall quality deterioration. The objective of this research was to screen soybean accessions from the United States Department of Agriculture germplasm collection for resistance to PSS. In total, 123 plant introductions (PI) from 28 different countries, representing maturity groups (MG) III, IV, and V, were screened. Incidence of Cercospora leaf blight (% CLB), visual PSS (% PSS), and seed infected by C. kikuchii (% C. kikuchii) in harvested seed were determined. In 2007, % C. kikuchii was 2 to 51% for MG III, 2 to 35% for MG IV, and 0 to 33% for MG V. In 2008, % C. kikuchii was 0 to 45% for MG III, 1 to 71% for MG IV, and 0 to 15% for MG V. In total, four and ten PI from MG III and IV, respectively, were identified as resistant to PSS in both years. Highly positive correlations were found for inoculated versus noninoculated treatments and for % PSS versus % C. kikuchii infection. The PSS-resistant PI identified in this study will be valuable to breeders in developing resistant cultivars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julieta Alloatti
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
| | - Shuxian Li
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Crop Genetics Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
| | - Pengyin Chen
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas
| | - Luciano Jaureguy
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas
| | - S Faye Smith
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas
| | | | - Moldir Orazaly
- Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas
| | - John Rupe
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sikora EJ, Allen TW, Wise KA, Bergstrom G, Bradley CA, Bond J, Brown-Rytlewski D, Chilvers M, Damicone J, DeWolf E, Dorrance A, Dufault N, Esker P, Faske TR, Giesler L, Goldberg N, Golod J, Gómez IRG, Grau C, Grybauskas A, Franc G, Hammerschmidt R, Hartman GL, Henn RA, Hershman D, Hollier C, Isakeit T, Isard S, Jacobsen B, Jardine D, Kemerait R, Koenning S, Langham M, Malvick D, Markell S, Marois JJ, Monfort S, Mueller D, Mueller J, Mulrooney R, Newman M, Osborne L, Padgett GB, Ruden BE, Rupe J, Schneider R, Schwartz H, Shaner G, Singh S, Stromberg E, Sweets L, Tenuta A, Vaiciunas S, Yang XB, Young-Kelly H, Zidek J. A Coordinated Effort to Manage Soybean Rust in North America: A Success Story in Soybean Disease Monitoring. Plant Dis 2014; 98:864-875. [PMID: 30708845 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-02-14-0121-fe] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Existing crop monitoring programs determine the incidence and distribution of plant diseases and pathogens and assess the damage caused within a crop production region. These programs have traditionally used observed or predicted disease and pathogen data and environmental information to prescribe management practices that minimize crop loss. Monitoring programs are especially important for crops with broad geographic distribution or for diseases that can cause rapid and great economic losses. Successful monitoring programs have been developed for several plant diseases, including downy mildew of cucurbits, Fusarium head blight of wheat, potato late blight, and rusts of cereal crops. A recent example of a successful disease-monitoring program for an economically important crop is the soybean rust (SBR) monitoring effort within North America. SBR, caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi, was first identified in the continental United States in November 2004. SBR causes moderate to severe yield losses globally. The fungus produces foliar lesions on soybean (Glycine max) and other legume hosts. P. pachyrhizi diverts nutrients from the host to its own growth and reproduction. The lesions also reduce photosynthetic area. Uredinia rupture the host epidermis and diminish stomatal regulation of transpiration to cause tissue desiccation and premature defoliation. Severe soybean yield losses can occur if plants defoliate during the mid-reproductive growth stages. The rapid response to the threat of SBR in North America resulted in an unprecedented amount of information dissemination and the development of a real-time, publicly available monitoring and prediction system known as the Soybean Rust-Pest Information Platform for Extension and Education (SBR-PIPE). The objectives of this article are (i) to highlight the successful response effort to SBR in North America, and (ii) to introduce researchers to the quantity and type of data generated by SBR-PIPE. Data from this system may now be used to answer questions about the biology, ecology, and epidemiology of an important pathogen and disease of soybean.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Sikora
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn 36849
| | - T W Allen
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville 38776
| | - K A Wise
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette 47907
| | - G Bergstrom
- Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca 14853
| | - C A Bradley
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
| | - J Bond
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 62901
| | - D Brown-Rytlewski
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
| | - M Chilvers
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
| | - J Damicone
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078
| | - E DeWolf
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506
| | - A Dorrance
- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691
| | - N Dufault
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611
| | - P Esker
- Escuela de Agronomia, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica 10111
| | - T R Faske
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas Lonoke Research and Extension Center, Lonoke 72086
| | - L Giesler
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68508
| | - N Goldberg
- Department of Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003
| | - J Golod
- Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802
| | - I R G Gómez
- Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiologica Fitosanitaria, Centro Nacional de Referenceia Fitosanitaria, Col. Del Carmen, Coyoacan, Mexico
| | - C Grau
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
| | - A Grybauskas
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape Management, University of Maryland, College Park 20742
| | | | - R Hammerschmidt
- Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
| | - G L Hartman
- United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Urbana 61801
| | - R A Henn
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State 39762
| | - D Hershman
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research and Education Center, Princeton 42445
| | - C Hollier
- Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803
| | - T Isakeit
- Department of Plant Pathology & Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843
| | - S Isard
- Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802
| | - B Jacobsen
- Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717
| | - D Jardine
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506
| | - R Kemerait
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton 31793
| | - S Koenning
- Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
| | - M Langham
- Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007
| | - D Malvick
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108
| | - S Markell
- Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58108
| | - J J Marois
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611
| | - S Monfort
- Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville 29817
| | - D Mueller
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - J Mueller
- Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville 29817
| | - R Mulrooney
- Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware, Newark 19716
| | - M Newman
- BASF Corporation, Jackson, TN 38301
| | | | - G B Padgett
- Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803
| | - B E Ruden
- South Dakota Wheat Growers Association, Aberdeen 57401
| | - J Rupe
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
| | - R Schneider
- Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803
| | - H Schwartz
- Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523
| | - G Shaner
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette 47907
| | - S Singh
- Department of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Kimberly 83341
| | - E Stromberg
- Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061
| | - L Sweets
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
| | - A Tenuta
- Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, and Ministry of Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada, NOP2CO
| | - S Vaiciunas
- New Jersey Department of Agriculture, Trenton 08625
| | - X B Yang
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
| | - H Young-Kelly
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee West Tennessee Research and Education Center, Jackson 38301
| | - J Zidek
- ZedX Incorporated, Bellefonte, PA 16823
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cross C, Wrather A, Fothergill K, Shannon G, Li S, Shumway C, Rupe J. Effect of Lactofen, Azoxystrobin, and Genotypes on Charcoal Rot, Phomopsis Seed Decay, and Pod and Stem Blight in Soybean. Plant Dis 2012; 96:1154-1158. [PMID: 30727092 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-09-11-0810-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Yield-limiting diseases such as charcoal rot and Phomopsis seed decay have a significant impact on the economic potential for soybean because there are few methods for management of these diseases. The objectives of this study were to determine the development of charcoal rot, infection of seed by Phomopsis spp., and severity of pod and stem blight on Asgrow 4403, Delta Pine 5806, United States Department of Agriculture-introduced DT 97-4290 and plant introduction (PI) number PI 567562A, and Asgrow 4403 treated and not treated with lactofen or azoxystrobin. This is the first report of high levels of resistance in PI 567562A to charcoal rot, and resistance in this PI was greater than for DT 97-4290. Application of lactofen at growth stage R1 and azoxystrobin at either planting, R3, or R6 had no significant impact on severity of charcoal rot, percentage of harvested seed infected by Phomopsis spp., or severity of pod and stem blight on genotype Asgrow 4403. Of four genotypes evaluated, none were resistant to infection by Phomopsis spp. The genotypes Asgrow 4403, DP 5806, and DT 97-4290 were susceptible to pod and stem blight and PI 567562A was resistant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cory Cross
- University of Missouri, Portageville 63873
| | | | | | | | - Shuxian Li
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS 38776
| | | | - John Rupe
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rupe J, Schumann GL, MacDonald JD. Turfgrass Diseases: Diagnosis and Management. Mycologia 1998. [DOI: 10.2307/3761288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|