Exploring the Support and Involvement of Family Caregivers for Reablement Programs: A Qualitative Study

Background

Reablement is a person-centered, holistic approach promoting older adults' participation through social, leisure, and physical activities. Family caregivers are seldom involved in reablement services despite their wish to be an active member of the care team and expressing a need for more support and recognition. The voice of family caregivers is often forgotten when evaluating services such as reablement. Little is known how family caregivers can be involved and supported more effectively in reablement services, therefore the aim of our research is to investigate the perceived support and involvement of family caregivers.

Methods

As part of the TRANS-SENIOR project, we studied perceived support and involvement of family caregivers during and after geriatric rehabilitation, a setting in which principles of reablement, like goal setting and training of daily activities, are applied. In total, fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with family caregivers of people admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation facility. Thematic analysis was used.

Results

Results reflected four themes: (1) support for family caregivers, (2) involvement in care, (3) trusting care professionals, and (4) asking for and accepting support. Family caregivers' experiences with support from care professionals were mainly ambivalent. While caregivers expressing a lack of support and information whilst also indicating that they do not expect to be supported by care professionals. Regarding involvement, caregivers wanted to be involved; ie express their opinion and be involved in decision-making. However, more involvement could also lead to a higher burden.

Conclusion

There is a discrepancy between the perceived support and involvement of family caregivers, their expressed needs, and their expectations of care professionals. A personalized approach is needed to create room for the family caregiver to be an active participant in the care process while also providing the right amount of support, when preferred by the caregiver.

Unacceptable pain in oncology: The patients' perspective on reasons for absence of pain interventions

Objective

Around 40% of oncology patients receive inadequate pain treatment. A previous study reported pain interventions for only 70% of patients who reported unacceptable pain at the self‐service registration desk. The aim of this study is to gain insight in reasons for the absence of pain intervention among oncology patients who reported unacceptable pain.

Methods

In this mixed methods study, 20 patients visiting the oncology outpatient clinic were selected via patient record assessment and interviewed about their perceived reasons for absence of pain intervention.

Results

The reasons mentioned by the patients for absence of pain intervention included reluctance of the patient to discuss pain, no treatment preferred by the patient, focus of the physician on treatment of the disease, pain treatment difficult or impossible, and the perception that pain is an inevitable consequence of the cancer treatment. Almost 50% of the patients considered the physician responsible for the absence of pain intervention.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a variety of reasons for absence of pain intervention are reported by patients, including patient‐related and health professional‐related reasons. Improvements can be made by promoting regular discussion of pain during hospital visits and empowerment of patients.

Developing a Reablement Program Aimed at Preventing Unnecessary Care Transitions After Geriatric Rehabilitation

Patients returning home after geriatric rehabilitation may encounter several challenges related to daily functioning, which only manifest after returned home due to the large difference in environment and amount of support provided in both settings. This study aimed to develop an intervention preventing transitional care. A co-creation design was used, including literature research, observations, interviews, and working groups including a variety of stakeholders (n=13), including care professionals, policymakers of the municipality, client representatives, and an expert in the field of geriatric rehabilitation. Results indicated four main causes for transitional care problems: lack of communication between patients and professionals, coordination and continuity of care, patients’ limited self-management skills, and insufficient preparation. To solve these problems, an intervention was developed consisting of six intervention components aiming to increase self-management during meaningful daily activities, narrow the gap between the rehabilitation and home setting, and enhance communication and coordination.

Outcomes of a community-based treatment programme for people with acquired brain injury in the chronic phase: a pilot study

The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of Brainz, a low intensity community-based treatment programme for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Participants were 62 people with sustained ABI (5.2 years post-injury, SD = 4.5) and 35 family caregivers. Participants attended two to five cognitive and physical group modules and received two hours of individual home treatment every two weeks. Primary outcomes for people with ABI were participation, perceived difficulties in daily life and need of care, level of goal attainment, and self-esteem. Primary family caregiver outcome was perceived burden of care. Attrition rate of people with ABI was 24% (n = 15), and of family caregivers was 31% (n = 11). People with ABI were more satisfied with the level of their participation after completing Brainz (p < .01), but showed no change in participation frequency or in restrictions (both ps > .01). They perceived fewer difficulties in daily life and less need of care (both ps < .01). Also, in two cognitive modules people improved on their goal achievement (p < .01). However, their self-esteem was reduced (p < .01). Caregiver burden was reduced (p < .01). This study has provided preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a combined group-based clinical and individual home-based treatment programme, but more research is needed, preferably in larger controlled studies.