[Criteria to indicate kidney biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients with proteinuria: Survey among French nephrologists]

Diabetic nephropathy is usually a presumptive diagnosis based on clinical and biological evidence. Renal biopsies are performed in diabetic patients with atypical findings evoking non-diabetic renal disease who could benefit from specific therapies. French speaking nephrologists were asked which criteria they retain to indicate renal biopsy in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria>0.5g/day or equivalent through an online anonymous questionnaire. Among the suggested criteria were absence of diabetic retinopathy, hematuria, rapid decrease in GFR, short diabetes duration or rapid raise of proteinuria. 188 people answered the poll among whom interns (12%), fellows (13%), university hospital practitioners (26%), general hospital practitioners (24%), practitioners in a non-profit organization (13%), practitioners on private activity (10%), multi-modal practitioners (3%) and people without clinical activity (2%). Increasing proteinuria was retained as an indication criterion for renal biopsy by 51% of respondents, nephrotic syndrome by 56% of respondents, absence of diabetic retinopathy by 57% of respondents, short diabetes duration by 65% of respondents, rapid GFR decline by 75% of respondents and hematuria by 78% of respondents. These data highlight the high diversity of opinions on this topic and their discrepancies with guidelines and current literature regarding the association between non-diabetic renal disease and clinical and biological features. The lack of adhesion of nephrologists to guidelines was especially noteworthy regarding the absence of diabetic retinopathy. These results emphasize the need for studies focusing on biopsy indication criteria in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Malakoplakia as a cause of severe hypercalcemia through ectopic 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-hydroxylase expression: A case report

RATIONALE

Malakoplakia is a rare disease characterized by the presence of nongranulomatous macrophage infiltration. In most cases, it affects the urinary tract. Malakoplakia can cause acute kidney injury when it is localized in the kidneys.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here, we report the case of a 65-year-old female patient with renal malakoplakia responsible for hypercalcemia. During her initial assessment, she was also diagnosed 25-OH vitamin D insufficiency, for which she was prescribed oral cholecalciferol. Three months later, she developed severe hypercalcemia with normal 25-OH vitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels and high 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels.

DIAGNOSES

After a superimposed granulomatous disease was excluded, malakoplakia cells were suspected to be responsible for the abnormal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-hydroxylase activity, which was confirmed by immunohistochemistry.

INTERVENTIONS

Cholecalciferol was stopped, the patient was rehydrated with intravenous physiological saline, and prednisone was initiated to decrease the enzyme activity.

OUTCOMES

Six months later, she displayed normal serum calcium, 25-OH vitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels.

LESSONS

This case illustrates that malakoplakia may exhibit ectopic 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-hydroxylase activity and cause severe hypercalcemia upon vitamin D supplementation. Therefore, such supplementation should not be given in malakoplakia patients without an actual deficiency and requires careful monitoring of serum calcium.