|
1
|
Bronswijk M, Vanella G, van Wanrooij RLJ, Samanta J, Lauwereys J, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Dell'Anna G, Dhar J, Gupta V, van Malenstein H, Laleman W, Jaekers J, Topal H, Topal B, Crippa S, Falconi M, Besselink MG, Messaoudi N, Arcidiacono PG, Kunda R, Van der Merwe S. Same-session double EUS-guided bypass versus surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy: an international multicenter comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:225-236.e1. [PMID: 36990124 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Gastric outlet and biliary obstruction are common manifestations of GI malignancies and some benign diseases for which standard treatment would be surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy (ie, "double bypass"). Therapeutic EUS has allowed for the creation of an EUS-guided double bypass. However, same-session double EUS-guided bypass has only been described in small proof-of-concept series and lacks a comparison with surgical double bypass. METHODS A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed of all consecutive same-session double EUS-guided bypass procedures performed in 5 academic centers. Surgical comparators were extracted from these centers' databases from the same time interval. Efficacy, safety, hospital stay, nutrition and chemotherapy resumption, long-term patency, and survival were compared. RESULTS Of 154 identified patients, 53 (34.4%) received treatment with EUS and 101 (65.6%) with surgery. At baseline, patients undergoing EUS exhibited higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores and a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (9.0 [interquartile range {IQR}, 7.0-10.0] vs 7.0 [IQR, 5.0-9.0], P < .001). Technical success (96.2% vs 100%, P = .117) and clinical success rates (90.6% vs 82.2%, P = .234) were similar when comparing EUS and surgery. Overall (11.3% vs 34.7%, P = .002) and severe adverse events (3.8% vs 19.8%, P = .007) occurred more frequently in the surgical group. In the EUS group, median time to oral intake (0 days [IQR, 0-1] vs 6 days [IQR, 3-7], P < .001) and hospital stay (4.0 days [IQR, 3-9] vs 13 days [IQR, 9-22], P < .001) were significantly shorter. CONCLUSIONS Despite being used in a patient population with more comorbidities, same-session double EUS-guided bypass achieved similar technical and clinical success and was associated with fewer overall and severe adverse events when compared with surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda Hospital Bonheiden, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | | | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Departments of Gastroenterology and GI Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jonas Lauwereys
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda Hospital Bonheiden, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, APHP, Centre, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Departments of Gastroenterology and GI Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
| | - Vikas Gupta
- Departments of Gastroenterology and GI Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Wim Laleman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
| | - Joris Jaekers
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Halit Topal
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nouredin Messaoudi
- Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Rastislav Kunda
- Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|