1
|
Hanevelt J, Huisman JF, Leicher LW, Lacle MM, Richir MC, Didden P, Geesing JMJ, Smakman N, Sive Droste JST, Ter Borg F, Talsma AK, Schrauwen RWM, van Wely BJ, Schot I, Vermaas M, Bos P, Sietses C, Hazen WL, Wasowicz DK, Ploeg DE, Ramsoekh D, Tuynman JB, Alderlieste YA, Renger RJ, Schreuder RM, Bloemen JG, van Lijnschoten I, Consten ECJ, Sikkenk DJ, Schwartz MP, Vos A, Burger JPW, Spanier BWM, Knijn N, Cappel WHDVTN, Moons LMG, van Westreenen HL. Correction: Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) - rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:256. [PMID: 37501070 PMCID: PMC10375605 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02905-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hanevelt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Isala, Zwolle, 28025 AB, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Isala, Zwolle, 28025 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W Leicher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, Isala, Zwolle, 28025 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Milan C Richir
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Smakman
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - A Koen Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Schot
- Department of Gastroenter ology & Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capellle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dareczka K Wasowicz
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - David E Ploeg
- Department of Pathology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Renger
- Department of Surgery, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon-Michel Schreuder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Annelotte Vos
- Department of Pathology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jordy P W Burger
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology DNA, Location Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanevelt J, Huisman JF, Leicher LW, Lacle MM, Richir MC, Didden P, Geesing JMJ, Smakman N, Droste JSTS, Ter Borg F, Talsma AK, Schrauwen RWM, van Wely BJ, Schot I, Vermaas M, Bos P, Sietses C, Hazen WL, Wasowicz DK, van der Ploeg DE, Ramsoekh D, Tuynman JB, Alderlieste YA, Renger RJ, Schreuder RM, Bloemen JG, van Lijnschoten I, Consten ECJ, Sikkenk DJ, Schwartz MP, Vos A, Burger JPW, Spanier BWM, Knijn N, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Moons LMG, van Westreenen HL. Limited wedge resection for T1 colon cancer (LIMERIC-II trial) - rationale and study protocol of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:214. [PMID: 37337197 PMCID: PMC10278298 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02854-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sole presence of deep submucosal invasion is shown to be associated with a limited risk of lymph node metastasis. This justifies a local excision of suspected deep submucosal invasive colon carcinomas (T1 CCs) as a first step treatment strategy. Recently Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection (CAL-WR) has been shown to be able to resect pT1 CRCs with a high R0 resection rate, but the long term outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR as primary treatment for patients with suspected superficial and also deeply-invasive T1 CCs. METHODS In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, patients with a macroscopic and/or histologically suspected T1 CCs will receive CAL-WR as primary treatment in order to prevent unnecessary major surgery for low-risk T1 CCs. To make a CAL-WR technically feasible, the tumor may not include > 50% of the circumference and has to be localized at least 25 cm proximal from the anus. Also, there should be sufficient distance to the ileocecal valve to place a linear stapler. Before inclusion, all eligible patients will be assessed by an expert panel to confirm suspicion of T1 CC, estimate invasion depth and subsequent advise which local resection techniques are possible for removal of the lesion. The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients with pT1 CC that is curatively treated with CAL-WR only and in whom thus organ-preservation could be achieved. Secondary outcomes are 1) CAL-WR's technical success and R0 resection rate for T1 CC, 2) procedure-related morbidity and mortality, 3) 5-year overall and disease free survival, 4) 3-year metastasis free survival, 5) procedure-related costs and 6) impact on quality of life. A sample size of 143 patients was calculated. DISCUSSION CAL-WR is a full-thickness local resection technique that could also be effective in removing pT1 colon cancer. With the lack of current endoscopic local resection techniques for > 15 mm pT1 CCs with deep submucosal invasion, CAL-WR could fill the gap between endoscopy and major oncologic surgery. The present study is the first to provide insight in the long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR. TRIAL REGISTRATION CCMO register (ToetsingOnline), NL81497.075.22, protocol version 2.3 (October 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Hanevelt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
| | - Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W Leicher
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 28025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Milan C Richir
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Smakman
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - A Koen Talsma
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Bob J van Wely
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Schot
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capellle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Bos
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Sietses
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dareczka K Wasowicz
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dewkoemar Ramsoekh
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yasser A Alderlieste
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Renger
- Department of Surgery, Beatrixziekenhuis - Rivas, Gorinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Ramon-Michel Schreuder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanne G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Annelotte Vos
- Department of Pathology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Jordy P W Burger
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Pathology DNA, Location Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huisman JF, Dang H, Moons LMG, Backes Y, Dik VK, Groen JN, Ter Borg F, van Bergeijk JD, Geesing JMJ, Spanier BWM, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Overwater A, van Lelyveld N, Kessels K, Lacle MM, Offerhaus GJA, Brohet RM, Knijn N, Vleggaar FP, van Westreenen HL, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Boonstra JJ. Diagnostic value of radiological staging and surveillance for T1 colorectal carcinomas: A multicenter cohort study. United European Gastroenterol J 2023. [PMID: 37300377 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of radiological staging and surveillance imaging is under debate for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) as the risk of distant metastases is low and imaging may lead to the detection of incidental findings. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of radiological staging and surveillance imaging for T1 CRC. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, all patients of 10 Dutch hospitals with histologically proven T1 CRC who underwent radiological staging in the period 2000-2014 were included. Clinical characteristics, pathological, endoscopic, surgical and imaging reports at baseline and during follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Patients were classified as high-risk T1 CRC if at least one of the histological risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion or positive resection margins) was present and as low-risk when all risk factors were absent. RESULTS Of the 628 included patients, 3 (0.5%) had synchronous distant metastases, 13 (2.1%) malignant incidental findings and 129 (20.5%) benign incidental findings at baseline staging. Radiological surveillance was performed among 336 (53.5%) patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence, malignant and benign incidental findings were 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1%-5.4%), 2.5% (95% CI: 0.6%-10.4%) and 18.3% (95% CI: 13.4%-24.7%), respectively. No distant metastatic events occurred among low-risk T1 CRC patients. CONCLUSION The risk of synchronous distant metastases and distant recurrence in T1 CRC is low, while there is a substantial risk of detecting incidental findings. Radiological staging seems unnecessary prior to local excision of suspected T1 CRC and after local excision of low-risk T1 CRC. Radiological surveillance should not be performed in patients with low-risk T1 CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelle F Huisman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent K Dik
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen D van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anouk Overwater
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Niels van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard M Brohet
- Departmentof Epidemiology and Statistics, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Nikki Knijn
- Department of Pathology-DNA, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goey KKH, Aper SJA, van Tuyl SBAC, Geesing JMJ, Logtenberg SJJ. [Supportive treatment and decision-making in a patient with severe anaemia when blood transfusion is not an option]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2022; 166:D6391. [PMID: 35499550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In severely anaemic patients, blood transfusions remain the standard of care when haemoglobin levels become dangerously low. However, in some situations blood transfusion is not an option. In this clinical lesson, we present a case of a young Jehovah's Witness who developed a life-threatening anaemia due to a gastro-intestinal bleeding. The patient did not want to receive blood products. Although blood transfusions seemed crucial, we successfully treated our patient with only supportive measures. This articles gives an overview of supportive treatment options in severely anaemic patients in the absence of blood transfusions. These measures include monitoring and optimization of hemodynamics, prevention of further blood loss, correction of the haemostatic balance, enhancing haemostasis, improving oxygen delivery and optimizing haematopoiesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn K H Goey
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht: Afd. Interne Geneeskunde
- Contact: Kaitlyn K.H. Goey
| | - Stijn J A Aper
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht: Afd. Laboratorium Klinische Chemie, Hematologie en Immunologie
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dang H, van Pelt GW, Haasnoot KJC, Backes Y, Elias SG, Seerden TCJ, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk JD, Kessels K, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, ter Borg F, Wolfhagen FHJ, Seldenrijk CA, Raicu MG, Milne AN, van Lent AUG, Brosens LAA, Johan A. Offerhaus G, Siersema PD, Tollenaar RAEM, Hardwick JCH, Hawinkels LJAC, Moons LMG, Lacle MM, Mesker WE, Boonstra JJ. Tumour-stroma ratio has poor prognostic value in non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer: A multi-centre case-cohort study. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 9:2050640620975324. [PMID: 33210982 PMCID: PMC8259249 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620975324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current risk stratification models for early invasive (T1) colorectal cancer are not able to discriminate accurately between prognostic favourable and unfavourable tumours, resulting in over-treatment of a large (>80%) proportion of T1 colorectal cancer patients. The tumour-stroma ratio (TSR), which is a measure for the relative amount of desmoplastic tumour stroma, is reported to be a strong independent prognostic factor in advanced-stage colorectal cancer, with a high stromal content being associated with worse prognosis and survival. We aimed to investigate whether the TSR predicts clinical outcome in patients with non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumour tissue slides from a retrospective multi-centre case cohort of patients with non-pedunculated surgically treated T1 colorectal cancer were assessed for TSR by two independent observers who were blinded for clinical outcomes. The primary end point was adverse outcome, which was defined as the presence of lymph node metastasis in the resection specimen or colorectal cancer recurrence during follow-up. RESULTS All 261 patients in the case cohort had H&E slides available for TSR scoring. Of these, 183 were scored as stroma-low, and 78 were scored as stroma-high. There was moderate inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.42). In total, 41 patients had lymph node metastasis, 17 patients had recurrent cancer and five had both. Stroma-high tumours were not associated with an increased risk for an adverse outcome (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.18; p = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS Our study emphasises that existing prognosticators may not be simply extrapolated to T1 colorectal cancers, even though their prognostic value has been widely validated in more advanced-stage tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Gabi W. van Pelt
- Department of SurgeryLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Krijn J. C. Haasnoot
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Tom C. J. Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAmphia HospitalBredaThe Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMeander Medical CentreAmersfoortThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologySint Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Joost M. J. Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDiakonessenhuisUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - John N. Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologySint JansdalHarderwijkThe Netherlands
| | - Frank ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDeventer HospitalDeventerThe Netherlands
| | - Frank H. J. Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyAlbert Schweitzer HospitalDordrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Anya N. Milne
- Pathology DNASint Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Anja U. G. van Lent
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyOnze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A. A. Brosens
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - G. Johan A. Offerhaus
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Peter D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - James C. H. Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Lukas J. A. C. Hawinkels
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Leon M. G. Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Miangela M. Lacle
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Wilma E. Mesker
- Department of SurgeryLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J. Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Backes Y, Seerden TCJ, van Gestel RSFE, Kranenburg O, Ubink I, Schiffelers RM, van Straten D, van der Capellen MS, van de Weerd S, de Leng WWJ, Siersema PD, Offerhaus GJA, Morsink FH, Ramphal W, Terhaar Sive Droste J, van Lent AUG, Geesing JMJ, Vleggaar FP, Elias SG, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Tumor Seeding During Colonoscopy as a Possible Cause for Metachronous Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:1222-1232.e4. [PMID: 31419435 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In patients who have undergone surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), 3% have recurrence of (metachronous) CRC. We investigated whether tumor seeding during colonoscopy (iatrogenic implantation of tumor cells in damaged mucosa) increases risk for metachronous CRC. METHODS In a proof of principle study, we collected data from the Dutch National Pathology Registry for patients with a diagnosis of CRC from 2013 through 2015, with a second diagnosis of CRC within 6 months to 3.5 years after surgery. We reviewed pathology reports to identify likely metachronous CRC (histologically proven adenocarcinoma located elsewhere in the colon or rectum from the surgical anastomosis). For 22 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, we ascribed the most likely etiology to tumor seeding when endoscopic manipulations, such as biopsies or polypectomy, occurred at the location where the metachronous tumor was subsequently detected, after endoscopic manipulation of the primary tumor. We collected clinical data from patients and compared molecular profiles of the primary and metachronous colorectal tumors using next-generation sequencing. We then examined the source of seeded tumor. We tested whether tumor cells stay behind in the working channel of the endoscope after biopsies of colorectal tumors, and whether these cells maintain viability in organoid cultures. RESULTS In total, tumor seeding was suspected as the most likely etiology of metachronous CRC in 5 patients. Tumor tissues were available from 3 patients. An identical molecular signature was observed in the primary and metachronous colorectal tumors from all 3 patients. In 5 control cases with a different etiology of metachronous CRC, the molecular signature of the primary and metachronous tumor were completely different. Based on review of 2147 patient records, we estimated the risk of tumor seeding during colonoscopy to be 0.3%-0.6%. We demonstrated that the working channel of the colonoscope becomes contaminated with viable tumor cells during biopsy collection. Subsequent instruments introduced through this working channel also became contaminated. These cells were shown to maintain their proliferative potential. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of primary and secondary tumors from patients with metachronous CRC, we found that primary tumor cells might be seeded in a new location after biopsy of the primary tumor. Although our study does not eliminate other possibilities of transmission, our findings and experiments support the hypothesis that tumor seeding can occur during colonoscopy via the working channel of the endoscope. The possibility of iatrogenic seeding seems low. However, our findings compel awareness on this potentially preventable cause of metachronous CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Rosanne S F E van Gestel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Ubink
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond M Schiffelers
- Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Demian van Straten
- Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Malu S van der Capellen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simone van de Weerd
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Folkert H Morsink
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Winesh Ramphal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anja U G van Lent
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kessels K, Backes Y, Elias SG, van den Blink A, Offerhaus GJA, van Bergeijk JD, Groen JN, Seerden TCJ, Schwartz MP, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Spanier BWM, Geesing JMJ, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, Didden P, Boonstra JJ, Herrero LA, Wolfhagen FHJ, Ter Borg F, van Lent AU, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Hazen WL, Schrauwen RWM, Vleggaar FP, Laclé MM, Moons LMG. Pedunculated Morphology of T1 Colorectal Tumors Associates With Reduced Risk of Adverse Outcome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1112-1120.e1. [PMID: 30130623 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Risk stratification for adverse events, such as metastasis to lymph nodes, is based only on histologic features of tumors. We aimed to compare adverse outcomes of pedunculated vs nonpedunculated T1 colorectal cancers (CRC). METHODS We performed a retrospective study of 1656 patients diagnosed with T1CRC from 2000 through 2014 at 14 hospitals in The Netherlands. The median follow-up time of patients was 42.5 months (interquartile range, 18.5-77.5 mo). We evaluated the association between tumor morphology and the primary composite end point, adverse outcome, adjusted for clinical variables, histologic variables, resection margins, and treatment approach. Adverse outcome was defined as metastasis to lymph nodes, distant metastases, local recurrence, or residual tissue. Secondary end points were tumor metastasis, recurrence, and incomplete resection. RESULTS Adverse outcome occurred in 67 of 723 patients (9.3%) with pedunculated T1CRCs vs 155 of 933 patients (16.6%) with nonpedunculated T1CRCs. Pedunculated morphology was independently associated with decreased risk of adverse outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.83; P = .003). Metastasis, incomplete resection, and recurrence were observed in 5.8%, 4.6%, and 3.9% of pedunculated T1CRCs vs 10.6%, 8.0%, and 6.6% of nonpedunculated T1CRCs, respectively. Pedunculated morphology was independently associated with a reduced risk of metastasis (adjusted OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.94; P = .03), incomplete resection (adjusted OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91; P = .02), and recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.85; P = .009). Metastasis, incomplete resection, and recurrence did not differ significantly between low-risk pedunculated vs nonpedunculated T1CRCs (0.8% vs 2.9%, P = .38; 1.5% vs 0%, P = .99; 1.5% vs 0%; P = .99). However, incomplete resection and recurrence were significantly lower for high-risk pedunculated vs nonpedunculated T1CRCs (6.5% vs 12.5%; P = .007; 4.4% vs 8.6%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS In a retrospective study of patients with T1CRC, we found pedunculated morphology to be associated independently with a decreased risk of adverse outcome in a T1CRC population at high risk of adverse outcome. Incorporating morphologic features of tumors in risk assessment could help predict outcomes of patients with T1CRC and help identify the best candidates for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aneya van den Blink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen D van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenza Alvarez Herrero
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Anja U van Lent
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Backes Y, Schwartz MP, Ter Borg F, Wolfhagen FHJ, Groen JN, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk J, Geesing JMJ, Spanier BWM, Didden P, Vleggaar FP, Lacle MM, Elias SG, Moons LMG. Multicentre prospective evaluation of real-time optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps using narrow band imaging (the OPTICAL study). Gut 2019; 68:271-279. [PMID: 29298873 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the preresection accuracy of optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). DESIGN In this multicentre prospective study, endoscopists predicted the histology during colonoscopy in consecutive patients with LNPCPs using a standardised procedure for optical assessment. The presence of morphological features assessed with white light, and vascular and surface pattern with narrow-band imaging (NBI) were recorded, together with the optical diagnosis, the confidence level of prediction and the recommended treatment. A risk score chart was developed and validated using a multivariable mixed effects binary logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection (LASSO) model. RESULTS Among 343 LNPCPs, 47 cancers were found (36 T1 CRCs and 11 ≥T2 CRCs), of which 11 T1 CRCs were superficial invasive T1 CRCs (23.4% of all malignant polyps). Sensitivity and specificity for optical diagnosis of T1 CRC were 78.7% (95% CI 64.3 to 89.3) and 94.2% (95% CI 90.9 to 96.6), and 63.3% (95% CI 43.9 to 80.1) and 99.0% (95% CI 97.1 to 100.0) for optical diagnosis of endoscopically unresectable lesions (ie, ≥T1 CRC with deep invasion), respectively. A LASSO-derived model using white light and NBI features discriminated T1 CRCs from non-invasive polyps with a cross-validation area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.90). This model was validated in a temporal validation set of 100 LNPCPs (AUC of 0.81; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96). CONCLUSION Our study provides insights in the preresection accuracy of optical diagnosis of T1 CRC. Sensitivity is still limited, so further studies will show how the risk score chart could be improved and finally used for clinical decision making with regard to the type of endoresection to be used and whether to proceed to surgery instead of endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR5561.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Backes Y, Elias SG, Groen JN, Schwartz MP, Wolfhagen FHJ, Geesing JMJ, Ter Borg F, van Bergeijk J, Spanier BWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Kessels K, Seldenrijk CA, Raicu MG, Drillenburg P, Milne AN, Kerkhof M, Seerden TCJ, Siersema PD, Vleggaar FP, Offerhaus GJA, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Histologic Factors Associated With Need for Surgery in Patients With Pedunculated T1 Colorectal Carcinomas. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:1647-1659. [PMID: 29366842 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Most patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors referred for surgery are not found to have lymph node metastases, and were therefore unnecessarily placed at risk for surgery-associated complications. We aimed to identify histologic factors associated with need for surgery in patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors. METHODS We performed a cohort-nested matched case-control study of 708 patients diagnosed with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors at 13 hospitals in The Netherlands, from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2014, followed for a median of 44 months (interquartile range, 20-80 months). We identified 37 patients (5.2%) who required surgery (due to lymph node, intramural, or distant metastases). These patients were matched with patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal tumors without a need for surgery (no metastases, controls, n = 111). Blinded pathologists analyzed specimens from each tumor, stained with H&E. We evaluated associations between histologic factors and patient need for surgery using univariable conditional logistic regression analysis. We used multivariable least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO; an online version of the LASSO model is available at: http://t1crc.com/calculator/) regression to develop models for identification of patients with tumors requiring surgery, and tested the accuracy of our model by projecting our case-control data toward the entire cohort (708 patients). We compared our model with previously developed strategies to identify high-risk tumors: conventional model 1 (based on poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, or Haggitt level 4) and conventional model 2 (based on poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, Haggitt level 4, or tumor budding). RESULTS We identified 5 histologic factors that differentiated cases from controls: lymphovascular invasion, Haggitt level 4 invasion, muscularis mucosae type B (incompletely or completely disrupted), poorly differentiated clusters and tumor budding, which identified patients who required surgery with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.90). When we used a clinically plausible predicted probability threshold of ≥4.0%, 67.5% (478 of 708) of patients were predicted to not need surgery. This threshold identified patients who required surgery with 83.8% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 68.0%-93.8%) and 70.3% specificity (95% confidence interval, 60.9%-78.6%). Conventional models 1 and 2 identified patients who required surgery with lower AUC values (AUC, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74; P = .002 and AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70; P < .001, respectively) than our LASSO model. When we applied our LASSO model with a predicted probability threshold of ≥4.0%, the percentage of missed cases (tumors mistakenly assigned as low risk) was comparable (6 of 478 [1.3%]) to that of conventional model 1 (4 of 307 [1.3%]) and conventional model 2 (3 of 244 [1.2%]). However, the percentage of patients referred for surgery based on our LASSO model was much lower (32.5%, n = 230) than that for conventional model 1 (56.6%, n = 401) or conventional model 2 (65.5%, n = 464). CONCLUSIONS In a cohort-nested matched case-control study of 708 patients with pedunculated T1 colorectal carcinomas, we developed a model based on histologic features of tumors that identifies patients who require surgery (due to high risk of metastasis) with greater accuracy than previous models. Our model might be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mihaela G Raicu
- Pathology DNA, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anya N Milne
- Department of Pathology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Overwater A, Kessels K, Elias SG, Backes Y, Spanier BWM, Seerden TCJ, Pullens HJM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van den Blink A, Offerhaus GJA, van Bergeijk J, Kerkhof M, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, van Lelyveld N, Ter Borg F, Wolfhagen F, Siersema PD, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Gut 2018; 67:284-290. [PMID: 27811313 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2015] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is difficult to predict the presence of histological risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) before endoscopic treatment of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, endoscopic therapy is propagated to obtain adequate histological staging. We examined whether secondary surgery following endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 CRC does not have a negative effect on patients' outcomes compared with primary surgery. DESIGN Patients with T1 CRC with one or more histological risk factors for LNM (high risk) and treated with primary or secondary surgery between 2000 and 2014 in 13 hospitals were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional data were collected from hospital records, endoscopy, radiology and pathology reports. A propensity score analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting (IPW) to correct for confounding by indication. RESULTS 602 patients were eligible for analysis (263 primary; 339 secondary surgery). Overall, 34 recurrences were observed (5.6%). After adjusting with IPW, no differences were observed between primary and secondary surgery for the presence of LNM (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.93; p=0.940) and recurrence during follow-up (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34; p=0.954). Further adjusting for lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion and number of retrieved lymph nodes did not alter this outcome. CONCLUSIONS Our data do not support an increased risk of LNM or recurrence after secondary surgery compared with primary surgery. Therefore, an attempt for an en-bloc resection of a possible T1 CRC without evident signs of deep invasion seems justified in order to prevent surgery of low-risk T1 CRC in a significant proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Overwater
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Flevohospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - T C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - H J M Pullens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | | | - A van den Blink
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G J A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - M Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - J M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Jansdal Harderwijk, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - N van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - F Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Backes Y, Elias SG, Bhoelan BS, Groen JN, van Bergeijk J, Seerden TCJ, Pullens HJM, Spanier BWM, Geesing JMJ, Kessels K, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Lelyveld N, Wolfhagen FHJ, Ter Borg F, Offerhaus GJA, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. The prognostic value of lymph node yield in the earliest stage of colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Med 2017; 15:129. [PMID: 28705200 PMCID: PMC5512847 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0892-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) the number of surgically retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) is associated with prognosis, resulting in a minimum of 10-12 retrieved LNs being recommended for this stage. Current guidelines do not provide a recommendation regarding LN yield in T1 CRC. Studies evaluating LN yield in T1 CRC suggest that such high LN yields are not feasible in this early stage, and a lower LN yield might be appropriate. We aimed to validate the cut-off of 10 retrieved LNs on risk for recurrent cancer and detection of LN metastasis (LNM) in T1 CRC, and explored whether this number is feasible in clinical practice. METHODS Patients diagnosed with T1 CRC and treated with surgical resection between 2000 and 2014 in thirteen participating hospitals were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Medical records were reviewed to collect additional information. The association between LN yield and recurrence and LNM respectively were analyzed using 10 LNs as cut-off. Propensity score analysis using inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to adjust for clinical and histological confounding factors (i.e., age, sex, tumor location, size and morphology, presence of LNM, lymphovascular invasion, depth of submucosal invasion, and grade of differentiation). RESULTS In total, 1017 patients with a median follow-up time of 49.0 months (IQR 19.6-81.5) were included. Four-hundred five patients (39.8%) had a LN yield ≥ 10. Forty-one patients (4.0%) developed recurrence. LN yield ≥ 10 was independently associated with a decreased risk for recurrence (IPW-adjusted HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.67; P = 0.009). LNM were detected in 84 patients (8.3%). LN yield ≥ 10 was independently associated with increased detection of LNM (IPW-adjusted OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.39-3.69; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective observational study, retrieving < 10 LNs was associated with an increased risk of CRC recurrence, advocating the importance to perform an appropriate oncologic resection of the draining LNs and diligent LN search when patients with T1 CRC at high-risk for LNM are referred for surgical resection. Given that both gastroenterologists, surgeons and pathologists will encounter T1 CRCs with increasing frequency due to the introduction of national screening programs, awareness on the consequences of an inadequate LN retrieval is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bibie S Bhoelan
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J M Pullens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Niels van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Backes Y, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk J, Ter Borg F, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, Geesing JMJ, Kessels K, Kerkhof M, Groen JN, Wolfhagen FHJ, Seerden TCJ, van Lelyveld N, Offerhaus GJA, Siersema PD, Lacle MM, Moons LMG. Risk for Incomplete Resection after Macroscopic Radical Endoscopic Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112:785-796. [PMID: 28323275 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The decision to perform secondary surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) depends on the risk of lymph node metastasis and the risk of incomplete resection. We aimed to examine the incidence and risk factors for incomplete endoscopic resection of T1 CRC after a macroscopic radical endoscopic resection. METHODS Data from patients treated between 2000 and 2014 with macroscopic complete endoscopic resection of T1 CRC were collected from 13 hospitals. Incomplete resection was defined as local recurrence at the polypectomy site during follow-up or malignant tissue in the surgically resected specimen in case secondary surgery was performed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to analyze factors associated with incomplete resection. RESULTS In total, 877 patients with a median follow-up time of 36.5 months (interquartile range 16.0-68.3) were included, in whom secondary surgery was performed in 358 patients (40.8%). Incomplete resection was observed in 30 patients (3.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-4.6%). Incomplete resection rate was 0.7% (95% CI 0-2.1%) in low-risk T1 CRC vs. 4.4% (95% CI 2.7-6.5%) in high-risk T1 CRC (P=0.04). Overall adverse outcome rate (incomplete resection or metastasis) was 2.1% (95% CI 0-5.0%) in low-risk T1 CRC vs. 11.7% (95% CI 8.8-14.6%) in high-risk T1 CRC (P=0.001). Piecemeal resection (adjusted odds ratio 2.60; 95% CI 1.20-5.61, P=0.02) and non-pedunculated morphology (adjusted odds ratio 2.18; 95% CI 1.01-4.70, P=0.05) were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. Among patients in whom no additional surgery was performed, who developed recurrent cancer, 41.7% (95% CI 20.8-62.5%) died as a result of recurrent cancer. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of histological high-risk factors, a 'wait-and-see' policy with limited follow-up is justified. Piecemeal resection and non-pedunculated morphology are independent risk factors for incomplete endoscopic resection of T1 CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - J van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - M P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - B W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - J M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K Kessels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - M Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - J N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - F H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - N van Lelyveld
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - G J A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Backes Y, Moons LMG, van Bergeijk JD, Berk L, Ter Borg F, Ter Borg PCJ, Elias SG, Geesing JMJ, Groen JN, Hadithi M, Hardwick JCH, Kerkhof M, Mangen MJJ, Straathof JWA, Schröder R, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Wolfhagen FHJ, Koch AD. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16:56. [PMID: 27229709 PMCID: PMC4882830 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0468-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is currently the most used technique for resection of large distal colorectal polyps. However, in large lesions EMR can often only be performed in a piecemeal fashion resulting in relatively low radical (R0)-resection rates and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a newer procedure that is more difficult resulting in a longer procedural time, but is promising due to the high en-bloc resection rates and the very low recurrence rates. We aim to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of ESD against EMR on both short (i.e. 6 months) and long-term (i.e. 36 months). We hypothesize that in the short-run ESD is more time consuming resulting in higher healthcare costs, but is (cost-) effective on the long-term due to lower patients burden, a higher number of R0-resections and lower recurrence rates with less need for repeated procedures. Methods This is a multicenter randomized clinical trial in patients with a non-pedunculated polyp larger than 20 mm in the rectum, sigmoid, or descending colon suspected to be an adenoma by means of endoscopic assessment. Primary endpoint is recurrence rate at follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months. Secondary endpoints are R0-resection rate, perceived burden and quality of life, healthcare resources utilization and costs, surgical referral rate, complication rate and recurrence rate at 36 months. Quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) will be estimated taking an area under the curve approach and using EQ-5D-indexes. Healthcare costs will be calculated by multiplying used healthcare services with unit prices. The cost-effectiveness of ESD against EMR will be expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) showing additional costs per recurrence free patient and as ICER showing additional costs per QALY. Discussion If this trial confirms ESD to be favorable on the long-term, the burden of extra colonoscopies and repeated procedures can be prevented for future patients. Trial registration NCT02657044 (Clinicaltrials.gov), registered January 8, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Backes
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - L M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - J D van Bergeijk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelderse Vallei, Ede, Netherlands
| | - L Berk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Franciscus, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - P C J Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ikazia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J M J Geesing
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J N Groen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Sint Jansdal, Harderwijk, Netherlands
| | - M Hadithi
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Maasstad hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - J C H Hardwick
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M Kerkhof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands
| | - M J J Mangen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J W A Straathof
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - R Schröder
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
| | - M P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - B W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rijnstate hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | | | - F H J Wolfhagen
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - A D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jeung L, Furnée EJB, Witjes HHG, Zwitserlood CPM, Geesing JMJ, Dorresteijn JAM. [Late recognition of intestinal malrotation]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2016; 160:A9810. [PMID: 27299489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal malrotation is a congenital intestinal abnormality caused by abnormal intestinal rotation during foetal development. CASE DESCRIPTION We describe a 20-year-old woman with many years' history of abdominal symptoms and eating disorders that were labelled as psychosomatic following repeated and extensive investigations. The diagnosis of malrotation was only made after an emergency laparotomy, with right hemicolectomy for intestinal necrosis. CONCLUSION The reason that diagnosis was missed in this patient was probably not only because malrotation is accompanied by non-specific symptoms. The cognitive strategies used by doctors to make a diagnosis on the basis of symptoms may also have led to ignoring details that did not fit, and to clinging to earlier diagnoses. Furthermore, eating disorders and gastrointestinal disorders are sometimes difficult to distinguish and are often linked. Even with extra vigilance a misdiagnosis cannot always be avoided.
Collapse
|